{
  "id": "R43199",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R43199",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 435971,
      "date": "2014-11-28",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T19:53:43.133070",
      "title": "Energy-Water Nexus: The Energy Sector\u2019s Water Use",
      "summary": "Water and energy are critical resources that are reciprocally linked; this interdependence is often described as the water-energy nexus. Meeting energy-sector water needs, which are often large, depends upon the local availability of water for fuel production, hydropower generation, and thermoelectric power plant cooling. The U.S. energy sector\u2019s use of water is significant in terms of water withdrawals and water consumption. Thermoelectric cooling represented 38% of freshwater withdrawn nationally and 45% of all water (fresh and saline) withdrawn in 2010, and the broader energy sector\u2019s water use (including biofuels) represented around 14% of water consumed nationally. Energy-related water consumption is anticipated to continue to increase in coming decades as the result of more domestic biofuel and unconventional onshore oil and natural gas production. Policy makers at the federal, state, and local levels are faced with deciding whether to respond to the growing water needs of the energy sector, and if so, which policy levers to use (e.g., tax incentives, loan guarantees, permits, regulations, planning, or education). Many U.S. energy sector water decisions are made by private entities, and state entities have the majority of the authority over water use and allocation policies and decisions. \nFor fuel production, water is either an essential input or is difficult and costly to substitute, and degraded water is often a waste byproduct that creates management and disposal challenges. U.S. unconventional oil and natural gas production has expanded quickly since 2008, and U.S. natural gas and coal exports may rise. This has sparked interest in the quantities of water and other inputs \u201cembedded\u201d in these resources, as well as the wastes produced (e.g., wastewaters from oil and natural gas extraction) and how they are reused or disposed (e.g., concerns over induced seismicity from injection of oil and natural gas wastewaters). Much of the growth in water demand for unconventional fuel production is concentrated in regions with already intense competition over water (e.g., tight gas and other unconventional production in Colorado, Eagle Ford shale gas and oil in south Texas), preexisting water concerns (e.g., groundwater decline in North Dakota before Bakken oil development), or regions with abundant, but ecologically sensitive surface water resources (e.g., Marcellus shale region in Pennsylvania and New York). \nConventional hydropower accounts for approximately 8% of total U.S. net electricity generation, and more than 80% of U.S. electricity is generated at thermoelectric facilities that depend on cooling water. Water availability issues, such as regional drought, low flow, or intense competition for water, can curtail hydroelectric and thermoelectric generation. An assessment of the drought vulnerability of electricity in the western United States found broad resiliency, while also identifying the Pacific Northwest and the Texas grid at higher risk. Future withdrawals associated with electric generation may grow slightly, remain steady, or decline depending on a number of factors. These include reduced generation from facilities using once-through cooling because of compliance with proposed federal cooling water intake regulations or shifts in how electricity is generated (e.g., less from coal and more from certain natural gas technologies and wind).\nEnergy choices represent complex tradeoffs; water use and wastewater byproducts are two of many factors to consider when making energy choices. For many policy makers, concerns other than water\u2014low-cost reliable energy, energy independence and security, climate change mitigation, public health, and job creation\u2014are more significant drivers of their positions on energy policies.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43199",
          "sha1": "1be7f0a0cd085f4b2b0f8ee44e0dc2903c3c343b",
          "filename": "files/20141128_R43199_1be7f0a0cd085f4b2b0f8ee44e0dc2903c3c343b.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43199",
          "sha1": "60336cce1db7df04b1934f1b0030d46729e778fd",
          "filename": "files/20141128_R43199_60336cce1db7df04b1934f1b0030d46729e778fd.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 2061,
          "name": "Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817855/",
      "id": "R43199_2013Aug30",
      "date": "2013-08-30",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "Energy-Water Nexus: The Energy Sector\u2019s Water Use",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20130830_R43199_7793482c551d603a396b156931c169cf5bf655ef.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20130830_R43199_7793482c551d603a396b156931c169cf5bf655ef.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": []
}