{ "id": "R44778", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R44778", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 460776, "date": "2017-03-08", "retrieved": "2017-05-09T15:06:37.123013", "title": "Judge Neil M. Gorsuch: His Jurisprudence and Potential Impact on the Supreme Court", "summary": "On January 31, 2017, President Donald J. Trump announced the nomination of Judge Neil M. Gorsuch of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (Tenth Circuit) to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court of the United States created by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia in 2016. Judge Gorsuch was appointed to the Tenth Circuit by President George W. Bush in 2006. The Tenth Circuit\u2019s territorial jurisdiction covers Colorado, Kansas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, Wyoming, and parts of Yellowstone National Park that extend into Idaho and Montana.\nImmediately prior to his appointment to the bench, the nominee served as the Principal Deputy to the Associate Attorney General, the third-ranking official at the U.S. Department of Justice, assisting the Associate Attorney General with oversight of the Department\u2019s various civil litigation components. Before serving in the Justice Department, the nominee worked in private practice as a civil litigator at the Washington, D.C. firm of Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel. Judge Gorsuch began his legal career clerking for federal judges. He first served as a law clerk to Judge David B. Sentelle of the D.C. Circuit. Later, he served two Supreme Court Justices, newly retired Justice Byron White and Justice Anthony Kennedy, during the October 1993 term.\nThis report provides an overview of Judge Gorsuch\u2019s jurisprudence and discusses how the Supreme Court might be affected if he were to succeed Justice Scalia. In particular, the report focuses on those areas of law where Justice Scalia can be seen to have influenced the High Court\u2019s approach to particular issues or provided a fifth and deciding vote on the Court, with a view toward how the nominee might approach those same issues. The report begins by discussing the nominee\u2019s views on two cross-cutting issues\u2014the role of the judiciary and statutory interpretation. It then addresses fourteen separate areas of law, arranged in alphabetical order, from \u201cadministrative law\u201d to \u201ctakings.\u201d The report includes a table that notes the cases where the Supreme Court has reviewed majority opinions written or joined by Judge Gorsuch. Another set of tables in this report analyzes the nominee\u2019s concurrences and dissents and those of his colleagues on the Tenth Circuit.\nA separate report, CRS Report R44772, Majority, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions by Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, coordinated by Michael John Garcia, briefly summarizes all opinions authored by Judge Gorsuch during his tenure on the federal bench. Other CRS products discuss various issues related to the vacancy on the Court. For an overview of available products, see CRS Legal Sidebar WSLG1526, Supreme Court Nomination: CRS Products, by Kate M. Manuel and Andrew Nolan.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R44778", "sha1": "e23547ab7d5d5842cebe3f0dc5cf873dc67c067d", "filename": "files/20170308_R44778_e23547ab7d5d5842cebe3f0dc5cf873dc67c067d.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R44778", "sha1": "06be84126676617b7ca38cc9648bf31182030840", "filename": "files/20170308_R44778_06be84126676617b7ca38cc9648bf31182030840.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Constitutional Questions", "Environmental Policy", "Foreign Affairs", "Health Policy" ] }