{ "id": "R43061", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R43061", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 585871, "date": "2017-11-02", "retrieved": "2020-01-02T13:56:34.598452", "title": "The U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Recent, Current, and Projected Employment, Wages, and Unemployment", "summary": "The adequacy of the U.S. science and engineering workforce has been an ongoing concern of Congress for more than 60 years. Scientists and engineers are widely believed to be essential to U.S. technological leadership, innovation, manufacturing, and services, and thus vital to U.S. economic strength, national defense, and other societal needs. Congress has enacted many programs to support the education and development of scientists and engineers. Congress has also undertaken broad efforts to improve science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) skills to prepare a greater number of students to pursue science and engineering (S&E) degrees. In addition, some policymakers have sought to increase the number of foreign scientists and engineers working in the United States through changes in visa and immigration policies. \nPolicymakers, business leaders, academicians, S&E professional society analysts, economists, and others hold diverse views with respect to the adequacy of the S&E workforce and related policy issues. These issues include whether a shortage of scientists and engineers exists in the United States, what the nature of such a shortage might be (e.g., too few people with S&E degrees, mismatched skills and needs), and whether the federal government should undertake policy interventions to address such a putative shortage or to allow market forces to work in this labor market. Among the key indicators used by labor economists to assess occupational labor shortages are employment growth, wage growth, and unemployment rates.\nIn 2016, there were 6.9 million scientists and engineers (as defined in this report) employed in the United States, accounting for 4.9% of total U.S. employment. Science and engineering employment was concentrated in two S&E occupational groups, computer occupations (57.6%) and engineers (23.6%), with the rest accounted for by S&E managers (8.4%), physical scientists (3.8%), life scientists (4.1%), and those in mathematical occupations (2.4%). From 2012 to 2016, S&E employment increased by 747,040, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.9%, while overall U.S. employment grew by 1.9% CAGR. Viewed only in aggregate, the increase in S&E employment masks the varied degrees of growth and decline in detailed S&E occupations. \nIn 2016, the mean wage for all scientists and engineers was $94,450, while the mean wage for all other occupations was $49,630. Between 2012 and 2016, the nominal mean wages of the S&E occupational groups grew between 1.0% CAGR (mathematical occupations) and 2.5% CAGR (S&E managers). Inflation-adjusted wage growth for each of the S&E occupational groups was less than 1.4% CAGR, and in the case of mathematical occupations was negative. Nominal wage growth for all occupations in the economy was 2.0%; real wages grew by 0.9%.\nCompared to the overall workforce, the S&E occupational groups had significantly lower unemployment rates for the 2012-2016 period. In general, though, the professional occupations (of which the S&E occupations are a part) historically have had lower unemployment rates than the workforce as a whole. In 2016, with the exception of life scientists, the unemployment rates for S&E occupational groups (2.0%-2.9%) were higher than other selected professional occupations, including lawyers (0.7%), physicians and surgeons (0.5%), dentists (0.4%), and registered nurses (1.2%). Life scientists had an unemployment rate of 0.6%.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects that the number of S&E jobs will grow by 853,600 between 2016 and 2026, a growth rate (1.1% CAGR) that is somewhat faster than that of the overall workforce (0.7%). In addition, BLS projects that 5.179 million scientists and engineers will be needed due to labor force exits and occupational transfers (referred to collectively as occupational separations). BLS projects the total number of openings in S&E due to growth, labor force exits, and occupational transfers between 2016 and 2026 to be 6.033 million, including 3.477 million in the computer occupations and 1.265 million in the engineering occupations.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43061", "sha1": "b4d8c23cd65c026052bf425f4861cf22fed36403", "filename": "files/20171102_R43061_b4d8c23cd65c026052bf425f4861cf22fed36403.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/12.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_8c6ec7f3e3647832722a21fdb14a240b48c7a760.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/11.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_109450e0749341a941efff9fd7f8a649f9115b1c.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/10.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_01a5cb0ccf460e4c77dd8147425c7e92267075fc.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/13.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_ebc9b292af059848bc776dcc14fdd78d589ec832.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/3.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_b7974ca466aeed560ac5248f8f16a6adfc91bce5.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/6.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_bfc01120e9b614b594b2116691cd1dc53c2b19b3.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/5.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_773853b53e8fa80a06ad5e0c2a870b7a19d7e8c6.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/14.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_01a5cb0ccf460e4c77dd8147425c7e92267075fc.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_1d268d4cf48fa711eba42ec85341a181f4b73d6b.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_55dec7e9b91ace348f94977fdbcacbb4387e0556.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/7.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_8aa839722d7448df0a7e8409e94a55c66544ee4b.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/9.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_1ec98ac6f336c075e810f488a61dad9e2ba379b8.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/4.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_0922920765b1d532d49854d333743892fa376e7c.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/8.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_e8f4b2c90b233d4717d73b3fc2de507df2546262.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171102_R43061_images_ec0db82e235cf6e07d5358abba7f2fb753ea5e91.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43061", "sha1": "24b134143037db86f0fcd0a01bee0a2f29051f6c", "filename": "files/20171102_R43061_24b134143037db86f0fcd0a01bee0a2f29051f6c.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 573936, "date": "2017-09-28", "retrieved": "2017-10-17T14:22:26.855899", "title": "The U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Recent, Current, and Projected Employment, Wages, and Unemployment", "summary": "The adequacy of the U.S. science and engineering workforce has been an ongoing concern of Congress for more than 60 years. Scientists and engineers are widely believed to be essential to U.S. technological leadership, innovation, manufacturing, and services, and thus vital to U.S. economic strength, national defense, and other societal needs. Congress has enacted many programs to support the education and development of scientists and engineers. Congress has also undertaken broad efforts to improve science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) skills to prepare a greater number of students to pursue science and engineering (S&E) degrees. In addition, some policymakers have sought to increase the number of foreign scientists and engineers working in the United States through changes in visa and immigration policies. \nPolicymakers, business leaders, academicians, S&E professional society analysts, economists, and others hold diverse views with respect to the adequacy of the S&E workforce and related policy issues. These issues include whether a shortage of scientists and engineers exists in the United States, what the nature of such a shortage might be (e.g., too few people with S&E degrees, mismatched skills and needs), and whether the federal government should undertake policy interventions to address such a putative shortage or to allow market forces to work in this labor market. Among the key indicators used by labor economists to assess occupational labor shortages are employment growth, wage growth, and unemployment rates.\nIn 2016, there were 6.9 million scientists and engineers (as defined in this report) employed in the United States, accounting for 4.9% of total U.S. employment. Science and engineering employment was concentrated in two S&E occupational groups, computer occupations (57.6%) and engineers (23.6%), with the rest accounted for by S&E managers (8.4%), physical scientists (3.8%), life scientists (4.1%), and those in mathematical occupations (2.4%). From 2012 to 2016, S&E employment increased by 747,040, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.9%, while overall U.S. employment grew by 1.9% CAGR. Viewed only in aggregate, the increase in S&E employment masks the varied degrees of growth and decline in detailed S&E occupations. \nIn 2016, the mean wage for all scientists and engineers was $94,450, while the mean wage for all other occupations was $49,630. Between 2012 and 2016, the nominal mean wages of the S&E occupational groups grew between 1.0% CAGR (mathematical occupations) and 2.5% CAGR (S&E managers). Inflation-adjusted wage growth for each of the S&E occupational groups was less than 1.4% CAGR, and in the case of mathematical occupations was negative. Nominal wage growth for all occupations in the economy was 2.0%; real wages grew by 0.9%.\nCompared to the overall workforce, the S&E occupational groups had significantly lower unemployment rates for the 2012-2016 period. In general, though, the professional occupations (of which the S&E occupations are a part) historically have had lower unemployment rates than the workforce as a whole. In 2016, with the exception of life scientists, the unemployment rates for S&E occupational groups (2.0%-2.9%) were higher than other selected professional occupations, including lawyers (0.7%), physicians and surgeons (0.5%), dentists (0.4%), and registered nurses (1.2%). Life scientists had an unemployment rate of 0.6%.\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects that the number of S&E jobs will grow by 694,400 between 2014 and 2024, a growth rate (1.0% CAGR) that is somewhat faster than that of the overall workforce (0.6%). In addition, BLS projects that 1.3 million scientists and engineers will be needed to replace those projected to exit S&E occupations. The number of scientists and engineers needed to meet growth and net replacement needs between 2014 and 2024 is 2.0 million, including 1.1 million in the computer occupations and 510,700 engineers.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43061", "sha1": "edda41adbed6e01f63dba475dc6f6040ff2cd712", "filename": "files/20170928_R43061_edda41adbed6e01f63dba475dc6f6040ff2cd712.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/5.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_6608da4e9db5c242ae5cfc305e31974ed21c607d.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/1.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_1d268d4cf48fa711eba42ec85341a181f4b73d6b.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/0.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_55dec7e9b91ace348f94977fdbcacbb4387e0556.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/2.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_ec0db82e235cf6e07d5358abba7f2fb753ea5e91.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/4.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_20cfab10f59e8d8fe597eeda06691a0b0b64849b.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/3.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_b7974ca466aeed560ac5248f8f16a6adfc91bce5.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43061_files&id=/6.png": "files/20170928_R43061_images_877435913032ba45c62f0d43f3a3d969fb438652.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43061", "sha1": "e606bc04869770e0c13e383ca22dc75c49c72e05", "filename": "files/20170928_R43061_e606bc04869770e0c13e383ca22dc75c49c72e05.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 428295, "date": "2014-02-19", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T20:39:05.456275", "title": "The U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Recent, Current, and Projected Employment, Wages, and Unemployment", "summary": "The adequacy of the U.S. science and engineering workforce has been an ongoing concern of Congress for more than 60 years. Scientists and engineers are widely believed to be essential to U.S. technological leadership, innovation, manufacturing, and services, and thus vital to U.S. economic strength, national defense, and other societal needs. Congress has enacted many programs to support the education and development of scientists and engineers. Congress has also undertaken broad efforts to improve science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) skills to prepare a greater number of students to pursue science and engineering (S&E) degrees. In addition, some policy makers have sought to increase the number of foreign scientists and engineers working in the United States through changes in visa and immigration policies. \nPolicy makers, business leaders, academicians, S&E professional society analysts, economists, and others hold diverse views with respect to the adequacy of the S&E workforce and related policy issues. These issues include whether a shortage of scientists and engineers exists in the United States, what the nature of such a shortage might be (e.g., too few people with S&E degrees, mismatched skills and needs), and whether the federal government should undertake policy interventions to address such a putative shortage or to allow market forces to work in this labor market. Among the key indicators used by labor economists to assess occupational labor shortages are employment growth, wage growth, and unemployment rates.\nIn 2012, there were 6.2 million scientists and engineers (as defined in this report) employed in the United States, accounting for 4.8% of total U.S. employment. Science and engineering employment was concentrated in two S&E occupational groups, computer occupations (56%) and engineers (25%), with the rest accounted for by S&E managers (9%), physical scientists (4%), life scientists (4%), and those in mathematical occupations (2%). From 2008 to 2012, S&E employment increased by 352,370, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.5%, while overall U.S. employment contracted at 0.9% CAGR. Viewed only in aggregate, the increase in S&E employment masks the varied degrees of growth and decline in detailed S&E occupations. \nIn 2012, the mean wage for all scientists and engineers was $87,330, while the mean wage for all other occupations was $45,790. Between 2008 and 2012, the nominal mean wages of the S&E occupational groups grew between 1.4% CAGR (life scientists) and 2.2% CAGR (physical scientists, S&E managers, mathematicians). Inflation-adjusted wage growth for each of the S&E occupational groups was less than 0.6% CAGR, and in the case of life scientists was negative. Nominal wage growth for all occupations in the economy was 1.1%; real wages declined 0.5%.\nCompared to the overall workforce, the S&E occupational groups had significantly lower unemployment rates for the 2008-2012 period. In general, though, the professional occupations (of which the S&E occupations are a part) historically have had lower unemployment rates than the workforce as a whole. In 2012, the overall S&E unemployment rate of 3.6% was higher than for other selected professional occupations, including lawyers (1.4%), physicians and surgeons (0.8%), dentists (1.5%), and registered nurses (2.6%).\nThe Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) projects that the number of S&E jobs will grow by 953,200 between 2012 and 2022, a growth rate (1.3% CAGR) that is somewhat faster than that of the overall workforce (1.0%). In addition, BLS projects that 1.3 million scientists and engineers will be needed to replace those projected to exit S&E occupations. The number of scientists and engineers needed to meet growth and net replacement needs between 2012 and 2022 is 2.3 million, including 1.2 million in the computer occupations and 544,300 engineers.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43061", "sha1": "da4aca82846e79ac6f6679621b88bfbd426cdbfc", "filename": "files/20140219_R43061_da4aca82846e79ac6f6679621b88bfbd426cdbfc.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43061", "sha1": "241bd81aa40ddb288d2917a9b09d73fe33bb00dc", "filename": "files/20140219_R43061_241bd81aa40ddb288d2917a9b09d73fe33bb00dc.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462043/", "id": "R43061_2013May06", "date": "2013-05-06", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "The U.S. Science and Engineering Workforce: Recent, Current, and Projected Employment, Wages, and Unemployment", "summary": "This report uses a modified version of the Standard Occupation Classification (SOC) system to categorize scientists and engineers. The report taxonomy includes six science and engineering (S&E) S&E occupational groups, each composed of closely related detailed occupations.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130506_R43061_b8a18c0da854fc4a5e6f085f5563494ee5cd23b1.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130506_R43061_b8a18c0da854fc4a5e6f085f5563494ee5cd23b1.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Science policy", "name": "Science policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Technology policy", "name": "Technology policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Mathematics", "name": "Mathematics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Physics", "name": "Physics" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy", "Science and Technology Policy" ] }