{
  "id": "R44227",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44227",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 446327,
      "date": "2015-10-13",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T18:12:36.042422",
      "title": "The Internet of Things: Frequently Asked Questions",
      "summary": "\u201cInternet of Things\u201d (IoT) refers to networks of objects that communicate with other objects and with computers through the Internet. \u201cThings\u201d may include virtually any object for which remote communication, data collection, or control might be useful, such as vehicles, appliances, medical devices, electric grids, transportation infrastructure, manufacturing equipment, or building systems. \nIn other words, the IoT potentially includes huge numbers and kinds of interconnected objects. It is often considered the next major stage in the evolution of cyberspace. Some observers believe it might even lead to a world where cyberspace and human space would seem to effectively merge, with unpredictable but potentially momentous societal and cultural impacts.\nTwo features make objects part of the IoT\u2014a unique identifier and Internet connectivity. Such \u201csmart\u201d objects each have a unique Internet Protocol (IP) address to identify the object sending and receiving information. Smart objects can form systems that communicate among themselves, usually in concert with computers, allowing automated and remote control of many independent processes and potentially transforming them into integrated systems.\nThose systems can potentially impact homes and communities, factories and cities, and every sector of the economy, both domestically and globally. Although the full extent and nature of the IoT\u2019s impacts remain uncertain, economic analyses predict that it will contribute trillions of dollars to economic growth over the next decade. Sectors that may be particularly affected include agriculture, energy, government, health care, manufacturing, and transportation. \nThe IoT can contribute to more integrated and functional infrastructure, especially in \u201csmart cities,\u201d with projected improvements in transportation, utilities, and other municipal services. The Obama Administration announced a smart-cities initiative in September 2015. \nThere is no single federal agency that has overall responsibility for the IoT. Agencies may find IoT applications useful in helping them fulfill their missions. Each is responsible for the functioning and security of its own IoT, although some technologies, such as drones, may fall under the jurisdiction of other agencies as well. Various agencies also have relevant regulatory, sector-specific, and other mission-related responsibilities, such as the Departments of Commerce, Energy, and Transportation, the Federal Communications Commission, and the Federal Trade Commission. \nSecurity and privacy are often cited as major issues for the IoT, given the perceived difficulties of providing adequate cybersecurity for it, the increasing role of smart objects in controlling components of infrastructure, and the enormous increase in potential points of attack posed by the proliferation of such objects. The IoT may also pose increased risks to privacy, with cyberattacks potentially resulting in exfiltration of identifying or other sensitive information about an individual. With an increasing number of IoT objects in use, privacy concerns also include questions about the ownership, processing, and use of the data they generate.\nSeveral other issues might affect the continued development and implementation of the IoT. Among them are\nthe lack of consensus standards for the IoT, especially with respect to connectivity;\nthe transition to a new Internet Protocol (IPv6) that can handle the exponential increase in the number of IP addresses that the IoT will require;\nmethods for updating the software used by IoT objects in response to security and other needs; \nenergy management for IoT objects, especially those not connected to the electric grid; and\nthe role of the federal government, including investment, regulation of applications, access to wireless communications, and the impact of federal rules regarding \u201cnet neutrality.\u201d\nNo bills specifically on the IoT have been introduced in the 114th Congress, although S.Res. 110 was agreed to in March 2015, and H.Res. 195 was introduced in April. Both call for a U.S. IoT strategy, a focus on a consensus-based approach to IoT development, commitment to federal use of the IoT, and its application in addressing challenging societal issues. House and Senate hearings have been held on the IoT, and several congressional caucuses may consider associated issues. Moreover, bills affecting privacy, cybersecurity, and other aspects of communication could affect IoT applications.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44227",
          "sha1": "1bae40377293da1c6b63fb9122715afc8f4abc53",
          "filename": "files/20151013_R44227_1bae40377293da1c6b63fb9122715afc8f4abc53.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44227",
          "sha1": "a6e31f65391ff8ef07e9b07e2f2a578cf3ccb77a",
          "filename": "files/20151013_R44227_a6e31f65391ff8ef07e9b07e2f2a578cf3ccb77a.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Science and Technology Policy"
  ]
}