{ "id": "IN11180", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN11180", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 606298, "date": "2019-10-16", "retrieved": "2019-10-16T22:21:09.056714", "title": "Kosovo\u2019s Election: Early Results May Signal Major Changes", "summary": "On October 6, 2019, Kosovo held its fourth parliamentary election since declaring independence from Serbia in 2008 (Serbia does not recognize Kosovo\u2019s independence). Opposition parties\u2019 strong performance may result in the most consequential government turnover since independence, with implications for the future direction of the European Union (EU)-facilitated dialogue to normalize relations between Kosovo and Serbia. The United States has long supported Kosovo\u2019s political and economic development, and U.S. officials and many Members of Congress support and have closely followed the dialogue. \nResults\nKosovo\u2019s early parliamentary election follows the unexpected resignation of outgoing Prime Minister Ramush Haradinaj in July 2019. The results, while fragmented, are considered to be a victory for the two largest opposition parties. The left-wing Self-Determination (Vet\u00ebvendosje) party placed first with 25.49% of votes, followed by the center-right Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) with 24.82%. \nVet\u00ebvendosje leader Albin Kurti has begun coalition talks with LDK\u2019s Vjosa Osmani, who led the party\u2019s election list. A Vet\u00ebvendosje-LDK government would hold a slim majority of the National Assembly\u2019s 120 seats (results are not yet finalized). \nAnalysts assess that corruption and economic conditions were among key voter concerns. The outgoing governing parties, often referred to as the war wing because their leaders battled against Serbian forces during the 1990s-era independence campaign, have long held sway in politics. Given their long tenure in office, many critics associate them with \u201cendemic government corruption\u201d and nepotism. High unemployment (about 30% overall and 50% among youth) and poverty also fueled voter dissatisfaction.\nVet\u00ebvendosje has never been in national government. The party grew out of a street movement critical of Kosovo\u2019s ruling political factions and the international community\u2019s administration of Kosovo following the retreat of Serbian forces in 1999. The party at times has been criticized for using violent tactics, taking an uncompromising position on negotiations with Serbia, and advocating Kosovo\u2019s eventual unification with neighboring Albania (a majority of Kosovo\u2019s population is ethnic Albanian). Vet\u00ebvendosje\u2019s supporters\u2014and Kurti himself\u2014contend that the party has since moderated and is prepared to lead a responsible, responsive government focused on economic and social reforms, as well as strengthening the rule of law. \nTest of Kosovo\u2019s Democracy\nSome viewed the election as a successful test of Kosovo\u2019s young democracy. The EU Election Observation Mission positively assessed the \u201cvibrant and competitive\u201d election, noting that it was \u201cwell administered and transparent.\u201d Other observers praised incumbent parties for accepting their losses, in particular the Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), which has been in all government coalitions since independence. \nBy contrast, many observers expressed concern over the election process in northern Kosovo, where ethnic Serbs form a majority. Serbia\u2019s influence there is considered to be strong and wielded in part through the Serbian List party. The EU mission described the campaign as \u201cmarred by intimidation\u201d against non-Serbian List candidates and an \u201cuneven playing field.\u201d Serbian List won overwhelmingly in the north and is expected to gain the 10 seats in the National Assembly reserved for ethnic Serbs. \nDialogue Outlook and U.S.-Kosovo Relations\nA Vet\u00ebvendosje-LDK government could affect the tenor and future of the dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia. Since its launch in 2011, the EU-facilitated dialogue has resulted in numerous technical agreements but thus far has fallen short of a permanent settlement resulting in Serbia\u2019s recognition of Kosovo. The dialogue has been suspended since November 2018, when Haradinaj\u2019s government imposed tariffs on Serbian imports in response to Serbia\u2019s ongoing campaign to undermine Kosovo\u2019s international legitimacy. Vet\u00ebvendosje has been critical of the dialogue in the past. In a postelection interview, party leader Kurti stated his intention to review existing agreements reached through the dialogue and said that he would not immediately lift tariffs. \nA Vet\u00ebvendosje-LDK government could revisit controversial developments in the dialogue. In 2018, Kosovo President Hashim Tha\u00e7i and Serbian President Aleksandar Vui raised the prospect of redrawing the Serbia-Kosovo border as an approach to normalizing relations (sometimes described as a land swap or border adjustment). Analysts believe such a proposal could entail transferring Serb-majority municipalities in northern Kosovo to Serbia. To the surprise of some, the Trump Administration signaled its willingness to consider such a proposal, breaking with long-standing U.S. and European opposition to redrawing borders in the Balkans. Germany and some other European countries remain opposed due to their concern that it could set a dangerous precedent and destabilize neighboring countries. Opposition parties in Kosovo, including Vet\u00ebvendosje, expressed opposition to any partition.\nKosovo considers the United States to be a crucial international partner. Nevertheless, bilateral relations grew somewhat strained when the Haradinaj government repeatedly spurned U.S. (and European) calls to lift the tariffs against Serbia. Some were dismayed by what they perceived as U.S. pressure on Kosovo to cede part of its territory to Serbia against the wishes of much of the population. \nU.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo appointed Deputy Assistant Secretary Matthew Palmer as Special Representative for the Western Balkans in August 2019, and President Trump named U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell as Special Envoy for the Serbia-Kosovo Dialogue in October. These appointments may signal the Administration\u2019s interest in a greater U.S. role in negotiations and its desire to reach a quick settlement between Kosovo and Serbia, whose unresolved dispute is considered to pose a risk to regional stability. \nCongressional interest in Kosovo, which dates back to Yugoslavia\u2019s disintegration, remains strong. Many Members support the EU-facilitated dialogue and have urged Kosovo and Serbia to resume talks during visits to both countries. Among countries in the Western Balkans, Kosovo receives the highest amount of U.S. foreign assistance. About $50 million was appropriated in FY2018. The Senate Appropriations Committee recommended a funding level of $38.5 million for Kosovo for FY2019 (S.Rept. 115-282 to S. 3108). The Administration requested $26.25 million for FY2020. Additional assistance is provided through a $49 million Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) Threshold Program launched in 2017, and the MCC Board recently selected Kosovo to participate in a compact.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11180", "sha1": "a00e4bbe694dc467588d3c954d16d43c0eaa513d", "filename": "files/20191016_IN11180_a00e4bbe694dc467588d3c954d16d43c0eaa513d.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11180", "sha1": "beb063aa82e39c65968dafaeb221eeed6925653e", "filename": "files/20191016_IN11180_beb063aa82e39c65968dafaeb221eeed6925653e.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "CRS Insights" ] }