{ "id": "IN11010", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN11010", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 616215, "date": "2020-02-06", "retrieved": "2020-02-07T23:02:59.484166", "title": "Funding for ACA-Established Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF) Extended Through FY2029", "summary": "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA, P.L. 111-148, as amended) authorized the establishment of a private, nonprofit, tax-exempt corporation called the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) at Social Security Act (SSA) Section 1181. This built on provisions in prior law that expanded the federal government\u2019s role in comparative effectiveness research (CER). The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5) provided a total of $1.1 billion for CER and required an Institute of Medicine report with recommendations on national CER priorities.\nPCORI is responsible for coordinating and supporting comparative clinical effectiveness research, which is statutorily defined as \u201cresearch evaluating and comparing health outcomes and the clinical effectiveness, risks, and benefits of 2 or more ... health care interventions ... being used in the treatment, management, and diagnosis of, or prevention of, illness or injury.\u201d Health care interventions include care management and delivery, medical devices, diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, and integrative health practices, among others. PCORI was initially required to identify national priorities for research, and an agenda to carry out these priorities, and then to enter into contracts with federal agencies, as well as with academic and private sector research entities, to carry out the research agenda.\nAs part of this effort, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) is required to broadly disseminate research findings published by PCORI and other government-funded CER entities and to develop a public database of government-funded evidence (Public Health Service Act [PHSA] Section 937). \nThe Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF)\nThe ACA created a 10-year, multibillion dollar trust fund\u2014the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF)\u2014to support comparative clinical effectiveness research, and specifically to fund PCORI and its research activities. PCORTF\u2014codified at Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 9511\u2014received initial annual funding for a period of 10 years, from FY2010 through FY2019, from three sources: (1) annual appropriations, (2) fees on health insurance policies and self-insured plans, and (3) transfers from the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds (26 U.S.C. \u00a79511). The fund had an original termination date of September 30, 2019. \nThe termination date of PCORTF was extended twice by provisions associated with the continuing resolution laws for FY2020 (\u00a71403, P.L. 116-59; \u00a71403, P.L. 116-69), which allowed for funds in PCORTF to continue to be expended from October 1, 2019, through December 20, 2019. The Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-94, Division N, \u00a7104), extended funding for PCORTF through FY2029 by annually appropriating the amount equivalent to the net revenues received from the fees on health insurance policies and self-insured plans and providing for a direct appropriation in a specified amount (the \u201capplicable amount\u201d) for each of FY2020 through FY2029. The transfers from the Medicare Trust Funds were not similarly extended. The act extends the termination date of PCORTF, and the termination dates of the fees on health insurance policies and self-insured plans, through FY2029. It also makes modifications to the authorizing language for PCORI relating to the composition of its Board, appointments to its Methodology Committee, and the identification of research priorities, among others. \nSources of PCORTF Funds\nThe ACA provided to PCORTF (1) $10 million for FY2010, (2) $50 million for FY2011, and (3) $150 million for each of FY2012 through FY2019. P.L. 116-94 provides for an appropriation in an annually specified \u201capplicable amount\u201d for each of FY2020 through FY2029 (e.g., $285 million in FY2021, $320 million in FY2024).\nFor each of FY2013 through FY2019, ACA also provided to PCORTF an amount equivalent to the net revenues from new fees the law imposed on health insurance policies and self-insured plans. For all policy/plan years ending after FY2013, the fees equaled $2 multiplied by the number of covered lives. P.L. 116-94 did not modify the calculation of the fees when it extended them. \nFinally, transfers to PCORTF from the Medicare Trust Funds were calculated by multiplying the average number of individuals entitled to benefits under Medicare Part A, or enrolled in Medicare Part B, by $1 (for FY2013) or by $2 (for each of FY2014 through FY2019). As noted, P.L. 116-94 did not extend these transfers; however, the \u201capplicable amount\u201d of the annual appropriation provided for each of FY2020 through FY2029 by the law is significantly higher than the annual appropriation of $150 million for each of FY2012 through FY2019 provided by the ACA.\nAllocation of PCORTF Funds\nFor each of FY2011 through FY2019, IRC Section 9511 required 80% of PCORTF funds to be made available to PCORI and the remaining 20% of funds to be transferred to the HHS Secretary for carrying out PHSA Section 937. This requirement was extended through FY2029 by P.L. 116-94. Of the total amount transferred to HHS, 80% is to be distributed to AHRQ to carry out the dissemination activities authorized under PHSA Section 937. Beginning with the FY2018 budget request, the President proposed to incorporate AHRQ under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by creating a new institute, the National Institute for Research on Safety and Quality (NIRSQ). This change was not adopted by Congress, and AHRQ continues to be a stand-alone HHS agency. Table 1 shows the allocation of PCORTF funds through FY2019. \nTable 1. Distribution of PCORTF Funding\nMillions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year\nFunding Recipient\n2012\n2013\n2014\n2015\n2016\n2017\n2018\n2019 (Est.) \n\nPCORI\n120\n289\n376\n396\n469\n476\n492\n563\n\nHHS\n30\n72\n94\n99\n117\n119\n123\n140\n\nAHRQ (non-add)\n(24)\n(58)\n(75)\n(80)\n(94)\n(95)\n(98)\n(112)\n\nOffice of the Secretary (non-add)\n(6)\n(14)\n(19)\n(19)\n(23)\n(24)\n(25)\n(28)\n\nTotal\n150\n361\n470\n495\n586\n595\n615\n703\n\nSource: CRS calculations using data provided in Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government, Appendix (FY2013-FY2020).\nNote: Non-add numbers are included for clarification, but are not part of the total.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11010", "sha1": "bd565f53260a1e54ba72f460849c2b0353be3c6f", "filename": "files/20200206_IN11010_bd565f53260a1e54ba72f460849c2b0353be3c6f.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11010", "sha1": "5f59902c3eb7f7506e9a36fd5acc913676f7afad", "filename": "files/20200206_IN11010_5f59902c3eb7f7506e9a36fd5acc913676f7afad.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4788, "name": "Health Care Delivery" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4881, "name": "Health Care Reform" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 609441, "date": "2019-11-27", "retrieved": "2019-12-13T15:11:12.234273", "title": "Funding for ACA-Established Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF) Expired in FY2019", "summary": "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA, P.L. 111-148, as amended) authorized the establishment of a private, nonprofit, tax-exempt corporation called the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) at Social Security Act (SSA) Section 1181. This built on provisions in prior law that expanded the federal government\u2019s role in comparative effectiveness research (CER). The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5) provided a total of $1.1 billion for CER; required an Institute of Medicine (IOM, now the National Academy of Medicine) report with recommendations on national CER priorities; and created the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (FCCCER), an interagency advisory group. FCCCER was required to report to the President and Congress annually on federal CER activities, and terminated upon enactment of the ACA. \nPCORI is responsible for coordinating and supporting comparative clinical effectiveness research, which is defined in law to mean \u201cresearch evaluating and comparing health outcomes and the clinical effectiveness, risks, and benefits of 2 or more ... health care interventions ... being used in the treatment, management, and diagnosis of, or prevention of illness or injury.\u201d Health care interventions include a wide range of things, including care management and delivery, medical devices, diagnostics, pharmaceuticals, and integrative health practices. PCORI was initially required to identify national priorities for research, and an agenda to carry out these priorities, and then to enter into contracts with federal agencies, as well as with academic and private sector research entities, to carry out the research agenda.\nThe ACA also required the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to broadly disseminate research findings that are published by PCORI and other government-funded CER entities and to develop a public database of government-funded evidence (Public Health Service Act [PHSA] Section 937). Dissemination materials must identify researchers; describe research methodology, limitations, and subpopulation-specific considerations; and must not include practice guidelines or recommendations for payment, coverage, or treatment. AHRQ has to support training of researchers in methods used in comparative clinical effectiveness research and build data capacity for the research (e.g., development of clinical registries) in coordination with other federal health programs.\nThe Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF)\nThe ACA created a 10-year, multibillion dollar trust fund\u2014the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF)\u2014to support comparative effectiveness research, and specifically to fund PCORI and its research activities. Funding for PCORTF expired in FY2019. The law provided annual funding to PCORTF over the period FY2010-FY2019 from three sources: (1) annual appropriations, (2) fees on health insurance and self-insured plans, and (3) transfers from the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds (26 U.S.C. \u00a79511).\nThe termination date of PCORTF has been extended twice by provisions associated with the continuing resolution laws for FY2020 (\u00a71403, P.L. 116-59 and \u00a71403, P.L. 116-69), with termination set to take place on December 20, 2019. This allows for funds in PCORTF to continue to be expended in the interim. In addition, several bills have been introduced in the 116th Congress that would extend funding for PCORTF, and thus PCORI and AHRQ\u2019s activities under SSA Section 1181 and PHSA Section 937. The bills would generally extend funding for PCORTF\u2014extending all three sources of funding for the trust fund\u2014for between 7 and 10 additional years; extend the termination date for PCORTF; and stipulate various research related requirements for PCORI going forward (e.g., research must prioritize maternal mortality and morbidity; research must consider the full range of outcomes data). \nThree Sources of PCORTF Funds\nThe ACA appropriated the following amounts to the PCORTF: (1) $10 million for FY2010, (2) $50 million for FY2011, and (3) $150 million for each of FY2012 through FY2019. In addition, for each of FY2013 through FY2019, the ACA appropriated an amount equivalent to the net revenues from a new fee that the law imposes on health insurance policies and self-insured plans. For policy/plan years ending during FY2013, the fee equaled $1 multiplied by the number of covered lives. For policy/plan years ending during each subsequent fiscal year through FY2019, the fee equaled $2 multiplied by the number of covered lives. Finally, transfers to PCORTF from the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds are calculated by multiplying the average number of individuals entitled to benefits under Medicare Part A, or enrolled in Medicare Part B, by $1 (for FY2013) or by $2 (for each of FY2014 through FY2019).\nAllocation of PCORTF Funds\nFor each of FY2011 through FY2019, the ACA required 80% of the PCORTF funds to be made available to PCORI and the remaining 20% of funds to be transferred to the HHS Secretary for carrying out PHSA Section 937. Of the total amount transferred to HHS, 80% was to be distributed to AHRQ to carry out the dissemination activities authorized under PHSA Section 937 (with the remaining 20% staying with HHS Office of the Secretary). Beginning in the FY2018 budget request, the President proposed to incorporate AHRQ under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by creating a new institute, the National Institute for Research on Safety and Quality (NIRSQ). Although this proposed change has not been adopted by Congress and AHRQ has continued to be its own stand-alone agency, for FY2018 and FY2019, the funds that are in fact going to AHRQ are shown as going to NIRSQ. Table 1 shows the allocation of PCORTF funds through FY2019. \nTable 1. Distribution of PCORTF Funding\nMillions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year\nFunding Recipient\n2012\n2013\n2014\n2015\n2016\n2017\n2018\n2019 (Est.) \n\nPCORI\n120\n289\n376\n396\n469\n476\n492\n563\n\nHHS\n30\n72\n94\n99\n117\n119\n123\n140\n\nAHRQ (non-add)\n(24)\n(58)\n(75)\n(80)\n(94)\n(95)\n\u2014\n\u2014\n\nNIH/NIRSQ (non-add)\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n(98)\n(112)\n\nOffice of the Secretary (non-add)\n(6)\n(14)\n(19)\n(19)\n(23)\n(24)\n(25)\n(28)\n\nTotal\n150\n361\n470\n495\n586\n595\n615\n703\n\nSource: CRS calculations using data provided in Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government, Appendix (FY2013-FY2020).\nNote: Non-add numbers are included for clarification, but are not part of the total.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11010", "sha1": "d5cad228c72b3d8a8a7e2050991eca92f03e25bc", "filename": "files/20191127_IN11010_d5cad228c72b3d8a8a7e2050991eca92f03e25bc.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11010", "sha1": "a3ec30658358c3b58fe01608d53db2efc152dcdb", "filename": "files/20191127_IN11010_a3ec30658358c3b58fe01608d53db2efc152dcdb.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4788, "name": "Health Care Delivery" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4881, "name": "Health Care Reform" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 589175, "date": "2018-12-20", "retrieved": "2019-01-03T14:12:58.795783", "title": "Funding for ACA-Established Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF) Expires in FY2019", "summary": "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA, P.L. 111-148, as amended) authorized the establishment of a private, nonprofit, tax-exempt corporation called the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI, or the Institute). This built on provisions in prior law that expanded the federal government\u2019s role in the oversight and funding of comparative effectiveness research. The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5) provided a total of $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness research; required an Institute of Medicine (IOM, now the National Academy of Medicine) report with recommendations on national comparative effectiveness research priorities; and created the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (FCCCER), an interagency advisory group. FCCCER was required to report to the President and the Congress annually on federal comparative effectiveness research activities, and was terminated upon enactment of the ACA. \nPCORI is responsible for coordinating and supporting comparative clinical effectiveness research, which is broadly defined in law to mean \u201cresearch evaluating and comparing health outcomes and the clinical effectiveness, risks, and benefits of 2 or more ... health care interventions ... being used in the treatment, management, and diagnosis of, or prevention of illness or injury.\u201d Health care interventions include a wide range of things, for example, care management and delivery, medical devices, diagnostic tools, pharmaceuticals, and integrative health practices. PCORI was required to identify national priorities for research, and an agenda to carry out the priorities, including attention to chronic conditions, gaps in evidence, quality of care, patient health and well-being, and the effect on national expenditures associated with interventions or conditions, among other concerns. In addition, PCORI can enter into contracts with federal agencies as well as with academic, private sector research, or study-conducting entities for the management of funding and conduct of research.\nThe ACA also required the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to broadly disseminate research findings that are published by PCORI and other government-funded comparative effectiveness research entities, to create information tools, to and develop a publicly available database of government-funded evidence (Public Health Service Act [PHSA] Section 937). Dissemination materials must identify researchers; describe research methodology, limitations, and subpopulation-specific considerations; and must not include practice guidelines or recommendations for payment, coverage, or treatment. AHRQ has to support training of researchers and building of data capacity in coordination with other federal health programs; in addition, other federal agencies are broadly authorized to contract with PCORI for the conduct and support of relevant research.\nThe Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF)\nThe ACA created a 10-year, multibillion dollar trust fund\u2014the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (PCORTF)\u2014to support comparative effectiveness research, and specifically to fund PCORI and its research activities. Funding for PCORTF expires in FY2019. The law provided annual funding to the PCORTF over the period FY2010-FY2019 from the following three sources: (1) annual appropriations, (2) fees on health insurance and self-insured plans, and (3) transfers from the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds (26 U.S.C. \u00a79511).\nThree Sources of PCORTF Funds\nSpecifically, the ACA appropriated the following amounts to the PCORTF: (1) $10 million for FY2010, (2) $50 million for FY2011, and (3) $150 million for each of FY2012 through FY2019. In addition, for each of FY2013 through FY2019, the ACA appropriated an amount equivalent to the net revenues from a new fee that the law imposes on health insurance policies and self-insured plans. For policy/plan years ending during FY2013, the fee equals $1 multiplied by the number of covered lives. For policy/plan years ending during each subsequent fiscal year through FY2019, the fee equals $2 multiplied by the number of covered lives. Finally, transfers to PCORTF from the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds are calculated by multiplying the average number of individuals entitled to benefits under Medicare Part A, or enrolled in Medicare Part B, by $1 (for FY2013) or by $2 (for each of FY2014 through FY2019).\nAllocation of PCORTF Funds\nFor each of FY2011 through FY2019, the ACA requires 80% of the PCORTF funds to be made available to PCORI and the remaining 20% of funds to be transferred to the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary for carrying out PHSA Section 937. Of the total amount transferred to HHS, 80% is to be distributed to AHRQ to carry out the dissemination activities authorized under PHSA Section 937. Beginning in the FY2018 budget request, the President proposed to incorporate AHRQ under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by creating a new institute, the National Institute for Research on Safety and Quality (NIRSQ). Although this proposed change has not been adopted by Congress and AHRQ has continued to be its own stand-alone agency, for FY2018 and FY2019, the funds that are in fact going to AHRQ are shown as going to NIRSQ. Table 1 shows the allocation of PCORTF funds through FY2019. \nTable 1. Distribution of PCORTF Funding\nMillions of Dollars, by Fiscal Year\nFunding Recipient\n2012\n2013\n2014\n2015\n2016\n2017\n2018\n(Est.)\n2019 (Est.) \n\nPCORI\n120\n289\n376\n396\n469\n476\n499\n622\n\nHHS\n30\n72\n94\n99\n117\n119\n125\n155\n\nAHRQ (non-add)\n(24)\n(58)\n(75)\n(80)\n(94)\n(95)\n\u2014\n\u2014\n\nNIH/NIRSQ (non-add)\n\n\n\n\n\n\u2014\n(100)\n(124)\n\nOffice of the Secretary (non-add)\n(6)\n(14)\n(19)\n(19)\n(23)\n(24)\n(25)\n(31)\n\nTotal\n150\n361\n470\n495\n586\n595\n624\n777\n\nSource: CRS calculations using data provided in Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government, Appendix (FY2013-FY2019).", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11010", "sha1": "6f1ad9edc9836a8a1d11deecbaf7d903fcefa053", "filename": "files/20181220_IN11010_6f1ad9edc9836a8a1d11deecbaf7d903fcefa053.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11010", "sha1": "2808707c7938d8a55915d4d2f65aa21c65f5cd30", "filename": "files/20181220_IN11010_2808707c7938d8a55915d4d2f65aa21c65f5cd30.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "CRS Insights" ] }