{
  "id": "RL31530",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RL31530",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 349576,
      "date": "2006-12-15",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:38:47.104029",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemicals (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. Because few terrorist attacks have been attempted against chemical facilities in the United States, the risk of death and injury in the near future is estimated to be low, relative to the likelihood of accidents at such facilities or attacks on other targets using conventional weapons. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing\u2014with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Available evidence indicates that many chemical facilities may lack adequate safeguards.\nAfter 9/11, Congress enacted legislation that requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to analyze vulnerabilities and suggest security enhancements for \u201ccritical infrastructure.\u201d The Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-188) and the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA, P.L. 107-295) require vulnerability assessments and emergency response plans for some chemical facilities that supply drinking water or are located in ports, as well as security plans for chemical facilities in ports. Many other chemical facilities, including wastewater treatment facilities, remain unregulated.\nCongress could choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could direct DHS to oversee security enhancement at potentially dangerous facilities. Or, Congress might enact legislation to reduce risks, either by \u201chardening\u201d defenses against terrorists (for example by increasing security patrols) or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes. Restricting terrorists\u2019 access to information might be a least-cost approach to reducing risks, but it would also limit public access to information about potential risks and reduce accountability of facility owners. For more on this topic, see CRS Report RL33043, Legislative Approaches to Chemical Facility Security, by Dana A. Shea.\nThe 109th Congress enacted chemical security legislation as Section 550 of the DHS appropriations legislation, P.L. 109-295. The law provides authority to DHS for three years to regulate high-risk chemical facilities other than drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities and facilities in ports. The enacted provisions also are found in H.R. 6348. These provisions combine certain elements of H.R. 5695, as reported by the House Homeland Security Committee, and S. 2145, as reported by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. For example, the enacted law directs DHS to establish risk-based security performance standards for facilities, and requires facility owners or operators to prepare vulnerability assessments and facility security plans. The new law also authorizes DHS to inspect facilities and to close down any that are repeatedly noncompliant. However, the law did not address the most controversial issues: whether state laws are preempted and whether facilities should be required to consider use of inherently safer technology.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL31530",
          "sha1": "3ea2860942b408ea1b6a2def8b837b3a8c70f195",
          "filename": "files/20061215_RL31530_3ea2860942b408ea1b6a2def8b837b3a8c70f195.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL31530",
          "sha1": "5845a7e58ed88328c4cbb793a2a4bef3a3603abf",
          "filename": "files/20061215_RL31530_5845a7e58ed88328c4cbb793a2a4bef3a3603abf.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9917/",
      "id": "RL31530 2006-10-11",
      "date": "2006-10-11",
      "retrieved": "2007-06-12T15:47:10",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemical (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing -- with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Congress might choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could expand existing environmental planning requirements for chemical facilities to require consideration of terrorism. Congress might also enact legislation to reduce risks, either by \"hardening\" defenses against terrorists or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20061011_RL31530_82c72619222b9a27ba784e480bd76567e927d4da.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20061011_RL31530_82c72619222b9a27ba784e480bd76567e927d4da.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810365/",
      "id": "RL31530_2006Oct03",
      "date": "2006-10-03",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20061003_RL31530_3f11ccf644b0193d81bfed3b2e3f4c4f88b8cc09.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20061003_RL31530_3f11ccf644b0193d81bfed3b2e3f4c4f88b8cc09.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9770/",
      "id": "RL31530 2006-08-02",
      "date": "2006-08-02",
      "retrieved": "2007-06-12T14:08:58",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemical (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing -- with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Congress might choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could expand existing environmental planning requirements for chemical facilities to require consideration of terrorism. Congress might also enact legislation to reduce risks, either by \"hardening\" defenses against terrorists or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20060802_RL31530_cdfff861795ff9edb440317e09998572571db63a.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20060802_RL31530_cdfff861795ff9edb440317e09998572571db63a.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10459/",
      "id": "RL31530_2006May22",
      "date": "2006-05-22",
      "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:26:12",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "The potential for United States hazardous chemical facilities to become the targets of terrorist attacks is a concern which Congress has begun to address in earnest. While the likelihood of such attacks is low at present,  Congress enacted legislation that requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to analyze such facilities and suggest enhancements in security and infrastructure. Such legislation--and future like legislation--could include requiring certain environmental and security standards in the future construction of new hazardous chemical facilities. Congress is focusing on educating the public and holding facility owners accountable to increase security, rather than simply restricting terrorists' access to information about the United States' chemical facility infrastructure.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20060522_RL31530_6601cadea3a8ad5d34046d9e8d6f263f10c5b53d.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20060522_RL31530_6601cadea3a8ad5d34046d9e8d6f263f10c5b53d.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8643/",
      "id": "RL31530 2006-03-24",
      "date": "2006-03-24",
      "retrieved": "2006-06-01T12:54:53",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemical (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing -- with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Congress might choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could expand existing environmental planning requirements for chemical facilities to require consideration of terrorism. Congress might also enact legislation to reduce risks, either by \"hardening\" defenses against terrorists or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20060324_RL31530_7d1a9312bd8fc67f3c8774ed1a13a36ec22f2076.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20060324_RL31530_7d1a9312bd8fc67f3c8774ed1a13a36ec22f2076.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Industrial buildings - Security measures",
          "name": "Industrial buildings - Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8110/",
      "id": "RL31530 2006-01-12",
      "date": "2006-01-12",
      "retrieved": "2006-02-14T16:38:09",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemical (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing -- with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Congress might choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could expand existing environmental planning requirements for chemical facilities to require consideration of terrorism. Congress might also enact legislation to reduce risks, either by \"hardening\" defenses against terrorists or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20060112_RL31530_86ad87179222c4bcd4d875c98ddb04e35e17635f.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20060112_RL31530_86ad87179222c4bcd4d875c98ddb04e35e17635f.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Industrial buildings - Security measures",
          "name": "Industrial buildings - Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6749/",
      "id": "RL31530 2005-07-29",
      "date": "2005-07-29",
      "retrieved": "2005-08-10T08:44:23",
      "title": "Chemical Facility Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemical (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but the risks may be increasing -- with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Congress might choose to rely on existing efforts in the public and private sectors to improve chemical site security over time. Alternatively, Congress could expand existing environmental planning requirements for chemical facilities to require consideration of terrorism. Congress might also enact legislation to reduce risks, either by \"hardening\" defenses against terrorists or by requiring industries to consider use of safer chemicals, procedures, or processes.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20050729_RL31530_d0ff34bf5e4f4bcbe40e0e745ebb189d962e12fc.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20050729_RL31530_d0ff34bf5e4f4bcbe40e0e745ebb189d962e12fc.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Industrial buildings - Security measures",
          "name": "Industrial buildings - Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6140/",
      "id": "RL31530 2005-02-14",
      "date": "2005-02-14",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T21:12:45",
      "title": "Chemical Plant Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemicals (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. Because few terrorist attacks have been attempted against chemical facilities in the United States, the risk of death and injury in the near future is estimated to be low, relative to the likelihood of accidents at such facilities or attacks on other targets using conventional weapons. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but risks may be increasing with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Available evidence indicates that many chemical facilities may lack adequate safeguards.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20050214_RL31530_9b46fe2b47eac9bf4e9819641da2abccfbd0aee1.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20050214_RL31530_9b46fe2b47eac9bf4e9819641da2abccfbd0aee1.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Industrial buildings - Security measures",
          "name": "Industrial buildings - Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc816245/",
      "id": "RL31530_2004Oct22",
      "date": "2004-10-22",
      "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26",
      "title": "Chemical Plant Security",
      "summary": null,
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20041022_RL31530_0ab151797e30fe563c7749175004d41e424e47ae.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20041022_RL31530_0ab151797e30fe563c7749175004d41e424e47ae.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5747/",
      "id": "RL31530 2004-01-20",
      "date": "2004-01-20",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T21:11:07",
      "title": "Chemical Plant Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemicals (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. Because few terrorist attacks have been attempted against chemical facilities in the United States, the risk of death and injury in the near future is estimated to be low, relative to the likelihood of accidents at such facilities or attacks on other targets using conventional weapons. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but risks may be increasing with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Available evidence indicates that many chemical facilities may lack adequate safeguards.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20040120_RL31530_3ff849d03f03d51ea1ae28fb6e357686502a93ad.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20040120_RL31530_3ff849d03f03d51ea1ae28fb6e357686502a93ad.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Industrial buildings - Security measures",
          "name": "Industrial buildings - Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs3882/",
      "id": "RL31530 2003-01-23",
      "date": "2003-01-23",
      "retrieved": "2005-06-10T21:09:42",
      "title": "Chemical Plant Security",
      "summary": "Facilities handling large amounts of potentially hazardous chemicals (i.e., chemical facilities) might be of interest to terrorists, either as targets for direct attacks meant to release chemicals into the community or as a source of chemicals for use elsewhere. Because few terrorist attacks have been attempted against chemical facilities in the United States, the risk of death and injury in the near future is estimated to be low, relative to the likelihood of accidents at such facilities or attacks on other targets using conventional weapons. For any individual facility, the risk is very small, but risks may be increasing with potentially severe consequences for human health and the environment. Available evidence indicates that many chemical facilities may lack adequate safeguards.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20030123_RL31530_c7c55cf68baafa79d650fa2b24171dd3cc64474d.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20030123_RL31530_c7c55cf68baafa79d650fa2b24171dd3cc64474d.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Business",
          "name": "Business"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Chemical industries",
          "name": "Chemical industries"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Industrial buildings - Security measures",
          "name": "Industrial buildings - Security measures"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Hazardous substances",
          "name": "Hazardous substances"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Appropriations",
    "Foreign Affairs",
    "Intelligence and National Security",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}