{
  "id": "R45732",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "R",
  "number": "R45732",
  "active": true,
  "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov",
      "title": "The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA): A Legal Overview",
      "retrieved": "2023-05-17T04:03:35.607870",
      "id": "R45732_6_2023-04-17",
      "formats": [
        {
          "filename": "files/2023-04-17_R45732_8e8c243456ec4cc6ac6dd6b0a2dace083e50a750.pdf",
          "format": "PDF",
          "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45732/6",
          "sha1": "8e8c243456ec4cc6ac6dd6b0a2dace083e50a750"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/2023-04-17_R45732_8e8c243456ec4cc6ac6dd6b0a2dace083e50a750.html"
        }
      ],
      "date": "2023-04-17",
      "summary": null,
      "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov",
      "typeId": "R",
      "active": true,
      "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R45732",
      "type": "CRS Report"
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 608468,
      "date": "2019-11-20",
      "retrieved": "2019-12-13T15:18:42.732400",
      "title": "The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA): A Legal Overview",
      "summary": "A plaintiff injured by a defendant\u2019s wrongful act may file a tort lawsuit to recover money from that defendant. To name a particularly familiar example, a person who negligently causes a vehicular collision may be liable to the victim of that crash. By forcing people who wrongfully injure others to pay money to their victims, the tort system serves at least two functions: (1) deterring people from injuring others and (2) compensating those who are injured.\nEmployees and officers of the federal government occasionally commit torts just like other members of the general public. For a substantial portion of this nation\u2019s history, however, plaintiffs injured by the tortious acts of a federal officer or employee were barred from filing lawsuits against the United States by \u201csovereign immunity\u201d\u2014a legal doctrine that ordinarily prohibits private citizens from haling a sovereign state into court without its consent. Until the mid-20th century, a tort victim could obtain compensation from the United States only by persuading Congress to pass a private bill compensating him for his loss. \nCongress, deeming this state of affairs unacceptable, enacted the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), which authorizes plaintiffs to obtain compensation from the United States for the torts of its employees. However, subjecting the federal government to tort liability not only creates a financial cost to the United States, it also creates a risk that government officials may inappropriately base their decisions not on socially desirable policy objectives, but rather on the desire to reduce the government\u2019s exposure to monetary damages. In an attempt to mitigate these potential negative effects of abrogating the government\u2019s immunity from liability and litigation, the FTCA limits the circumstances in which a plaintiff may pursue a tort lawsuit against the United States. For example, the FTCA contains several exceptions that categorically bar plaintiffs from recovering tort damages in certain categories of cases. Federal law also restricts the types and amount of damages a victorious plaintiff may recover in an FTCA suit. Additionally, a plaintiff may not initiate an FTCA lawsuit unless he has timely complied with a series of procedural requirements, such as providing the government an initial opportunity to evaluate the plaintiff\u2019s claim and decide whether to settle it before the case proceeds to federal court.\nSince Congress first enacted the FTCA, the federal courts have developed a robust body of judicial precedent interpreting the statute\u2019s contours. In recent years, however, the Supreme Court has expressed reluctance to reconsider its long-standing FTCA precedents, thereby leaving the task of potentially further developing the FTCA to Congress. Some Members of Congress have accordingly proposed legislation to modify the FTCA in various respects, such as by broadening the circumstances in which a plaintiff may hold the United States liable for torts committed by government employees.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45732",
          "sha1": "14b226eca2b949713affeb76578ae6541c33be15",
          "filename": "files/20191120_R45732_14b226eca2b949713affeb76578ae6541c33be15.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45732",
          "sha1": "1e513b392c1a6c2066ca790065c187aa890b4dbc",
          "filename": "files/20191120_R45732_1e513b392c1a6c2066ca790065c187aa890b4dbc.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 598565,
      "date": "2019-05-21",
      "retrieved": "2019-05-21T22:15:28.257173",
      "title": "The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA): A Legal Overview",
      "summary": "A plaintiff injured by a defendant\u2019s wrongful act may file a tort lawsuit to recover money from that defendant. To name a particularly familiar example, a person who negligently causes a vehicular collision may be liable to the victim of that crash. By forcing people who wrongfully injure others to pay money to their victims, the tort system serves at least two functions: (1) deterring people from injuring others and (2) compensating those who are injured.\nEmployees and officers of the federal government occasionally commit torts just like other members of the general public. For a substantial portion of this nation\u2019s history, however, plaintiffs injured by the tortious acts of a federal officer or employee were barred from filing lawsuits against the United States by \u201csovereign immunity\u201d\u2014a legal doctrine that ordinarily prohibits private citizens from haling a sovereign state into court without its consent. Until the mid-20th century, a tort victim could obtain compensation from the United States only by persuading Congress to pass a private bill compensating him for his loss. \nCongress, deeming this state of affairs unacceptable, enacted the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), which authorizes plaintiffs to obtain compensation from the United States for the torts of its employees. However, subjecting the federal government to tort liability not only creates a financial cost to the United States, it also creates a risk that government officials may inappropriately base their decisions not on socially desirable policy objectives, but rather on the desire to reduce the government\u2019s exposure to monetary damages. In an attempt to mitigate these potential negative effects of abrogating the government\u2019s immunity from liability and litigation, the FTCA limits the circumstances in which a plaintiff may pursue a tort lawsuit against the United States. For example, the FTCA contains several exceptions that categorically bar plaintiffs from recovering tort damages in certain categories of cases. Federal law also restricts the types and amount of damages a victorious plaintiff may recover in an FTCA suit. Additionally, a plaintiff may not initiate an FTCA lawsuit unless he has timely complied with a series of procedural requirements, such as providing the government an initial opportunity to evaluate the plaintiff\u2019s claim and decide whether to settle it before the case proceeds to federal court.\nSince Congress first enacted the FTCA, the federal courts have developed a robust body of judicial precedent interpreting the statute\u2019s contours. In recent years, however, the Supreme Court has expressed reluctance to reconsider its long-standing FTCA precedents, thereby leaving the task of further developing the FTCA to Congress. Some Members of Congress have accordingly proposed legislation to modify the FTCA in various respects, such as by broadening the circumstances in which a plaintiff may hold the United States liable for torts committed by government employees.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": true,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/R45732",
          "sha1": "1b517cb79ae2fba11954d9093c70234887e08be9",
          "filename": "files/20190521_R45732_1b517cb79ae2fba11954d9093c70234887e08be9.html",
          "images": {}
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/R45732",
          "sha1": "45fcf58bf6bd97f2eda2549a185b03c608fec0ed",
          "filename": "files/20190521_R45732_45fcf58bf6bd97f2eda2549a185b03c608fec0ed.pdf",
          "images": {}
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "American Law"
  ]
}