{ "id": "R41360", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "R", "number": "R41360", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "retrieved": "2022-08-11T04:03:31.303290", "id": "R41360_29_2022-07-15", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-07-15_R41360_9fbefad8ec8685d57634ee2387378a44b49b1ef7.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R41360/29", "sha1": "9fbefad8ec8685d57634ee2387378a44b49b1ef7" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-07-15_R41360_9fbefad8ec8685d57634ee2387378a44b49b1ef7.html" } ], "date": "2022-07-15", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "R", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R41360", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "retrieved": "2022-08-11T04:03:31.301853", "id": "R41360_27_2020-08-21", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-08-21_R41360_3a2dc5ca6cd5891c40566468a0b691ecb2b22a72.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R41360/27", "sha1": "3a2dc5ca6cd5891c40566468a0b691ecb2b22a72" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-08-21_R41360_3a2dc5ca6cd5891c40566468a0b691ecb2b22a72.html" } ], "date": "2020-08-21", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "R", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R41360", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 606561, "date": "2019-10-23", "retrieved": "2019-10-23T22:15:27.651842", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and has continued to be a point of contention during the 116th Congress. \nThese issues have been debated for over four decades in the context of a broader domestic abortion controversy that began with the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which holds that the Constitution protects a woman\u2019s decision to terminate her pregnancy. Since Roe, Congress has enacted foreign assistance legislation placing restrictions or requirements on the federal funding of abortions and on family planning activities abroad. Many of these provisions, often referred to by the name of the lawmakers that introduced them, have been included in foreign aid authorizations, appropriations, or both, and affect different types of foreign assistance. Examples include\nthe \u201cHelms amendment,\u201d which prohibits the use of U.S. funds to perform abortions or to coerce individuals to practice abortions;\nthe \u201cBiden amendment,\u201d which states that U.S. funds may not be used for biomedical research related to abortion or involuntary sterilization; \nthe \u201cSiljander amendment,\u201d which prohibits U.S. funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion; \nthe \u201cKemp-Kasten amendment,\u201d which prohibits funding for any organization or program that, as determined by the President, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization (the Trump Administration has withheld funding from UNFPA under this law); and \nthe \u201cTiahrt amendment,\u201d which places requirements on voluntary family planning projects receiving assistance from USAID.\nThe executive branch has also engaged in the debate over international abortion and family planning. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan issued what has become known as the \u201cMexico City policy,\u201d which required foreign nongovernmental organizations receiving USAID family planning assistance to certify that they would not perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, even if such activities were conducted with non-U.S. funds. The policy was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and reinstituted and expanded by President George W. Bush to include State Department activities. In January 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the policy. It was reinstated and expanded by President Trump in January 2017, and renamed \u201cProtecting Life in Global Health Assistance\u201d (PLGHA). \nThis report focuses primarily on legislative restrictions and executive branch policies related to international abortion and family planning. For information on domestic abortion laws and U.S. global health assistance, including international family planning, see\nCRS Report RL33467, Abortion: Judicial History and Legislative Response, by Jon O. Shimabukuro; \nCRS In Focus IF10131, U.S. Global Health Assistance: FY2017-FY2020 Request, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther; and \nCRS In Focus IF11013, Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther and Sara M. Tharakan. \nThis report is updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41360", "sha1": "433a1058f7c59d91eb3c84440006610f5d097817", "filename": "files/20191023_R41360_433a1058f7c59d91eb3c84440006610f5d097817.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41360", "sha1": "dad854b379bed7868b77cc50c34cc403d8f0bccb", "filename": "files/20191023_R41360_dad854b379bed7868b77cc50c34cc403d8f0bccb.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4848, "name": "Abortion & Family Planning Services" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 585135, "date": "2018-09-12", "retrieved": "2019-04-18T13:46:07.683551", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and has continued to be a point of contention during the 115th Congress. \nThese issues have been debated for over four decades in the context of a broader domestic abortion controversy that began with the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which holds that the Constitution protects a woman\u2019s decision to terminate her pregnancy. Since Roe, Congress has enacted foreign assistance legislation placing restrictions or requirements on the federal funding of abortions and on family planning activities abroad. Many of these provisions, often referred to by the name of the lawmakers that introduced them, have been included in foreign aid authorizations, appropriations, or both, and affect different types of foreign assistance. Examples include\nthe \u201cHelms amendment,\u201d which prohibits the use of U.S. funds to perform abortions or to coerce individuals to practice abortions;\nthe \u201cBiden amendment,\u201d which states that U.S. funds may not be used for biomedical research related to abortion or involuntary sterilization; \nthe \u201cSiljander amendment,\u201d which prohibits U.S. funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion; \nthe \u201cKemp-Kasten amendment,\u201d which prohibits funding for any organization or program that, as determined by the President, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization (the Trump Administration has withheld funding from UNFPA under this law); and \nthe \u201cTiahrt amendment,\u201d which places requirements on voluntary family planning projects receiving assistance from USAID.\nThe executive branch has also engaged in the debate over international abortion and family planning. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan issued what has become known as the \u201cMexico City policy,\u201d which required foreign nongovernmental organizations receiving USAID family planning assistance to certify that they would not perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, even if such activities were conducted with non-U.S. funds. The policy was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and reinstituted and expanded by President George W. Bush to include State Department activities. In January 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the policy. It was reinstated and expanded by President Trump in January 2017, and renamed \u201cProtecting Life in Global Health Assistance\u201d (PLGHA). \nThis report focuses primarily on legislative restrictions and executive branch policies related to international abortion and family planning. For information on domestic abortion laws and U.S. global health assistance, including international family planning, see\nCRS Report RL33467, Abortion: Judicial History and Legislative Response, by Jon O. Shimabukuro, and \nCRS In Focus IF10131, U.S. Global Health Assistance: FY2017-FY2019 Request, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. \nThis report is updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41360", "sha1": "0c496f4cd9afeb170aff19c7f43c9f72202bf109", "filename": "files/20180912_R41360_0c496f4cd9afeb170aff19c7f43c9f72202bf109.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41360", "sha1": "710f93eea1d27b7aca9d53fcf5eaaa2ed5ca5ff7", "filename": "files/20180912_R41360_710f93eea1d27b7aca9d53fcf5eaaa2ed5ca5ff7.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4848, "name": "Abortion & Family Planning Services" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 579935, "date": "2018-04-05", "retrieved": "2018-04-10T13:20:10.215109", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and has continued to be a point of contention during the 115th Congress. \nThese issues have been debated for over four decades in the context of a broader domestic abortion controversy that began with the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which holds that the Constitution protects a woman\u2019s decision to terminate her pregnancy. Since Roe, Congress has enacted foreign assistance legislation placing restrictions or requirements on the federal funding of abortions and on family planning activities abroad. Many of these provisions, often referred to by the name of the lawmakers that introduced them, have been included in foreign aid authorizations, appropriations, or both, and affect different types of foreign assistance. Examples include\nthe \u201cHelms amendment,\u201d which prohibits the use of U.S. funds to perform abortions or to coerce individuals to practice abortions;\nthe \u201cBiden amendment,\u201d which states that U.S. funds may not be used for biomedical research related to abortion or involuntary sterilization; \nthe \u201cSiljander amendment,\u201d which prohibits U.S. funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion; \nthe \u201cKemp-Kasten amendment,\u201d which prohibits funding for any organization or program that, as determined by the President, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization (the Trump Administration has withheld funding from UNFPA under this law); and \nthe \u201cTiahrt amendment,\u201d which places requirements on voluntary family planning projects receiving assistance from USAID.\nThe executive branch has also engaged in the debate over international abortion and family planning. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan issued what has become known as the \u201cMexico City policy,\u201d which required foreign nongovernmental organizations receiving USAID family planning assistance to certify that they would not perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, even if such activities were conducted with non-U.S. funds. The policy was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and reinstituted and expanded by President George W. Bush to include State Department activities. In January 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the policy. It was reinstated and expanded by President Trump in January 2017. \nThis report focuses primarily on legislative restrictions and executive branch policies related to international abortion and family planning. For information on domestic abortion laws and U.S. global health assistance, including international family planning, see\nCRS Report RL33467, Abortion: Judicial History and Legislative Response, by Jon O. Shimabukuro, and \nCRS In Focus IF10131, U.S. Global Health Assistance: FY2017-FY2019 Request, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. \nThis report is updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41360", "sha1": "e4cf248d40eb76c18e88c6294f88c6a1d8305daf", "filename": "files/20180405_R41360_e4cf248d40eb76c18e88c6294f88c6a1d8305daf.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41360", "sha1": "512f1fa1d6b13ec725d48fea02de22f5d194aba9", "filename": "files/20180405_R41360_512f1fa1d6b13ec725d48fea02de22f5d194aba9.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4848, "name": "Abortion & Family Planning Services" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 458464, "date": "2017-01-24", "retrieved": "2017-02-03T19:13:44.670152", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the 115th Congress. \nThese issues have been debated for over four decades in the context of a broader domestic abortion controversy that began with the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which holds that the Constitution protects a woman\u2019s decision to terminate her pregnancy. Since Roe, Congress has enacted foreign assistance legislation placing restrictions or requirements on the federal funding of abortions and on family planning activities abroad. Many of these provisions, often referred to by the name of the lawmakers that introduced them, have been included in foreign aid authorizations, appropriations, or both, and affect different types of foreign assistance. Examples include\nthe \u201cHelms amendment,\u201d which prohibits the use of U.S. funds to perform abortions or to coerce individuals to practice abortions;\nthe \u201cBiden amendment,\u201d which states that U.S. funds may not be used for biomedical research related to abortion or involuntary sterilization; \nthe \u201cSiljander amendment,\u201d which prohibits U.S. funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion; \nthe \u201cKemp-Kasten amendment,\u201d which prohibits funding for any organization or program that, as determined by the President, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization; and \nthe \u201cTiahrt amendment,\u201d which places requirements on voluntary family planning projects receiving assistance from USAID.\nThe executive branch has also engaged in the debate over international abortion and family planning. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan issued what has become known as the \u201cMexico City policy,\u201d which required foreign non-governmental organizations receiving USAID family planning assistance to certify that they would not perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, even if such activities were conducted with non-U.S. funds. The policy was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and reinstituted and expanded by President George W. Bush to include State Department activities. In January 2009, President Barack Obama rescinded the policy. It was reinstated by President Trump on January 23, 2017. \nThis report focuses primarily on legislative restrictions and executive branch policies related to international abortion and family planning. For information on domestic abortion laws and international population assistance, including funding levels and U.S. programs, see\nCRS Report RL33467, Abortion: Judicial History and Legislative Response, by Jon O. Shimabukuro, and \nCRS Report RL33250, U.S. International Family Planning Programs: Issues for Congress, by Luisa Blanchfield.\nThis report is updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41360", "sha1": "0b8bbc4f4065ce69decd2a00ab6ba88918edb161", "filename": "files/20170124_R41360_0b8bbc4f4065ce69decd2a00ab6ba88918edb161.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41360", "sha1": "b6877de1528c20f9c9e13a37268d7f7be17ed4c0", "filename": "files/20170124_R41360_b6877de1528c20f9c9e13a37268d7f7be17ed4c0.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4848, "name": "Abortion & Family Planning Services" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 452619, "date": "2016-05-17", "retrieved": "2016-05-24T19:06:45.117941", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the 114th Congress. \nThese issues have been debated for over four decades in the context of a broader domestic abortion controversy that began with the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which holds that the Constitution protects a woman\u2019s decision to terminate her pregnancy. Since Roe, Congress has enacted foreign assistance legislation placing restrictions or requirements on the federal funding of abortions and on family planning activities abroad. Many of these provisions, often referred to by the name of the lawmakers that introduced them, have been included in foreign aid authorizations, appropriations, or both, and affect different types of foreign assistance. Examples include\nthe \u201cHelms amendment,\u201d which prohibits the use of U.S. funds to perform abortions or to coerce individuals to practice abortions;\nthe \u201cBiden amendment,\u201d which states that U.S. funds may not be used for biomedical research related to abortion or involuntary sterilization; \nthe \u201cSiljander amendment,\u201d which prohibits U.S. funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion; \nthe \u201cKemp-Kasten amendment,\u201d which prohibits funding for any organization or program that, as determined by the President, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization; and \nthe \u201cTiahrt amendment,\u201d which places requirements on voluntary family planning projects receiving assistance from USAID.\nThe executive branch has also engaged in the debate over international abortion and family planning. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan issued what has become known as the \u201cMexico City policy,\u201d which required foreign non-governmental organizations receiving USAID family planning assistance to certify that they would not perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, even if such activities were conducted with non-U.S. funds. The policy was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and reinstituted by President George W. Bush. It was rescinded by President Barack Obama in January 2009 and remains a controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance.\nThis report focuses primarily on legislative restrictions and executive branch policies related to international abortion and family planning. For information on domestic abortion laws and international population assistance, including funding levels and U.S. programs, see\nCRS Report RL33467, Abortion: Judicial History and Legislative Response, by Jon O. Shimabukuro, and \nCRS Report RL33250, U.S. International Family Planning Programs: Issues for Congress, by Luisa Blanchfield.\nThis report is updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41360", "sha1": "34c3efa89f77fcc89611245e84e36b949617b305", "filename": "files/20160517_R41360_34c3efa89f77fcc89611245e84e36b949617b305.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41360", "sha1": "3dcc264e0345bdf7eb0e85e3396d03ae93ee54b1", "filename": "files/20160517_R41360_3dcc264e0345bdf7eb0e85e3396d03ae93ee54b1.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3178, "name": "Abortion, Family Planning, and Reproductive Health" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3241, "name": "Global Health, Human Rights, and Humanitarian Policy" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3467, "name": "Foreign Aid" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 443042, "date": "2015-07-15", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T18:47:33.297126", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the second session of the 114th Congress. \nThese issues have been debated for over four decades in the context of a broader domestic abortion controversy that began with the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade, which holds that the Constitution protects a woman\u2019s decision to terminate her pregnancy. Since Roe, Congress has enacted foreign assistance legislation placing restrictions or requirements on the federal funding of abortions and on family planning activities abroad. Many of these provisions, often referred to by the name of the lawmakers that introduced them, have been included in foreign aid authorizations, appropriations, or both, and affect different types of foreign assistance. Examples include\nthe \u201cHelms amendment,\u201d which prohibits the use of U.S. funds to perform abortions or to coerce individuals to practice abortions;\nthe \u201cBiden amendment,\u201d which states that U.S. funds may not be used for biomedical research related to abortion or involuntary sterilization; \nthe \u201cSiljander amendment,\u201d which prohibits U.S. funds from being used to lobby for or against abortion; \nthe \u201cKemp-Kasten amendment,\u201d which prohibits funding for any organization or program that, as determined by the President, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization; and \nthe \u201cTiahrt amendment,\u201d which places requirements on voluntary family planning projects receiving assistance from USAID.\nThe executive branch has also engaged in the debate over international abortion and family planning. In 1984, President Ronald Reagan issued what has become known as the \u201cMexico City policy,\u201d which required foreign non-governmental organizations receiving USAID family planning assistance to certify that they would not perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning, even if such activities were conducted with non-U.S. funds. The policy was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and reinstituted by President George W. Bush. It was rescinded by President Barack Obama in January 2009 and remains a controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance.\nThis report focuses primarily on legislative restrictions and executive branch policies related to international abortion and family planning. For information on domestic abortion laws and international population assistance, including funding levels and U.S. programs, see\nCRS Report RL33467, Abortion: Judicial History and Legislative Response, by Jon O. Shimabukuro, and \nCRS Report RL33250, U.S. International Family Planning Programs: Issues for Congress, by Luisa Blanchfield.\nThis report is updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41360", "sha1": "e5c0f7b862ba3c27e0b631ab7a41a8bf69cf642f", "filename": "files/20150715_R41360_e5c0f7b862ba3c27e0b631ab7a41a8bf69cf642f.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41360", "sha1": "2166b2702776e5e701978ef59397387d6c467a8b", "filename": "files/20150715_R41360_2166b2702776e5e701978ef59397387d6c467a8b.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3178, "name": "Abortion, Family Planning, and Reproductive Health" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3241, "name": "Global Health, Human Rights, and Humanitarian Policy" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3467, "name": "Foreign Aid" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc700584/", "id": "R41360_2015Jul15", "date": "2015-07-05", "retrieved": "2015-08-27T16:20:31", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the second session of the 114th Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150705_R41360_51760670278bd5ff063d9b7730d6885348b9bdf5.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150705_R41360_51760670278bd5ff063d9b7730d6885348b9bdf5.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Abortion", "name": "Abortion" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Birth control", "name": "Birth control" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign aid", "name": "Foreign aid" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810103/", "id": "R41360_2014Jan31", "date": "2014-01-31", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140131_R41360_67b7719ae43ab7e5d4ccffbdc218471b7f631e1d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140131_R41360_67b7719ae43ab7e5d4ccffbdc218471b7f631e1d.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462999/", "id": "R41360_2013Feb12", "date": "2013-02-12", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Law and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the 113th Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130212_R41360_f46a2b4414dcb02fdd24d6210b81f6c45b007a01.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130212_R41360_f46a2b4414dcb02fdd24d6210b81f6c45b007a01.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Abortion", "name": "Abortion" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Birth control", "name": "Birth control" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign aid", "name": "Foreign aid" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491350/", "id": "R41360_2010Dec01", "date": "2010-12-01", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Legislation and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the 112th Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20101201_R41360_da0ce60993629818d6c33c3fb04e69bf5849714d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20101201_R41360_da0ce60993629818d6c33c3fb04e69bf5849714d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Abortion", "name": "Abortion" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Abortion policy", "name": "Abortion policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign aid", "name": "Foreign aid" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc490872/", "id": "R41360_2010Aug06", "date": "2010-08-06", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Abortion and Family Planning-Related Provisions in U.S. Foreign Assistance Legislation and Policy", "summary": "This report details legislation and policies that restrict or place requirements on U.S. funding of abortion or family planning activities abroad. The level and extent of federal funding for these activities is an ongoing and controversial issue in U.S. foreign assistance and will likely continue to be a point of contention during the 111th Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100806_R41360_e6b6caf17b65ef0fe8be24bf37e7633fef0d0ac5.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100806_R41360_e6b6caf17b65ef0fe8be24bf37e7633fef0d0ac5.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Abortion", "name": "Abortion" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Birth control", "name": "Birth control" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign aid", "name": "Foreign aid" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security" ] }