{ "id": "IN11273", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN11273", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 621790, "date": "2020-04-03", "retrieved": "2020-04-03T22:21:11.020772", "title": "COVID-19: The Basics of Domestic Defense Response", "summary": "As the COVID-19 pandemic has unfolded, Congress has considered how the Department of Defense (DOD) might support the U.S. government\u2019s domestic response. Below are the funding, authorities, and descriptions of potential ways DOD might further contribute. Links in this product connect to more detailed information on the highlighted subjects.\nPresident Donald J. Trump declared a U.S. national emergency on March 13, 2020. On Friday, March 20, the Federal Emergency Management Agency assumed the lead agency role in the Coronavirus Task Force under the National Response Framework (NRF) for national emergencies. DOD participates in the national response within the NRF. For more information on the domestic and international health aspects of COVID-19, see CRS Report R46219, Overview of U.S. Domestic Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and CRS In Focus IF11421, COVID-19: Global Implications and Responses. \nDefense Funding\nThe Families First Coronavirus Response Act (P.L. 116-127) became law on March 18, 2020. Title II of Division A of the act included $82 million for the Defense Health Program to waive all TRICARE cost-sharing requirements related to COVID-19. \nThe Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act; P.L. 116-136) became law on March 27, 2020. Title III of Division B of the act includes $10.5 billion in emergency funding for DOD.\nOf the $10.5 billion, $4.9 billion (47%) is for the Defense Health Program (DHP), according to the bill text. The DHP funding includes $1.8 billion for patient care and procurement of medical and protective equipment; $1.6 billion to increase capacity in military treatment facilities; $1.1 billion for private-sector care; and $415 million to develop vaccines and to procure diagnostic tests, according to a summary released by the Senate Appropriations Committee. H.R. 748 also provides:\n$2.5 billion for the defense industrial base, including $1.5 billion in defense working capital funds and $1 billion in Defense Production Act purchases;\n$1.9 billion in operations and maintenance (O&M) funding for the Services, in part to support deployment of the hospital ships USNS COMFORT and USNS MERCY to ease civilian hospital demand by caring for non-COVID patients; and\n$1.2 billion in military personnel (MILPERS) funding for Army and Air National Guard personnel deployments.\nDefense Capabilities and Authorities\nDOD has capabilities that can directly support civil authorities in health emergency situations, including health and medical surveillance, research on diseases, treatment facilities, communications equipment, temporary lodging facilities and storage space, material-handling equipment, and logistics support. Installations approved for these purposes include Active and Reserve Component bases. This type of assistance is called Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA). For more on DSCA in the COVID response see CRS Insight IN11305, COVID-19: Defense Support of Civil Authorities, by Lawrence Kapp and Alan Ott and see CRS In Focus IF11483, The National Guard in the COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Framework for Action, by Alan Ott.\nIntegrating Defense Capabilities\nCurrently, legal authority for DOD involvement in domestic disasters is provided in the following statutes. \nThe Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is the statutory authority for disaster relief for both natural disasters and human-caused incidents. \nThe Economy Act permits federal agencies to order items from other federal agencies; agencies may request DOD support in situations other than those in the Stafford Act.\nThe Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits federal troops from search, seizure, and arrest. While under the control of a governor, however, National Guard personnel are not subject to the restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act.\nMilitary Support to Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies provisions (10 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7271-284) authorize certain types of military support to civilian law enforcement officials including use of military equipment and facilities, training and advising, maintenance and operation of equipment, support for counterdrug activities, and support for activities to counter transnational organized crime.\nDOD Directive 3025.18 is the DOD regulation governing defense support of civil authorities.\nReserve Component Activation\nOn March 22, the President authorized activation of National Guard personnel in hardest-hit states of New York, Washington, and California under Title 32 U.S.C. \u00a7502(f), which allows governors to control operations with pay and benefits provided by the federal government. The President could also order the National Guard and Reserves to federal active duty under Title 10; applicable authorities include\n10 U.S.C. 12302, Partial Mobilization.\n10 U.S.C. 12304a, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve: order to active duty to provide assistance in response to a major disaster or emergency.\nA state\u2019s governor can also activate its National Guard for full-time state duty (i.e., state active duty); in this status, pay and benefits are determined by state law. For more on Reserve Component activation, see CRS In Focus IF10540, Defense Primer: Reserve Forces.\nU.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)\nPer historical precedent, USACE involvement in rehabilitating or constructing facilities as part of a domestic disaster response under the National Response Framework would be funded through the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), not from DOD funds. In this situation, the federal lead for the disaster would assign a task to USACE and pay for the task through the DRF. Below is an excerpt from the NRF that describes the typical assignment for USACE\u2019s largely civilian staff.\n/\nDefense Production Act\nAs the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, the United States faces scarcities due to disrupted supply chains and increased demand for drugs and medical supplies. In response, the President may invoke emergency authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA; 50 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a74501 et seq.) to address economic impacts. He did so on March 18, 2020, through an executive order but has yet to give direction to the private sector under this authority. For more on the DPA, see CRS Insight IN11231, The Defense Production Act (DPA) and COVID-19: Key Authorities and Policy Considerations, and CRS Report R43767, The Defense Production Act of 1950: History, Authorities, and Considerations for Congress, by Michael H. Cecire and Heidi M. Peters.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11273", "sha1": "967dc815969db58c5d213860d9cfb00627cad617", "filename": "files/20200403_IN11273_967dc815969db58c5d213860d9cfb00627cad617.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN11273_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200403_IN11273_images_42d34b57706dc1c5dd67ac9cb9d63e80621348ab.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11273", "sha1": "baba3edeaab12495be0987b6e11facb79bd942e1", "filename": "files/20200403_IN11273_baba3edeaab12495be0987b6e11facb79bd942e1.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4778, "name": "Defense Budgets & Appropriations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4872, "name": "Military Personnel, Compensation, & Health Care" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 621155, "date": "2020-03-26", "retrieved": "2020-03-28T22:02:22.783041", "title": "COVID-19: The Basics of Domestic Defense Response", "summary": "As the COVID-19 pandemic has unfolded, Congress has considered how the Department of Defense (DOD) might support the U.S. government\u2019s domestic response. Below are the funding, authorities, and descriptions of potential ways DOD might further contribute. Links in this product connect to more detailed information on the highlighted subjects.\nPresident Donald J. Trump declared a U.S. national emergency on March 13, 2020. On Friday, March 20, the Federal Emergency Management Agency assumed the lead agency role in the Coronavirus Task Force under the National Response Framework (NRF) for national emergencies. DOD participates in the national response within the NRF. For more information on the domestic and international health aspects of COVID-19, see CRS Report R46219, Overview of U.S. Domestic Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and CRS In Focus IF11421, COVID-19: Global Implications and Responses. \nDefense Funding\nThe Families First Coronavirus Response Act (P.L. 116-127) became law on March 18, 2020. Title II of Division A of the act included $82 million for the Defense Health Program to waive all TRICARE cost-sharing requirements related to COVID-19. \nAs of March 26, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act; H.R. 748) is pending House consideration after Senate passage on March 25. Title III of Division B of the act includes $10.5 billion in emergency funding for DOD.\nOf the $10.5 billion, $4.9 billion (47%) is for the Defense Health Program (DHP), according to the bill text. The DHP funding includes $1.8 billion for patient care and procurement of medical and protective equipment; $1.6 billion to increase capacity in military treatment facilities; $1.1 billion for private-sector care; and $415 million to develop vaccines and to procure diagnostic tests, according to a summary released by the Senate Appropriations Committee. H.R. 748 also provides:\n$2.5 billion for the defense industrial base, including $1.5 billion in defense working capital funds and $1 billion in Defense Production Act purchases;\n$1.9 billion in operations and maintenance (O&M) funding for the Services, in part to support deployment of the hospital ships USNS COMFORT and USNS MERCY to ease civilian hospital demand by caring for non-COVID patients; and\n$1.2 billion in military personnel (MILPERS) funding for Army and Air National Guard personnel deployments.\nDefense Capabilities and Authorities\nDOD has capabilities that can directly support civil authorities in health emergency situations, including health and medical surveillance, research on diseases, treatment facilities, communications equipment, temporary lodging facilities and storage space, material-handling equipment, and logistics support. Installations approved for these purposes include Active and Reserve Component bases. This type of assistance is called Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA). For more on these capabilities, see CRS Report R43560, Deployable Federal Assets Supporting Domestic Disaster Response Operations: Summary and Considerations for Congress, coordinated by Jared T. Brown (PDF pages 36-40).\nIntegrating Defense Capabilities\nCurrently, legal authority for DOD involvement in domestic disasters is provided in the following statutes. \nThe Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is the statutory authority for disaster relief for both natural disasters and human-caused incidents. \nThe Economy Act permits federal agencies to order items from other federal agencies; agencies may request DOD support in situations other than those in the Stafford Act.\nThe Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits federal troops from search, seizure, and arrest. While under the control of a governor, however, National Guard personnel are not subject to the restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act.\nMilitary Support to Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies provisions (10 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7271-284) authorize certain types of military support to civilian law enforcement officials including use of military equipment and facilities, training and advising, maintenance and operation of equipment, support for counterdrug activities, and support for activities to counter transnational organized crime.\nDOD Directive 3025.18 is the DOD regulation governing defense support of civil authorities.\nReserve Component Activation\nOn March 22, the President authorized activation of National Guard personnel in hardest-hit states of New York, Washington, and California under Title 32 U.S.C. \u00a7502(f), which allows governors to control operations with pay and benefits provided by the federal government. The President could also order the National Guard and Reserves to federal active duty under Title 10; applicable authorities include\n10 U.S.C. 12302, Partial Mobilization.\n10 U.S.C. 12304a, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve: order to active duty to provide assistance in response to a major disaster or emergency.\nA state\u2019s governor can also activate its National Guard for full-time state duty (i.e., state active duty); in this status, pay and benefits are determined by state law. For more on Reserve Component activation, see CRS In Focus IF10540, Defense Primer: Reserve Forces.\nU.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)\nPer historical precedent, USACE involvement in rehabilitating or constructing facilities as part of a domestic disaster response under the National Response Framework would be funded through the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), not from DOD funds. In this situation, the federal lead for the disaster would assign a task to USACE and pay for the task through the DRF. Below is an excerpt from the NRF that describes the typical assignment for USACE\u2019s largely civilian staff.\n/\nDefense Production Act\nAs the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, the United States faces scarcities due to disrupted supply chains and increased demand for drugs and medical supplies. In response, the President may invoke emergency authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA; 50 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a74501 et seq.) to address economic impacts. He did so on March 18, 2020, through an executive order but has yet to give direction to the private sector under this authority. For more on the DPA, see CRS Insight IN11231, The Defense Production Act (DPA) and COVID-19: Key Authorities and Policy Considerations, and CRS Report R43767, The Defense Production Act of 1950: History, Authorities, and Considerations for Congress.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11273", "sha1": "f682cab1aaaa1110dcfd6a4913e8ac1d5651b68b", "filename": "files/20200326_IN11273_f682cab1aaaa1110dcfd6a4913e8ac1d5651b68b.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN11273_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200326_IN11273_images_42d34b57706dc1c5dd67ac9cb9d63e80621348ab.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11273", "sha1": "db7e2ffd2913413e2e9eb69fff137072c1c7e0dd", "filename": "files/20200326_IN11273_db7e2ffd2913413e2e9eb69fff137072c1c7e0dd.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4778, "name": "Defense Budgets & Appropriations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4872, "name": "Military Personnel, Compensation, & Health Care" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 620794, "date": "2020-03-19", "retrieved": "2020-03-25T22:20:07.531592", "title": "COVID-19: The Basics of Domestic Defense Response", "summary": "As the COVID-19 pandemic has unfolded, the Department of Defense (DOD) has been drawn steadily into an ever more direct supporting role in the U.S. government\u2019s domestic response. Below are the funding, authorities, and basic descriptions of foreseeable ways DOD might further contribute. Links in this product connect to more detailed information on the highlighted subjects within CRS products or web pages.\nThe World Health Organization (WHO) declared the global COVID-19 outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on January 30, raised its global risk assessment to \u201cVery High\u201d on February 28, and labeled the outbreak a \u201cpandemic\u201d on March 11. President Donald J. Trump declared a U.S. national emergency on March 13. For more information on the domestic and international health aspects of COVID-19, see CRS Report R46219, Overview of U.S. Domestic Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and CRS In Focus IF11421, COVID-19: Global Implications and Responses . \nOn Friday March 20, the Federal Emergency Management Agency assumed the lead agency role in President Trump\u2019s Coronavirus Task Force under the National Response Framework (NRF) for national emergencies. DOD participates in the national response to the crisis within the NRF. \nDefense Funding\nOn March 14, 2020, the House passed by a vote of 363-40 the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (P.L. 116-127), Title II of which included $82 million for the Defense Health Program to waive all TRICARE cost-sharing requirements related to COVID-19. On March 18, the Senate approved the bill by a vote of 90-8. President Trump signed the bill the same day.\nOn March 17, the Trump Administration delivered to Congress an FY2020 supplemental appropriations request for $45.8 billion to respond to the pandemic, including $8.3 billion in emergency funding for DOD. \nDOD proposed these Operation and Maintenance funds be allocated to its Emergency Response Fund account to: \nfacilitate changes in military personnel policy (e.g., return of dependents to the United States, changes to reassignments, cancelled training);\nexpedite access to rapid COVID-19 diagnostics;\nensure access to medical care;\naddress the impacts of the pandemic on logistics and supply chains; and\nbolster the overall national response.\nDefense Capabilities and Authorities\nDOD has capabilities that can directly support civil authorities in health emergency situations, including health and medical surveillance, research on diseases, treatment facilities, communications equipment, temporary lodging facilities and storage space, material-handling equipment, and logistics support. Installations approved for these purposes include Active and Reserve Component bases. This type of assistance is called Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA). For more on these capabilities, see CRS Report R43560, Deployable Federal Assets Supporting Domestic Disaster Response Operations: Summary and Considerations for Congress, coordinated by Jared T. Brown (PDF pages 36-40).\nIntegrating Defense Capabilities\nLegal authority for DOD involvement in domestic disasters is provided in the following statutes: \nThe Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is the statutory authority for disaster relief for both natural disasters and human-caused incidents. \nThe Economy Act provides authority for federal agencies to order goods or services from other federal agencies; it permits an agency to request DOD support in situations other than those outlined in the Stafford Act.\nThe Posse Comitatus Act generally prohibits federal troops from search, seizure, and arrest. While under the control of a governor, however, National Guard personnel are not subject to the restrictions of the Posse Comitatus Act.\nMilitary Support to Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies provisions (10 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a7271-284) authorize certain types of military support to civilian law enforcement officials including use of military equipment and facilities, training and advising, maintenance and operation of equipment, support for counterdrug activities, and support for activities to counter transnational organized crime.\nDOD Directive 3025.18 is the DOD regulation governing defense support of civil authorities.\nReserve Component Activation\nOn March 22, the President authorized activation of National Guard personnel in hardest hit states of New York, Washington, and California under Title 32 U.S.C \u00a7 502(f), under which governors control operations with pay and benefits provided by the federal government. The President could also order the National Guard and Reserves to federal active duty under Title 10; applicable authorities include\n10 U.S.C. 12302, Partial Mobilization; \n10 U.S.C. 12304, Presidential Reserve Call-up; and \n10 U.S.C. 12304a, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Air Force Reserve: order to active duty to provide assistance in response to a major disaster or emergency.\nA state\u2019s governor can also activate its National Guard for full time duty (i.e., state active duty); this may include federal pay and benefits. For more on Reserve Component activation, see CRS In Focus IF10540, Defense Primer: Reserve Forces.\nU.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)\nPer historical precedent, USACE involvement in rehabilitating or constructing facilities as part of a domestic disaster response under the National Response Framework would be funded through the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), not from DOD funds. In this situation, the federal lead for the disaster would assign a task to USACE and pay for the task through the DRF. Below is an excerpt from the NRF that describes the typical assignment for USACE\u2019s largely civilian staff.\n/\nDefense Production Act\nAs the COVID-19 pandemic evolves, the United States faces drug and medical supply scarcities due to disrupted supply chains and increased demand. In response, the President may invoke emergency authorities under the Defense Production Act of 1950 (DPA; 50 U.S.C. \u00a7\u00a74501 et seq.) to address economic impacts. He did so on March 18, 2020 through an executive order but has yet to give direction to the private sector under this authority. For more on the DPA, see CRS Insight IN11231, The Defense Production Act (DPA) and COVID-19: Key Authorities and Policy Considerations, and CRS Report R43767, The Defense Production Act of 1950: History, Authorities, and Considerations for Congress.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11273", "sha1": "7d682edd2cc8305f29a7e0221900de3bd2753f6b", "filename": "files/20200319_IN11273_7d682edd2cc8305f29a7e0221900de3bd2753f6b.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=IN/ASPX/IN11273_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200319_IN11273_images_42d34b57706dc1c5dd67ac9cb9d63e80621348ab.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/IN11273", "sha1": "6f8f5730ce9c6635cfb1bf2e4dfc203fa1313f35", "filename": "files/20200319_IN11273_6f8f5730ce9c6635cfb1bf2e4dfc203fa1313f35.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4778, "name": "Defense Budgets & Appropriations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4872, "name": "Military Personnel, Compensation, & Health Care" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "CRS Insights" ] }