{
  "id": "R44340",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R44340",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 448726,
      "date": "2016-01-13",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-06T17:30:54.587301",
      "title": "Goldwater-Nichols and the Evolution of Officer Joint Professional Military Education (JPME)",
      "summary": "In November 2015, the Senate Armed Services Committee initiated a review of the Goldwater-Nichols Act (GNA). This piece of legislation, enacted in 1986 and amended in subsequent years, led to major reforms in defense organization. The year 2016 will mark the 30th anniversary of this landmark legislation, and lawmakers have expressed interest in whether the changes, as implemented, are achieving the goals of the reform, and whether further reforms are needed to achieve current and future national security goals. \nOne of Congress\u2019s main goals of the legislation was to improve joint interoperability among the military services through a series of structural changes and incentives for participation in joint matters. Joint matters, by statute (10 U.S.C. \u00a7661), are currently defined as,\n...matters related to the achievement of unified action by multiple military forces in operations conducted across domains such as land, sea, or air, in space, or in the information environment...\nModifications of the officer management system under the GNA reforms were intended to enhance the quality, experience, and education of joint officers. The law required, for the first time, that officers complete Joint Professional Military Education (JPME) in order to be eligible for certain joint assignments and promotion categories. Some have questioned the extent to which these statutory JPME requirements are achieving the goals of the reform and whether they should be amended or repealed. Others have questioned whether the JPME curriculum, method of delivery and instruction, course structure, and career timing are appropriate in the context of today\u2019s strategic environment and force structure needs. \nIn parallel to congressional efforts, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter announced in December 2015 that the Department of Defense (DOD) would be launching a review of the department\u2019s structure and efficiency in the context of the GNA reforms. A DOD memorandum dated January 4, 2016, outlined the key questions that would be addressed in this review. With respect to the joint officer management system, DOD plans to consider,\nDo current law and policy governing joint duty qualifications provide the right human capital development to meet our joint warfighting requirements?\nAre there adjustments that can be made to balance the often competing demands of joint professional development and other specialized expertise or other career development considerations?\nA spokesman for DOD indicated that this review might result in internal policy changes and/or legislative proposals. Any reforms to the military personnel management system might also be considered in conjunction with DOD\u2019s \u201cForce of the Future\u201d initiative, the first phase of which was launched by Secretary Carter on November 18, 2015. The purpose of this initiative is to improve the department\u2019s ability to recruit and retain the talent it needs to adapt to future mission requirements.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44340",
          "sha1": "b2462e50e119e8a8ea4fc1d5ca89a827a886f570",
          "filename": "files/20160113_R44340_b2462e50e119e8a8ea4fc1d5ca89a827a886f570.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44340",
          "sha1": "700ec32618dfd35df1088b58df165b109985227d",
          "filename": "files/20160113_R44340_700ec32618dfd35df1088b58df165b109985227d.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "National Defense"
  ]
}