{ "id": "R42930", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R42930", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 431207, "date": "2014-05-14", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T20:25:27.431481", "title": "Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: Issues for Congress", "summary": "Rising tensions stemming from maritime territorial disputes in East Asia have become a pressing challenge for U.S. policy makers, and pose one of the most complicated issues for the Obama Administration\u2019s policy of strategic \u201crebalancing\u201d towards the Asia-Pacific.\nSince around 2005-2006, long-disputed waters and land features in the South China Sea and, more recently, the East China Sea have seen increasingly aggressive behavior from nations trying to strengthen claims to disputed areas. Although China is not the only nation that has sought to press its maritime territorial claims, actions taken by People\u2019s Republic of China (PRC) actors, including its maritime law enforcement authorities and the People\u2019s Liberation Army (PLA), have been a particular concern. Chinese maritime authorities have taken actions include harassing vessels, destroying equipment, and blockading islets and shoals. Observers are concerned that the increasing frequency of such events raises the possibility of miscalculations that could lead to overt conflict at sea.\nIn the South China Sea, the PRC makes extensive claims, including marking on its maps an ambiguous \u201cnine dash line\u201d that covers approximately 80% of the sea, including the Spratly and Paracel island groups and other features such as Scarborough Shoal. These claims overlap with those of four Southeast Asian nations\u2014Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Vietnam, which themselves have claims that conflict with each other. Taiwan also makes extensive claims mirroring those of the PRC.\nIn the East China Sea, China, Japan, and Taiwan all claim a Japan-administered island group that Japan calls the Senkakus, China the Diaoyu Islands, and Taiwan the Diaoyutai Islands.\nOther territorial disputes exist between Japan and South Korea in the Sea of Japan, and between China and South Korea in the Yellow Sea.\nAlthough the United States has no territorial claim in these waters and does not take a position on the various sovereignty disputes, it is long-standing U.S. policy to oppose the use of force, threat, or coercion to promote sovereignty claims, and to support the use of international law, including arbitration mechanisms, to resolve disputes peacefully.\nThe ability of the disputing countries, and of the United States and other parties, to manage tensions touches on numerous U.S. interests including\nmaintaining peace and stability among maritime nations in the Asia-Pacific;\nprotecting free and unimpeded lawful commerce along some of the world\u2019s busiest maritime trade routes;\nprotecting the U.S. Navy\u2019s ability to operate in these areas;\nmanaging U.S. treaty alliances with nations involved in the disputes;\nencouraging rules-based regional norms that discourage coercion or the use of force; and\navoiding intimidation of U.S. companies that may seek to operate in the region.\nThe 113th Congress has held several hearings on the issues surrounding maritime disputes in East Asia. In 2013, the Senate unanimously passed a resolution (S.Res. 167) which expressed strong support of the United States for the peaceful resolution of territorial, sovereignty, and jurisdictional disputes in the Asia-Pacific maritime domains. In the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4310/P.L. 112-239), Congress stated its position that the Senkakus are administered by Japan, and that no acts of other nations will change their status. Another resolution, S.Res. 412, has been referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. In the House, H.R. 4495 has been referred to the Committee on Armed Services and the Committee on Foreign Affairs.\nThere are other issues relating to East Asian maritime disputes that the 113th Congress may choose to address. The Senate may consider offering its advice and consent on the United States becoming a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Congress also may choose to examine the economic and security implications of a greater U.S. military presence in disputed areas, or the merits of providing additional resources to Southeast Asian nations to monitor and police their maritime domains. It also may choose to support efforts to lower tensions, including discussions between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on a Code of Conduct for parties in the South China Sea.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R42930", "sha1": "bae812d9881bac178c30d8d00631bdd11e228fda", "filename": "files/20140514_R42930_bae812d9881bac178c30d8d00631bdd11e228fda.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R42930", "sha1": "03bc3d7399587b390111eb768647642ccdde3da0", "filename": "files/20140514_R42930_03bc3d7399587b390111eb768647642ccdde3da0.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 278, "name": "China, Taiwan, and Mongolia" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 280, "name": "Korean Peninsula and Japan" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3407, "name": "Asian Regionalism" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 473, "name": "Southeast Asia, Australasia, and the Pacific Islands" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462926/", "id": "R42930_2013Jan30", "date": "2013-01-30", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the territorial claims in East Asia that underlie the growing tensions, U.S. interests that are at stake, factors that may be driving the growing tensions, and possible options for Congress to consider.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130130_R42930_80c3699d309406a4072dc7e4fa16b211f213d09a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130130_R42930_80c3699d309406a4072dc7e4fa16b211f213d09a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Maritime law", "name": "Maritime law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International affairs", "name": "International affairs" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Marine resources", "name": "Marine resources" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign relations -- U.S. -- China", "name": "Foreign relations -- U.S. -- China" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign economic relations -- China -- U.S.", "name": "Foreign economic relations -- China -- U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc806343/", "id": "R42930_2013Jan23", "date": "2013-01-23", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130123_R42930_70e04bc4533a3f94d62d7fd97ebe108394d4f0bd.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130123_R42930_70e04bc4533a3f94d62d7fd97ebe108394d4f0bd.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs", "National Defense" ] }