{
  "id": "R45200",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R45200",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 581250,
      "date": "2018-05-18",
      "retrieved": "2018-05-22T13:11:03.425983",
      "title": "Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government Activity, Private Sector Initiatives, and Issues of Congressional Interest",
      "summary": "By the end of 2017, the People\u2019s Republic of China (PRC) had the world\u2019s largest number of internet users, estimated at over 750 million people. At the same time, the country has one of the most sophisticated and aggressive internet censorship and control regimes in the world. PRC officials have argued that internet controls are necessary for social stability, and intended to protect and strengthen Chinese culture. However, in its 2017 Annual Report, Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Fronti\u00e8res, RSF) called China the \u201cworld\u2019s biggest prison for journalists\u201d and warned that the country \u201ccontinues to improve its arsenal of measures for persecuting journalists and bloggers.\u201d China ranks 176th out of 180 countries in RSF\u2019s 2017 World Press Freedom Index, surpassed only by Turkmenistan, Eritrea, and North Korea in the lack of press freedom. At the end of 2017, RSF asserted that China was holding 52 journalists and bloggers in prison.\nThe PRC government employs a variety of methods to control online content and expression, including website blocking and keyword filtering; regulating and monitoring internet service providers; censoring social media; and arresting \u201ccyber dissidents\u201d and bloggers who broach sensitive social or political issues. The government also monitors the popular mobile app WeChat. WeChat began as a secure messaging app, similar to WhatsApp, but it is now used for much more than just messaging and calling, such as mobile payments, and all the data shared through the app is also shared with the Chinese government. While WeChat users have recently begun to question how their WeChat data is being shared with the Chinese government, there is little indication that any new protections will be offered in the future.\nThe U.S. government continues to advocate policies to promote internet freedom in China\u2019s increasingly restrictive environment and to mitigate the global impact of Chinese government censorship. The Department of State, the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG), and Congress have taken an active role in fighting global internet censorship:\nSince 2008, the State Department has created programs that support digital safety, policy advocacy, technology, and research to help global internet users overcome barriers to accessing the internet, including the Freedom Online Coalition. \nIn 2016, the BBG created the Office of Internet Freedom to oversee the efforts of BBG-funded internet freedom projects, including the research, development, deployment, and use of BBG-funded internet freedom technologies. \nIn 2000, Congress created the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) to monitor China\u2019s compliance with international human rights standards, to encourage the development of the rule of law in the PRC, and to establish and maintain a list of victims of human rights abuses in China.\nAdditionally, the U.S. information and communications technology (ICT) industry has taken steps to advance internet freedom. In 2008, a group of U.S. ICT companies, along with nongovernmental organizations, investors, and universities, formed the Global Network Initiative (GNI). The GNI aims to promote best practices related to the conduct of U.S. companies in countries with poor internet freedom records.\nIn the 115th Congress, the CECC held a hearing on April 26, 2018, on \u201cdigital authoritarianism and the global threat to free speech.\u201d No legislation has been introduced in the 115th Congress related to global internet freedom in authoritarian regimes.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45200",
          "sha1": "bad78f83cb7d5aa877d86e3eed297c9ee06148b2",
          "filename": "files/20180518_R45200_bad78f83cb7d5aa877d86e3eed297c9ee06148b2.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45200",
          "sha1": "6468a95037fb2b22d6091773e241b8877186840d",
          "filename": "files/20180518_R45200_6468a95037fb2b22d6091773e241b8877186840d.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Internet and Telecommunications Policy"
  ]
}