{ "id": "IN11278", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "number": "IN11278", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 622650, "date": "2020-04-20", "retrieved": "2020-04-21T22:06:13.501818", "title": "Bank and Credit Union Regulators\u2019 Response to COVID-19", "summary": "Once it became clear that the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak would have serious financial ramifications, the federal agencies that regulate banks and credit unions\u2014the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) (collectively referred to as the bank regulators), and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)\u2014responded using existing authorities in two broad ways:\ntaking measures to encourage banks to work with customers affected by COVID-19; and\nmaking adjustments to bank regulation.\nThe regulators have also issued rulemakings pursuant to Sections 1102, 4003, and 4012 of the CARES Act. Those sections of the law are described in CRS Report R46301, Title IV Provisions of the CARES Act (P.L. 116-136); and in CRS Insight IN11341, SBA\u2019s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans and Self-Employed Individuals. In addition, the Federal Reserve has taken steps to provide liquidity to financial markets, examined in CRS Insight IN11327, Federal Reserve: Emergency Lending in Response to COVID-19.\nAssisting Affected Consumers\nRegulators\u2019 efforts to deal with the potential effects of COVID-19 began in early March with attempts to ensure that depository institutions were adequately planning for the potential risks. On March 6, 2020, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) updated its influenza pandemic guidance to minimize the potentially adverse effects of COVID-19. The guidance identifies business continuity plans as a key tool to address pandemics and provides a comprehensive framework to ensure the continuation of critical operations. \nIn the past month, regulators have shifted focus to providing guidance on how to address and serve customers affected by the virus. (For more on policy options for financial services companies responding to customers affected by COVID-19, see CRS Insight IN11244, COVID-19: The Financial Industry and Consumers Struggling to Pay Bills.)\nMarch 9, 2020: Banking regulators issued a joint statement to encourage depository institutions to meet the financial services needs of their customers and members in COVID-19-affected areas. \nMarch 13: The Federal Reserve, the OCC, and the FDIC issued guidance identifying ways to assist customers by waiving fees, offering repayment accommodations, extending payment due dates, increasing credit card limits, and increasing ATM withdrawal limits. \nMarch 19: Banking regulators issued a new statement encouraging depository institutions to continue working with affected customers and communities\u2014particularly those that are low- and moderate-income\u2014by providing favorable consideration for those activities pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA, 12 U.S.C. \u00a72901). \nMarch 22: Bank regulators and the NCUA issued an interagency statement to allow banks to provide certain modifications to loans without designating them as a troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). Under accounting principles, a TDR designation could have negative consequences for a bank\u2019s financial and regulatory reporting requirements. On April 7, the agencies issued a revised guidance that included information about Section 4013 of the CARES Act, which allows banks flexibility in accounting related to troubled debt restructurings.\nMarch 26: Banking regulators and the NCUA issued guidance encouraging banks to make responsible small-dollar loans.\nApril 3: Bank regulators and the NCUA issued guidance encouraging mortgage servicers to place consumers in short-term forbearance programs.\nRegulatory Adjustments\nBanks are subject to \u201csafety and soundness\u201d regulations, which include rules related to banks\u2019 capital and liquidity. Bank regulators also have the authority to supervise banks, which includes examinations and off-site monitoring. In response to COVID-19, bank regulators have made certain adjustments to banking regulation and supervision. In the following announcements and rulemakings, the regulators cited COVID-19 as a motivating factor.\nMarch 17, 2020: Bank regulators released a statement encouraging banks to use their capital and liquidity buffers to support continued lending. On March 19, the agencies released a clarification on the statement that included a Q&A document. These guidance documents remind banks that the purpose of the buffers is to ensure banks can keep lending during distressed times and encourage banks to continue lending prudently. On the same day, the Federal Reserve issued a statement encouraging banks that need liquidity to borrow from its discount window.\nMarch 20: Bank regulators issued a rule change on how capital is measured to make it easier for banks to comply with capital rules that can place restrictions on a bank\u2019s dividend payments and other capital distributions. On March 23, the Federal Reserve announced the new definition would also be applied to the total loss-absorbing capacity rules applied to the largest U.S. banks and U.S. operations of foreign banks. The rules require those banks to hold certain types and amounts of capital and debt.\nMarch 24: The Federal Reserve delayed the upcoming implementation of a rule that would change the methodology used to determine how much liquidity the U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations have through temporary overdrafts on their Federal Reserve accounts. The effective date was rescheduled from April 1 to October 1.\nMarch 24: The Federal Reserve announced adjustments to its supervisory activities and priorities in response to the uncertainties created by COVID-19. Broadly, the Federal Reserve is shifting focus away from examination in favor of monitoring in order to better understand \u201cthe challenges and risks that the current environment presents.\u201d\nMarch 25: Bank regulators granted banks an additional 30 days to file their required quarterly reports on condition and income. On March 26, the Federal Reserve granted a similar grace period to bank holding companies (BHCs) and their nonbank subsidiaries with less than $5 billion in assets.\nMarch 27: Bank regulators announced that banks could adopt a change in the accounting methodology for certain derivatives contracts early and certain banks could delay the effect on regulatory capital of another new accounting standard related to estimating future losses.\nMarch 31: The Federal Reserve delayed the implementation of a new framework for what factors determine \u201ccontrol\u201d of a company for the purposes of the Bank Holding Company Act and the Home Loan Act from April 1 to September 30.\nApril 1: The Federal Reserve relaxed the Supplementary Leverage Ratio rule that applies to the largest banking organization by exempting certain safe assets from the banks\u2019 exposure measure.\nApril 14: The regulators issued a rule to allow institutions to defer certain real estate appraisals for up to 120 days after closing of residential or commercial real estate loan transactions.", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11278", "sha1": "57b7a68c7dde5e02a040e2756957c79e5188955a", "filename": "files/20200420_IN11278_57b7a68c7dde5e02a040e2756957c79e5188955a.html", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4870, "name": "Banking" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 620946, "date": "2020-03-25", "retrieved": "2020-03-25T22:19:03.145597", "title": "Banking Regulators\u2019 Response to COVID-19", "summary": "Economic conditions have deteriorated rapidly in the past few weeks, as the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak has caused many businesses and public institutions to limit or close their operations. Policymakers are considering a range of programs and policy options to assist Americans facing increased financial hardship and those incurring time off work because of illness. \nOnce it became clear that the COVID-19 outbreak would have serious financial ramifications for households and businesses, the federal agencies that regulate banks and credit unions\u2014the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (collectively referred to as the bank regulators), and the National Credit Union Administration\u2014responded in two general ways as discussed in this Insight:\nmeasures to encourage banks to work with customers affected by COVID-19; and\nadjustments to bank regulation related to capital, liquidity, and supervision.\nAssisting Affected Consumers\nRegulators\u2019 efforts to deal with the potential effects of COVID-19 began in early March with attempts to ensure that depository institutions were adequately planning for the potential risks. On March 6, 2020, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) updated its influenza pandemic guidance to minimize the potentially adverse effects of COVID-19. The guidance identifies business continuity plans as a key tool to address pandemics and provides a comprehensive framework to ensure the continuation of critical operations. \nIn the past month, regulators have shifted focus to providing guidance on how to address and serve customers affected by the virus. (For more on policy options for financial services companies responding to customers affected by COVID-19, see CRS Insight IN11244, The Financial Industry and Consumers Struggling to Pay Bills during the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Outbreak, by Cheryl R. Cooper.) \nMarch 9, 2020: the banking regulators issued a joint statement to encourage depository institutions to meet the financial services needs of their customers and members in COVID-19-affected areas. \nMarch 13: each of the banking regulators issued guidance identifying efforts to work with customers by waiving fees, offering repayment accommodations, extending payment due dates, increasing credit card limits, and increasing ATM withdrawal limits. \nMarch 19, 2020: the banking regulators issued a new statement encouraging depository institutions to continue working with affected customers and communities\u2014particularly those that are low- and moderate-income\u2014by providing favorable consideration for those activities pursuant to the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). \nMarch 22, 2020: each of the banking regulators issued an interagency statement to allow banks to provide certain modifications to loans without designating them as a troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). Under accounting principles, a TDR designation could have negative consequences for a bank\u2019s financial and regulatory reporting requirements.\nRegulatory Adjustments\nBecause banks are vital to the economy\u2019s functioning, the government has created taxpayer-backed \u201csafety nets\u201d to prevent them from failing and to protect depositors. To reduce the likelihood that these safety nets need to be used, regulatory agencies have implemented \u201csafety and soundness\u201d regulations, which include rules related to banks\u2019 capital and liquidity. Bank regulators also have the authority to supervise banks, which includes examinations and off-site monitoring, to ensure they are well run and following these rules. In response to COVID-19, bank regulators have made certain adjustments to banking regulation and supervision. \nCapital allows a bank to withstand unanticipated losses, up to a point, without failing. Unlike liabilities, which place specific and inflexible payment obligations on a bank, the value of bank capital can be written down in the event of unexpected losses. To reduce the likelihood of bank failures, regulators require banks to hold certain minimum amounts of capital to absorb losses and liquid assets to meet obligations. The value and riskiness of a bank\u2019s assets and its size determines how much capital and liquidity it must hold. In addition, banks must hold certain amounts of capital over the minimums, called buffers, to avoid restrictions on capital distributions, such as dividends. Certain large banks also are required to hold liquidity buffers. Most banks elect to hold buffers in excess of any requirement to ensure they stay above minimums and distribution restriction thresholds in the event of an economic downturn.\nIf COVID-19 causes borrowers to miss payments\u2014which seems likely in light of the drastic reduction in economic activity\u2014it would cause banks to incur losses and draw down their capital. If at the same time, individuals and businesses are withdrawing savings, it could strain bank liquidity. This is why capital and liquidity requirements are in place; so that banks have enough cushion that they are likely to survive such events. However, as the buffers are depleted and capital levels get closer to minimums, banks could respond by making fewer or no new loans because those new assets would increase the amount of capital the bank had to hold. This in turn would decrease the amount of credit available in the economy, potentially hastening, deepening, or causing a recession. Bank regulators have taken steps to reduce the likelihood that occurs.\nAs part of a March 17 announcement, bank regulators released a statement encouraging banks to use their capital and liquidity buffers to support continued lending. On March 19, the agencies released a clarification on the buffer statement that included a Q&A document. These guidance documents remind banks that the purpose of the buffers is to ensure banks can keep lending during distressed times, note how much capital and liquidity are currently in the bank system, and encourage banks to continue lending prudently.\nBank regulators also issued a rule change to how capital is measured to make it easier for banks to comply with capital rules that can place restrictions on a bank\u2019s dividend payments and other capital distributions. Under this new rule, banks have an option to count more of their net income from the past year as \u201celigible retained earnings\u201d that count toward meeting capital requirements. On March 23, the Federal Reserve announced the new definition would also be applied to the total loss-absorbing capacity rules that the largest U.S. banks and U.S. operations of foreign banks face. The rules require those banks to hold certain types and amounts of capital and debt. On March 24, the Federal Reserve announced that it would delay the upcoming implementation of a rule that would change the methodology used to determine how much liquidity the U.S. operations of foreign banking organizations have through temporary overdrafts on their Federal Reserve accounts, citing changing priorities stemming from the pandemic. The effective date was rescheduled from April 1 to October 1. In addition, the Federal Reserve has encouraged banks that need liquidity to borrow from its discount window. Recent actions taken by the Federal Reserve to provide liquidity to financial markets in response to COVID-19 are covered in CRS Insight IN11259, Federal Reserve: Recent Actions in Response to COVID-19, by Marc Labonte.\nOn March 24, the Federal Reserve announced adjustments to its supervisory activities and priorities in response to the uncertainties created by COVID-19. Broadly, the Federal Reserve is shifting focus away from examination in favor of monitoring. It will cease all examinations of institutions with less than $100 billion, except in cases where there is \u201curgent need.\u201d Certain examination activities will be deferred at institutions with more than $100 million. The Federal Reserve\u2019s focus will instead shift to monitoring efforts to understand \u201cthe challenges and risks that the current environment presents.\u201d", "type": "CRS Insight", "typeId": "INSIGHTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/IN11278", "sha1": "a71cdc69ceffab7afbe4920c8c04afe407c88b96", "filename": "files/20200325_IN11278_a71cdc69ceffab7afbe4920c8c04afe407c88b96.html", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4870, "name": "Banking" } ] } ], "topics": [ "CRS Insights", "Economic Policy" ] }