{
  "id": "R45156",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R45156",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 584289,
      "date": "2018-04-10",
      "retrieved": "2018-08-29T15:38:56.871680",
      "title": "The Smart Grid: Status and Outlook",
      "summary": "The electrical grid in the United States comprises all of the power plants generating electricity, together with the transmission and distribution lines and systems that bring power to end-use customers. The \u201cgrid\u201d also connects the many publicly and privately owned electric utility and power companies in different states and regions of the United States. However, with changes in federal law, regulatory changes, and the aging of the electric power infrastructure as drivers, the grid is changing from a largely patchwork system built to serve the needs of individual electric utility companies to essentially a national interconnected system, accommodating massive transfers of electrical energy among regions of the United States.\nThe modernization of the grid to accommodate today\u2019s more complex power flows, serve reliability needs, and meet future projected uses is leading to the incorporation of electronic intelligence capabilities for power control purposes and operations monitoring. The \u201cSmart Grid\u201d is the name given to this evolving intelligent electric power network. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) describes the Smart Grid as \u201can intelligent electricity grid\u2014one that uses digital communications technology, information systems, and automation to detect and react to local changes in usage, improve system operating efficiency, and, in turn, reduce operating costs while maintaining high system reliability.\u201d\nIn 2007, Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act (P.L. 110-140). Title XIII of the act described characteristics of the Smart Grid and directed DOE to establish a Smart Grid Investment Matching Grant (SGIG) program to help support the modernization of the nation\u2019s electricity system.\nIn 2014, DOE concluded that the adoption of Smart Grid technologies was accelerating but at varying rates \u201cdepending largely on decision-making at utility, state, and local levels.\u201d DOE noted that the nation\u2019s electricity system is in the midst of \u201cpotentially transformative change,\u201d with challenges for Smart Grid deployment remaining with respect to grid-connected renewable and distributed energy sources and adaptability to current and future consumer-oriented applications. \nCosts of deploying the Smart Grid remains an issue, and study estimates vary. While some DOE programs have supported grid modernization, Congress has not explicitly appropriated funding for deployment of the Smart Grid since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5). In its 2014 study, DOE estimated historical and forecast investment in the Smart Grid as approximately $32.5 billion between 2008 and 2017, averaging $3.61 billion annually in the period. If this level of investment remains constant, it would put spending well below levels the Electric Power Research Institute (in 2011) and the Brattle Group (in 2008) estimated were needed to fully build the Smart Grid by approximately 2030. From 2010 to 2015, $3.4 billion in SGIG grants supported 99 projects resulting in $8 billion in grid modernization.\nCongress could provide funding to help bridge the funding gap if it chooses to accelerate adoption of the Smart Grid. A number of near-term trends\u2014including electric vehicles, environmental concerns, and the ability of customers to take advantage of real-time pricing programs to reduce consumer cost and energy demand\u2014would benefit from investments in Smart Grid enabled technologies.\nWhile concerns such as cybersecurity and privacy exist, most electric utilities appear to view Smart Grid systems positively. Costs could be reduced and system resiliency improved by further integration of automated switches and sensors, even considering the cost of a more cybersecure environment. But with the potentially high costs of a formal transition, some see the deployment of the Smart Grid continuing much the same as it has, with a gradual modernization of the system as older components are replaced.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45156",
          "sha1": "1619572c7387263d08221ecd7b0cda3fd33b7fb8",
          "filename": "files/20180410_R45156_1619572c7387263d08221ecd7b0cda3fd33b7fb8.html",
          "images": {
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45156_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180410_R45156_images_67b0d821f663ea052fbe227db184fe030356741a.png",
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45156_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180410_R45156_images_b4d13be6043c0f76344bdb1842b85b993d3e90de.png"
          }
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45156",
          "sha1": "fee5d734aa9e788252620dbc55dacb3a06a592eb",
          "filename": "files/20180410_R45156_fee5d734aa9e788252620dbc55dacb3a06a592eb.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4840,
          "name": "Electricity"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Energy Policy",
    "Foreign Affairs"
  ]
}