{
  "id": "R45014",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R45014",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 585862,
      "date": "2017-11-08",
      "retrieved": "2018-10-04T14:01:37.929731",
      "title": "Government Printing, Publications, and Digital Information Management: Issues and Challenges",
      "summary": "In the past half-century, in government and beyond, information creation, distribution, retention, and preservation activities have transitioned from a tangible, paper-based process to digital processes managed through computerized information technologies. Information is created as a digital object which then may be rendered as a text, image, or video file. Those files are then distributed through a myriad of outlets ranging from particular software applications and websites to social media platforms. The material may be produced in tangible, printed form, but typically remains in digital formats.\nThe Government Publishing Office (GPO) is a legislative branch agency that serves all three branches of the national government as a centralized resource for gathering, cataloging, producing, providing, authenticating, and preserving published information. The agency is overseen by the Joint Committee on Printing (JCP), which in 1895 was charged with overseeing and regulating U.S. government printing. GPO operates on the basis of a number of statutory authorities first granted in the 19th and 20th centuries that presume the existence of government information in an ink-on-paper format, because no other format existed when those authorities were enacted. GPO\u2019s activities include the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), which provides permanent public access to published federal government information, and which last received legislative consideration in 1962.\nIn light of the governance and technological changes of the past four decades, a relevant question for Congress might arise: To what extent can decades-old authorities and work patterns meet the challenges of digital government information? For example, the widespread availability of government information in digital form has led some to question whether paper versions of some publications might be eliminated in favor of digital versions, but others note that paper versions are still required for a variety of reasons. Another area of concern focuses on questions about the capacity of current information dissemination authorities to enable the provision of digital government information in an effective and efficient manner. With regard to information retention, the emergence of a predominantly digital FDLP may raise questions about the capacity of GPO to manage the program given its existing statutory authorities.\nThese questions are further complicated by the lack of a stable, robust set of digital information resources and management practices like those that were in place when Congress last considered current government information policies. The 1895 printing act was arguably an expression of the state-of-the-art standard of printing technology and provided a foundation which supported government information distribution for more than a century. By contrast, in the fourth or fifth decade of transitioning from the tangible written word to ubiquitous digital creation and distribution, the way ahead is not as clear, due in part to a lack of widely understood and accepted standards for managing digital information.\nThis report examines three areas related to the production, distribution, retention, and management of government information in a primarily digital environment. These areas include\nthe Joint Committee on Printing;\nthe Federal Depository Library Program; and\ngovernment information management in the future.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45014",
          "sha1": "2041d5c12d842a93e7e587595425030fc0dbf22a",
          "filename": "files/20171108_R45014_2041d5c12d842a93e7e587595425030fc0dbf22a.html",
          "images": {
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45014_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171108_R45014_images_6e99d7e5b554e2d92b97f4d14b4b1e4ca015a57b.png"
          }
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45014",
          "sha1": "5e93c2ae9a29d8d7bd33af116ec24a8deec97098",
          "filename": "files/20171108_R45014_5e93c2ae9a29d8d7bd33af116ec24a8deec97098.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "American Law",
    "Economic Policy"
  ]
}