{ "id": "R43954", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R43954", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 439644, "date": "2015-03-25", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T19:18:52.494027", "title": "Federal Involvement in Sex Offender Registration and Notification: Overview and Issues for Congress, In Brief", "summary": "The federal government plays a role in the management of sex offenders. In a law enforcement capacity, it enforces federal laws involving sexual abuse, online predatory offenses, or other related federal crimes. In addition, Congress has enacted legislation that encourages the development of state sex offender registries, urges states to punish recalcitrant sex offenders, and induces state and local law enforcement to make certain information on sex offenders public, and has taken other steps involving the registration of sex offenders and notification of the community. Federal legislation affecting sex offender policy has largely centered on sex offender registration and notification, and therefore they are the focus of this report.\nAll states have sex offender registration and notification laws; however, these laws vary widely. Congress has attempted to standardize these laws through legislation, most recently through the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), a major component of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (Adam Walsh Act; P.L. 109-248) enacted in 2006. Among other things, SORNA created a three-tier classification system for sex offenders based solely on the crime of conviction. To date, 17 states, 3 territories, and many American Indian tribes have been found to have \u201csubstantially implemented SORNA.\u201d SORNA stated that jurisdictions that fail to comply with its requirements risk having their annual Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) funds reduced by 10%. While several noncompliant states have chosen to lose 10% of their JAG funds, the majority of noncompliant states have applied to have these funds reallocated and used solely for the purpose of implementing SORNA.\nSex offenses and sex offender management are primarily state and local criminal justice issues; however, the federal government plays a role in sex offender registration and notification as well as other sex offender management issues not discussed in this report. The federal government (1) sets minimum requirements and baseline standards for states for sex offender registration and notification, (2) provides assistance to states via grants and law enforcement support in tracking down noncompliant offenders, (3) maintains a public national website that provides information on registered sex offenders, (4) maintains a national sex offender registry for assisting law enforcement, and (5) receives and transmits information on the international travel of sex offenders.\nIn recent years, several issues with sex offender registration and notification in the United States have been raised by state governments, the media, and academics alike. Congress may decide to address a number of these issues that fall under federal jurisdiction. Issues include notification of offenders\u2019 international travel, issues with registration of sex offenders in the military, states\u2019 noncompliance with requirements of SORNA, and the effectiveness of SORNA.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R43954", "sha1": "cac1a97a262149833e1f1d39dea8dde80c51de1a", "filename": "files/20150325_R43954_cac1a97a262149833e1f1d39dea8dde80c51de1a.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R43954", "sha1": "2fcbdceab599884260a76c7a276b144ed219518d", "filename": "files/20150325_R43954_2fcbdceab599884260a76c7a276b144ed219518d.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 2496, "name": "Crime and Punishment" } ] } ], "topics": [] }