{ "id": "IN11055", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN11055", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 597291, "date": "2019-02-26", "retrieved": "2020-01-02T16:06:31.471937", "title": "The Disaster Recovery Reform Act: Homeland Security Issues in the 116th Congress", "summary": "/\n \nThe Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 (DRRA, Division D of P.L. 115-254), which became law on October 5, 2018, is the most comprehensive legislation on the Federal Emergency Management Agency\u2019s (FEMA\u2019s) disaster assistance programs since the passage of the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013 (SRIA, Division B of P.L. 113-2) and, previous to that, the Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform Act of 2006 (PKEMRA, P.L. 109-295). The legislation focuses on improving predisaster planning and mitigation, response, and recovery, and increasing FEMA accountability. As such, it amends many sections of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a75121 et seq.). Generally, DRRA\u2019s amendments to the Stafford Act apply to major disasters and emergencies declared on or after August 1, 2017. Other new authorities apply to major disasters and emergencies declared on or after January 1, 2016.\nCongress may consider tracking the implementation of DRRA\u2019s requirements, which include \u201cmore than 50 provisions that require FEMA policy or regulation changes for full implementation.... \u201d In addition to its reporting and rulemaking requirements\u2014many of which include 2019 deadlines\u2014much of DRRA\u2019s implementation is at FEMA\u2019s discretion.\nThis Insight provides an overview of some of DRRA\u2019s broad impacts with a few significant, illustrative provisions, and potential considerations for Congress.\nPotential Investments in Preparedness, Response, and Recovery \nDRRA includes provisions that have the potential to improve disaster preparedness, response, and recovery, but also to increase federal spending. For example, under the revised authority under Section 203 of the Stafford Act (42 U.S.C. \u00a75133)\u2014Predisaster Hazard Mitigation\u2014the President may provide financial and technical assistance by setting aside up to 6% of the estimated aggregated amount of certain federal grant assistance from the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), including grants made pursuant to awards of Public Assistance (PA) and Individual Assistance (IA) under the Stafford Act. Previously, predisaster mitigation was funded by discretionary annual appropriations, and financial assistance was limited by the amount available in the National Predisaster Mitigation Fund, which was separate from the DRF. Post-DRRA, predisaster mitigation has the potential to have significantly higher funding through the new set-aside from the DRF, but how this will be implemented and managed by FEMA remains uncertain. \nAdditionally, DRRA may significantly increase the amount of financial assistance provided under Section 408 of the Stafford Act (42 U.S.C. \u00a75174)\u2014Federal Assistance to Individuals and Households. Prior to DRRA, an individual or household could receive up to $33,300 (FY2017; adjusted annually) in financial assistance, including both housing assistance and other needs assistance (ONA). Post-DRRA, financial assistance for repairs and replacement of housing may not exceed $34,900 (FY2019; adjusted annually), and separate from that, financial assistance for ONA may not exceed $34,900 (FY2019; adjusted annually). Financial assistance to rent alternate housing accommodations is not subject to the cap. In the past, the maximum amount of financial assistance may have resulted in applicants with significant home damage and/or other needs having little to no remaining funding available to pay for rental assistance. Changes post-DRRA may result in increased spending on temporary disaster housing assistance and ONA.\nFEMA may also pilot some provisions of the DRRA, as it has done with regard to management costs incurred in the administration of the PA Program and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). Following the passage of DRRA, the PA management cost reimbursement rate increased to 12% of the total grant award; 7% may be used by the grantee, and 5% by the subgrantee. Previously, PA management costs were capped at 3.34% for major disasters and 3.90% for emergency declarations. Additionally, the HMGP management cost reimbursement rate increased to 15% of the total grant award; 10% may be used by the grantee, and 5% by the subgrantee. Previously, HMGP management costs were capped at 4.89% for major disasters. In addition, prior to DRRA, there was not a pass-through requirement for subgrantees to receive a percentage of management costs.\nLimitations on the Ability to Recoup Funding\nA number of DRRA provisions may restrict FEMA\u2019s ability to recoup assistance, and the retroactive implementation of these provisions may be of interest to Congress. For example, FEMA may waive a debt owed by an individual or household if distributed in error by FEMA and if its collection would be inequitable, provided there was no fault on behalf of the debtor. Additionally, with regard to Section 705 of the Stafford Act (42 U.S.C. \u00a75205)\u2014Disaster Grant Closeout Procedures\u2014DRRA amends the statute of limitations on FEMA\u2019s ability to recover assistance. No administrative action to recover payments may be initiated \u201cafter the date that is 3 years after the date of transmission of the final expenditure report for project completion as certified by the grantee.\u201d Prior to the passage of DRRA, the statute of limitations applied to the final expenditure report for the disaster or emergency. This is a significant change because it may take years to close all of the projects associated with a disaster. Previously, it was possible to recoup funding from projects that may have been completed and closed years prior to FEMA\u2019s pursuit of funding because the disaster was still open.\nIncreased Agency Accountability and Transparency\nDRRA includes reporting requirements that may influence decisionmaking regarding future disaster response and recovery. The earliest reports were due not later than 90 days after DRRA\u2019s enactment (thus a deadline of January 3, 2019). Some provisions also include briefings ahead of the reporting deadline. In addition to FEMA, other federal entities are assigned responsibilities (e.g., the Office of Inspector General for the Department of Homeland Security, which was required to initiate an audit of certain FEMA contracts by November 4, 2018).\nPotential Considerations for Congress\nIn general, among other options, Congress may consider whether to\nevaluate if FEMA\u2019s implementation of provisions fulfills congressional intent;\nreview the effectiveness and impacts of FEMA\u2019s DRRA-related regulations and policy guidance; or\nassess the effects of DRRA-related changes to federal assistance for past and future disasters.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11055", "sha1": "6a9e5f16a5ee7e515cca667a575697ddc4358542", "filename": "files/20190226_IN11055_6a9e5f16a5ee7e515cca667a575697ddc4358542.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN11055_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190226_IN11055_images_4c90792b4ac35865273673c3e0c671ab3bf94038.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11055", "sha1": "6e854c939c957e2ec6c544388abae2921f2e4359", "filename": "files/20190226_IN11055_6e854c939c957e2ec6c544388abae2921f2e4359.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "CRS Insights" ] }