{ "id": "RL31007", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL31007", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 104903, "date": "2002-02-05", "retrieved": "2016-05-24T20:15:43.993941", "title": "Appropriations for FY2002: Energy and Water Development", "summary": "The Energy and Water Development appropriations bill includes funding for civil works projects\nof\nthe Army Corps of Engineers, the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), most\nof the Department of Energy (DOE), and a number of independent agencies. The Bush\nAdministration requested $22.5 billion for these programs for FY2002 compared with $23.6 billion\nappropriated in FY2001. The House bill, ( H.R. 2311 ), passed on June 28, 2001,\nallocated $23.7 billion for these programs. The Senate approved its version of the bill July 19, 2001,\nwith $25.0 billion. The final bill appropriating $25.086 billion was approved by both houses on\nNovember 1, 2001 and enacted on November 12, 2001 as P.L. 107-66 .\n Key issues involving Energy and Water Development appropriations programs included:\n authorization of appropriations for major water/ecosystem restoration\ninitiatives for the Florida Everglades and California \"Bay-Delta\"; \n general provisions concerning operation of federal water projects on the\nMissouri River; \n proposed reductions in spending for solar and renewable\nenergy; \n the electrometallurgical treatment of nuclear spent fuel for storage and disposal,\na process that opponents contend raises nuclear proliferation concerns; \n cost and management of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) in DOE's Nuclear\nWeapons Stewardship program; \n restricted funding of physical sciences research in DOE contrasted with major\nincreases in life sciences research in the National Institutes of Health; and \n proposed higher funding for DOE's civilian nuclear waste management\nprogram as the Department nears a decision on building a waste repository under Nevada's Yucca\nMountain.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL31007", "sha1": "f2bf5f8dcf4c7f3952229b86509e665e74d77367", "filename": "files/20020205_RL31007_f2bf5f8dcf4c7f3952229b86509e665e74d77367.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL31007", "sha1": "8a86242eacbe5b1c999b32d1a82da81461121a59", "filename": "files/20020205_RL31007_8a86242eacbe5b1c999b32d1a82da81461121a59.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Energy Policy", "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }