{ "id": "R45326", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "R45326", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 585787, "date": "2018-10-01", "retrieved": "2018-10-02T15:19:51.897741", "title": "Army Corps of Engineers Annual and Supplemental Appropriations: Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is an agency within the Department of Defense with both military and civil works responsibilities. The agency\u2019s civil works activities consist largely of the planning, construction, and operation of water resource projects to maintain navigable channels, reduce flood and storm damage, and restore aquatic ecosystems. Congress directs USACE\u2019s civil works activities through authorization legislation, annual and supplemental appropriations, and oversight. For Congress, the issue is not only the level of USACE appropriations but also how efficiently the agency is delivering flood control, navigation, and ecosystem restoration projects. These projects can have significant local as well as national economic and environmental benefits. \nAnnual and Supplemental Appropriations\nUSACE discretionary appropriations, which typically are provided through annual Energy and Water Development appropriations acts, have ranged from $4.7 billion to $7.0 billion during the decade from FY2009 to FY2019 and have been increasing since FY2013. In recent years, Congress has directed that more than 50% of the enacted appropriations be used for operation and maintenance of USACE\u2019s aging infrastructure. \nUSACE also has a prominent role in responding to natural disasters, especially floods, in U.S. states and territories. Congress increasingly is using supplemental appropriations not only to perform emergency response and repair for damaged flood control works and USACE projects but also to study and construct new projects that reduce flood risks in areas recently affected by hurricanes and floods. From FY2005 through FY2018, Congress enacted 13 supplemental bills related to flooding and natural disasters, providing a total of almost $45 billion to USACE; for the same period, annual discretionary appropriations for USACE\u2019s flood-related projects and activities totaled $23 billion. Supplemental appropriations bills often alter or waive various requirements for USACE activities, such as cost shares and project cost limitations, and establish project selection and reporting requirements that differ from requirements for USACE activities funded through annual discretionary appropriations.\nIssues for Congress\nIssues for Congress include the significant role of supplemental appropriations in advancing studies and construction of flood control projects since FY2005 and the agency\u2019s backlog of authorized but unconstructed projects. The agency has reported a $96 billion backlog of authorized construction projects; for context, annual appropriations for the USACE Construction account (which funds most USACE construction projects) in FY2018 and FY2019 are $2.1 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively. Congress also has limited the number of new studies and construction projects initiated with annual discretionary appropriations (e.g., a limit of five new construction starts using FY2019 appropriations). Given that only a few construction projects typically are started each fiscal year, numerous projects authorized for construction by previous Congresses remain unfunded. \nUSACE may fund some of the authorized flood control projects in its backlog with the more than $17 billion in emergency supplemental appropriations provided to USACE accounts in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA; P.L. 115-123). Although no numerical limits on starting new studies or construction projects are associated with these funds, the study and construction funds have some geographic limitations that tie their use to areas affected by flooding by the hurricanes in 2017 or by more than one flood in calendar years 2014 through 2017. As a result of this limitation, seventeen states (including North Carolina, which was affected by Hurricane Matthew in 2016 and Hurricane Florence in 2018) did not qualify for USACE supplemental construction appropriations provided through the BBA 2018.\nRelated policy questions for Congress and other decisionmakers include the following:\nHow have the roles of Congress and the Administration shifted vis-\u00e0-vis USACE and its appropriations, and does that shift affect the type of information and engagement that Congress may pursue in the future regarding USACE\u2019s use of appropriations? \nHow do trends in annual and supplemental appropriations amounts, processes, and requirements influence the effective, efficient, and accountable use of federal funding provided to USACE? \nWhat do these trends portend for USACE\u2019s long-term planning, budgeting, and duties?", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45326", "sha1": "b08d4b5019bf1b36d55d9a3805b4392469b0d36e", "filename": "files/20181001_R45326_b08d4b5019bf1b36d55d9a3805b4392469b0d36e.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45326_files&id=/3.png": "files/20181001_R45326_images_4f9a749dd76842895f8635fae12b8da7a6e38912.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45326_files&id=/1.png": "files/20181001_R45326_images_e58646b87b0b3dcdebb7f4b8ba5e6f730c07836f.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45326_files&id=/0.png": "files/20181001_R45326_images_c493897e886564ddf0e7f7074086acf707bb7e67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45326_files&id=/5.png": "files/20181001_R45326_images_9484df69a55fe07d473e15425959280ebf6b5281.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45326_files&id=/2.png": "files/20181001_R45326_images_0ac6349c12beecd38d719ff983ed6ccb7b24adea.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45326_files&id=/4.png": "files/20181001_R45326_images_83a86ff0a7553ef8df3f39a0de064ec916349b2b.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45326", "sha1": "6530bcb7c381658da592b4124b9c33bf6a7627e3", "filename": "files/20181001_R45326_6530bcb7c381658da592b4124b9c33bf6a7627e3.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4894, "name": "Energy & Water Development Appropriations" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4909, "name": "Water Resource Management" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Energy Policy" ] }