{ "id": "IB89148", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "number": "IB89148", "active": false, "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810214/", "id": "IB89148_2006Jul19", "date": "2006-07-19", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060719_IB89148_c396543dd445210f57f8dfb502dd4718ca303389.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060719_IB89148_c396543dd445210f57f8dfb502dd4718ca303389.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc815561/", "id": "IB89148_2006Feb03", "date": "2006-02-03", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060203_IB89148_b5ea6465a2d0c4483eb7c19fd55d3a4d7ea616ee.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060203_IB89148_b5ea6465a2d0c4483eb7c19fd55d3a4d7ea616ee.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8536/", "id": "IB89148_2005Sep26", "date": "2005-09-26", "retrieved": "2006-04-19T08:31:30", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Bush, like his recent predecessors, has called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050926_IB89148_c9cdd47fa528577401551a606bd2c9ccc66e2aa8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050926_IB89148_c9cdd47fa528577401551a606bd2c9ccc66e2aa8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7252/", "id": "IB89148 2005-07-18", "date": "2005-07-18", "retrieved": "2005-09-27T13:10:23", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050718_IB89148_d99bb1af3d9cd982cfe2578079a0ee8dfb0a6288.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050718_IB89148_d99bb1af3d9cd982cfe2578079a0ee8dfb0a6288.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc824443/", "id": "IB89148_2004Nov22", "date": "2004-11-22", "retrieved": "2016-04-04T14:48:17", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto, particularly in relation to federal spending and the budget process.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20041122_IB89148_8e86cefa63dfaf241f7f5248d3f095b513eb4164.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20041122_IB89148_8e86cefa63dfaf241f7f5248d3f095b513eb4164.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3816/", "id": "IB89148_2003Sep03", "date": "2003-09-03", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:28:55", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030903_IB89148_e98007f9b741b3518c5a3a7d6c041e8239c629d8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030903_IB89148_e98007f9b741b3518c5a3a7d6c041e8239c629d8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3815/", "id": "IB89148_2003Jul02", "date": "2003-07-02", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:28:35", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030702_IB89148_8124ae4c379e2f677ccc837e31bc47cb41b242bd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030702_IB89148_8124ae4c379e2f677ccc837e31bc47cb41b242bd.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3814/", "id": "IB89148_2003May08", "date": "2003-05-08", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:28:15", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030508_IB89148_54163b8f54949276f823985d06bf4fe1f287dafd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030508_IB89148_54163b8f54949276f823985d06bf4fe1f287dafd.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3813/", "id": "IB89148_2003Mar14", "date": "2003-03-14", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:27:55", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "On February 3, 2003, President Bush transmitted his budget submission for FY2004,\r\nwhich again contained some proposals for reform of the budget process, including a\r\nreformulated line item veto for the President. This report discusses the history of the line item veto and examines the policy debate regarding the issue.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030314_IB89148_f904dc8160021c0384aec44ec1d8d504540ed5c8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030314_IB89148_f904dc8160021c0384aec44ec1d8d504540ed5c8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3812/", "id": "IB89148_2003Jan24", "date": "2003-01-24", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:27:34", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030124_IB89148_690c1a8981e9a2538a5ddd3c7be5f95442001687.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030124_IB89148_690c1a8981e9a2538a5ddd3c7be5f95442001687.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2180/", "id": "IB89148_2002Nov27", "date": "2002-11-27", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:27:14", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20021127_IB89148_6d5d6cbba16cc592a162aaa04e126c89328b91cd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20021127_IB89148_6d5d6cbba16cc592a162aaa04e126c89328b91cd.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2179/", "id": "IB89148_2002Aug15", "date": "2002-08-15", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:26:54", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20020815_IB89148_27dde4c2287ff8492f1694dffa91efce644c553b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20020815_IB89148_27dde4c2287ff8492f1694dffa91efce644c553b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2178/", "id": "IB89148_2002Jun20", "date": "2002-06-20", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:26:34", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20020620_IB89148_38ef257d8829273bb6d5e2f5c18cb25509f6b1ea.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20020620_IB89148_38ef257d8829273bb6d5e2f5c18cb25509f6b1ea.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2177/", "id": "IB89148_2002Mar14", "date": "2002-03-14", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:26:14", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20020314_IB89148_c2b4d2d035839d5ec5b655df548b0930b8c1547e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20020314_IB89148_c2b4d2d035839d5ec5b655df548b0930b8c1547e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1077/", "id": "IB89148_2000Nov20", "date": "2000-11-20", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:25:47", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": "In recent years conflicting budget priorities and divided political control have accentuated the institutional tensions between the executive and legislative branches inherent in the federal budget process. President Clinton, like his two predecessors, called for an item veto, or possibly expanded impoundment authority, to provide him with greater control over federal spending. This report provides a brief history of impoundment and discusses the debate surrounding the line item veto.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20001120_IB89148_ba236fc011c2fb6dd0d920c42adbcb900372ea3a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20001120_IB89148_ba236fc011c2fb6dd0d920c42adbcb900372ea3a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1076/", "id": "IB89148 2000-09-15", "date": "2000-09-15", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T19:25:26", "title": "Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20000915_IB89148_6d15c994ed456d64e3110002a6ea3ccd28cca2af.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20000915_IB89148_6d15c994ed456d64e3110002a6ea3ccd28cca2af.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds", "name": "Executive impoundment of appropriated funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Item veto", "name": "Item veto" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidents", "name": "Presidents" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy" ] }