{ "id": "R41803", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R41803", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 388392, "date": "2011-05-31", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T00:48:30.804660", "title": "Interagency Collaborative Arrangements and Activities: Types, Rationales, Considerations ", "summary": "Interagency collaboration among federal agencies with overlapping jurisdictions and shared responsibilities is not a new phenomenon. Attempts to foster cooperation among agencies, reduce their number in particular policy areas, or clarify the division of labor among them date to the early days of the republic. Such arrangements are increasing in the contemporary era in number, prominence, and proposals across virtually all policy areas. The reasons for the current upsurge are the growth in government responsibilities, cross-cutting programs, and their complexity; certain crises which showed severe limitations of existing structures; and heightened pressure to reduce the size of federal programs and expenditures.\nRecent congressional action reflects these considerations. In 2010, Congress directed the Government Accountability Office (GAO) (P.L. 111-139, 124 Stat. 29) to\nconduct routine investigations to identify programs, agencies, offices, and initiatives with duplicative goals and activities within Departments and governmentwide and report annually to Congress on the findings, including the cost of such duplication.\nGAO identified 34 such programs. The GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-352) provides that the Office of Management and Budget\u2019s government-wide priority goals include \u201coutcome-oriented goals covering a limited number of crosscutting policy areas.\u201d Legislative initiatives in the 112th Congress have also advanced across-the-board reviews (e.g., H.R. 155) or recognize shared jurisdictions and responsibilities among agencies. And House Rules for the 112th Congress call on its standing committees to include proposals in their oversight plans to eliminate \u201cprograms that are inefficient, duplicative, outdated, or more appropriately administered by State or local governments.\u201d President Barack Obama has taken similar stands regarding overlapping programs\u2014in his 2011 State of the Union Address, subsequent memoranda, and recent budget requests\u2014and the executive has continued ongoing arrangements or added new ones.\nThe broad concept of interagency collaboration contains at least six types of various activities and arrangements: collaboration (an exchange among relatively equal entities or peers, separate from collaboration\u2019s broad use), coordination, mergers, integration, networks, and partnerships. These categories often overlap with, supplement, or reinforce one another; and several different types may occur in the same organizational structure and endeavor. Complicating matters, the different types are not defined in public laws or executive directives, even though required in some. Because of this and other reasons, the terms have sometimes lacked consistency and precision, have been used interchangeably, or have been applied to more than one category.\nNonetheless, working definitions can be developed for the different types. All of these are surrounded by a number of rationales, intended to enhance collaboration, improve coordination, or clarify responsibilities and jurisdictions among agencies. The underlying objectives and expectations range from reducing policy fragmentation and mitigating competition among agencies, to enhancing efficiency and effectiveness, changing organizational and administrative cultures, and streamlining and improving congressional and executive oversight. Despite these appeals, concerns and questions have arisen over some of the rationales and their underlying assumptions as well as determining the success or failure of interagency efforts. This report\u2014which will be updated as conditions dictate\u2014examines the burgeoning field of interagency collaboration and presents a bibliography at the end, highlighting the broad subject as well as specific areas.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R41803", "sha1": "c093b5396e63f1caa15cc380a8d1c6609bfb4c75", "filename": "files/20110531_R41803_c093b5396e63f1caa15cc380a8d1c6609bfb4c75.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R41803", "sha1": "0a5b95d07a37283f393eae267a22993d8886df37", "filename": "files/20110531_R41803_0a5b95d07a37283f393eae267a22993d8886df37.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40148/", "id": "R41803_2011May17", "date": "2011-05-17", "retrieved": "2011-08-27T10:13:38", "title": "Interagency Collaborative Arrangements and Activities: Types, Rationales, Considerations", "summary": "This report examines formal interagency collaborative arrangements and activities, which are intended to enhance joint efforts and cooperation among independent federal agencies with shared responsibilities and overlapping jurisdictions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110517_R41803_929e608a0a4464ec30becf9cf3922a4169ff3569.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110517_R41803_929e608a0a4464ec30becf9cf3922a4169ff3569.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Federal agencies", "name": "Federal agencies" }, { "source": "KWD", "id": "Interagency collaboration", "name": "Interagency collaboration" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc40147/", "id": "R41803_2011May9", "date": "2011-05-09", "retrieved": "2011-08-27T10:13:38", "title": "Interagency Collaborative Arrangements and Activities: Types, Rationales, Considerations", "summary": "This report examines formal interagency collaborative arrangements and activities, which are intended to enhance joint efforts and cooperation among independent federal agencies with shared responsibilities and overlapping jurisdictions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110509_R41803_fd21338613ce2f8cc7f5148f75adf0ba773c4071.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110509_R41803_fd21338613ce2f8cc7f5148f75adf0ba773c4071.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Federal agencies", "name": "Federal agencies" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive departments", "name": "Executive departments" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Jurisdiction", "name": "Jurisdiction" }, { "source": "KWD", "id": "independent federal agencies", "name": "independent federal agencies" } ] } ], "topics": [ "American Law", "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }