{ "id": "R40119", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R40119", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 459211, "date": "2017-02-24", "retrieved": "2017-03-01T17:37:11.270408", "title": "Filling Advice and Consent Positions at the Outset of Recent Administrations, 1981-2009", "summary": "The length of the appointment processes during presidential transitions has been of concern to observers for more than 30 years. The process is likely to develop a bottleneck during this time due to the large number of candidates who must be selected, vetted, and, in the case of positions filled through appointment by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate (PAS positions), considered by that body.\nThe appointment process has three stages: selection and vetting, nomination and Senate consideration, and presidential appointment. Congress has taken steps to accelerate appointments during presidential transitions. In recent decades, Senate committees have provided for pre-nomination consideration of Cabinet-level nominations; examples of such actions are provided in this report. In addition, recently adopted statutory provisions appear designed to facilitate faster processing of appointments during presidential transitions. Among the new statutory provisions were those enacted by Congress in response to certain 9/11 Commission recommendations, mainly in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. Also part of this act was a sense of the Senate resolution stating that nominations to national security positions should be submitted by the President-elect to the Senate by Inauguration Day, and that Senate consideration of all such nominations should be completed within 30 days of submission.\nThe President has certain powers\u2014constitutional recess appointment authority and statutory authority under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998\u2014that he or she could, under certain circumstances, use unilaterally to fill PAS positions on a temporary basis.\nAnalyses of data related to Cabinet and selected subcabinet appointments during the last five transitions from 1981 through 2009 suggest the following: In general, transition-period Cabinet-level nominees were selected, vetted, considered, and confirmed expeditiously; they generally took office shortly after the new President\u2019s inauguration. Comparisons among the five transitions suggest that some Presidents announced their Cabinet-position selections sooner than did others, but that this did not appear to affect the pace of the overall appointment process. On average, the interval between election day and final disposition of nominations to selected subcabinet positions was more than twice as long as that of nominations to Cabinet-level positions, though nominees to subcabinet positions in some departments were faster than others. Comparisons among the median intervals for the five transitions suggest that (1) the time required for selection and vetting of nominees for these positions has grown longer; (2) the period of Senate consideration has also grown longer; (3) Senate consideration of nominations is generally faster than the selection and vetting process that precedes it; and (4) the median durations of the appointment process for the George H.W. Bush, Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama transitions were notably longer than for the Reagan transition.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R40119", "sha1": "670326d91c9525ca61194c9d536fd83ea023c007", "filename": "files/20170224_R40119_670326d91c9525ca61194c9d536fd83ea023c007.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R40119", "sha1": "e1e5f8c25663e2ba6dd884da9965bec2051eba32", "filename": "files/20170224_R40119_e1e5f8c25663e2ba6dd884da9965bec2051eba32.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4747, "name": "Senate Floor Procedure" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 412739, "date": "2010-04-01", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T22:19:09.808650", "title": "Filling Advice and Consent Positions at the Outset of a New Administration", "summary": "In its 2004 report, the 9/11 Commission identified what it perceived were shortcomings in the appointment process during presidential transitions. The report asserted that delays in filling top executive branch leadership positions, such as those experienced during the 2000-2001 transition, could compromise national security policymaking in the early months of a new Administration. Although the unique circumstances of the 2000 presidential race truncated the ensuing transition period, the commission\u2019s observations could be applied to other recent transitions; lengthy appointment processes during presidential transitions, particularly between those of different political parties, have been of concern to observers for more than 20 years. The process is likely to develop a bottleneck during this time, even under the best of circumstances, due to the large number of candidates who must be selected, vetted, and, in the case of positions filled through appointment by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate (PAS positions), considered by that body.\nThe appointment process has three stages: selection and vetting, Senate consideration, and presidential appointment. Congress has taken steps to accelerate appointments during presidential transitions. In recent decades, Senate committees have provided for pre-nomination consideration of Cabinet-level nominations; examples of such actions are provided in this report. In addition, recently adopted statutory provisions appear designed to facilitate faster processing of appointments during presidential transitions. Among the new statutory provisions were those enacted by Congress in response to 9/11 Commission recommendations, mainly in the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. Also part of this act was a sense of the Senate resolution stating that nominations to national security positions should be submitted by the President-elect to the Senate by Inauguration Day, and that Senate consideration of all such nominations should be completed within 30 days of submission.\nThe President has certain powers\u2014constitutional recess appointment authority and statutory authority under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998\u2014that he could, under certain circumstances, use unilaterally to fill PAS positions on a temporary basis.\nAnalyses of data related to Cabinet and selected subcabinet appointments during four recent party-turnover transitions suggest the following: In general, transition-period Cabinet-level nominees were selected, vetted, considered, and confirmed expeditiously; they generally took office shortly after the new President\u2019s inauguration. Comparisons among the four transitions suggest that some Presidents announced their Cabinet-position selections sooner than did others, but that this did not appear to affect the pace of the overall appointment process. On average, the interval between election day and final disposition of nominations to selected subcabinet positions was more than twice as long as that of nominations to Cabinet-level positions, though nominees to subcabinet positions in some departments were faster than others. Comparisons among the median intervals for the four transitions suggest that (1) the time required for selection and vetting of nominees for these positions has grown longer; (2) the period of Senate consideration has also grown longer; (3) Senate consideration of nominations is generally faster than the selection and vetting process that precedes it; and (4) the median durations of the appointment process for the Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama transitions were notably longer than for the Reagan transition.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R40119", "sha1": "0493f41b8bb2fdd1cb7872bed02fe357882e5ac9", "filename": "files/20100401_R40119_0493f41b8bb2fdd1cb7872bed02fe357882e5ac9.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R40119", "sha1": "155c95a7ad4ae0b5f2ca76afb3969dc4274626ae", "filename": "files/20100401_R40119_155c95a7ad4ae0b5f2ca76afb3969dc4274626ae.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "CongOpsList", "id": 4140, "name": "Senate Floor Proceedings" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818296/", "id": "R40119_2009Dec18", "date": "2009-12-18", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Filling Advice and Consent Positions at the Outset of a New Administration", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091218_R40119_6cbea9610d7af3090a5c0ba961f80231b74fd608.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091218_R40119_6cbea9610d7af3090a5c0ba961f80231b74fd608.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463507/", "id": "R40119_2008Dec18", "date": "2008-12-18", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Filling Advice and Consent Positions at the Outset of a New Administration", "summary": "In its 2004 report, the 9/11 Commission identified what it perceived were shortcomings in the appointment process during presidential transitions. This report examines the advice and consent appointment process during such transitional periods, including the selection and vetting of PAS positions, temporary staffing and differences in the length of the appointment process for cabinet members compared to sub-cabinet members.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081218_R40119_be258f7189924377101aa468370995bc61a97dc9.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081218_R40119_be258f7189924377101aa468370995bc61a97dc9.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidential appointments", "name": "Presidential appointments" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Advice and consent of the Senate", "name": "Advice and consent of the Senate" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Presidential transitions", "name": "Presidential transitions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive power", "name": "Executive power" } ] } ], "topics": [ "American Law", "Constitutional Questions", "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "Legislative Process", "National Defense" ] }