{ "id": "RL30360", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL30360", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 460287, "date": "2017-04-07", "retrieved": "2017-08-22T15:13:20.147274", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": "The filibuster is widely viewed as one of the Senate\u2019s most characteristic procedural features. Filibustering includes any use of dilatory or obstructive tactics to block a measure by preventing it from coming to a vote. The possibility of filibusters exists because Senate rules place few limits on Senators\u2019 rights and opportunities in the legislative process.\nIn particular, a Senator who seeks recognition usually has a right to the floor if no other Senator is speaking, and then that Senator may speak for as long as he or she wishes. Also, there is no motion by which a simple majority of the Senate can stop a debate and allow itself to vote in favor of an amendment, a bill or resolution, or most other debatable questions. Most bills, indeed, are potentially subject to at least two filibusters before the Senate votes on final passage: first, a filibuster on a motion to proceed to the bill\u2019s consideration and, second, after the Senate agrees to this motion, a filibuster on the bill itself.\nSenate Rule XXII, however, known as the cloture rule, enables Senators to end a filibuster on any debatable matter the Senate is considering. Sixteen Senators initiate this process by presenting a motion to end the debate. In most circumstances, the Senate does not vote on this cloture motion until the second day of session after the motion is made. Then, it requires the votes of at least three-fifths of all Senators (normally 60 votes) to invoke cloture. (Invoking cloture on a proposal to amend the Senate\u2019s standing rules requires the support of two-thirds of the Senators present and voting, whereas cloture on nominations requires a numerical majority.)\nThe primary effect of invoking cloture on most questions is to impose a maximum of 30 additional hours for considering that question. This 30-hour period for consideration encompasses all time consumed by roll call votes, quorum calls, and other actions, as well as the time used for debate. Under cloture, as well, the only amendments Senators can offer are ones that are germane and were submitted in writing before the cloture vote took place. Finally, the presiding officer also enjoys certain additional powers under cloture such as, for example, the power to count to determine whether a quorum is present and to rule amendments, motions, and other actions out of order on the grounds that they are dilatory.\nThe ability of Senators to engage in filibusters has a profound and pervasive effect on how the Senate conducts its business on the floor. In the face of a threatened filibuster, for example, the majority leader may decide not to call a bill up for floor consideration or may defer calling it up if there are other, equally important bills the Senate can consider and pass with less delay. Similarly, the prospect of a filibuster can persuade a bill\u2019s proponents to accept changes in the bill that they do not support but that are necessary to prevent an actual filibuster.\nThis report concentrates on the operation of cloture under the general provisions of Senate Rule XXII, paragraph 2, though it also identifies key modifications to its application in recent years. This report will be updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL30360", "sha1": "ccb9ca25cc05c500c345ebaa840d3d3c37d40934", "filename": "files/20170407_RL30360_ccb9ca25cc05c500c345ebaa840d3d3c37d40934.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL30360", "sha1": "8c449f94d05b4598076df20c9b7276f0b68f8f50", "filename": "files/20170407_RL30360_8c449f94d05b4598076df20c9b7276f0b68f8f50.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4747, "name": "Senate Floor Procedure" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 436731, "date": "2014-12-24", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T19:46:18.220583", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": "The filibuster is widely viewed as one of the Senate\u2019s most characteristic procedural features. Filibustering includes any use of dilatory or obstructive tactics to block a measure by preventing it from coming to a vote. The possibility of filibusters exists because Senate rules place few limits on Senators\u2019 rights and opportunities in the legislative process.\nIn particular, a Senator who seeks recognition usually has a right to the floor if no other Senator is speaking, and then that Senator may speak for as long as he or she wishes. Also, there is no motion by which a simple majority of the Senate can stop a debate and allow itself to vote in favor of an amendment, a bill or resolution, or most other debatable questions. Most bills, indeed, are potentially subject to at least two filibusters before the Senate votes on final passage: first, a filibuster on a motion to proceed to the bill\u2019s consideration and, second, after the Senate agrees to this motion, a filibuster on the bill itself.\nSenate Rule XXII, however, known as the cloture rule, enables Senators to end a filibuster on any debatable matter the Senate is considering. Sixteen Senators initiate this process by presenting a motion to end the debate. In most circumstances, the Senate does not vote on this cloture motion until the second day of session after the motion is made. Then, it requires the votes of at least three-fifths of all Senators (normally 60 votes) to invoke cloture. (Invoking cloture on a proposal to amend the Senate\u2019s standing rules requires the support of two-thirds of the Senators present and voting, whereas cloture on nominations other than to the U.S. Supreme Court requires a numerical majority.)\nThe primary effect of invoking cloture on most questions is to impose a maximum of 30 additional hours for considering that question. This 30-hour period for consideration encompasses all time consumed by roll call votes, quorum calls, and other actions, as well as the time used for debate. Under cloture, as well, the only amendments Senators can offer are ones that are germane and were submitted in writing before the cloture vote took place. Finally, the presiding officer also enjoys certain additional powers under cloture such as, for example, the power to count to determine whether a quorum is present and to rule amendments, motions, and other actions out of order on the grounds that they are dilatory.\nThe ability of Senators to engage in filibusters has a profound and pervasive effect on how the Senate conducts its business on the floor. In the face of a threatened filibuster, for example, the majority leader may decide not to call a bill up for floor consideration or may defer calling it up if there are other, equally important bills the Senate can consider and pass with less delay. Similarly, the prospect of a filibuster can persuade a bill\u2019s proponents to accept changes in the bill that they do not support but that are necessary to prevent an actual filibuster.\nThis report concentrates on the operation of cloture under the general provisions of Senate Rule XXII, paragraph 2. It identifies modifications (including temporary ones) in rules governing debate agreed to at the beginning of the 113th Congress, but the detailed provisions of these changes are addressed in CRS Report R42996, Changes to Senate Procedures at the Start of the 113th Congress Affecting the Operation of Cloture (S.Res. 15 and S.Res. 16), by Elizabeth Rybicki. This report will be updated as events warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL30360", "sha1": "d8ae473a323a556c3a4089ccfc2e3d9bb9de197e", "filename": "files/20141224_RL30360_d8ae473a323a556c3a4089ccfc2e3d9bb9de197e.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL30360", "sha1": "b18d13a0aeee2b725fcf32a7ca5f040828b9fe4a", "filename": "files/20141224_RL30360_b18d13a0aeee2b725fcf32a7ca5f040828b9fe4a.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "CongOpsList", "id": 4140, "name": "Senate Floor Proceedings" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc808017/", "id": "RL30360_2013May31", "date": "2013-05-31", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130531_RL30360_0e5483b1d9711d0c3ffa53040d5328981e18844d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130531_RL30360_0e5483b1d9711d0c3ffa53040d5328981e18844d.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227956/", "id": "RL30360_2012Nov29", "date": "2012-11-29", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": "Report that discusses major aspects of Senate procedure related to filibusters and cloture.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20121129_RL30360_35a05cdc9aeb058f065b6f3526d3d6b3370da342.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20121129_RL30360_35a05cdc9aeb058f065b6f3526d3d6b3370da342.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate rules and procedure", "name": "Senate rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Filibuster", "name": "Filibuster" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cloture", "name": "Cloture" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc820003/", "id": "RL30360_2010Mar12", "date": "2010-03-12", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100312_RL30360_9b466b2343dcd0f80989a7779eb2b110a6fbeeac.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100312_RL30360_9b466b2343dcd0f80989a7779eb2b110a6fbeeac.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3997/", "id": "RL30360_2003Mar28", "date": "2003-03-28", "retrieved": "2005-06-10T23:21:06", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": "This report discusses major aspects of Senate procedure related to filibusters and cloture. The two, however, are not always as closely linked in practice as they are in popular conception. Even when opponents of a measure resort to extended debate or other tactics of delay, supporters may not decide to seek cloture (although this situation seems to have been more common in earlier decades than today). In recent times, conversely, the Senate leadership has increasingly utilized cloture as a routine tool to manage the flow of business, even in the absence of any apparent filibuster.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20030328_RL30360_b97d9f60bbdb2ab38193276e3c06dccb665538c2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20030328_RL30360_b97d9f60bbdb2ab38193276e3c06dccb665538c2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate rules and procedure", "name": "Senate rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Filibuster", "name": "Filibuster" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Cloture", "name": "Cloture" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc814024/", "id": "RL30360_2001Jan17", "date": "2001-01-17", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20010117_RL30360_581e1d3d19df552b868e7410929418394403d6ca.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20010117_RL30360_581e1d3d19df552b868e7410929418394403d6ca.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Legislative Process" ] }