{ "id": "RL30862", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "RL", "number": "RL30862", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate\u2019s \u201cByrd Rule\u201d", "retrieved": "2022-11-08T04:03:37.986924", "id": "RL30862_19_2022-09-28", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-09-28_RL30862_a8033213d37fb1368bf3690502cdf8d0efec8032.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL30862/19", "sha1": "a8033213d37fb1368bf3690502cdf8d0efec8032" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-09-28_RL30862_a8033213d37fb1368bf3690502cdf8d0efec8032.html" } ], "date": "2022-09-28", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL30862", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate\u2019s \u201cByrd Rule\u201d", "retrieved": "2022-11-08T04:03:37.986002", "id": "RL30862_18_2021-05-04", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-05-04_RL30862_0408a86d23f3b58d9c4e5e9d36450beeb0c4bdbb.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL30862/18", "sha1": "0408a86d23f3b58d9c4e5e9d36450beeb0c4bdbb" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-05-04_RL30862_0408a86d23f3b58d9c4e5e9d36450beeb0c4bdbb.html" } ], "date": "2021-05-04", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL30862", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate\u2019s \u201cByrd Rule\u201d", "retrieved": "2022-11-08T04:03:37.985255", "id": "RL30862_17_2020-12-01", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-12-01_RL30862_378b2b78df0e560fb9a98ecfec57e2b71f8a4b36.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL30862/17", "sha1": "378b2b78df0e560fb9a98ecfec57e2b71f8a4b36" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-12-01_RL30862_378b2b78df0e560fb9a98ecfec57e2b71f8a4b36.html" } ], "date": "2020-12-01", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL30862", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 457187, "date": "2016-11-22", "retrieved": "2016-11-28T21:04:09.611097", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate\u2019s \u201cByrd Rule\u201d", "summary": "Reconciliation is a procedure under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by which Congress implements budget resolution policies affecting mainly permanent spending and revenue programs. The principal focus in the reconciliation process has been deficit reduction, but in some years reconciliation has involved revenue reduction generally and spending increases in selected areas. Although reconciliation is an optional procedure, it has been used most years since its first use by the House and Senate in 1980 (20 reconciliation bills have been enacted into law and four have been vetoed).\nDuring the first several years\u2019 experience with reconciliation, the legislation contained many provisions that were extraneous to the purpose of implementing budget resolution policies. The reconciliation submissions of committees included such things as provisions that had no budgetary effect, that increased spending or reduced revenues when the reconciliation instructions called for reduced spending or increased revenues, or that violated another committee\u2019s jurisdiction.\nIn 1985 and 1986, the Senate adopted the Byrd rule (named after its principal sponsor, Senator Robert C. Byrd) on a temporary basis as a means of curbing these practices. The Byrd rule was extended and modified several times over the years. In 1990, the Byrd rule was incorporated into the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as Section 313 and made permanent (2 U.S.C. 644).\nA Senator opposed to the inclusion of extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation may offer an amendment (or a motion to recommit the measure with instructions) that strikes such provisions from the legislation, or, under the Byrd rule, a Senator may raise a point of order against such matter. In general, a point of order authorized under the Byrd rule may be raised in order to strike extraneous matter already in the bill as reported or discharged (or in the conference report), or to prevent the incorporation of extraneous matter through the adoption of amendments or motions. A motion to waive the Byrd rule, or to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the chair on a point of order raised under the Byrd rule, requires the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the membership (60 Senators if no seats are vacant).\nThe Byrd rule provides six definitions of what constitutes extraneous matter for purposes of the rule (and several exceptions thereto), but the term is generally described as covering provisions unrelated to achieving the goals of the reconciliation instructions.\nThe Byrd rule has been in effect during Senate consideration of 19 reconciliation measures from late 1985 through the present. Actions were taken under the Byrd rule in the case of 15 of the 19 measures. In total, 70 points of order and 57 waiver motions were considered and disposed of under the rule, largely in a manner that favored those who opposed the inclusion of extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation (60 points of order were sustained, in whole or in part, and 48 waiver motions were rejected).\nThis report has been updated to include the consideration of the Restoring Americans\u2019 Healthcare Freedom Reconciliation Act of 2015 (H.R. 3762, 114th Congress).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL30862", "sha1": "ac98c2be0aa34ecef47c5ace1dabb8858349ee7d", "filename": "files/20161122_RL30862_ac98c2be0aa34ecef47c5ace1dabb8858349ee7d.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL30862", "sha1": "ce42dbc9f4a53acdf63bcb8097c7392495568965", "filename": "files/20161122_RL30862_ce42dbc9f4a53acdf63bcb8097c7392495568965.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4900, "name": "Budget & Appropriations Procedure" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 370488, "date": "2010-09-13", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T22:15:09.789651", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate\u2019s \u201cByrd Rule\u201d", "summary": "Reconciliation is a procedure under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by which Congress implements budget resolution policies affecting mainly permanent spending and revenue programs. The principal focus in the reconciliation process has been deficit reduction, but in some years reconciliation has involved revenue reduction generally and spending increases in selected areas. Although reconciliation is an optional procedure, it has been used most years since its first use in 1980 (20 reconciliation bills have been enacted into law and three have been vetoed).\nDuring the first several years\u2019 experience with reconciliation, the legislation contained many provisions that were extraneous to the purpose of implementing budget resolution policies. The reconciliation submissions of committees included such things as provisions that had no budgetary effect, that increased spending or reduced revenues when the reconciliation instructions called for reduced spending or increased revenues, or that violated another committee\u2019s jurisdiction.\nIn 1985 and 1986, the Senate adopted the Byrd rule (named after its principal sponsor, Senator Robert C. Byrd) on a temporary basis as a means of curbing these practices. The Byrd rule was extended and modified several times over the years. In 1990, the Byrd rule was incorporated into the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as Section 313 and made permanent (2 U.S.C. 644).\nA Senator opposed to the inclusion of extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation may offer an amendment (or a motion to recommit the measure with instructions) that strikes such provisions from the legislation, or, under the Byrd rule, a Senator may raise a point of order against such matter. In general, a point of order authorized under the Byrd rule may be raised in order to strike extraneous matter already in the bill as reported or discharged (or in the conference report), or to prevent the incorporation of extraneous matter through the adoption of amendments or motions. A motion to waive the Byrd rule, or to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the chair on a point of order raised under the Byrd rule, requires the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the membership (60 Senators if no seats are vacant).\nThe Byrd rule provides six definitions of what constitutes extraneous matter for purposes of the rule (and several exceptions thereto), but the term is generally described as covering provisions unrelated to achieving the goals of the reconciliation instructions.\nThe Byrd rule has been in effect during Senate consideration of 18 reconciliation measures from late 1985 through the present. Actions were taken under the Byrd rule in the case of 14 of the 18 measures. In total, 65 points of order and 52 waiver motions were considered and disposed of under the rule, largely in a manner that favored those who opposed the inclusion of extraneous matter in reconciliation legislation (46 points of order were sustained, in whole or in part, and 43 waiver motions were rejected).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL30862", "sha1": "399dc6e463ea6f348a5ea9b8a73e14fb494cd5a3", "filename": "files/20100913_RL30862_399dc6e463ea6f348a5ea9b8a73e14fb494cd5a3.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL30862", "sha1": "1763896ff8d624a6c565a83037da84bd3e708296", "filename": "files/20100913_RL30862_1763896ff8d624a6c565a83037da84bd3e708296.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "CongOpsList", "id": 4148, "name": "Budget Reconciliation" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491526/", "id": "RL30862_2010Jul02", "date": "2010-07-02", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate's \"Byrd Rule\"", "summary": "Reconciliation is a procedure under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by which Congress implements budget resolution policies affecting mainly permanent spending and revenue programs. The principal focus in the reconciliation process has been deficit reduction, but in recent years reconciliation has encompassed revenue reduction generally and spending increases in selected program areas. This report discusses the Byrd rule, which provides six definitions of what constitutes extraneous matter for purposes of the rule (and several exceptions thereto), but the term is generally described as covering provisions unrelated to achieving the goals of the reconciliation instructions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100702_RL30862_09e5286491f2782bc501fff9a56b5372b2c0a332.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100702_RL30862_09e5286491f2782bc501fff9a56b5372b2c0a332.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate rules and procedure", "name": "Senate rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congressional budget process", "name": "Congressional budget process" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budget reconciliation", "name": "Budget reconciliation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc819790/", "id": "RL30862_2008Mar20", "date": "2008-03-20", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate\u2019s \u201cByrd Rule\u201d", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080320_RL30862_cd912ae7335bb27210bd3d7e039fab170e77348d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080320_RL30862_cd912ae7335bb27210bd3d7e039fab170e77348d.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7261/", "id": "RL30862 2005-04-07", "date": "2005-04-07", "retrieved": "2005-09-27T13:19:07", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate's \"Byrd\" Rule", "summary": "Reconciliation is a procedure under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by which Congress implements budget resolution policies affecting mainly permanent spending and revenue programs. The principal focus in the reconciliation process has been deficit reduction, but in recent years reconciliation has encompassed revenue reduction generally and spending increases in selected program areas. The Byrd rule provides six definitions of what constitutes extraneous matter for purposes of the rule (and several exceptions thereto), but the term is generally described as covering provisions unrelated to achieving the goals of the reconciliation instructions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050407_RL30862_24b866051caa841db106bfad0992d00a8bbf8128.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050407_RL30862_24b866051caa841db106bfad0992d00a8bbf8128.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate rules and procedure", "name": "Senate rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congressional budget process", "name": "Congressional budget process" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budget reconciliation", "name": "Budget reconciliation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7099/", "id": "RL30862 2004-02-19", "date": "2004-02-19", "retrieved": "2005-09-27T13:18:09", "title": "The Budget Reconciliation Process: The Senate's \"Byrd\" Rule", "summary": "Reconciliation is a procedure under the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 by which Congress implements budget resolution policies affecting mainly permanent spending and revenue programs. The principal focus in the reconciliation process has been deficit reduction, but in recent years reconciliation has encompassed revenue reduction generally and spending increases in selected program areas. The Byrd rule provides six definitions of what constitutes extraneous matter for purposes of the rule (and several exceptions thereto), but the term is generally described as covering provisions unrelated to achieving the goals of the reconciliation instructions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20040219_RL30862_0b018e320685d4e37ad2ed9912f897de9f1b74a7.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20040219_RL30862_0b018e320685d4e37ad2ed9912f897de9f1b74a7.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate rules and procedure", "name": "Senate rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congressional budget process", "name": "Congressional budget process" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budget reconciliation", "name": "Budget reconciliation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" } ] } ], "topics": [ "American Law", "Legislative Process" ] }