{ "id": "R43334", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R43334", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 429589, "date": "2014-04-07", "retrieved": "2016-06-21T21:30:07.667819", "title": "Campaign Contribution Limits: Selected Questions About McCutcheon and Policy Issues for Congress", "summary": "Recently invalidated aggregate limits on federal campaign contributions capped the total amount that one can give to all candidates, parties, or political action committees (PACs). For the 2014 election cycle, the aggregate limit for individual contributions was $123,200.The Supreme Court of the United States struck down the aggregate limits on April 2, 2014. Alabama contributor Shaun McCutcheon and the Republican National Committee (RNC) brought the case, McCutcheon v. FEC, after the aggregate limits prevented McCutcheon from contributing as desired to federal candidates and parties during the 2012 election cycle. The decision does not affect base limits that individuals may contribute to particular candidates or parties. Instead, McCutcheon permits individuals to give limited contributions to an unlimited number of candidates, political parties, and political action committees. \nThis report offers a preliminary analysis of major policy issues and potential implications that appear to be most relevant as the House and Senate decide whether or how to respond to McCutcheon. With the aggregate limits relaxed, additional funds might flow to candidate committees, party committees, or PACs. Joint fundraising committees and leadership PACs might expand as tools to funnel large contributions to multiple candidate committees, parties, or PACs. Disclosure of contributors who exceed the current aggregate limits might also be a policy concern. It is important to note that whether these possibilities will occur is unclear at this time. \nThis report will be updated to reflect major developments. This version of the report supersedes previous versions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43334", "sha1": "73ac7e1913bc5af58d77b110b35d73837865f974", "filename": "files/20140407_R43334_73ac7e1913bc5af58d77b110b35d73837865f974.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43334", "sha1": "fca4c5a08735a25a434099fc83a795cde51b4530", "filename": "files/20140407_R43334_fca4c5a08735a25a434099fc83a795cde51b4530.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc272068/", "id": "R43334_2013Dec12", "date": "2013-12-12", "retrieved": "2014-02-03T19:46:03", "title": "Campaign Contribution Limits: Selected Questions About McCutcheon and Policy Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report offers a preliminary analysis of major policy issues and potential implications that appear to be most relevant as the House and Senate prepare for the ruling and decide whether or how to respond.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20131212_R43334_537d5da2bd756b7e76fb85c2e3e17b3fe9a0dd73.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20131212_R43334_537d5da2bd756b7e76fb85c2e3e17b3fe9a0dd73.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Campaign funds", "name": "Campaign funds" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Fund raising", "name": "Fund raising" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Campaign contributors", "name": "Campaign contributors" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Fund raising", "name": "Fund raising" } ] } ], "topics": [] }