{ "id": "R44727", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R44727", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 586905, "date": "2017-01-04", "retrieved": "2020-01-02T14:58:07.420315", "title": "Major Foreign Aid Initiatives Under the Obama Administration: A Wrap-Up", "summary": "Over the past few Administrations, Congress has maintained strong interest in and support for the broad global development areas of global health, food security, and climate-related aid and investment. The Obama Administration built its foreign assistance programming around the priorities and practices it identified in the 2010 Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) on Global Development, which identified broad-based economic growth and democratic governance as overarching U.S. development priorities. In particular, the Obama Administration focused on three key initiatives: the Global Health Initiative (GHI), the Global Climate Change Initiative, and the Global Food Security Initiative (Feed the Future). While built on the foundation of existing programs, each initiative was intended to bring new focus, improve coordination, and boost funding to the aid sectors it supported. The initiatives shared several principles, including an emphasis on building host country capacity, investing in innovation and research, using whole-of-government strategies, being results oriented, leveraging global partnerships, and applying a cross-sectoral approach. \nThe Global Health Initiative was launched to improve health outcomes through strengthened health systems and increased and integrated investments in maternal and child health, family planning, nutrition, and infectious diseases. GHI as a distinct platform faded away over the course of the Administration, but progress in global health outcomes that began during the George W. Bush Administration have been largely sustained during the Obama Administration, and the role of multilateral programs was elevated. Some assert that implementation of the initiative was inadequate, but others contend that U.S. global health programs were strong and effective before President Obama took office, and the scaled back emphasis on GHI reflects recognition that little change was needed. \nFeed the Future aimed to accelerate inclusive growth in the agriculture sector of partner countries and improve nutritional status, particularly of women and girls. Feed the Future is the only original Obama foreign aid initiative specifically authorized in law (the Global Food Security Act of 2016, P.L. 114-195). The law established a specific statutory foundation for global food security assistance, required the President to develop a whole-of-government strategy to promote global food security (released in October 2016), and authorized funding to support the strategy (just over $1 billion per year) for FY2017 and FY2018. The initiative and the legislative support provided by the GFSA have given food security and agricultural development a more prominent role in the U.S. development policy and budget.\nThe Global Climate Change Initiative ramped up U.S. climate-related aid to developing countries, with a focus on promoting clean energy, sustainable landscapes, and climate change resilience and adaptation. While Congress has not always supported GCCI programs and funding, the United States has met its international pledges, and the initiative has reportedly had an impact on U.S. development practice, with USAID now assessing and addressing climate risks and climate change mitigation opportunities in all new country strategies. However, by promoting its climate agenda primarily through executive action, without seeking the approval of Congress, the Obama Administration has made any progress in this area vulnerable to dismantlement.\nReported results have been mixed, but the Obama Administration\u2019s global development initiatives sustained efforts from the Bush Administration on global health and climate change and brought new attention to food security and agricultural development. While budget pressures have tamped down growth in the foreign aid budget, the portion of U.S. bilateral development assistance obligated for global health, agricultural development, and environment programs\u2014more than one-third of total economic aid from FY2012 to FY2015\u2014increased under the Obama Administration, continuing a trend that began under the Bush Administration. The incoming Administration and the 115th Congress may examine these initiatives as they consider future U.S. global development policy. Interest in these issues, if not these specific initiatives, can be expected to continue beyond the end of the Obama Administration.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44727", "sha1": "37b219e9ac0d21b8c38ace73ef55f8625d61f1d6", "filename": "files/20170104_R44727_37b219e9ac0d21b8c38ace73ef55f8625d61f1d6.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/1.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_e6a0536afb0c874279f732a883b7657d76e26646.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/5.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_2c6cb6e5b5c487863c33ab4274e1d665a37a3b6c.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/3.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_8d4479fb99f339c5f077dcabeb3aa2a8e833caf1.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/2.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_21b342fbe74e900c4c3cec78498210e94789828d.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/4.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_853e1e22ed379b0b5ed9308009d1b05f91618b2f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/6.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_dd7380aff2f6f2b1cf9b0aad27b2ef6270454e18.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R44727_files&id=/0.png": "files/20170104_R44727_images_a24ddc1a66666588896815a02e10e6565763b3b7.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44727", "sha1": "08c6993a5c7e0f43b9c5e94f906441e678b6af4a", "filename": "files/20170104_R44727_08c6993a5c7e0f43b9c5e94f906441e678b6af4a.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4896, "name": "State & Foreign Operations Appropriations" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs" ] }