{ "id": "R44613", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R44613", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 587850, "date": "2016-08-31", "retrieved": "2020-01-02T15:24:48.060299", "title": "Northeast Asia and Russia\u2019s \u201cTurn to the East\u201d: Implications for U.S. Interests", "summary": "Since Russia\u2019s aggression in Ukraine and its annexation of the Crimea in March 2014, Moscow\u2019s already tense relationship with the United States and Europe has grown more fraught. After the imposition of sanctions on Russia by much of the West, Russian President Vladimir Putin has turned to East Asia, seeking new partnerships to counter diplomatic isolation and secure new markets to help Russia\u2019s struggling economy. His outreach to Beijing, Tokyo, Seoul, and Pyongyang has met varying degrees of success. The most high-profile outreach was a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in May 2014, when the leaders announced dozens of economic cooperation agreements. Putin has met with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe over a dozen times in an effort to resolve a territorial dispute and improve bilateral relations. Putin has also reached out to both Koreas in his bid to step up engagement with Northeast Asian countries.\nRussian engagement in Northeast Asia challenges the U.S. strategic presence in the region in a number of ways and represents a new arena of potential concern for Congress. If Moscow\u2019s engagement efforts succeed, it could undermine U.S. efforts to impose sanctions on Russia and isolate Putin diplomatically for his intervention in Ukraine. It could also create mistrust between the United States and its allies Japan and South Korea if those countries\u2019 leaders are drawn closer to Russia. Diplomatic initiatives in the region to deal with the threat of North Korea\u2019s nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs could suffer if Moscow disrupts international efforts to rein in North Korean provocations. Perhaps most importantly, China and Russia could form a regional bloc whose primary purpose could be to reduce U.S. economic leverage and challenge the U.S. security presence in the region.\nThe Chinese-Russian relationship is driven in large part by the perceived threat of the U.S. rebalance to Asia and their shared perspective of American unilateralism. Concrete progress on bilateral projects, however, is marked by inconsistency and faltering implementation of agreements. With Russia\u2019s economy devastated by falling energy prices since 2014, China appears to view Russia as a junior partner. Although Russia-China military relations have increased rapidly, so too has an element of competition, particularly in the Arctic region. Chinese firms are wary of investing in Russia, seeing it as politically risky and commercially unattractive. In multilateral fora like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and new Silk Road initiatives, China wants to expand its economic clout while Russia looks to assert its military dominance in Central Asia. These tensions may prevent a full-fledged strategic partnership, but relations continue to grow stronger through regular bilateral summits and global cooperation. \nJapan appears enthusiastic about improving relations with Russia and resolving their territorial dispute over four islands at the northern edge of Japan. Even as U.S.-Japan security links grow stronger, Abe continues to respond to Putin\u2019s overtures with an eye on balancing China. Russia\u2019s economic engagement of Pyongyang has chilled since the Kim regime resumed testing nuclear weapons and missiles. The stalemate in inter-Korean relations and the abandonment of cross-border projects also limit Russia\u2019s potential role in facilitating infrastructure and trade links on the Peninsula. Seoul\u2019s increasingly close U.S. alliance contracts the space for Moscow\u2019s diplomatic maneuver. \nJapan, South Korea, and China all have interest in Russia\u2019s supply of oil and gas from its resource-rich Far East. Although several partnerships already exist, dealing with Russia\u2019s government-controlled energy companies has proved difficult. Private firms are reluctant to invest in a politically risky environment, and the availability of cheap energy from elsewhere has dampened commercial enthusiasm for investing heavily in Russia\u2019s energy industry.\nDespite obstacles, Russia\u2019s pursuit of better relations with countries in East Asia remains a complicating and potentially destabilizing factor for the U.S. policy of rebalancing its security and economic interests to the region. Russia could become a larger factor for Congress to consider when assessing progress on the rebalance to Asia strategy. Russia\u2019s \u201cTurn to the East\u201d could also affect areas of congressional concern such as the efficacy of U.S. sanctions policy, U.S. North Korean policy, U.S. strategy in the Arctic region, U.S. priorities at the United Nations, and global energy politics.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44613", "sha1": "19cb9588bc12094696fea9b130e9fefd36348787", "filename": "files/20160831_R44613_19cb9588bc12094696fea9b130e9fefd36348787.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/0.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_62b60119bf3e8cc816e8455d9e04528685f0def3.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/6.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_79842ebf1f54b27471fabb0946acbff61b84cb52.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/4.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_304373aff5ca91c671b157304df574c8d7f06fe9.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/2.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_44fc5387c6f0cf050a54acf86640347baf636833.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/1.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_f06040d4b9abf7c8bbdd0b9f97f641a5aadf87c9.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/3.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_06c8c977c2c343317f3fdf2dc9d7f4d98ee140ea.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44613_files&id=/5.png": "files/20160831_R44613_images_12290a7fb284c7228396ad55a9ab3b735d2832e5.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44613", "sha1": "9d3478d464e549227552ddc16be568abaa2ba5c5", "filename": "files/20160831_R44613_9d3478d464e549227552ddc16be568abaa2ba5c5.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Asian Affairs", "Foreign Affairs", "National Defense" ] }