{ "id": "IN10917", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN10917", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 586088, "date": "2018-10-04", "retrieved": "2018-10-05T22:06:16.589998", "title": "Ebola: Democratic Republic of Congo", "summary": "On August 1, 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that a new Ebola outbreak was detected in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), about one week after having declared that a separate outbreak had ended in the western part of the country. This new outbreak is occurring in North Kivu and Ituri provinces, the most populated provinces in DRC, where a humanitarian crisis affecting over 1 million displaced people is ongoing. Health workers have begun vaccinating people in the districts to control the spread of the disease, though armed conflict in the areas is complicating control efforts. As of October 2, 2018, 162 people have contracted Ebola in North Kivu and Ituri provinces (including 19 health workers), 106 of whom have died (3 of whom were health workers). \nThis outbreak is the 10th Ebola outbreak in DRC since the disease was discovered in 1976, and it stands in stark contrast to the previous outbreak (Figure 1). The outbreak that began in May 2018 was contained and ended within two months after having infected 54 people, including 33 of whom died. In its second month, this outbreak has caused twice as many deaths and is continuing to spread. Issues complicating efforts to contain the current outbreak include the following:\nConflict. In September 2018, clashes between rebels and government forces had forced WHO to temporarily suspend operations in Beni, the WHO operational base. During that time, WHO was unable to monitor about 80% of contacts of confirmed and suspected Ebola contacts. \nCommunity resistance and mistrust. New cases continue to emerge in parts of Beni where resistance to vaccination efforts is particularly strong. Ebola cases detected on October 2 had reportedly refused vaccinations from health workers.\nGeographical spread. Violence and mistrust of health workers, some of which has been stoked by local politicians and opposition groups who blame the government and responders for bringing Ebola to communities, has prompted some of those infected with Ebola and their contacts to flee into forested areas and conflict areas. Some of those who have fled are now in areas that are very close to Uganda. \nSome opposition groups in parts of North Kivu are reportedly urging communities to hold protests against a perceived government effort to spread Ebola. Violence against safe burial, vaccination, and public health education teams has been reported in various parts of North Kivu, and resistance to health workers remains a challenge. Peter Salama, the WHO Deputy Director-General for Emergency Preparedness and Response, warned that if violence intensified and forced WHO and its partners to leave the region, then \u201cwe would have grave concerns that this outbreak would not be able to be well controlled in the coming weeks to months.\u201d \nFigure 1. Ebola Virus Outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of Congo: 1976-2018\n/\nSource: Adjusted by CRS from World Health Organization, Ebola Outbreak Response in The Democratic Republic of The Congo, Briefing to Committee A at the World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland, May 23, 2018.\nNote: CRS adapted the graphic to include information on Ebola cases and deaths in May 2018 and to identify the location of North Kivu and its proximity to Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi. \nThe WHO indicates that Uganda is facing an \u201cimminent threat\u201d of Ebola importation from the DRC and has already, in partnership with the Ugandan government, designated treatment facilities and prepositioned vaccines in Uganda. The risk of national and regional spread remains high. The WHO and its partners have supported the strengthening of Public Health Emergency Operations Centers in Rwanda, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia to aid in pandemic preparedness efforts. \nIn contrast to the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak, the WHO response to the recent outbreaks was swift. On the same day that the outbreak was reported, WHO released $2 million from its Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE), deployed a team to the region, and activated an emergency incident management system. WHO also issued a $57 million appeal to control the outbreak. The international community exceeded the request and raised $63 million. The largest contributions were provided by Germany (5 million), United Kingdom (\u00a35 million), and the United States ($5.3 million). Other types of support included in-kind contributions for medical evacuations and intercountry air transport from Norway and the European Union, respectively, and technical assistance from Germany, Guinea, the United Kingdom, and the United States. \nThe DRC\u2019s Ministry of Health, WHO, and other stakeholders took several steps to contain the outbreak. Notably, a new vaccine, which was used for the first time in the field during the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreaks, was provided to all primary and secondary contacts to prevent disease transmission. Merck initially provided more than 7,500 doses for the vaccination effort. WHO report that almost 12,000 people have been vaccinated and an additional 39 people have received investigational drugs. There is no approved treatment for Ebola. Twenty-seven of the 39 people infected with Ebola who received the experimental treatments survived. This marks the first time in which investigational drugs were used in the field during an outbreak. \nU.S. Support \nIn May 2018, the United States committed to provide $8.0 million in support of Ebola control efforts in the country, drawing on $5.0 million in FY2017 appropriations for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)-administered Global Health Program (GHP) funding and $3 million in GHP funds appropriated in FY2015 for Ebola response in West Africa. Roughly $5.0 million of the funds were provided to WHO for case management, entry screenings, diagnosis testing, and support for other laboratory functions. About $2.0 million was for the United Nations Children\u2019s Fund (UNICEF) to implement Ebola awareness communication campaigns and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) projects. An estimated $700,000 was used by the International Federation of the Red Cross/Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) for promoting safe burial practices and Ebola prevention education campaigns. In addition, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided technical assistance for communications, logistics, operational and personnel support, laboratory capacity building, and the development and implementation of an outbreak response plan. \nOn June 5, the White House withdrew proposed rescissions of $252 million in unobligated emergency International Disaster Assistance (IDA) funds appropriated in 2015 to control the West Africa Ebola outbreak and bolster response capacity in affected countries. The funds were provided by Congress in 2015 to control the 2014-2015 West Africa Ebola outbreak. Excess funds were intended to be made available for future Ebola control efforts. \nOn October 1, 2018, USAID announced that it had deployed a Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) to bolster ongoing U.S. efforts in the country. The DART team is composed of disaster and health experts from USAID and the CDC and is expected to expand healthcare services, water and sanitation interventions, and carry out other disease prevention measures.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN10917", "sha1": "b24d15187ce691816315f879df1da2e84dd9f1a0", "filename": "files/20181004_IN10917_b24d15187ce691816315f879df1da2e84dd9f1a0.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN10917_files&id=/0.png": "files/20181004_IN10917_images_f0b225b4e05fa1696223c3b68166d090e2a72781.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN10917", "sha1": "a0f0d22ac56b0502807d0099ef00c572e0200d9d", "filename": "files/20181004_IN10917_a0f0d22ac56b0502807d0099ef00c572e0200d9d.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4758, "name": "Middle East & North Africa" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4787, "name": "State Department & International Organizations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4896, "name": "State & Foreign Operations Appropriations" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 583527, "date": "2018-08-03", "retrieved": "2018-08-07T13:34:23.819782", "title": "Ebola: Democratic Republic of Congo", "summary": "On August 1, 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that a new Ebola outbreak was detected in the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), about one week after having declared that a separate outbreak had ended in the western part of the country. This new outbreak is occurring in North Kivu, a province experiencing its own humanitarian crisis with over 1 million displaced people. WHO will shift staff that had just completed working to contain the previous outbreak in the Equateur province to North Kivu. Health experts have reportedly determined that the strain in North Kivu is the same one for which a vaccine is available and has been used to control past Ebola outbreaks, though ongoing conflict in the province may complicate control efforts. As of August 2, press reports indicate that 20 people, including two health workers, died after showing symptoms of hemorrhagic fever. Four of six samples collected tested positive for Ebola. \nAbout one week ago on July 24, 2018, WHO reported that an Ebola outbreak in the DRC had ended after having infected 54 people, 33 of whom died. The outbreak began on May 8, 2018, when DRC health officials reported to WHO that two Ebola cases had been detected in the Equateur province, a rural area in the northwestern portion of the country. The disease later spread to Mbandaka, a city that holds 1.2 million people and serves as a regional trade hub. This was the ninth Ebola outbreak in DRC since the disease was discovered in 1976, when an outbreak infected 318 people and killed 280 (Figure 1). \nIn contrast to the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreak, the WHO response was swift. On the same day that the outbreak was reported, WHO released $2 million from its Contingency Fund for Emergencies (CFE), deployed a team to the region, and activated an emergency incident management system. WHO also issued a $57 million appeal to control the outbreak. The international community exceeded the request, having provided $63 million. The largest contributions were provided by Germany (5 million), United Kingdom (\u00a35 million), and the United States ($5.3 million). Other types of support included in-kind contributions for medical evacuations and intercountry air transport from Norway and the European Union, respectively; technical assistance from Germany, Guinea, the United Kingdom, and the United States; and the provision of vaccines to protect over 3,300 people. \nFigure 1. Ebola Virus Outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of Congo: 1976-2018\n/\nSource: Adjusted by CRS from World Health Organization, Ebola Outbreak Response in The Democratic Republic of The Congo, Briefing to Committee A at the World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland, May 23, 2018.\nNote: CRS adapted the graphic to include information on Ebola cases and deaths in May 2018 and to identify the location of North Kivu and its proximity to Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi. \nThe DRC\u2019s Ministry of Health, WHO, and other stakeholders took several steps to contain the outbreak. Notably, a new vaccine, which was used for the first time in the field during the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreaks, was provided to all primary and secondary contacts to prevent disease transmission. Merck provided more than 7,500 doses for the vaccination effort. In addition, health officials approved the use of investigational drugs to treat those infected with Ebola. This marks the first time in which investigational drugs were used in the field during an outbreak. \nHealth experts were particularly troubled by this outbreak, because it occurred in a province that is densely populated (2.5 million people) and hosts a portion of the Congo River that is vital for regional transportation. Previous outbreaks occurred primarily in sparsely populated, rural areas. The only other urban outbreak occurred in Kikwit in 1995, which held 400,000 people at the time. WHO conducted operational readiness and preparedness assessments in the nine countries bordering the DRC and placed particular emphasis on the Central African Republic due to its proximity to the outbreak area. The assessment plans were aimed at identifying operational needs should the outbreak have spread to the country and providing technical support for the development and implementation of contingency plans. \nU.S. Support \nThe United States committed to provide $8.0 million in support of Ebola control efforts in the country, drawing on $5.0 million in FY2017 appropriations for USAID-administered Global Health Program (GHP) funding and $3 million in GHP funds appropriated in FY2015 for Ebola response in West Africa. Roughly $5.0 million of the funds were provided to WHO for case management, entry screenings, diagnosis testing, and support for other laboratory functions. About $2.0 million was for the United Nations Children\u2019s Fund (UNICEF) to implement Ebola awareness communication campaigns and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) projects. An estimated $700,000 was used by the International Federation of the Red Cross/Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) for promoting safe burial practices and Ebola prevention education campaigns. In addition, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provided technical assistance for communications, logistics, operational and personnel support, laboratory capacity building, and the development and implementation of an outbreak response plan. \nOn June 5, the White House withdrew proposed rescissions of $252 million in unobligated emergency International Disaster Assistance (IDA) funds appropriated in 2015 to control the West Africa Ebola outbreak and bolster response capacity in affected countries. These funds may be made available for future Ebola control efforts.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN10917", "sha1": "14309be861850f829e677b573fa9b3e94c5e5778", "filename": "files/20180803_IN10917_14309be861850f829e677b573fa9b3e94c5e5778.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN10917_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180803_IN10917_images_18bc89ed98189ed82719372050cf04a535347d17.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN10917", "sha1": "06fe85cf55d152d48fc9c01ab2aa2633af31db1b", "filename": "files/20180803_IN10917_06fe85cf55d152d48fc9c01ab2aa2633af31db1b.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4758, "name": "Middle East & North Africa" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4787, "name": "State Department & International Organizations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4896, "name": "State & Foreign Operations Appropriations" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 581962, "date": "2018-06-12", "retrieved": "2018-06-19T13:19:03.102915", "title": "Ebola: Democratic Republic of Congo", "summary": "On May 8, 2018, health officials from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) that two Ebola cases had been detected in the Equateur province, a rural area in the northwestern portion of the country. The disease has since spread to Mbandaka, a city that holds 1.2 million people and serves as a regional trade hub. As of June 10, 2018, WHO reported a total of 55 cases, including 28 deaths. Of these cases, 69% were confirmed through diagnostics. WHO asserts that 14 of these cases were probably Ebola, but could not collect laboratory specimens before the burial. This is the ninth Ebola outbreak in DRC since the disease was discovered in 1976, when an outbreak infected 318 people and killed 280 (Figure 1). WHO considers the public health risk of transmission to be very high at the national level due to the serious nature of the disease, insufficient epidemiological capacity, and delayed detection of the first case. At the global level, however, the risk is considered low. The outbreak appears to have been contained in the most populous areas and active transmission appears to be occurring only in rural areas. \nFigure 1. Ebola Virus Outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of Congo Since 1976\n/\nSource: World Health Organization, Ebola Outbreak Response in The Democratic Republic of The Congo, Briefing to Committee A at the World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland, May 23, 2018.\nThe DRC\u2019s Ministry of Health, WHO, and other stakeholders are taking several steps to contain the outbreak. Notably, a new vaccine, used for the first time in the field during the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola outbreaks, is now being provided to all primary and secondary contacts to prevent disease transmission. Merck provided more than 7,500 doses for the vaccination effort. In addition, health officials approved the use of investigational drugs to treat those infected with Ebola. This marks the first time in which investigational drugs are being used in the field during an outbreak. \nHealth experts are particularly troubled by this outbreak, as it is occurring in a city that is densely populated (2.5 million people) and hosts a portion of the Congo River that is vital for regional transportation. Previous outbreaks occurred primarily in sparsely populated, rural areas. The only other urban outbreak occurred in Kikwit in 1995, which held 400,000 people at the time. WHO has conducted operational readiness and preparedness assessments in the nine countries bordering the DRC, placing particular emphasis on the Central African Republic, due to its proximity to the outbreak area. The assessment plans are aimed at identifying operational needs should an outbreak occur and providing technical support for the development and implementation of contingency plans. WHO has \u201ccautious optimism\u201d that ongoing containment measures are working. The disease was once present in three health zones (Bikoro, Wangata, and Iboko) in Equateur province, and since May 17, all new cases were detected in the Iboko Health Zone. \nWHO is seeking $56.7 million to control the Ebola outbreak through a coordinated approach across several international actors. As of June 3, 2018, donors have pledged $25.7 million. The United States committed to provide $8.0 million in support of Ebola control efforts in the country, drawing on $5.0 million in FY2017 appropriations for USAID-administered Global Health Program (GHP) funding. It is also drawing $3 million in GHP funds appropriated in FY2015 for Ebola response in West Africa. Roughly $5.0 million of the funds is to be provided to WHO for case management, entry screenings, diagnosis testing, and support for other laboratory functions. About $2.0 million is for the United Nations Children\u2019s Fund (UNICEF) to implement Ebola awareness communication campaigns and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) projects. An estimated $700,000 is to be used by the International Federation of the Red Cross/Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) for promoting safe burial practices and Ebola prevention education campaigns. \nOn June 5, the White House withdrew proposed rescissions of $252 million in unobligated emergency International Disaster Assistance (IDA) funds appropriated in 2015 to control the West Africa Ebola outbreak and bolster response capacity in affected countries. These funds may be made available for ongoing Ebola control efforts in the DRC. \nIn addition, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is working with partners to support the development and implementation of an outbreak response plan, as well as to provide technical assistance in communications, logistics, operational and personnel support, and laboratory capacity building. The United Nations peacekeeping operation in the DRC, to which the United States is the largest financial contributor, is also providing logistical support to response efforts.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN10917", "sha1": "0d77a58ae739aa67cb3ed2d45b39270318004162", "filename": "files/20180612_IN10917_0d77a58ae739aa67cb3ed2d45b39270318004162.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN10917_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180612_IN10917_images_e4e0aa1a14edd3df25a111819e293fbbf506e342.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN10917", "sha1": "f7b1b1d67f36c14d0625642ac412658eed4d9e29", "filename": "files/20180612_IN10917_f7b1b1d67f36c14d0625642ac412658eed4d9e29.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4758, "name": "Middle East & North Africa" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4787, "name": "State Department & International Organizations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4896, "name": "State & Foreign Operations Appropriations" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "CRS Insights", "Foreign Affairs" ] }