{ "id": "RL30165", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "number": "RL30165", "active": false, "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc820181/", "id": "RL30165_2006Jan24", "date": "2006-01-24", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060124_RL30165_82b7d8effd3b4d63fc53b0d7be500edb08e9a1b5.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060124_RL30165_82b7d8effd3b4d63fc53b0d7be500edb08e9a1b5.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc822263/", "id": "RL30165_2005Jan21", "date": "2005-01-21", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050121_RL30165_3b7901867593ba9b6121ac7452e074e56eb0d154.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050121_RL30165_3b7901867593ba9b6121ac7452e074e56eb0d154.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4414/", "id": "RL30165 2003-05-20", "date": "2003-05-20", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T06:27:33", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": "This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect school aid programs and summarizes all of the pertinent Supreme Court decisions, with particular attention to Zelman. It also summarizes the pending case of Davey v. Locke and other recent and ongoing state and lower federal court cases concerning vouchers.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030520_RL30165_6771d2cfe06b5a79a8ca59acc15afa28a88888ba.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030520_RL30165_6771d2cfe06b5a79a8ca59acc15afa28a88888ba.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elementary and secondary education", "name": "Elementary and secondary education" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court decisions", "name": "Supreme Court decisions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Constitutional law", "name": "Constitutional law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Educational vouchers", "name": "Educational vouchers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4413/", "id": "RL30165 2003-04-08", "date": "2003-04-08", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T06:26:59", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": "This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and summarizes all of the pertinent state and federal court decisions, including the Ohio case that will be heard by the Supreme Court. On September 25, 2001, the Supreme Court agreed to review a case raising the controversial issue of the constitutionality of education vouchers. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris the Sixth Circuit held Ohio\u2019s Pilot Scholarship Program, which provided up to $2500 to help low-income students in Cleveland\u2019s public schools attend private schools in the city, to violate the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030408_RL30165_c67f475b754649f11d518589a91e7233a909b15c.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030408_RL30165_c67f475b754649f11d518589a91e7233a909b15c.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elementary and secondary education", "name": "Elementary and secondary education" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court decisions", "name": "Supreme Court decisions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Constitutional law", "name": "Constitutional law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Educational vouchers", "name": "Educational vouchers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2609/", "id": "RL30165 2002-09-10", "date": "2002-09-10", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T06:26:26", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": "This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and summarizes all of the pertinent state and federal court decisions, including the Ohio case that will be heard by the Supreme Court. On September 25, 2001, the Supreme Court agreed to review a case raising the controversial issue of the constitutionality of education vouchers. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris the Sixth Circuit held Ohio\u2019s Pilot Scholarship Program, which provided up to $2500 to help low-income students in Cleveland\u2019s public schools attend private schools in the city, to violate the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20020910_RL30165_254a4f526554b3faaf7cddda38cc7dc093635fa2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20020910_RL30165_254a4f526554b3faaf7cddda38cc7dc093635fa2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elementary and secondary education", "name": "Elementary and secondary education" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court decisions", "name": "Supreme Court decisions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Constitutional law", "name": "Constitutional law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Educational vouchers", "name": "Educational vouchers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs2608/", "id": "RL30165 2002-07-16", "date": "2002-07-16", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T06:25:56", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": "This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and summarizes all of the pertinent state and federal court decisions, including the Ohio case that will be heard by the Supreme Court. On September 25, 2001, the Supreme Court agreed to review a case raising the controversial issue of the constitutionality of education vouchers. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris the Sixth Circuit held Ohio\u2019s Pilot Scholarship Program, which provided up to $2500 to help low-income students in Cleveland\u2019s public schools attend private schools in the city, to violate the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20020716_RL30165_736e59f65716421aa7bf916599fdf4d489affe82.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20020716_RL30165_736e59f65716421aa7bf916599fdf4d489affe82.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elementary and secondary education", "name": "Elementary and secondary education" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court decisions", "name": "Supreme Court decisions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Constitutional law", "name": "Constitutional law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Educational vouchers", "name": "Educational vouchers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1645/", "id": "RL30165 2001-11-15", "date": "2001-11-15", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T06:25:28", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": "This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and summarizes all of the pertinent state and federal court decisions, including the Ohio case that will be heard by the Supreme Court. On September 25, 2001, the Supreme Court agreed to review a case raising the controversial issue of the constitutionality of education vouchers. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris the Sixth Circuit held Ohio\u2019s Pilot Scholarship Program, which provided up to $2500 to help low-income students in Cleveland\u2019s public schools attend private schools in the city, to violate the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20011115_RL30165_9f76d1e50e580bb1a014e9972c7a7f7374fe0107.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20011115_RL30165_9f76d1e50e580bb1a014e9972c7a7f7374fe0107.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elementary and secondary education", "name": "Elementary and secondary education" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court decisions", "name": "Supreme Court decisions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Constitutional law", "name": "Constitutional law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Educational vouchers", "name": "Educational vouchers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs1162/", "id": "RL30165 2000-12-19", "date": "2000-12-19", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T06:25:04", "title": "Education Vouchers: Constitutional Issues and Cases", "summary": "This report details the constitutional standards that currently apply to indirect aid programs and summarizes all of the pertinent state and federal court decisions, including the Ohio case that will be heard by the Supreme Court. On September 25, 2001, the Supreme Court agreed to review a case raising the controversial issue of the constitutionality of education vouchers. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris the Sixth Circuit held Ohio\u2019s Pilot Scholarship Program, which provided up to $2500 to help low-income students in Cleveland\u2019s public schools attend private schools in the city, to violate the establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20001219_RL30165_8de057141991e00bdde99bdad69100869770d11b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20001219_RL30165_8de057141991e00bdde99bdad69100869770d11b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Elementary and secondary education", "name": "Elementary and secondary education" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court decisions", "name": "Supreme Court decisions" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Constitutional law", "name": "Constitutional law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Educational vouchers", "name": "Educational vouchers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] } ], "topics": [ "American Law", "Constitutional Questions" ] }