{ "id": "IN10625", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN10625", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 457658, "date": "2016-12-15", "retrieved": "2017-04-21T15:11:55.590263", "title": "Restrictions on Lobbying the Government: Current Policy and Proposed Changes", "summary": "During the 2016 presidential campaign, President-elect Donald Trump proposed a series of ethics measures, including several lobbying-related provisions. They are:\nextending \u201ccooling off\u201d periods on lobbying the government for five years after government service; \n\u201cinstituting a five-year ban on lobbying by former Members of Congress and their staffs\u201d;\nexpanding the definition of a lobbyist to cover former government officials who engage in strategic consulting; and \nissuing a \u201clifetime ban against senior executive branch officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.\u201d\nPresident-elect Trump\u2019s ethics plan shares some features with past efforts to restrict Administration officials\u2019 future lobbying activities (the \u201crevolving door\u201d) by adjusting \u201ccooling off\u201d periods\u2014a period of time a former government official is restricted from contacting their former employer on particular matters they might have worked on in government. These previous efforts include a 1993 executive order issued by President Bill Clinton (E.O. 12834) and a 2009 executive order issued by President Barack Obama (E.O. 13490), and the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (HLOGA) of 2007. The executive orders supplemented existing statutory revolving door and \u201ccooling off\u201d period requirements.\nExecutive Branch Post-Employment Restrictions\nSeveral laws govern the movement of federal employees from the government to the private sector and vice versa. Most prominently, 18 U.S.C. \u00a7207 provides a series of post-employment restrictions on \u201crepresentational\u201d activities for executive branch personnel when they leave government service, including\na lifetime ban on \u201cswitching sides\u201d on a matter involving specific parties on which any executive branch employee had worked personally and substantially while with the government;\na two-year ban on \u201cswitching sides\u201d on a somewhat broader range of matters which were under the employee\u2019s official responsibility;\na one-year restriction on assisting others on certain trade or treaty negotiations;\na one-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period for certain \u201csenior\u201d officials, barring representational communications before their former departments or agencies;\na two-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period for \u201cvery senior\u201d officials, barring representational communications to and attempts to influence certain other high-ranking officials in the entire executive branch of government; and\na one-year ban on certain officials in performing some representational or advisory activities for foreign governments or foreign political parties.\nIn addition to these statutory provisions, as mentioned above, President Barack Obama issued an executive order (E.O. 13490) that banned executive branch employees from accepting gifts from registered lobbyists; restricted for two years executive branch appointees\u2014including former lobbyists\u2014from participating in \u201cparticular matters\u201d involving subjects related to former clients or employers; and restricted former Administration officials from contacting back agencies for two years pursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7207(c) or from lobbying \u201cany covered executive branch official or non-career Senior Executive Service appointees for the remainder of the administration.\u201d Officials covered by President Obama\u2019s executive order signed an ethics pledge agreeing to the restrictions. Waivers are available from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Similar restrictions were included in President Clinton\u2019s executive order (E.O. 12834). \nLegislative Branch Post-Employment Restrictions\nPost-employment restrictions are applied differently by the House and Senate. In the House, former Members and senior staff are subject to a one-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period, during which they cannot make lobbying contact with Representatives, Senators, or congressional staff. In the Senate, a two-year ban on lobbying is in place. During this time, former Senators cannot lobby anyone in Congress or legislative branch employees. For senior Senate staff, a one-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period is in place. Further, pursuant to House and Senate rules, former Representatives and Senators, who generally enjoy the privilege of admission to the floor of the House or Senate, respectively, are restricted if they are a registered lobbyist under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) or the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA).\nPotential Options to Change Lobbying Restrictions\nSeveral options potentially exist should the White House or Congress wish to alter existing post-employment restrictions on government employees. These include making changes to existing law or using executive orders to alter statutory \u201ccooling off\u201d periods, a ban on holding certain types of post-employment positions, and restrictions on the activities of lobbyists in the presidential transition.\nAlter Statutory \u201cCooling Off\u201d Periods\nPursuant to 18 U.S.C. \u00a7207, a one-year or two-year \u201ccooling off\u201d period exists prohibiting senior officials and \u201cvery senior\u201d officials from lobbying their former departments. Should changes to the length of \u201ccooling off\u201d periods for contact \u201cwith the intent to influence\u201d be desired, the duration could potentially be decreased or increased statutorily or by executive order. As discussed above, President-elect Trump has proposed increasing current \u201ccooling off\u201d periods to five years. Additionally, legislative proposals have previously been introduced, but not passed into law, to extend \u201ccooling off\u201d periods for former Members of Congress. Extensions of \u201ccooling off\u201d periods by executive order, however, have occurred previously (see Executive Order 12834).\nBan on Certain Types of Post-Employment Positions\nCurrent proposals also suggest a ban on lobbying for former government officials. Two laws may be particularly relevant\u2014the LDA and FARA. These acts require the registration and disclosure of certain influence activities for a carefully defined group with the Clerk of the House of Representatives and Secretary of the Senate (for LDA) or the Department of Justice (for FARA). Current \u201ccooling off\u201d periods do restrict former officials from engaging in some activities, even if they are not prohibited from accepting lobbying positions. \nRestricting Lobbyists on the Presidential Transition\nRecently, legislation was introduced that would amend the Presidential Transition Act of 1963 (3 U.S.C. \u00a7102 note) to prohibit the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) from paying for \u201cservices or facilities provided by a person who is registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) of 1995 (2 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a71601-1614).\u201d If enacted, such a restriction would likely prohibit the inclusion of registered lobbyists from being paid by GSA for transition services. \nProponents of restricting government-lobbyist interactions assert a need to reduce outside influence on government decisionmaking. Others argue that government-lobbyist interactions are essential for the exchange of information and ideas.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN10625", "sha1": "f44ef7b87f915c4fb4759dd1635967d824d5a67d", "filename": "files/20161215_IN10625_f44ef7b87f915c4fb4759dd1635967d824d5a67d.html", "images": null } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "CRS Insights" ] }