{
  "id": "R45486",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "R45486",
  "active": true,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, Federation of American Scientists",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 597270,
      "date": "2019-04-24",
      "retrieved": "2019-12-20T19:22:04.644342",
      "title": "Child Nutrition Programs: Current Issues",
      "summary": "The term child nutrition programs refers to several U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service (USDA-FNS) programs that provide food for children in institutional settings. These include the school meals programs\u2014the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program\u2014as well as the Child and Adult Care Food Program, Summer Food Service Program, Special Milk Program, and Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. \nThe most recent child nutrition reauthorization, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA; P.L. 111-296), made a number of changes to the child nutrition programs. In some cases, these changes spurred debate during the law\u2019s implementation, particularly in regard to updated nutrition standards for school meals and snacks. On September 30, 2015, some of the authorities created by the HHFKA expired. Efforts to reauthorize the child nutrition programs in the 114th Congress, while not completed, considered several related issues and prompted further discussion about the programs. There were no substantial reauthorization attempts in the 115th Congress. \nCurrent issues discussed in this report include the following: \nNutrition standards for school meals and snacks. The HHFKA required USDA to update the nutrition standards for school meals and other foods sold in schools. USDA issued final rules on these standards in 2012 and 2016, respectively. Some schools had difficulty implementing the nutrition standards, and USDA and Congress have taken actions to change certain parts of the standards related to whole grains, sodium, and milk.\nOfferings in the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP). There have been debates recently over whether the FFVP should include processed and preserved fruits and vegetables, including canned, dried, and frozen items. Currently, statute permits only fresh offerings.\n\u201cBuy American\u201d requirements for school meals. The school meals programs\u2019 authorizing laws require schools to source foods domestically, with some exceptions, under Buy American requirements. Efforts both to tighten and loosen these requirements have been made in recent years. The enacted 2018 farm bill (P.L. 115-334) instructed USDA to \u201cenforce full compliance\u201d with the Buy American requirements and report to Congress within 180 days of enactment. \nCongregate feeding in summer meals. Under current law, children must consume summer meals on-site. This is known as the \u201ccongregate feeding\u201d requirement. Starting in 2010, Congress funded demonstration projects, including the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) demonstration, to test alternatives to congregate feeding in summer meals. Congress has increased funding for Summer EBT in recent appropriations cycles and there have been discussions about whether to continue or expand the program.\nImplementation of the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). The HHFKA created CEP, an option for qualifying schools, groups of schools, and school districts to offer free meals to all students. Because income-based applications for school meals are no longer required in schools adopting CEP, its implementation has created data issues for federal and state programs relying on free and reduced-price lunch eligibility data.\nUnpaid meal costs and \u201clunch shaming.\u201d The issue of students not paying for meals and schools\u2019 handling of these situations has received increasing attention. Some schools have adopted what some term as \u201clunch shaming\u201d practices, including throwing away a student\u2019s selected hot meal and providing a cold meal alternative when a student does not pay. Congress and USDA have taken actions recently to reduce instances of student nonpayment and stigmatization.\nPaid lunch pricing. One result of new requirements in the HHFKA was price increases for paid (full price) lunches in many schools. Attempts have been made\u2014some successfully\u2014to loosen these \u201cpaid lunch equity\u201d requirements in recent years.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45486",
          "sha1": "d91f704946eb51986ea3c2eed3a1ce18d756546a",
          "filename": "files/20190424_R45486_d91f704946eb51986ea3c2eed3a1ce18d756546a.html",
          "images": {
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45486_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190424_R45486_images_b969d218fc7799a0ce0c56548a8422376effb3b9.png"
          }
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45486",
          "sha1": "7a9e2cbc09d268bf6f0de619ef07a0357c360e4f",
          "filename": "files/20190424_R45486_7a9e2cbc09d268bf6f0de619ef07a0357c360e4f.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4811,
          "name": "School Nutrition & Health"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4856,
          "name": "Nutrition Programs & Policies"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4917,
          "name": "Food & Nutrition Assistance"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "Federation of American Scientists",
      "sourceLink": "https://sgp.fas.org/crs/",
      "id": "R45486_FAS",
      "date": "2019-02-05",
      "retrieved": "2019-02-05T11:21:26",
      "title": "Child Nutrition Programs: Current Issues",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20190205_R45486_1bf7629f61a6b79534195dacb8c0ad9ea7f449ae.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20190205_R45486_1bf7629f61a6b79534195dacb8c0ad9ea7f449ae.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 590667,
      "date": "2019-01-31",
      "retrieved": "2019-04-17T14:25:49.616273",
      "title": "Child Nutrition Programs: Current Issues",
      "summary": "The term child nutrition programs refers to several U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service (USDA-FNS) programs that provide food for children in institutional settings. These include the school meals programs\u2014the National School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program\u2014as well as the Child and Adult Care Food Program, Summer Food Service Program, Special Milk Program, and Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program. \nThe most recent child nutrition reauthorization, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA; P.L. 111-296), made a number of changes to the child nutrition programs. In some cases, these changes spurred debate during the law\u2019s implementation, particularly in regard to updated nutrition standards for school meals and snacks. On September 30, 2015, some of the authorities created by the HHFKA expired. Efforts to reauthorize the child nutrition programs in the 114th Congress, while not completed, considered several related issues and prompted further discussion about the programs. There were no substantial reauthorization attempts in the 115th Congress. \nCurrent issues discussed in this report include the following: \nNutrition standards for school meals and snacks. The HHFKA required USDA to update the nutrition standards for school meals and other foods sold in schools. USDA issued final rules on these standards in 2012 and 2016, respectively. Some schools had difficulty implementing the nutrition standards, and USDA and Congress have taken actions to change certain parts of the standards related to whole grains, sodium, and milk.\nOfferings in the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP). There have been debates recently over whether the FFVP should include processed and preserved fruits and vegetables, including canned, dried, and frozen items. Currently, statute permits only fresh offerings.\n\u201cBuy American\u201d requirements for school meals. The school meals programs\u2019 authorizing laws require schools to source foods domestically, with some exceptions, under Buy American requirements. Efforts both to tighten and loosen these requirements have been made in recent years. The enacted 2018 farm bill (P.L. 115-334) instructed USDA to \u201cenforce full compliance\u201d with the Buy American requirements and report to Congress within 180 days of enactment. \nCongregate feeding in summer meals. Under current law, children must consume summer meals on-site. This is known as the \u201ccongregate feeding\u201d requirement. Starting in 2010, Congress funded demonstration projects, including the Summer Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) demonstration, to test alternatives to congregate feeding in summer meals. Congress has increased funding for Summer EBT in recent appropriations cycles and there have been discussions about whether to continue or expand the program.\nImplementation of the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP). The HHFKA created CEP, an option for qualifying schools, groups of schools, and school districts to offer free meals to all students. Because income-based applications for school meals are no longer required in schools adopting CEP, its implementation has created data issues for federal and state programs relying on free and reduced-price lunch eligibility data.\nUnpaid meal costs and \u201clunch shaming.\u201d The issue of students not paying for meals and schools\u2019 handling of these situations has received increasing attention. Some schools have adopted what some term as \u201clunch shaming\u201d practices, including throwing away a student\u2019s selected hot meal and providing a cold meal alternative when a student does not pay. Congress and USDA have taken actions recently to reduce instances of student nonpayment and stigmatization.\nPaid lunch pricing. One result of new requirements in the HHFKA was price increases for paid (full price) lunches in many schools. Attempts have been made\u2014some successfully\u2014to loosen these \u201cpaid lunch equity\u201d requirements in recent years.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45486",
          "sha1": "36b7f9129c2d499a5a70725df97f64c68ff6106c",
          "filename": "files/20190131_R45486_36b7f9129c2d499a5a70725df97f64c68ff6106c.html",
          "images": {
            "/products/Getimages/?directory=R/html/R45486_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190131_R45486_images_b969d218fc7799a0ce0c56548a8422376effb3b9.png"
          }
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45486",
          "sha1": "709eab3565fae2fa60a1513e3e93ee2afb6d775b",
          "filename": "files/20190131_R45486_709eab3565fae2fa60a1513e3e93ee2afb6d775b.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4811,
          "name": "School Nutrition & Health"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4856,
          "name": "Nutrition Programs & Policies"
        },
        {
          "source": "IBCList",
          "id": 4917,
          "name": "Food & Nutrition Assistance"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations",
    "Domestic Social Policy",
    "Health Policy"
  ]
}