{ "id": "R41592", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R41592", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 402182, "date": "2012-02-15", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:15:26.732273", "title": "The U.S. Foreign-Born Population: Trends and Selected Characteristics", "summary": "This report offers context for consideration of immigration policy options by presenting data on key geographic, demographic, social, and economic characteristics of the foreign-born population residing in the United States. Interest in the U.S. foreign-born population stems in part from the changing demographic profile of the United States as well as the rapidity of such change, and how both of these trends correspond to U.S. immigration policy. Although the foreign born are relatively small in absolute terms\u201439.9 million people representing 12.9% of the total U.S. population of 309.3 million in 2010\u2014they are growing far more rapidly than the native-born population. Between 2000 and 2010, the foreign born contributed 32% of the total U.S. population increase and almost all of the prime 25-54 working age group increase. Almost one-third of the foreign born arrived in the United States since 2000, and an estimated 28% were residing illegally in the United States in 2010. \nGeographic origins of the foreign born have shifted from Europe (74% in 1960) to Latin America and Asia (81% in 2010). In recent years, many foreign born have settled in new urban and rural destinations, often in response to employment opportunities in construction, manufacturing, and low-skilled services. Yet, as in previous decades, at least two-thirds of the foreign born remain concentrated in just six states: California, New York, Florida, Texas, Illinois, and New Jersey. \nSeveral measures of marital status and household structure show little difference between the native born and foreign born. The foreign born have lower average educational attainment, but the proportion with at least a bachelor\u2019s degree matches that of the native born.\nIn 2010, the foreign born accounted for 16.3% of all workers, with higher labor force participation rates among men and lower rates among women compared to native-born workers. With exceptions, native and foreign-born workers generally resemble each other in their distribution across broad industrial and occupational sectors. Among specific occupations, however, glaring differences occur, with native-born workers dominating occupations such as construction inspectors and librarians, and foreign-born workers dominating occupations such as agricultural laborers and tailors.\nLower education levels and differences in industrial sector and occupational distributions explain in part why foreign-born workers have lower median incomes and higher poverty rates than native-born workers. Earnings differences are minimal for those with a four-year college degree. Among the foreign born, median incomes of naturalized citizens are 62% higher than those of noncitizens, reflecting higher education levels, older ages, and greater U.S. labor market experience. Poverty status is linked to the lack of citizenship, a difference that is magnified after including the \u201cnear-poor,\u201d who earn between 100% and 200% of the poverty threshold. \nAlthough foreign-born population growth and transformation often occur because of factors beyond the control of Congress\u2014including political turmoil and natural disasters in neighboring countries and social and economic processes of globalization\u2014how Congress crafts immigration law does influence the size and character of resulting immigration flows to the United States.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41592", "sha1": "017008e5c1c845febde596213f43886d315e0496", "filename": "files/20120215_R41592_017008e5c1c845febde596213f43886d315e0496.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41592", "sha1": "00db4678b1fc8632e8eb553f352d3b9fe025ce95", "filename": "files/20120215_R41592_00db4678b1fc8632e8eb553f352d3b9fe025ce95.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491245/", "id": "R41592_2011Jan18", "date": "2011-01-18", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "The U.S. Foreign-Born Population: Trends and Selected Characteristics", "summary": "This report offers context for consideration of immigration policy options by presenting data on key geographic, demographic, social, and economic characteristics of the foreign-born population residing in the United States. Interest in the U.S. foreign-born population stems in part from the changing demographic profile of the United States as well as the rapidity of such change, and how both of these trends correspond to U.S. immigration policy.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110118_R41592_4092734ca4dc8df0c86b5d16d5f3a91f8b1ea726.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110118_R41592_4092734ca4dc8df0c86b5d16d5f3a91f8b1ea726.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immigration", "name": "Immigration" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Immigration policy", "name": "Immigration policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Demography", "name": "Demography" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy", "Health Policy", "Immigration Policy" ] }