{
  "id": "R44216",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44216",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 598304,
      "date": "2016-07-25",
      "retrieved": "2020-01-03T15:06:00.335885",
      "title": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future Initiative",
      "summary": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future (FTF) Initiative is a U.S. international development program launched in 2010 that invests in food security and agricultural development activities in a select group of developing countries in an effort to reduce hunger, malnutrition, poverty, and food insecurity. The bulk of FTF funding supports 19 \u201cfocus countries\u201d selected based on country ownership potential, needs, and opportunities to achieve success. FTF supports additional countries under aligned and regional programs and through assistance to three \u201cstrategic partners\u201d\u2014Brazil, India, and South Africa\u2014to increase regionally based sustainable development capacities.\nThe FTF initiative originated largely as the U.S. component of the international response to the heightened food insecurity resulting from the global food price crisis of 2007-2008. In July 2009, at the G8 Summit in L\u2019Aquila, Italy, President Obama pledged to provide at least $3.5 billion over three years to a global agriculture and food security initiative referred to as the Global Partnership. In total, the international donor community pledged $22 billion to promote global agricultural development, improved nutrition, and food security. Since its origin, FTF has expanded into a whole-of-government effort. In addition to the Global Partnership, FTF also supports implementation of President Obama\u2019s 2010 Policy Directive on Global Development and coordination of previously existing U.S. agricultural development policies. \nKey features of FTF include \na published set of metrics to justify U.S. investments in each recipient country and each development program; \nemphasis on coordination and partnering with recipient-country organizations, private sector entities, and international organizations to implement FTF activities; \nreliance on a set of common goals and measurable indicators to monitor and evaluate progress; and \nannual reports to Congress. \nFurthermore, the FTF strategy is being extended, under a whole-of-government framework, to all U.S. international agricultural development programs, including the Food for Peace Title II non-emergency (i.e., development) food aid, the Food for Progress program, and McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition program.\nFrom FY2010 through FY2014, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has invested $4.7 billion in direct food security and agricultural development activities under FTF. Other federal agencies active in implementing FTF have invested as much as $6.6 billion in development activities under the initiative. Over these five years, USAID has reported some initial success in reducing the prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition in several of the focus countries; however, results to date are available for only a select group of focus countries. \nBecause FTF is a presidential initiative, its institutional longevity beyond the current Obama Administration is uncertain. Congress is presently evaluating the overall merits of FTF and whether to permanently authorize it in statute. Several issues related to FTF are of potential interest to Congress. The FTF whole-of-government approach, which involves the coordination of activities across different government agencies in 19 focus countries, can be difficult to implement and monitor if interagency roles and responsibilities are not clearly defined. Authorities and appropriations underpinning FTF may also be incongruent with those governing long-standing separate programs, such as Food for Peace. In addition, some civil society actors have expressed concerns that FTF\u2019s goal of country-led planning could privilege government-led planning and marginalize citizen and civil society-focused development efforts.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44216",
          "sha1": "f05049f6b341f6b4f467ddb644d8fb4533df7050",
          "filename": "files/20160725_R44216_f05049f6b341f6b4f467ddb644d8fb4533df7050.html",
          "images": {
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44216_files&id=/1.png": "files/20160725_R44216_images_0493cb75021533051bcb35a27eb9575da7b03be3.png",
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44216_files&id=/0.png": "files/20160725_R44216_images_a5d6b385a3f13bed1e64e0c9b3eb65f748779c60.png"
          }
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44216",
          "sha1": "6bc01c15c9c4312de5a721e8f683a2e94da7e987",
          "filename": "files/20160725_R44216_6bc01c15c9c4312de5a721e8f683a2e94da7e987.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4829,
          "name": "Agricultural Trade & Food Aid"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 451726,
      "date": "2016-04-13",
      "retrieved": "2016-05-24T19:24:17.455941",
      "title": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future Initiative",
      "summary": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future (FTF) Initiative is a U.S. international development program launched in 2010 that invests in food security and agricultural development activities in a select group of developing countries in an effort to reduce hunger, malnutrition, poverty, and food insecurity. The bulk of FTF funding supports 19 \u201cfocus countries\u201d selected based on country ownership potential, needs, and opportunities to achieve success. FTF supports additional countries under aligned and regional programs and through assistance to three \u201cstrategic partners\u201d\u2014Brazil, India, and South Africa\u2014to increase regionally based sustainable development capacities.\nThe FTF initiative originated largely as the U.S. component of the international response to the heightened food insecurity resulting from the global food price crisis of 2007-2008. In July 2009, at the G8 Summit in L\u2019Aquila, Italy, President Obama pledged to provide at least $3.5 billion over three years to a global agriculture and food security initiative referred to as the Global Partnership. In total, the international donor community pledged $22 billion to promote global agricultural development, improved nutrition, and food security. Since its origin, FTF has expanded into a whole-of-government effort. In addition to the Global Partnership, FTF also supports implementation of President Obama\u2019s 2010 Policy Directive on Global Development and coordination of previously existing U.S. agricultural development policies. \nKey features of FTF include \na published set of metrics to justify U.S. investments in each recipient country and each development program; \nemphasis on coordination and partnering with recipient-country organizations, private sector entities, and international organizations to implement FTF activities; \nreliance on a set of common goals and measurable indicators to monitor and evaluate progress; and \nannual reports to Congress. \nFurthermore, the FTF strategy is being extended, under a whole-of-government framework, to all U.S. international agricultural development programs, including the Food for Peace Title II non-emergency (i.e., development) food aid, the Food for Progress program, and McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition program.\nFrom FY2010 through FY2014, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has invested $4.7 billion in direct food security and agricultural development activities under FTF. Other federal agencies active in implementing FTF have invested as much as $6.6 billion in development activities under the initiative. Over these five years, USAID has reported some initial success in reducing the prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition in several of the focus countries; however, results to date are available for only a select group of focus countries. \nBecause FTF is a presidential initiative, its institutional longevity beyond the current Obama Administration is uncertain. Congress is presently evaluating the overall merits of FTF and whether to permanently authorize it in statute. Several issues related to FTF are of potential interest to Congress. The FTF whole-of-government approach, which involves the coordination of activities across different government agencies in 19 focus countries, can be difficult to implement and monitor if interagency roles and responsibilities are not clearly defined. Authorities and appropriations underpinning FTF may also be incongruent with those governing long-standing separate programs, such as Food for Peace. In addition, some civil society actors have expressed concerns that FTF\u2019s goal of country-led planning could privilege government-led planning and marginalize citizen and civil society-focused development efforts.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44216",
          "sha1": "d8fd66d50713fd3f124e972cc615a4a86cb605b0",
          "filename": "files/20160413_R44216_d8fd66d50713fd3f124e972cc615a4a86cb605b0.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44216",
          "sha1": "df0b117d2d1e3e8212b83c0813869d58260e9d40",
          "filename": "files/20160413_R44216_df0b117d2d1e3e8212b83c0813869d58260e9d40.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 449335,
      "date": "2016-01-29",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T17:21:19.225771",
      "title": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future Initiative",
      "summary": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future (FTF) Initiative is a U.S. international development program launched in 2010 that invests in food security and agricultural development activities in a select group of developing countries in an effort to reduce hunger, malnutrition, poverty, and food insecurity. The bulk of FTF funding supports 19 \u201cfocus countries\u201d selected based on country ownership potential, needs, and opportunities to achieve success. FTF supports additional countries under aligned and regional programs and through assistance to three \u201cstrategic partners\u201d\u2014Brazil, India, and South Africa\u2014to increase regionally based sustainable development capacities.\nThe FTF initiative originated largely as the U.S. component of the international response to the heightened food insecurity resulting from the global food price crisis of 2007-2008. In July 2009, at the G8 Summit in L\u2019Aquila, Italy, President Obama pledged to provide at least $3.5 billion over three years to a global agriculture and food security initiative referred to as the Global Partnership. In total, the international donor community pledged $22 billion to promote global agricultural development, improved nutrition, and food security. Since its origin, FTF has expanded into a whole-of-government effort. In addition to the Global Partnership, FTF also supports implementation of President Obama\u2019s 2010 Policy Directive on Global Development and coordination of previously existing U.S. agricultural development policies. \nKey features of FTF include \na published set of metrics to justify U.S. investments in each recipient country and each development program; \nemphasis on coordination and partnering with recipient-country organizations, private sector entities, and international organizations to implement FTF activities; \nreliance on a set of common goals and measurable indicators to monitor and evaluate progress; and \nannual reports to Congress. \nFurthermore, the FTF strategy is being extended, under a whole-of-government framework, to all U.S. international agricultural development programs, including the Food for Peace Title II non-emergency (i.e., development) food aid, the Food for Progress program, and McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition program.\nFrom FY2010 through FY2014, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has invested $4.7 billion in direct food security and agricultural development activities under FTF. Other federal agencies active in implementing FTF have invested as much as $6.6 billion in development activities under the initiative. Over these five years, USAID has reported some initial success in reducing the prevalence of poverty and chronic malnutrition in several of the focus countries; however, results to date are available for only a select group of focus countries. \nBecause FTF is a presidential initiative, its institutional longevity beyond the current Obama Administration is uncertain. Congress is presently evaluating the overall merits of FTF and whether to permanently authorize it in statute. Several issues related to FTF are of potential interest to Congress. The FTF whole-of-government approach, which involves the coordination of activities across different government agencies in 19 focus countries, can be difficult to implement and monitor if interagency roles and responsibilities are not clearly defined. Authorities and appropriations underpinning FTF may also be incongruent with those governing long-standing separate programs, such as Food for Peace. In addition, some civil society actors have expressed concerns that FTF\u2019s goal of country-led planning could privilege government-led planning and marginalize citizen and civil society-focused development efforts.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44216",
          "sha1": "9ad1ef0a54731b052f3f24ca3aca20265e831f44",
          "filename": "files/20160129_R44216_9ad1ef0a54731b052f3f24ca3aca20265e831f44.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44216",
          "sha1": "68f93a7c885ac48b02c30364f328051c2e66c17a",
          "filename": "files/20160129_R44216_68f93a7c885ac48b02c30364f328051c2e66c17a.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818154/",
      "id": "R44216_2015Oct05",
      "date": "2015-10-05",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "The Obama Administration\u2019s Feed the Future Initiative",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20151005_R44216_c7d86f582207b7ef30d3b5ef10bf667deffc8d43.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20151005_R44216_c7d86f582207b7ef30d3b5ef10bf667deffc8d43.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "African Affairs",
    "Agricultural Policy",
    "Appropriations",
    "Foreign Affairs"
  ]
}