{ "id": "R45422", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "R", "number": "R45422", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "U.S. International Food Assistance: An Overview", "retrieved": "2021-03-17T04:03:29.686221", "id": "R45422_3_2021-02-23", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-02-23_R45422_9ffe400b9cdcdf65a89fbe75e4ec74744b39b3e3.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45422/3", "sha1": "9ffe400b9cdcdf65a89fbe75e4ec74744b39b3e3" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-02-23_R45422_9ffe400b9cdcdf65a89fbe75e4ec74744b39b3e3.html" } ], "date": "2021-02-23", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "R", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45422", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 588335, "date": "2018-12-06", "retrieved": "2019-12-20T20:24:41.363695", "title": "U.S. International Food Assistance: An Overview", "summary": "The United States has played a leading role in global efforts to alleviate hunger and improve food security. U.S. international food assistance programs provide support through two distinct methods: (1) in-kind aid, which ships U.S. commodities to regions in need, and (2) cash-based assistance, which provides recipients with vouchers, direct cash transfers, or locally procured foods.\nThe current suite of international food assistance programs began with the Food for Peace Act (P.L. 83-480), commonly referred to as \u201cP.L. 480,\u201d which established the Food for Peace program (FFP). Congress authorizes most food assistance programs in periodic farm bills. However, Congress authorized the Emergency Food Security Program (EFSP)\u2014a newer, cash-based food assistance program\u2014in the Global Food Security Act of 2016 (P.L. 114-195). Congress funds international food assistance programs through annual agriculture appropriations and state and foreign operations (SFOPS) appropriations bills. Since 2007, annual international food assistance outlays averaged $2.6 billion. In FY2016, FFP Title II and EFSP accounted for 87% of total international food assistance outlays. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) administer U.S. international food assistance programs. \nHistorically, the United States provided international food assistance exclusively through in-kind aid. Since the mid-1980s, FFP Title II, which provides in-kind donations, has been the dominant U.S. food aid program. (The name \u201cFFP Title II\u201d refers to Title II of the Food for Peace Act, in which Congress first authorized the program.) In the late 2000s, U.S. international food assistance began to shift toward a combination of in-kind and cash-based assistance. This is largely due to the Obama Administration creating the cash-based EFSP in 2010 to complement FFP Title II emergency aid. EFSP is used in conditions when in-kind aid cannot arrive soon enough or could potentially disrupt local markets or when it is unsafe to operate in conflict zones.\nDespite the growth in cash-based assistance, U.S. international food assistance still relies predominantly on in-kind aid. Many other countries with international food assistance programs have converted primarily to cash-based assistance. U.S. reliance on in-kind aid has become controversial due to its potential to disrupt local markets and cost more than procuring food locally. At the same time, lack of reliable suppliers and poor infrastructure in recipient countries may limit the efficacy and efficiency of cash-based assistance. Also, in poorly controlled settings, cash transfers or food vouchers could be stolen or used by recipients to purchase nonfood items. Agricultural cargo preference (ACP)\u2014the requirement that 50% of all in-kind aid be shipped on U.S.-flag ships\u2014has also become controversial due to findings that it can lead to higher transportation costs and longer delivery times. Higher costs may be partially due to higher wages and better working conditions on U.S.-flag vessels compared to foreign-flag vessels. ACP may also contribute to maintaining a U.S.-flag merchant marine to provide sealift capacity during wartime or national emergencies.\nThe Trump Administration and certain Members of Congress have proposed changes to the structure and intent of international food assistance programs. Some Members of Congress proposed changes in the House and Senate 2018 farm bills (H.R. 2). These proposed changes include amending requirements for some international food assistance programs and expanding flexibility to use cash-based assistance. Other proposed legislation would address ACP, expand flexibility to use cash-based assistance, and consolidate and alter funding for most international food assistance programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45422", "sha1": "0717639a2be3313fc48850f0a9391a87e2481515", "filename": "files/20181206_R45422_0717639a2be3313fc48850f0a9391a87e2481515.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45422_files&id=/0.png": "files/20181206_R45422_images_96e720a067422caac93c32651cad105696b46461.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45422", "sha1": "7d5adab5a9dfcdeba08f7f3c3ddcad09a9750d69", "filename": "files/20181206_R45422_7d5adab5a9dfcdeba08f7f3c3ddcad09a9750d69.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4757, "name": "Foreign Assistance" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4829, "name": "Agricultural Trade & Food Aid" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Agricultural Policy", "Foreign Affairs" ] }