{
  "id": "R42387",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R42387",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 402346,
      "date": "2012-03-02",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T21:50:54.057092",
      "title": "Mandatory Minimum Sentencing for Federal Sex Offenses: An Abridged Overview",
      "summary": "Sex offenses are usually state crimes. Federal law, however, outlaws sex offenses when they occur on federal lands or in federal prisons, when they involve interstate or foreign travel, or when they involve child pornography whose production or distribution is associated in some way with interstate or foreign commerce. Mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment attend conviction for any of several of these federal sex crimes. \nThe most severe mandatory minimum sentences have been reserved for aggravated sexual assaults committed in federal enclaves or federal prisons, for sex offenses resulting in death, and for sex crimes committed against children by repeat offenders.\nTwo-thirds of the federal trial judges responding to a U.S. Sentencing Commission survey questioned the severity of the mandatory minimum penalties required for receipt of child pornography (5 years; 15 years for repeat offenders). The Commission\u2019s report suggested that as a preliminary matter the perception may lead to inconsistent sentencing in child pornography cases. It explained that more study would be required before it could make any specific recommendations concerning mandatory minimum sentencing in sex offenses.\nThe constitutional authority to enact federal sex offense punishable by mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment is not unlimited. The ex post facto and double jeopardy clauses; the Fifth Amendment\u2019s equal protection component; the Eighth Amendment\u2019s cruel and unusual punishment clause; the separation of powers and the reservation of powers principles\u2014all establish boundaries that must be honored. Nevertheless, few defendants have successfully challenged the constitutionality of a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment imposed following their conviction for a federal sex offense. \nThis report is an abridged version of CRS Report R42386, Mandatory Minimum Sentencing for Federal Sex Offenses: An Overview, without the footnotes or citations to authority found here.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R42387",
          "sha1": "49483496baebf6d5c55157b4544e98542e57fd04",
          "filename": "files/20120302_R42387_49483496baebf6d5c55157b4544e98542e57fd04.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R42387",
          "sha1": "a0ca6aa2f97372d4812d4b71642f9a2a09baad25",
          "filename": "files/20120302_R42387_a0ca6aa2f97372d4812d4b71642f9a2a09baad25.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Constitutional Questions"
  ]
}