{ "id": "RL31055", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL31055", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 590750, "date": "2019-02-06", "retrieved": "2019-12-20T20:02:10.613341", "title": "House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations", "summary": "One of the most common methods for changing spending priorities in appropriations bills on the House floor is through offset amendments. House offset amendments may generally change spending priorities in a pending appropriations measure by increasing spending for certain activities (or creating spending for new activities not previously included in the bill) and offsetting the increase with funding decreases in other activities in the bill. Offset amendments are needed to avoid points of order under Sections 302(f) and 311(a) of the Congressional Budget Act, enforcing certain spending ceilings affecting regular appropriations bills, continuing resolutions (CRs), and supplemental appropriations measures (supplementals). In addition, amendments to general appropriations bills that would increase total spending provided in the bill must be entirely offset.\nTwo types of House offset amendments are considered in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union (Committee of the Whole): clause 2(f) and reachback (or fetchback) amendments. As provided under House Rule XXI, clause 2(f) offset amendments consist of two or more amendments considered together (or en bloc) that would change amounts by directly adding text or changing text in the body of the bill. Taken as a whole, the amendment does not increase the amount of funding in the pending bill. Such amendments (1) must provide offsets in both new budget authority and outlays, (2) can only include language transferring appropriations in the bill, and (3) may contain certain unauthorized appropriations.\nReachback offset amendments are generally offered at the end of the bill and change funding amounts in the pending bill by reference. These amendments (1) must provide offsets in new budget authority, but not necessarily outlays; (2) may add new appropriations (and spending set-asides within certain restrictions); (3) cannot include unauthorized appropriations; and (4) may provide across-the-board spending reductions as offsets.\nParliamentary rules governing consideration of offset amendments may be suspended or waived, typically by House adoption of a special rule but also by unanimous consent.\nThe advantages of clause 2(f) amendments over reachback amendments are that clause 2(f) amendments may contain certain unauthorized appropriations and are typically considered before reachback amendments, sometimes limiting offset opportunities for reachback amendments. The main advantages of reachback amendments are that they may not have to offset outlays, may add new appropriations, and may include across-the-board spending reductions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL31055", "sha1": "6fe30d69c1da6d835dd03974941e680cfdf963a8", "filename": "files/20190206_RL31055_6fe30d69c1da6d835dd03974941e680cfdf963a8.html", "images": {} }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL31055", "sha1": "081b5ac35206fb126a5c9959f184987cae2ec166", "filename": "files/20190206_RL31055_081b5ac35206fb126a5c9959f184987cae2ec166.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4900, "name": "Budget & Appropriations Procedure" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 457329, "date": "2016-11-30", "retrieved": "2016-12-09T19:09:17.096391", "title": "House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations", "summary": "One of the most common methods for changing spending priorities in appropriations bills on the House floor is through offset amendments. House offset amendments may generally change spending priorities in a pending appropriations measure by increasing spending for certain activities (or creating spending for new activities not previously included in the bill) and offsetting the increase with funding decreases in other activities in the bill. Offset amendments are needed to avoid points of order under Sections 302(f) and 311(a) of the Congressional Budget Act, enforcing certain spending ceilings affecting regular appropriations bills, continuing resolutions (CRs), and supplemental appropriations measures (supplementals). In addition, amendments to general appropriations bills that would increase total spending provided in the bill must be entirely offset.\nTwo types of House offset amendments are considered in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union (Committee of the Whole): clause 2(f) and reachback (or fetchback) amendments. As provided under House Rule XXI, clause 2(f) offset amendments consist of two or more amendments considered together (or en bloc) that would change amounts by directly adding text or changing text in the body of the bill. Taken as a whole, the amendment does not increase the amount of funding in the pending bill. Such amendments (1) must provide offsets in both new budget authority and outlays, (2) can only include language transferring appropriations in the bill, and (3) may contain certain unauthorized appropriations.\nReachback offset amendments are generally offered at the end of the bill and change funding amounts in the pending bill by reference. These amendments (1) must provide offsets in new budget authority, but not necessarily outlays; (2) may add new appropriations (and spending set-asides within certain restrictions); (3) cannot include unauthorized appropriations; and (4) may provide across-the-board spending reductions as offsets.\nParliamentary rules governing consideration of offset amendments may be suspended or waived, typically by House adoption of a special rule but also by unanimous consent.\nThe advantages of clause 2(f) amendments over reachback amendments are that clause 2(f) amendments may contain certain unauthorized appropriations and are typically considered before reachback amendments, sometimes limiting offset opportunities for reachback amendments. The main advantages of reachback amendments are that they may not have to offset outlays, may add new appropriations, and may include across-the-board spending reductions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL31055", "sha1": "5013e6f43651dc544b396d1110da17f9945409f9", "filename": "files/20161130_RL31055_5013e6f43651dc544b396d1110da17f9945409f9.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL31055", "sha1": "43923eac689a3ce5fcb583ade56c3ba023367566", "filename": "files/20161130_RL31055_43923eac689a3ce5fcb583ade56c3ba023367566.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4900, "name": "Budget & Appropriations Procedure" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 452877, "date": "2014-09-29", "retrieved": "2016-06-21T21:24:33.478819", "title": "House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations", "summary": "One of the most common methods for changing spending priorities in appropriations bills on the House floor is through offset amendments. House offset amendments generally change spending priorities in a pending appropriations measure by increasing spending for certain activities (or creating spending for new activities not included in the bill) and offsetting the increase with funding decreases in other activities in the bill. Offset amendments are needed to avoid the Congressional Budget Act 302(f) and 311(a) points of order enforcing certain spending ceilings affecting regular appropriations bills, continuing resolutions (CRs), and supplemental appropriations measures (supplementals). In addition, amendments to general appropriations bills that would increase total spending provided in the bill must be entirely offset.\nTwo types of House offset amendments are considered in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union (Committee of the Whole): clause 2(f) and reachback (or fetchback) amendments. As provided under House Rule XXI, clause 2(f) offset amendments consist of two or more amendments considered together (or en bloc) that would change amounts by directly adding text or changing text in the body of the bill. Taken as a whole, the amendment does not increase the amount of funding in the pending bill. Such amendments (1) must provide offsets in both new budget authority and outlays, (2) can only include language transferring appropriations in the bill, and (3) may contain certain unauthorized appropriations.\nReachback offset amendments are generally offered at the end of the bill and change funding amounts in the pending bill by reference. These amendments (1) must provide offsets in new budget authority, but not necessarily outlays; (2) may add new appropriations (and spending set-asides within certain restrictions); (3) cannot include unauthorized appropriations; and (4) may provide across-the-board spending reductions as offsets.\nParliamentary rules governing consideration of offset amendments may be suspended or waived, typically by House adoption of a special rule but also by unanimous consent.\nThe advantages of clause 2(f) amendments over reachback amendments are that clause 2(f) amendments may contain certain unauthorized appropriations and are typically considered before reachback amendments, sometimes limiting offset opportunities for reachback amendments. The main advantages of reachback amendments are that they may not have to offset outlays, may add new appropriations, and may include across-the-board spending reductions.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL31055", "sha1": "657c18b2ff4b85d0a033c276f607cc2cd50e19d2", "filename": "files/20140929_RL31055_657c18b2ff4b85d0a033c276f607cc2cd50e19d2.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL31055", "sha1": "d025d116838421046e36899d7520ba6a5a396efd", "filename": "files/20140929_RL31055_d025d116838421046e36899d7520ba6a5a396efd.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "CongOpsList", "id": 4149, "name": "Appropriations Process" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc96737/", "id": "RL31055_2011Jul05", "date": "2011-07-05", "retrieved": "2012-08-07T13:52:45", "title": "House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations", "summary": "This report is an introduction to selected House rules and practices governing the consideration of offset amendments to appropriations measures considered in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union (or Committee of the Whole).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110705_RL31055_3ec5a3fd73f13e612eb8ec1287290d5402eeea57.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110705_RL31055_3ec5a3fd73f13e612eb8ec1287290d5402eeea57.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "House of Representatives", "name": "House of Representatives" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "House rules and procedure", "name": "House rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Appropriations", "name": "Appropriations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Legislative procedure", "name": "Legislative procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Legislative amendments", "name": "Legislative amendments" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc31399/", "id": "RL31055_2010Nov19", "date": "2010-11-19", "retrieved": "2011-03-09T09:26:47", "title": "House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations", "summary": "This report is an introduction to selected House rules and practices governing the consideration of offset amendments to appropriations measures considered in the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union (or Committee of the Whole).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20101119_RL31055_71fa9b5d7f690b12610d1dd75a5ab0b4bf5708f0.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20101119_RL31055_71fa9b5d7f690b12610d1dd75a5ab0b4bf5708f0.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "House of Representatives", "name": "House of Representatives" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "House rules and procedure", "name": "House rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Budgets", "name": "Budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Appropriations", "name": "Appropriations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Legislative procedure", "name": "Legislative procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Legislative amendments", "name": "Legislative amendments" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc812801/", "id": "RL31055_2006Dec13", "date": "2006-12-13", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20061213_RL31055_43b90ac81773a5d918dc73471a0b176b3a142c87.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20061213_RL31055_43b90ac81773a5d918dc73471a0b176b3a142c87.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Legislative Process" ] }