{ "id": "R40474", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R40474", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 388993, "date": "2011-04-26", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:55:57.800356", "title": "DC Gun Laws and Proposed Amendments", "summary": "In the wake of the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which declared three firearms provisions of the DC Code unconstitutional, a flurry of legislation was introduced both in Congress and in the District of Columbia Council. \nIn the 110th Congress, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 6842, the Second Amendment Enforcement Act. In the 111th Congress, similar provisions were incorporated as an amendment to the District of Columbia Voting Rights Act of 2009 (S. 160), which was passed by the Senate. Later, separate measures, which also would have overturned or loosened many of the District\u2019s gun provisions, were introduced in both the House of Representatives (H.R. 5162) and the Senate (S. 3265). Meanwhile, the District Council passed its own legislation that made permanent amendments to DC\u2019s firearms control regulations. The two bills from the District are the Firearms Control Amendment Act of 2008 and the Inoperable Pistol Amendment Act of 2008, which amended the DC Code in an effort to comply with the ruling in Heller as well as provide a different range of restrictions on firearm possession.\nIn the 112th Congress, Representative Mike Ross introduced H.R. 645, \u201cTo restore Second Amendment rights in the District of Columbia.\u201d This measure is identical to H.R. 5162 from the previous Congress. This report provides an analysis of the District\u2019s firearms laws and congressional proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R40474", "sha1": "0e0f0041c505d37ada48c4ad3bf2c86462c343fb", "filename": "files/20110426_R40474_0e0f0041c505d37ada48c4ad3bf2c86462c343fb.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R40474", "sha1": "11950ee8f63a04aa82dd8c7b5b993965dcba2c0a", "filename": "files/20110426_R40474_11950ee8f63a04aa82dd8c7b5b993965dcba2c0a.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491184/", "id": "R40474_2010Jun28", "date": "2010-06-28", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "D.C. Gun Laws and Proposed Amendments", "summary": "In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, which declared three firearms provisions of the D.C. Code unconstitutional, a flurry of legislation was introduced both in Congress and in the District of Columbia Council. This report provides an analysis of the District's firearms laws and congressional proposals.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100628_R40474_e387e2b7547b26f2a95eed29983935da0b1c80db.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100628_R40474_e387e2b7547b26f2a95eed29983935da0b1c80db.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Firearms", "name": "Firearms" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Firearms control", "name": "Firearms control" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Criminal justice", "name": "Criminal justice" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Government regulation", "name": "Government regulation" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Constitutional Questions" ] }