{ "id": "R43429", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "R", "number": "R43429", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 118th Congress", "retrieved": "2023-04-06T04:03:51.637282", "id": "R43429_40_2023-02-24", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2023-02-24_R43429_6b79d2773f10eb9cf079d02919a4e4ae6acfff08.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43429/40", "sha1": "6b79d2773f10eb9cf079d02919a4e4ae6acfff08" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-02-24_R43429_6b79d2773f10eb9cf079d02919a4e4ae6acfff08.html" } ], "date": "2023-02-24", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "R", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R43429", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 118th Congress", "retrieved": "2023-04-06T04:03:51.635538", "id": "R43429_37_2021-04-21", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-04-21_R43429_89b0c6dcc70ae28684fa964750df0d3cf47c97fc.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43429/37", "sha1": "89b0c6dcc70ae28684fa964750df0d3cf47c97fc" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-04-21_R43429_89b0c6dcc70ae28684fa964750df0d3cf47c97fc.html" } ], "date": "2021-04-21", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "R", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R43429", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 118th Congress", "retrieved": "2023-04-06T04:03:51.634284", "id": "R43429_35_2021-02-16", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-02-16_R43429_a0ac509a3579495361af40effed1d0c73a303b78.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43429/35", "sha1": "a0ac509a3579495361af40effed1d0c73a303b78" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-02-16_R43429_a0ac509a3579495361af40effed1d0c73a303b78.html" } ], "date": "2021-02-16", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "R", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R43429", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 597230, "date": "2019-04-25", "retrieved": "2019-05-03T14:13:52.512754", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 116th Congress", "summary": "The Property Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, \u00a73, clause 2) grants Congress the authority to acquire, dispose of, and manage federal property. The 116th Congress faces multiple policy issues related to federal lands and natural resources. These issues include how much and which land the government should own and how lands and resources should be used and managed. These issues affect local communities, industries, ecosystems, and the nation. \nThere are approximately 640 million surface acres of federally owned land in the United States. Four agencies (referred to in this report as the federal land management agencies, or FLMAs) administer approximately 608 million surface acres (~95%) of federal lands: the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS), all in the Department of the Interior (DOI). The federal estate also extends to energy and mineral resources located below ground and offshore. BLM manages the onshore subsurface mineral estate and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, also in DOI, manages access to approximately 1.7 billion offshore acres in federal waters on the U.S. outer continental shelf. However, not all of these onshore or offshore acres can be expected to contain extractable mineral and energy resources.\nThis report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress has considered when addressing federal land policy and resource management. These include questions about the extent and location of the federal estate. For example, typically Congress considers both measures to authorize and fund the acquisition of additional lands and measures to convey some land out of federal ownership or management. Other issues for Congress include whether certain lands or resources should have additional protections, for example, through designation as wilderness or national monuments, or protection of endangered species and their habitat. \nOther policy questions involve how federal land should be used. Certain federal lands are considered primary- or dominant-use lands as specified in statute by Congress. For example, the dominant-use mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plant resources and associated habitats for the benefit of current and future Americans, and the dual-use mission of the National Park System is to conserve unique resources and provide for their use and enjoyment by the public. BLM and FS lands, however, have a statutory mission to balance multiple uses: recreation, grazing, timber, habitat and watershed protection, and energy production, among others. Conflicts arise as users and land managers attempt to balance these uses. Congress often addresses bills to clarify, prioritize, and alter land uses, including timber harvesting, livestock grazing, and recreation (motorized and nonmotorized). With respect to energy uses, in addition to questions about balancing energy production against other uses, other questions include how to balance traditional and alternative energy production on federal lands. \nAdditional issues of debate include whether or how to charge for access and use of federal resources and lands, how to use any funds collected, and whether or how to compensate local governments for the presence of untaxed federal lands within their borders. Congress also faces questions about wildfire management on both federal and nonfederal lands, including questions of risk management and funding suppression efforts.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43429", "sha1": "dfd6cf93e9dcfa4e36c7a760d86b9213499e48c4", "filename": "files/20190425_R43429_dfd6cf93e9dcfa4e36c7a760d86b9213499e48c4.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43429_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190425_R43429_images_4292e6ff7a6e85d6ac235b30865e38fb6b046e58.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43429", "sha1": "5741c79ff8e6b1043beccd0f9812ee297f493524", "filename": "files/20190425_R43429_5741c79ff8e6b1043beccd0f9812ee297f493524.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4841, "name": "Federal Land Management" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4928, "name": "Wildlife & Ecosystems" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 594177, "date": "2019-03-18", "retrieved": "2019-04-17T14:01:10.500285", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 116th Congress", "summary": "The Property Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, \u00a73, clause 2) grants Congress the authority to acquire, dispose of, and manage federal property. The 116th Congress faces multiple policy issues related to federal lands and natural resources. These issues include how much and which land the government should own and how lands and resources should be used and managed. These issues affect local communities, industries, ecosystems, and the nation. \nThere are approximately 640 million surface acres of federally owned land in the United States. Four agencies (referred to in this report as the federal land management agencies, or FLMAs) administer approximately 608 million surface acres (~95%) of federal lands: the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS), all in the Department of the Interior (DOI). The federal estate also extends to energy and mineral resources located below ground and offshore. BLM manages the onshore subsurface mineral estate and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, also in DOI, manages access to approximately 1.7 billion offshore acres in federal waters on the U.S. outer continental shelf. However, not all of these onshore or offshore acres can be expected to contain extractable mineral and energy resources.\nThis report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress has considered when addressing federal land policy and resource management. These include questions about the extent and location of the federal estate. For example, typically Congress considers both measures to authorize and fund the acquisition of additional lands and measures to convey some land out of federal ownership or management. Other issues for Congress include whether certain lands or resources should have additional protections, for example, through designation as wilderness or national monuments, or protection of endangered species and their habitat. \nOther policy questions involve how federal land should be used. Certain federal lands are considered primary- or dominant-use lands as specified in statute by Congress. For example, the dominant-use mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is the conservation of fish, wildlife, and plant resources and associated habitats for the benefit of current and future Americans, and the dual-use mission of the National Park System is to conserve unique resources and provide for their use and enjoyment by the public. BLM and FS lands, however, have a statutory mission to balance multiple uses: recreation, grazing, timber, habitat and watershed protection, and energy production, among others. Conflicts arise as users and land managers attempt to balance these uses. Congress often addresses bills to clarify, prioritize, and alter land uses, including timber harvesting, livestock grazing, and recreation (motorized and nonmotorized). With respect to energy uses, in addition to questions about balancing energy production against other uses, other questions include how to balance traditional and alternative energy production on federal lands. \nAdditional issues of debate include whether or how to charge for access and use of federal resources and lands, how to use any funds collected, and whether or how to compensate local governments for the presence of untaxed federal lands within their borders. Congress also faces questions about wildfire management on both federal and nonfederal lands, including questions of risk management and funding suppression efforts.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43429", "sha1": "1b67ce9ec9b686f8700c5076427d6b9b9a3122ac", "filename": "files/20190318_R43429_1b67ce9ec9b686f8700c5076427d6b9b9a3122ac.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43429_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190318_R43429_images_4292e6ff7a6e85d6ac235b30865e38fb6b046e58.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43429", "sha1": "99d0a2270e6b9992730b5fe810644138e64ff1ee", "filename": "files/20190318_R43429_99d0a2270e6b9992730b5fe810644138e64ff1ee.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4841, "name": "Federal Land Management" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4928, "name": "Wildlife & Ecosystems" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 580096, "date": "2018-04-13", "retrieved": "2018-04-16T13:06:00.790111", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 115th Congress", "summary": "The Property Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, \u00a73, clause 2) grants Congress the authority to acquire, dispose of, and manage federal property. The 115th Congress faces multiple federal land and natural resources policy and management issues. These issues include how much and which land the government should own and how lands and resources should be used and managed. These issues affect local communities, industries, ecosystems, and the nation. \nThere are approximately 640 million surface acres of federally owned land in the United States. Four agencies (referred to in this report as the federal land management agencies, or FLMAs) administer approximately 610 million surface acres (95%) of federal lands: the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS), all in the Department of the Interior (DOI). The federal estate also extends to energy and mineral resources located below ground and offshore. These include about 700 million onshore acres of the federal subsurface mineral estate that are managed by BLM. In addition, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, also in DOI, manages access to approximately 1.7 billion offshore acres in federal waters on the U.S. outer continental shelf. However, not all of these onshore or offshore acres can be expected to contain extractable mineral and energy resources.\nThis report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress has considered when addressing federal land policy and resource management, including questions about the extent and location of the federal estate. For example, typically Congress considers both measures to authorize and fund the acquisition of additional lands and measures to convey some land out of federal ownership or management. Other issues for Congress include whether certain lands or resources should have additional protections, for example, by designating certain lands as wilderness or national monuments, or protecting endangered species and their habitat. \nOther policy questions involve how federal land should be used. Certain federal lands are considered primary- or dominant-use lands as specified in statute by Congress. For example, the dominant-use mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is \u201cto administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans,\u201d and the dual-use mission of the National Park System is to conserve unique resources and provide for their use and enjoyment by the public. BLM and FS lands, however, have a statutory mission to balance multiple uses: recreation, grazing, timber, habitat and watershed protection, and energy production, among others. Conflicts arise as users and land managers attempt to balance these uses both spatially and temporally. Congress often addresses bills to clarify, prioritize, and alter land uses, including timber harvesting, livestock grazing, and recreation (motorized and nonmotorized). In addition to questions about balancing energy production against other uses, other questions include how to balance traditional and alternative energy production on federal lands. \nAdditional issues of debate include how or whether to charge for access and use of federal resources and lands, how to use any funds collected, and whether and how to compensate local governments for the presence of untaxed federal lands within their borders. Congress also faces questions about wildfire management on both federal and nonfederal lands, including questions of risk management and funding suppression efforts.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43429", "sha1": "799a30c2c02be50f4b7a007c0954a15c06323e23", "filename": "files/20180413_R43429_799a30c2c02be50f4b7a007c0954a15c06323e23.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R43429_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180413_R43429_images_8ea06b9a5604cad4206bf4f81aa2aeb063668570.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43429", "sha1": "840dd8e7ddcba9ca181dbbed6a51247dffd63f61", "filename": "files/20180413_R43429_840dd8e7ddcba9ca181dbbed6a51247dffd63f61.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4841, "name": "Federal Land Management" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4928, "name": "Wildlife & Ecosystems" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 458852, "date": "2017-01-18", "retrieved": "2017-02-10T18:24:59.685503", "title": "Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 115th Congress", "summary": "The Property Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, \u00a73, clause 2) grants Congress the authority to acquire, dispose of, and manage federal property. The 115th Congress faces multiple federal land and natural resources policy and management issues. These issues include how much and which land the government should own and how lands and resources should be used and managed. These issues affect local communities, industries, ecosystems, and the nation. \nThere are approximately 640 million surface acres of federally owned land in the United States. Four agencies (referred to in this report as the federal land management agencies, or FLMAs) administer approximately 610 million surface acres (95%) of federal lands: the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS), all in the Department of the Interior (DOI). The federal estate also extends to energy and mineral resources located below ground and offshore. These include about 700 million onshore acres of the federal subsurface mineral estate that are managed by BLM. In addition, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, also in DOI, manages access to approximately 1.7 billion offshore acres located in and below federal waters within and beyond the U.S. exclusive economic zone. However, not all of these onshore or offshore acres can be expected to contain extractable mineral and energy resources.\nThis report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress considers when addressing federal land policy and resource management, including questions about the extent and location of the federal estate. For example, typically Congress considers both measures to authorize and fund the acquisition of additional lands and measures to convey some land out of federal ownership or management. Other issues for Congress include whether certain lands or resources should have additional protections, for example, by designating certain lands as wilderness or national monuments, or protecting endangered species and their habitat. \nOther policy questions involve how federal land should be used. Certain federal lands are considered primary- or dominant-use lands as specified in statute by Congress. For example, the dominant-use mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is \u201cto administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans,\u201d and the dual-use mission of the National Park System is to conserve unique resources and provide for their use and enjoyment by the public. BLM and FS lands, however, have a statutory mission to balance multiple uses: recreation, grazing, timber, habitat and watershed protection, and energy production, among others. Conflicts arise as users and land managers attempt to balance these uses both spatially and temporally. Congress often addresses bills to clarify, prioritize, and alter land uses, including timber harvesting, livestock grazing, and recreation (motorized and nonmotorized). In addition to questions about balancing energy production against other uses, other questions include how to balance traditional and alternative energy production on federal lands. \nAdditional issues of debate are how or whether to charge for access and use of federal resources and lands, how to use those funds, and whether and how to compensate local governments for the presence of untaxed federal lands within their borders. Congress also faces questions about wildfire management on both federal and nonfederal lands, including questions of risk management and funding suppression efforts.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43429", "sha1": "9812fdaf3f4b1f94d008b5835be99cbf1d869b7c", "filename": "files/20170118_R43429_9812fdaf3f4b1f94d008b5835be99cbf1d869b7c.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43429", "sha1": "b9c05837b5e31fabccc94b69778b221c88e4e52d", "filename": "files/20170118_R43429_b9c05837b5e31fabccc94b69778b221c88e4e52d.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4841, "name": "Federal Land Management" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4928, "name": "Wildlife & Ecosystems" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 455721, "date": "2016-04-14", "retrieved": "2016-09-16T18:08:46.256396", "title": "Federal Lands and Natural Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 114th Congress", "summary": "The Property Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, \u00a73, Clause 2) grants Congress the authority to acquire, dispose of, and manage federal property. The 114th Congress is considering multiple federal land and natural resources policy and management issues. These issues are complex and often interrelated, and include how much and which land the government should own, and how lands and resources should be used and managed. These issues affect local communities, industries, ecosystems, and the nation. \nThere are approximately 640 million surface acres of federally owned land in the United States. Four agencies (referred to in this report as the federal land management agencies, or FLMAs) administer approximately 609 million surface acres (95%) of federal lands: the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS), all in the Department of the Interior (DOI). The federal estate also extends to the energy and mineral resources located below ground and offshore. These include about 700 million onshore acres of the federal subsurface mineral estate that are managed by BLM. In addition, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, also in DOI, manages access to approximately 1.7 billion offshore acres located in and below federal waters within and beyond the U.S. exclusive economic zone. However, not all of these onshore or offshore acres contain extractable mineral and energy resources.\nThis report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress considers when addressing federal land policy and resource management, including questions about the extent and location of the federal estate. For example, legislation has been introduced in the 114th Congress to continue funding laws that authorize the acquisition of additional lands, whereas other legislation has been introduced to restrict future acquisitions or to convey some land out of federal ownership or management. Other issues for Congress include whether certain lands or resources should have additional protections, for example, by designating certain lands as wilderness or national monuments, or protecting endangered species and their habitat. In addition, Congress faces questions about wildfire management on both federal and nonfederal lands, such as questions about funding suppression efforts. \nOther policy questions involve how federal land should be used. Certain federal lands are considered primary- or dominant-use lands as specified in statute by Congress. For example, the dominant-use mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is \u201cto administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans,\u201d and the dual-use mission of the National Park System is to conserve unique resources and provide for their use and enjoyment by the public. BLM and FS lands, however, have a statutory mission to balance multiple uses: recreation, grazing, timber, habitat and watershed protection, and energy production, among others. Conflicts arise as users and land managers attempt to balance these uses both spatially and temporally. The 114th Congress is debating bills that would attempt to clarify and prioritize these uses. In addition to questions about balancing energy production against other uses, other questions include how to balance traditional and alternative energy production on federal lands. \nAdditional issues under debate are how or whether to charge for access and use of federal resources and lands, how to use those funds, and whether and how to compensate local governments for the presence of untaxed federal lands within their borders.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43429", "sha1": "8f26b86bfc3d42bac0b611801f78175be450e347", "filename": "files/20160414_R43429_8f26b86bfc3d42bac0b611801f78175be450e347.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43429", "sha1": "18b86767f1fbfc4c943f73de4779647c557e5d23", "filename": "files/20160414_R43429_18b86767f1fbfc4c943f73de4779647c557e5d23.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 314, "name": "Federal Lands" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 440064, "date": "2015-04-06", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T19:16:41.755955", "title": "Federal Lands and Natural Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 114th Congress", "summary": "The Property Clause in the U.S. Constitution (Article IV, \u00a73, Clause 2) grants Congress the authority to acquire, dispose of, and manage federal property. The 114th Congress may consider multiple federal land and natural resources policy and management issues. These issues are complex and often interrelated, and include how much and which land the government should own, and how lands and resources should be used and managed. These issues affect local communities, industries, ecosystems, and the nation. \nThere are approximately 640 million surface acres of federally owned land in the United States. Four agencies (referred to in this report as the federal land management agencies, or FLMAs) administer approximately 609 million surface acres (95%) of federal lands: the Forest Service (FS) in the Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park Service (NPS), all in the Department of the Interior (DOI). The federal estate also extends to the energy and mineral resources located below ground and offshore. These include about 700 million onshore acres of the federal subsurface mineral estate that are managed by BLM. In addition, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, also in DOI, manages access to approximately 1.7 billion offshore acres located in and below federal waters within and beyond the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone. However, not all of these onshore or offshore acres contain extractable mineral and energy resources.\nThis report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress considers when addressing federal land policy and resource management, including questions about the extent and location of the federal estate. For example, legislation may be introduced in the 114th Congress to continue funding laws that authorize the acquisition of additional lands, and other legislation may propose to convey some land out of federal ownership or management. Other issues for Congress may include whether certain lands or resources should have additional protections, for example, by designating certain lands as wilderness or national monuments, or protecting endangered species and their habitat. Congress also may address questions about wildfire management on both federal and nonfederal lands, such as questions about funding suppression efforts. \nOther policy questions involve how federal land should be used. Certain federal lands are considered primary- or dominant-use lands as specified in statute by Congress. For example, the dominant-use mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System is \u201cto administer a national network of lands and waters for the conservation, management, and where appropriate, restoration of the fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats within the United States for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans,\u201d and the dual-use mission of the National Park System is to conserve unique resources and provide for their use and enjoyment by the public. BLM and FS lands, however, have a statutory mission to balance multiple uses: recreation, grazing, timber, habitat and watershed protection, and energy production. Conflicts arise as users and land managers attempt to balance these uses both spatially and temporally. The 114th Congress may consider bills that would attempt to clarify and prioritize these uses. In addition to questions about balancing energy production against other uses, other questions include how to balance traditional and alternative energy production on federal lands. \nCongress also may consider how or whether to charge for access and use of federal resources and lands, how to use those funds, and whether and how to compensate local governments for the presence of untaxed federal lands within their borders.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43429", "sha1": "5a4924aaa717b113831e986dfd32b5d81d196584", "filename": "files/20150406_R43429_5a4924aaa717b113831e986dfd32b5d81d196584.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43429", "sha1": "5a3b443daa9a62ca3a6b8b0277787fb78b8eb00f", "filename": "files/20150406_R43429_5a3b443daa9a62ca3a6b8b0277787fb78b8eb00f.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 314, "name": "Federal Lands" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491145/", "id": "R43429_2014Dec08", "date": "2014-12-08", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Federal Lands and Natural Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 113th Congress", "summary": "This report introduces some of the broad themes and issues Congress considers when addressing federal land policy and resource management. Federal land policy includes questions about the extent and location of the federal estate.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20141208_R43429_5401bcdb25a91a155153d95e89ff70e30850ecd2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20141208_R43429_5401bcdb25a91a155153d95e89ff70e30850ecd2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public lands", "name": "Public lands" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Natural resources", "name": "Natural resources" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Energy", "name": "Energy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National forests", "name": "National forests" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "National parks", "name": "National parks" } ] } ], "topics": [] }