{
  "id": "IN11058",
  "type": "CRS Insight",
  "typeId": "INSIGHTS",
  "number": "IN11058",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 592454,
      "date": "2019-03-01",
      "retrieved": "2019-04-17T14:10:16.687317",
      "title": "Sudan: Pressure Mounts on the Government",
      "summary": "Sudan\u2019s President Omar al Bashir, who took power in a 1989 coup, arguably faces the greatest challenge to his rule in three decades, as public pressure for a political transition mounts. Bashir\u2019s government has been the target of near-daily protests across the country since December 19. A common refrain among the protesters is \u201cTasgut bas\u201d (\u201cJust fall, that\u2019s all\u201d). \nSpurred by frustrations with deteriorating economic conditions, corruption, poor governance, and repression, the protests have been further fueled by the government\u2019s response, in which more than 2,600 people reportedly have been detained and over 50 killed. The crackdown threatens efforts to improve U.S.-Sudan relations and raises broader questions for U.S. policy. Bashir\u2019s recent declaration of martial law may increase prospects for instability, with implications for U.S. interests in the region. \nThese demonstrations are unprecedented for Sudan in their longevity and geographic scope. In addition to street protests, organized by a network of Sudanese professionals, doctors and medical professionals have staged strikes, staff of banks and telecommunications companies have led walk-outs, and engineers have stopped construction projects. Women are prominent among the protesters, as are university students. \nOpposition groups, in coordination with the Sudanese Professionals Association, have released a Declaration of Freedom and Change, calling for the immediate end of the regime and the formation of a transitional government. A group of university professors have issued a similar proposal. There appears little trust among regime critics that the government would conduct credible elections (scheduled for 2020), particularly given the Islamist ruling party\u2019s move to facilitate another term for Bashir. \nWhile some observers draw comparisons with the Arab Spring, Sudanese cite their own history of protest movements, which resulted in changes of government in 1964 and 1985. Those uprisings were also led by professional union and political party coalitions, rather than by armed insurgents. \nThe Government of Sudan\u2019s Response to the Protests\nSecurity forces have fired tear gas into hospitals, universities, and neighborhoods; used live ammunition against demonstrators; and reportedly targeted doctors treating wounded protesters. Reporting from inside Sudan is restricted, but the BBC has documented footage of so-called \u201chit squads,\u201d paramilitary units reportedly coordinated by the National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) to suppress the protests. The BBC reporting suggests that activists are tortured in secret detention facilities; several people have died in detention. \nSome contend, nevertheless, that the security response appears somewhat restrained, as Sudan seeks to shake its pariah status and gain debt relief from international creditors. By comparison, security forces reportedly killed over 170 people during a week of protests in 2013. Sudanese forces and state-backed militia have been previously implicated in war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. \nPresident Bashir\u2019s February 22 declaration of a year-long, nationwide state of emergency heightens the risk that the crisis will escalate as the government moves to quell the protests. In a late night broadcast, he first struck a conciliatory tone, pledging economic reform and a new national dialogue (despite the recent arrest of several opposition leaders). He directed the legislature to pause efforts to lift presidential term limits from the constitution. Bashir then replaced the state governors with senior security officers, however, and, after dismissing most of his government, promoted Defense Minister Awad Ibn Auf, who is subject to U.S. sanctions for his reported role in Darfur atrocities, to First Vice President. Ahmad Harun, also a target of sanctions and wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC), was named acting head of the ruling party. \nOn February 25, Bashir issued emergency decrees banning unauthorized gatherings, demonstrations, and strikes, and prohibiting the publication or circulation of news deemed as undermining the state or government officials. He also expanded authorities for searches, seizures, and arrests. Neither the decrees nor the deployment of additional troops in Khartoum have deterred protesters from returning to the streets, amid uncertainty about how strictly the new laws will be enforced. Opposition leaders have rejected Bashir\u2019s call for dialogue as insincere, and insufficient. \nFigure 1. President Bashir and Newly Appointed Military Governors\n/\nSource: Government of Sudan.\nU.S. Policy Issues and Outlook\nThe Sudanese government\u2019s heavy-handed response to the protests complicates the way forward for U.S.-Sudan relations. It also highlights questions about the U.S. policy approach toward a government seen as authoritarian and responsible for serious human rights violations. Under a phased framework for reengagement launched under the Obama Administration, President Trump lifted economic sanctions on Sudan in 2017, citing reported progress on five tracks. \nSome sanctions remain in place, including restrictions linked to Sudan\u2019s designation as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST) and congressionally-imposed restrictions on aid and debt relief. In November 2018, the State Department announced \u201cPhase II\u201d of the reengagement framework, under which the Administration would consider lifting Sudan\u2019s SST designation if relevant criteria are met and if the government makes progress on six key areas of concern, including counterterrorism cooperation, humanitarian access, and respect for human rights and religious freedom. \nU.S. officials have emphasized improvements in counterterrorism cooperation and praised Sudan\u2019s pledge to cut ties with North Korea, but there have been signs of backsliding on other stated priorities, including humanitarian access and an end to offensive operations in Darfur. The Trump Administration drew controversy (and an injunction) for its 2017 decision to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Sudan despite concerns raised by multiple agencies. A recent report suggesting Sudan deployed child soldiers to Yemen has provoked questions about the State Department\u2019s removal of Sudan from the Child Soldiers Prevention Act List. Some critics contend that the Obama and Trump Administrations have prioritized the intelligence relationship over other policy objectives, and one former U.S. diplomat argues that they have failed to articulate strategic objectives for the relationship. \nThe senior U.S. diplomat at the United Nations has expressed deep concern with the state of emergency and called on the government to \u201ccreate an environment for an inclusive political process that would lead to sustainable peace and democracy.\u201d The new emergency laws further undermine the prospects for credible elections. The status of Phase II is in question: the State Department has warned that the response to protests will determine future engagement. \nThe International Crisis Group has called for Western countries to create incentives for Bashir to step down and take steps to facilitate a peaceful transition. Bashir faces two ICC arrest warrants; some advocate for an ICC deferral in exchange for his resignation. The Trump Administration has not indicated its view on Bashir\u2019s political future. Some observers question whether there is sufficient international attention to calls for Bashir\u2019s retirement. Egypt and Qatar have signaled support for him; the positions of other Gulf countries are less clear. Meanwhile, food prices continue to rise and 5.8 million Sudanese face severe food insecurity. The Darfur peace process remains stalled, amid concerns about the drawdown of U.N. peacekeepers. The government shows no sign of shifting its spending on security, which reportedly represents as much as 70% of its budget, toward addressing the economic crisis. With no sign of a bailout forthcoming, frustrations growing, and security forces poised to suppress dissent, Sudan\u2019s overlapping crises may deteriorate.",
      "type": "CRS Insight",
      "typeId": "INSIGHTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11058",
          "sha1": "0a68f9f871a6698c649784d1d90b8ccf32dcfb67",
          "filename": "files/20190301_IN11058_0a68f9f871a6698c649784d1d90b8ccf32dcfb67.html",
          "images": {
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN11058_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190301_IN11058_images_c17e7229f0713e8434a082afecab9884a688dedc.png"
          }
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11058",
          "sha1": "7ba6d35a6ba23ef1336d07dd2743fd2189b52717",
          "filename": "files/20190301_IN11058_7ba6d35a6ba23ef1336d07dd2743fd2189b52717.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "CRS Insights",
    "Intelligence and National Security"
  ]
}