{ "id": "RL32109", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "RL", "number": "RL32109", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.682770", "id": "RL32109_271_2024-02-06", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2024-02-06_RL32109_ec6d12c3cf11cd64c9b1ac1b7d5c450bfea61eec.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/271", "sha1": "ec6d12c3cf11cd64c9b1ac1b7d5c450bfea61eec" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2024-02-06_RL32109_ec6d12c3cf11cd64c9b1ac1b7d5c450bfea61eec.html" } ], "date": "2024-02-06", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.680096", "id": "RL32109_269_2023-12-20", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2023-12-20_RL32109_2bc974c35c7a649f637c18e61054f089c4315594.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/269", "sha1": "2bc974c35c7a649f637c18e61054f089c4315594" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-12-20_RL32109_2bc974c35c7a649f637c18e61054f089c4315594.html" } ], "date": "2023-12-20", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.679391", "id": "RL32109_268_2023-08-08", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2023-08-08_RL32109_bab04133eb0958fd7c35b6077b0d60b28276b917.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/268", "sha1": "bab04133eb0958fd7c35b6077b0d60b28276b917" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-08-08_RL32109_bab04133eb0958fd7c35b6077b0d60b28276b917.html" } ], "date": "2023-08-08", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.676908", "id": "RL32109_267_2023-03-27", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2023-03-27_RL32109_87ce08010759e1ee7ab743d54c08fb4aa30106d2.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/267", "sha1": "87ce08010759e1ee7ab743d54c08fb4aa30106d2" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-03-27_RL32109_87ce08010759e1ee7ab743d54c08fb4aa30106d2.html" } ], "date": "2023-03-27", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.676328", "id": "RL32109_266_2022-12-21", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-12-21_RL32109_bc535ea766cf137418719f380cd138050aa90c3e.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/266", "sha1": "bc535ea766cf137418719f380cd138050aa90c3e" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-12-21_RL32109_bc535ea766cf137418719f380cd138050aa90c3e.html" } ], "date": "2022-12-21", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.674782", "id": "RL32109_265_2022-12-15", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-12-15_RL32109_6622358ae23a1aacf10759ac9f1adcbb490937e3.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/265", "sha1": "6622358ae23a1aacf10759ac9f1adcbb490937e3" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-12-15_RL32109_6622358ae23a1aacf10759ac9f1adcbb490937e3.html" } ], "date": "2022-12-15", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.672632", "id": "RL32109_263_2022-08-26", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-08-26_RL32109_68d2f626ac515e06b2f76618bbdab07f9fc4b921.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/263", "sha1": "68d2f626ac515e06b2f76618bbdab07f9fc4b921" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-08-26_RL32109_68d2f626ac515e06b2f76618bbdab07f9fc4b921.html" } ], "date": "2022-08-26", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.671273", "id": "RL32109_260_2022-07-25", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-07-25_RL32109_cd218c8b2d21e14033670d06580f631cd024e108.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/260", "sha1": "cd218c8b2d21e14033670d06580f631cd024e108" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-07-25_RL32109_cd218c8b2d21e14033670d06580f631cd024e108.html" } ], "date": "2022-07-25", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.670162", "id": "RL32109_258_2022-07-15", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-07-15_RL32109_e5d4e211d1a71ae1c9d342e7a8a62376b43b7337.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/258", "sha1": "e5d4e211d1a71ae1c9d342e7a8a62376b43b7337" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-07-15_RL32109_e5d4e211d1a71ae1c9d342e7a8a62376b43b7337.html" } ], "date": "2022-07-15", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.668837", "id": "RL32109_257_2022-05-02", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-05-02_RL32109_6a464921fe8e5cb7c812d21e4051617d98dd7094.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/257", "sha1": "6a464921fe8e5cb7c812d21e4051617d98dd7094" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-05-02_RL32109_6a464921fe8e5cb7c812d21e4051617d98dd7094.html" } ], "date": "2022-05-02", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.668145", "id": "RL32109_256_2022-03-31", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-03-31_RL32109_f5ea9450662a3bb41e7bbb2a5326622aa6c415e9.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/256", "sha1": "f5ea9450662a3bb41e7bbb2a5326622aa6c415e9" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-03-31_RL32109_f5ea9450662a3bb41e7bbb2a5326622aa6c415e9.html" } ], "date": "2022-03-31", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.666700", "id": "RL32109_254_2022-03-02", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-03-02_RL32109_f2ee226fa0842c20ddcf357b0286a1d81b475107.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/254", "sha1": "f2ee226fa0842c20ddcf357b0286a1d81b475107" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-03-02_RL32109_f2ee226fa0842c20ddcf357b0286a1d81b475107.html" } ], "date": "2022-03-02", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.666008", "id": "RL32109_253_2022-02-03", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-02-03_RL32109_79fc03317e8dc2d05d30f563a804f1a80949c496.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/253", "sha1": "79fc03317e8dc2d05d30f563a804f1a80949c496" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-02-03_RL32109_79fc03317e8dc2d05d30f563a804f1a80949c496.html" } ], "date": "2022-02-03", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.665309", "id": "RL32109_252_2022-01-31", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-01-31_RL32109_4b0df7f45fda82ad10beeee5d49d3954b6203d6e.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/252", "sha1": "4b0df7f45fda82ad10beeee5d49d3954b6203d6e" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-01-31_RL32109_4b0df7f45fda82ad10beeee5d49d3954b6203d6e.html" } ], "date": "2022-01-31", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.664738", "id": "RL32109_251_2021-12-08", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-12-08_RL32109_b6520a19ca2b894362b661ba40e6b0c4262272c4.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/251", "sha1": "b6520a19ca2b894362b661ba40e6b0c4262272c4" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-12-08_RL32109_b6520a19ca2b894362b661ba40e6b0c4262272c4.html" } ], "date": "2021-12-08", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.664040", "id": "RL32109_250_2021-11-17", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-11-17_RL32109_c5a59b86d46ca1d7c420ff6e96cf963751c3b3cb.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/250", "sha1": "c5a59b86d46ca1d7c420ff6e96cf963751c3b3cb" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-11-17_RL32109_c5a59b86d46ca1d7c420ff6e96cf963751c3b3cb.html" } ], "date": "2021-11-17", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.663541", "id": "RL32109_249_2021-10-19", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-10-19_RL32109_33d2514166772e6d84c021a735f3834d6f34a37c.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/249", "sha1": "33d2514166772e6d84c021a735f3834d6f34a37c" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-10-19_RL32109_33d2514166772e6d84c021a735f3834d6f34a37c.html" } ], "date": "2021-10-19", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.662642", "id": "RL32109_248_2021-09-29", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-09-29_RL32109_f23c07e87dfca40495c9bf7bdd53931ee33a282b.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/248", "sha1": "f23c07e87dfca40495c9bf7bdd53931ee33a282b" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-09-29_RL32109_f23c07e87dfca40495c9bf7bdd53931ee33a282b.html" } ], "date": "2021-09-29", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.662125", "id": "RL32109_247_2021-09-14", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-09-14_RL32109_7bb7cc39f28a7a1497da90da9bd46a4e2d8a1ee9.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/247", "sha1": "7bb7cc39f28a7a1497da90da9bd46a4e2d8a1ee9" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-09-14_RL32109_7bb7cc39f28a7a1497da90da9bd46a4e2d8a1ee9.html" } ], "date": "2021-09-14", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.661417", "id": "RL32109_246_2021-07-29", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-07-29_RL32109_eb1c822b084bc854330523222f7871f623def53c.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/246", "sha1": "eb1c822b084bc854330523222f7871f623def53c" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-07-29_RL32109_eb1c822b084bc854330523222f7871f623def53c.html" } ], "date": "2021-07-29", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.660931", "id": "RL32109_245_2021-06-28", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-06-28_RL32109_85b48fe585c895ddd3c5c1fa8497795e6d34b51f.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/245", "sha1": "85b48fe585c895ddd3c5c1fa8497795e6d34b51f" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-06-28_RL32109_85b48fe585c895ddd3c5c1fa8497795e6d34b51f.html" } ], "date": "2021-06-28", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.659779", "id": "RL32109_243_2021-06-25", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-06-25_RL32109_8fa705608ee12d5e7b05f92d4870bb300e297433.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/243", "sha1": "8fa705608ee12d5e7b05f92d4870bb300e297433" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-06-25_RL32109_8fa705608ee12d5e7b05f92d4870bb300e297433.html" } ], "date": "2021-06-25", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.658380", "id": "RL32109_241_2021-06-04", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-06-04_RL32109_74614341a75bb75abeec6d5265d88ecd7bf55218.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/241", "sha1": "74614341a75bb75abeec6d5265d88ecd7bf55218" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-06-04_RL32109_74614341a75bb75abeec6d5265d88ecd7bf55218.html" } ], "date": "2021-06-04", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.657303", "id": "RL32109_240_2021-02-24", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-02-24_RL32109_5c37a7f4faf754dd57871b9c481746e3e0839a63.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/240", "sha1": "5c37a7f4faf754dd57871b9c481746e3e0839a63" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-02-24_RL32109_5c37a7f4faf754dd57871b9c481746e3e0839a63.html" } ], "date": "2021-02-24", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.656690", "id": "RL32109_239_2020-12-22", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-12-22_RL32109_3ecb400896b7c8b64bccc9dd73ce018b30950ddc.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/239", "sha1": "3ecb400896b7c8b64bccc9dd73ce018b30950ddc" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-12-22_RL32109_3ecb400896b7c8b64bccc9dd73ce018b30950ddc.html" } ], "date": "2020-12-22", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.656081", "id": "RL32109_238_2020-12-08", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-12-08_RL32109_ffc943f82f48254a825638799ecc6b4e538eedc2.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/238", "sha1": "ffc943f82f48254a825638799ecc6b4e538eedc2" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-12-08_RL32109_ffc943f82f48254a825638799ecc6b4e538eedc2.html" } ], "date": "2020-12-08", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.655570", "id": "RL32109_237_2020-11-10", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-11-10_RL32109_ee5a3a7330d2c49ab16812852ef8b9915a8d58ae.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/237", "sha1": "ee5a3a7330d2c49ab16812852ef8b9915a8d58ae" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-11-10_RL32109_ee5a3a7330d2c49ab16812852ef8b9915a8d58ae.html" } ], "date": "2020-11-10", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.654166", "id": "RL32109_235_2020-10-06", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-10-06_RL32109_a856d2a6a28ebc44d269580faad52fb9683f468c.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/235", "sha1": "a856d2a6a28ebc44d269580faad52fb9683f468c" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-10-06_RL32109_a856d2a6a28ebc44d269580faad52fb9683f468c.html" } ], "date": "2020-10-06", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.653606", "id": "RL32109_234_2020-07-28", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-07-28_RL32109_8b3ef164d93a3dea13aacfadcfebb35944827f8d.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/234", "sha1": "8b3ef164d93a3dea13aacfadcfebb35944827f8d" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-07-28_RL32109_8b3ef164d93a3dea13aacfadcfebb35944827f8d.html" } ], "date": "2020-07-28", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.653018", "id": "RL32109_233_2020-07-22", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-07-22_RL32109_200ef40d349732b1eae60bc652d8f477eaa1139a.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/233", "sha1": "200ef40d349732b1eae60bc652d8f477eaa1139a" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-07-22_RL32109_200ef40d349732b1eae60bc652d8f477eaa1139a.html" } ], "date": "2020-07-22", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.652249", "id": "RL32109_232_2020-07-21", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-07-21_RL32109_43f64209c75fbba36dff23d3a6bb9b256e6039bb.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/232", "sha1": "43f64209c75fbba36dff23d3a6bb9b256e6039bb" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-07-21_RL32109_43f64209c75fbba36dff23d3a6bb9b256e6039bb.html" } ], "date": "2020-07-21", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.651621", "id": "RL32109_231_2020-06-08", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2020-06-08_RL32109_66c33cf698544b777d6481d6fcde231ed34c8d61.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/231", "sha1": "66c33cf698544b777d6481d6fcde231ed34c8d61" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2020-06-08_RL32109_66c33cf698544b777d6481d6fcde231ed34c8d61.html" } ], "date": "2020-06-08", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 620620, "date": "2020-03-22", "retrieved": "2020-03-23T22:22:17.697636", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 85 have been procured through FY2020, including three in FY2020. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2021 budget requests funding for the procurement of two more DDG-51s, which would be the 86th and 87th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s are being procured in FY2018-FY2022 under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a revised design, called the Flight III design, that incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $3,836.9 million, or an average of $1,918.5 million each. The ships have received $796.6 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2021 budget requests the remaining $3,040.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the two DDG-51s, as well as $29.3 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the MYP contract, and $9.6 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years, bringing the total amount of procurement funding requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2021 to $3,079.2 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2028. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2027 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2021 for the DDG-51 program include the following:\nthe potential impact of the COVID-19 (coronavirus) situation on the execution of U.S. military shipbuilding programs, including the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2021 funding request for the DDG-51 program;\na projected reduction under the Navy\u2019s FY2021 budget submission in the number of DDG-51s to be procured in FY2023-FY2025, compared to previous Navy plans for DDG-51 procurement in those fiscal years, and how this relates, if at all, to a possible change in the surface force architecture that Navy leaders have been talking about since 2019; and \ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "ee2f10674ea5992a9c6d4dddbb367820f117758b", "filename": "files/20200322_RL32109_ee2f10674ea5992a9c6d4dddbb367820f117758b.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20200322_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200322_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20200322_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "17d4ffcc1dd5117f0066d9eddb5cc0f595a86492", "filename": "files/20200322_RL32109_17d4ffcc1dd5117f0066d9eddb5cc0f595a86492.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 618495, "date": "2020-03-02", "retrieved": "2020-03-06T17:05:17.481962", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 85 have been procured through FY2020, including three in FY2020. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2021 budget requests funding for the procurement of two more DDG-51s, which would be the 86th and 87th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s are being procured in FY2018-FY2022 under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a revised design, called the Flight III design, that incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $3,836.9 million, or an average of $1,918.5 million each. The ships have received $796.6 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2021 budget requests the remaining $3,040.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the two DDG-51s, as well as $29.3 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the MYP contract, and $9.6 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years, bringing the total amount of procurement funding requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2021 to $3,079.2 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2028. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2027 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2021 for the DDG-51 program include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2021 funding request for the DDG-51 program;\na projected reduction under the Navy\u2019s FY2021 budget submission in the number of DDG-51s to be procured in FY2023-FY2025, compared to previous Navy plans for DDG-51 procurement in those fiscal years, and how this relates, if at all, to a possible change in the surface force architecture that Navy leaders have been talking about since 2019; and \ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "100103a6ef8c052a50497c429389a324eb705224", "filename": "files/20200302_RL32109_100103a6ef8c052a50497c429389a324eb705224.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20200302_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20200302_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20200302_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "e9fa1efca7a667efb0a3c48aa312debf030c06cd", "filename": "files/20200302_RL32109_e9fa1efca7a667efb0a3c48aa312debf030c06cd.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 611997, "date": "2019-12-17", "retrieved": "2020-01-02T13:37:16.560983", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort;\nthe potential impact on the DDG-51 program of a possible change in the surface force architecture; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "2ccddd4069d59569ccb8cc96777566eeda80289a", "filename": "files/20191217_RL32109_2ccddd4069d59569ccb8cc96777566eeda80289a.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20191217_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20191217_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20191217_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "f10fde6fe73044d14d3a3cc8f37795c3921a9b48", "filename": "files/20191217_RL32109_f10fde6fe73044d14d3a3cc8f37795c3921a9b48.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.647794", "id": "RL32109_226_2019-12-13", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2019-12-13_RL32109_903eb6a8c406e28e8fda02bdadc5473f9dfecfc7.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/226", "sha1": "903eb6a8c406e28e8fda02bdadc5473f9dfecfc7" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2019-12-13_RL32109_903eb6a8c406e28e8fda02bdadc5473f9dfecfc7.html" } ], "date": "2019-12-13", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 606124, "date": "2019-10-10", "retrieved": "2019-12-13T15:48:32.624904", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort;\nthe potential impact on the DDG-51 program of a possible change in the surface force architecture; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "4bb25f599170d63951e22da50963efeb6d50a5ec", "filename": "files/20191010_RL32109_4bb25f599170d63951e22da50963efeb6d50a5ec.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20191010_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20191010_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20191010_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "2b3f8dbcdb49e1f1b07f2547e172a6b7f202dc38", "filename": "files/20191010_RL32109_2b3f8dbcdb49e1f1b07f2547e172a6b7f202dc38.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 605124, "date": "2019-09-17", "retrieved": "2019-09-18T22:05:37.125175", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort;\nthe potential impact on the DDG-51 program of a possible change in the surface force architecture; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "75bdfa66aa67f44275834a39566ebef9635e26c1", "filename": "files/20190917_RL32109_75bdfa66aa67f44275834a39566ebef9635e26c1.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190917_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190917_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190917_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "95f886c6ebd068e0d49d060fbbffbdbb35f88348", "filename": "files/20190917_RL32109_95f886c6ebd068e0d49d060fbbffbdbb35f88348.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 600838, "date": "2019-06-21", "retrieved": "2019-07-02T22:11:51.019140", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort;\nthe potential impact on the DDG-51 program of a possible change in the surface force architecture; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "f67d9e577ef86ad7b8f5580c64df22899ac495bf", "filename": "files/20190621_RL32109_f67d9e577ef86ad7b8f5580c64df22899ac495bf.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190621_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190621_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190621_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "669f94fe4dedf1cae6d526fbf4ed3f3bc70f4e17", "filename": "files/20190621_RL32109_669f94fe4dedf1cae6d526fbf4ed3f3bc70f4e17.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.644066", "id": "RL32109_221_2019-06-18", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2019-06-18_RL32109_2d089e4801763905b26ef862f952d196137bbb41.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/221", "sha1": "2d089e4801763905b26ef862f952d196137bbb41" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2019-06-18_RL32109_2d089e4801763905b26ef862f952d196137bbb41.html" } ], "date": "2019-06-18", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2024-07-23T04:03:22.643461", "id": "RL32109_220_2019-06-07", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2019-06-07_RL32109_e2cca539182850163dc4b4afb94b502c07777352.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32109/220", "sha1": "e2cca539182850163dc4b4afb94b502c07777352" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2019-06-07_RL32109_e2cca539182850163dc4b4afb94b502c07777352.html" } ], "date": "2019-06-07", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32109", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 598368, "date": "2019-05-17", "retrieved": "2019-05-17T22:13:07.754205", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort;\nthe potential impact on the DDG-51 program of a possible change in the surface force architecture; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "ff2a1ffafd98886b36ec1cf6d0af784df62072e1", "filename": "files/20190517_RL32109_ff2a1ffafd98886b36ec1cf6d0af784df62072e1.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190517_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190517_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190517_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "e55c0dcc7021d857628c3710ade7ab6b123fb6c9", "filename": "files/20190517_RL32109_e55c0dcc7021d857628c3710ade7ab6b123fb6c9.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 597923, "date": "2019-05-07", "retrieved": "2019-05-08T22:05:18.877622", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort;\nthe potential impact on the DDG-51 program of a possible change in the surface force architecture; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "2a2ba277f6dafa434d0c33afce23f208ec7cd460", "filename": "files/20190507_RL32109_2a2ba277f6dafa434d0c33afce23f208ec7cd460.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190507_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190507_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190507_RL32109_images_90e9a9a238fe15cfe02da62b534837d5f388267d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "94ca651905d3a9bbb32b883cd637ca2b445f7c6a", "filename": "files/20190507_RL32109_94ca651905d3a9bbb32b883cd637ca2b445f7c6a.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 596524, "date": "2019-04-17", "retrieved": "2019-05-03T14:19:37.533816", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy began procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class destroyers, also known as Aegis destroyers, in FY1985, and a total of 82 have been procured through FY2019. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests funding for the procurement of three more DDG-51s, which would be the 83rd, 84th, and 85th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are being procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. In FY2007-FY2009, during the time when the Navy was not procuring DDG-51s, the Navy procured three Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers. The Navy plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests $155.9 million in procurement funding to help complete the total procurement cost of the three DDG-1000 class ships.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2020 at $5,463.0 million, or an average of $1,821.0 million each. The ships have received $363.7 million in prior-year Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2020 budget requests the remaining $5,099.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost of the three DDG-51s, as well as $224.0 million in EOQ funding for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2021 and FY2022, bringing the total amount requested for the DDG-51 program for FY2020 to $5,323.3 million, excluding outfitting and post-delivery costs.\nThe Navy wants to procure the first ship of a new class of large surface combatants in FY2025. Under the Navy\u2019s plan, FY2025 would be the final year of DDG-51 procurement.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2020 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe Navy\u2019s plan to shift the mission orientation of the DDG-1000s from an emphasis on naval surface fire support (NSFS) to an emphasis on surface strike.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "a1fcbdbade6ea075918b8ebce5f81f811295ee70", "filename": "files/20190417_RL32109_a1fcbdbade6ea075918b8ebce5f81f811295ee70.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190417_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190417_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "c2562fadc21fbcb32d9045da307a5c69b5f573bf", "filename": "files/20190417_RL32109_c2562fadc21fbcb32d9045da307a5c69b5f573bf.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 586539, "date": "2018-10-22", "retrieved": "2019-04-18T13:33:47.645636", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy\u2019s Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. The three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 are to be the 80th, 81st, and 82nd ships in the class. The Navy procured three DDG-1000s in FY2007-FY2009 and plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s.\nThe 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each. The ships are to receive $39.4 million in prior-year (FY2018) Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2019 budget requests the following:\nthe remaining $5,253.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost for the three DDG-51s requested for FY2019;\n$391.9 million in additional EOQ AP funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract;\n$54.0 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost increases on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$271.0 million in procurement funding to cover cost increases on Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2019 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement of an additional DDG-51 (for a total procurement of four DDG-51s rather than three) in FY2019;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\nthe Navy\u2019s intended shift in mission orientation for the DDG-1000s;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "a1fcbdbade6ea075918b8ebce5f81f811295ee70", "filename": "files/20181022_RL32109_a1fcbdbade6ea075918b8ebce5f81f811295ee70.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20181022_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20181022_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "c2562fadc21fbcb32d9045da307a5c69b5f573bf", "filename": "files/20181022_RL32109_c2562fadc21fbcb32d9045da307a5c69b5f573bf.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 584923, "date": "2018-07-31", "retrieved": "2018-10-05T22:59:17.130314", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy\u2019s Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. The three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 are to be the 80th, 81st, and 82nd ships in the class. The Navy procured three DDG-1000s in FY2007-FY2009 and plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s.\nThe 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each. The ships are to receive $39.4 million in prior-year (FY2018) Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2019 budget requests the following:\nthe remaining $5,253.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost for the three DDG-51s requested for FY2019;\n$391.9 million in additional EOQ AP funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract;\n$54.0 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost increases on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$271.0 million in procurement funding to cover cost increases on Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2019 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement of an additional DDG-51 (for a total procurement of four DDG-51s rather than three) in FY2019;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\nthe Navy\u2019s intended shift in mission orientation for the DDG-1000s;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "e36062318ca5bd0bb0c629d891b31a26f8ed4adc", "filename": "files/20180731_RL32109_e36062318ca5bd0bb0c629d891b31a26f8ed4adc.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180731_RL32109_images_94615abe02b4c52770376b56b0b1e2b1e37a9c64.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180731_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "8ad3512b5c710cc23ea0bf547b2f7716544e7a87", "filename": "files/20180731_RL32109_8ad3512b5c710cc23ea0bf547b2f7716544e7a87.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 582605, "date": "2018-07-03", "retrieved": "2018-07-10T20:09:43.782638", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy\u2019s Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. The three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 are to be the 80th, 81st, and 82nd ships in the class. The Navy procured three DDG-1000s in FY2007-FY2009 and plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s.\nThe 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each. The ships are to receive $39.4 million in prior-year (FY2018) Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2019 budget requests the following:\nthe remaining $5,253.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost for the three DDG-51s requested for FY2019;\n$391.9 million in additional EOQ AP funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract;\n$54.0 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost increases on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$271.0 million in procurement funding to cover cost increases on Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2019 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement of an additional DDG-51 (for a total procurement of four DDG-51s rather than three) in FY2019;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\nthe Navy\u2019s intended shift in mission orientation for the DDG-1000s;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "a923af6bb209d8523bd32d859978b9a0bed6cb14", "filename": "files/20180703_RL32109_a923af6bb209d8523bd32d859978b9a0bed6cb14.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180703_RL32109_images_adf7ae4a848402aee457e266dbf278e284b15910.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180703_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "73702df92cc5fa6b0c8cab686fcaf77e1ed68b8e", "filename": "files/20180703_RL32109_73702df92cc5fa6b0c8cab686fcaf77e1ed68b8e.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 581322, "date": "2018-05-18", "retrieved": "2018-05-23T22:10:39.522522", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy\u2019s Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. The three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 are to be the 80th, 81st, and 82nd ships in the class. The Navy procured three DDG-1000s in FY2007-FY2009 and plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s.\nThe 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each. The ships are to receive $39.4 million in prior-year (FY2018) Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2019 budget requests the following:\nthe remaining $5,253.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost for the three DDG-51s requested for FY2019;\n$391.9 million in additional EOQ AP funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract;\n$54.0 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost increases on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$271.0 million in procurement funding to cover cost increases on Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2019 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement of an additional DDG-51 (for a total procurement of four DDG-51s rather than three) in FY2019;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\nthe Navy\u2019s intended shift in mission orientation for the DDG-1000s;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "3e497d79dea11c50cc87916fbeb09b61d3cd038b", "filename": "files/20180518_RL32109_3e497d79dea11c50cc87916fbeb09b61d3cd038b.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180518_RL32109_images_adf7ae4a848402aee457e266dbf278e284b15910.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180518_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "54ee63399206f53fcb78c1548cdab75207d72ff0", "filename": "files/20180518_RL32109_54ee63399206f53fcb78c1548cdab75207d72ff0.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 580152, "date": "2018-04-16", "retrieved": "2018-05-10T10:37:05.281814", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy\u2019s Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. The three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 are to be the 80th, 81st, and 82nd ships in the class. The Navy procured three DDG-1000s in FY2007-FY2009 and plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s.\nThe 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design (the Flight III DDG-51 design), which incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each. The ships are to receive $39.4 million in prior-year (FY2018) Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2019 budget requests the following:\nthe remaining $5,253.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost for the three DDG-51s requested for FY2019;\n$391.9 million in additional EOQ AP funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract;\n$54.0 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost increases on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$271.0 million in procurement funding to cover cost increases on Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2019 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement of an additional DDG-51 (for a total procurement of four DDG-51s rather than three) in FY2019;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\nthe Navy\u2019s intended shift in mission orientation for the DDG-1000s;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "18c1ffaef476e1c169d51ea058dec2a6aa2fce08", "filename": "files/20180416_RL32109_18c1ffaef476e1c169d51ea058dec2a6aa2fce08.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180416_RL32109_images_adf7ae4a848402aee457e266dbf278e284b15910.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180416_RL32109_images_669c6dbd5194b46109a4aa141c6fd4ce785fbd67.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "ed654f9ffdaf29055118c79d6cf24ec326396800", "filename": "files/20180416_RL32109_ed654f9ffdaf29055118c79d6cf24ec326396800.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 579817, "date": "2018-04-02", "retrieved": "2018-04-05T13:12:13.784651", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy\u2019s Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy procured DDG-51s from FY1985 through FY2005, and resumed procuring them in FY2010. The three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 are to be the 80th, 81st, and 82nd ships in the class. The Navy procured three DDG-1000s in FY2007-FY2009 and plans no further procurement of DDG-1000s.\nThe 13 DDG-51s planned for procurement in FY2018-FY2022 are to be procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract that Congress approved as part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2018 budget. DDG-51s procured in FY2017 and subsequent years are being built to a new design, called the Flight III DDG-51 design, that incorporates a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the three DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2019 at $5,292.7 million, or an average of $1,764.2 million each. The ships are to receive $39.4 million in prior-year (FY2018) Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) advance procurement (AP) funding (i.e., funding for up-front batch orders of components of DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract). The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2019 budget requests the following:\nthe remaining $5,253.3 million in procurement funding needed to complete the estimated procurement cost for the three DDG-51s requested for FY2019;\n$391.9 million in additional EOQ AP funding for DDG-51s to be procured under the FY2018-FY2022 MYP contract;\n$54.0 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost increases on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$271.0 million in procurement funding to cover cost increases on Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers.\nIssues for Congress for FY2019 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2019 funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement of an additional DDG-51 (for a total procurement of four DDG-51s rather than three) in FY2019;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\nthe Navy\u2019s intended shift in mission orientation for the DDG-1000s;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "7a323fa042444a6448ecbf2df6820069fe7dd399", "filename": "files/20180402_RL32109_7a323fa042444a6448ecbf2df6820069fe7dd399.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180402_RL32109_images_adf7ae4a848402aee457e266dbf278e284b15910.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "3347ac7ba8f4f2801f652e1c01676e9c2ef55241", "filename": "files/20180402_RL32109_3347ac7ba8f4f2801f652e1c01676e9c2ef55241.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 576295, "date": "2017-12-08", "retrieved": "2017-12-12T14:11:37.970635", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 are to be the 78th and 79th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s procured in FY2013-FY2017 were procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract. As part of its FY2018 budget submission, the Navy is requesting authority to use another MYP contract to procure DDG-51s in FY2018-FY2022. The Navy plans to shift in FY2016 or FY2017 to a new variant of the DDG-51, called the Flight III DDG-51, that is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or the SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 at $3,499.1 million. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2018 budget requests the following:\n$3,499.1 million in procurement funding to fully fund the procurement of the two DDG-51s requested for FY2018;\n$90.3 million in EOQ (economic order quantity) advance procurement (AP) funding for up-front batch orders of components for DDG-51s to be procured under the proposed DDG-51 MYP contract for FY2018-FY2022;\n$51.4 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years;\n$224.0 million in procurement funding to cover costs for building DDG-1000 class destroyers procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$32.1 million in research and development funding for the AMDR.\nIssues for Congress for FY2018 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s requests for FY2018 procurement and research and development funding for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nthe impact of using a continuing resolution (CR) to fund DOD for the first few months of FY2018;\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s request for authority for a new MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of one or two additional DDG-51s (i.e., whether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of a total of three or four DDG-51s);\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "d51921c7a386032beea4ee37f153e6dc01026699", "filename": "files/20171208_RL32109_d51921c7a386032beea4ee37f153e6dc01026699.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171208_RL32109_images_55dd7835e193d6ce36454f911ed939af08d0e370.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "1199fd97d509996753075c74762be68f9627c937", "filename": "files/20171208_RL32109_1199fd97d509996753075c74762be68f9627c937.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 575952, "date": "2017-11-30", "retrieved": "2017-12-05T13:58:17.756194", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 are to be the 78th and 79th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s procured in FY2013-FY2017 were procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract. As part of its FY2018 budget submission, the Navy is requesting authority to use another MYP contract to procure DDG-51s in FY2018-FY2022. The Navy plans to shift in FY2016 or FY2017 to a new variant of the DDG-51, called the Flight III DDG-51, that is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or the SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 at $3,499.1 million. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2018 budget requests the following:\n$3,499.1 million in procurement funding to fully fund the procurement of the two DDG-51s requested for FY2018;\n$90.3 million in EOQ (economic order quantity) advance procurement (AP) funding for up-front batch orders of components for DDG-51s to be procured under the proposed DDG-51 MYP contract for FY2018-FY2022;\n$51.4 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years;\n$224.0 million in procurement funding to cover costs for building DDG-1000 class destroyers procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$32.1 million in research and development funding for the AMDR.\nIssues for Congress for FY2018 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s requests for FY2018 procurement and research and development funding for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nthe impact of using a continuing resolution (CR) to fund DOD for the first few months of FY2018;\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s request for authority for a new MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of one or two additional DDG-51s (i.e., whether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of a total of three or four DDG-51s);\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "45ba071eb47529819f1f90f037edd72385f785e4", "filename": "files/20171130_RL32109_45ba071eb47529819f1f90f037edd72385f785e4.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171130_RL32109_images_55dd7835e193d6ce36454f911ed939af08d0e370.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "0eabf72a0b26bfda90aebb9acb32e32c9b8d34ea", "filename": "files/20171130_RL32109_0eabf72a0b26bfda90aebb9acb32e32c9b8d34ea.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 573724, "date": "2017-10-03", "retrieved": "2017-10-04T13:51:31.886835", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 are to be the 78th and 79th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s procured in FY2013-FY2017 were procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract. As part of its FY2018 budget submission, the Navy is requesting authority to use another MYP contract to procure DDG-51s in FY2018-FY2022. The Navy plans to shift in FY2016 or FY2017 to a new variant of the DDG-51, called the Flight III DDG-51, that is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or the SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 at $3,499.1 million. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2018 budget requests:\n$3,499.1 million in procurement funding to fully fund the procurement of the two DDG-51s requested for FY2018;\n$90.3 million in EOQ (economic order quantity) advance procurement (AP) funding for up-front batch orders of components for DDG-51s to be procured under the proposed DDG-51 MYP contract for FY2018-FY2022;\n$51.4 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years;\n$224.0 million in procurement funding to cover costs for building DDG-1000 class destroyers procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$32.1 million in research and development funding for the AMDR.\nIssues for Congress for FY2018 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s requests for FY2018 procurement and research and development funding for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nthe impact of using a continuing resolution (CR) to fund DOD for the first few months of FY2018;\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s request for authority for a new MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of one or two additional DDG-51s (i.e., whether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of a total of three or four DDG-51s);\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "26614a55ff1888624eaefc889caa7c37d38e1a08", "filename": "files/20171003_RL32109_26614a55ff1888624eaefc889caa7c37d38e1a08.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171003_RL32109_images_55dd7835e193d6ce36454f911ed939af08d0e370.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "afd25acb418cce4783ed0e7dddde192c84393999", "filename": "files/20171003_RL32109_afd25acb418cce4783ed0e7dddde192c84393999.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 463237, "date": "2017-08-11", "retrieved": "2017-08-22T13:27:08.961440", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 are to be the 78th and 79th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s procured in FY2013-FY2017 were procured under a multiyear procurement (MYP) contract. As part of its FY2018 budget submission, the Navy is requesting authority to use another MYP contract to procure DDG-51s in FY2018-FY2022. The Navy plans to shift in FY2016 or FY2017 to a new variant of the DDG-51, called the Flight III DDG-51, that is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) or the SPY-6 radar.\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 at $3,499.1 million. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2018 budget requests:\n$3,499.1 million in procurement funding to fully fund the procurement of the two DDG-51s requested for FY2018;\n$90.3 million in EOQ (economic order quantity) advance procurement (AP) funding for up-front batch orders of components for DDG-51s to be procured under the proposed DDG-51 MYP contract for FY2018-FY2022;\n$51.4 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years;\n$224.0 million in procurement funding to cover costs for building DDG-1000 class destroyers procured in prior fiscal years; and\n$32.1 million in research and development funding for the AMDR.\nIssues for Congress for FY2018 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s requests for FY2018 procurement and research and development funding for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s request for authority for a new MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\nwhether one of the DDG-51s procured in FY2016 should be built to the Flight III design, as the Navy has planned, and how this may relate to the previous issue of whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s request for authority for a new MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of one or two additional DDG-51s (i.e., whether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of a total of three or four DDG-51s);\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "60b84ee7d6be2bd72d4efc864ef7585cd02a1415", "filename": "files/20170811_RL32109_60b84ee7d6be2bd72d4efc864ef7585cd02a1415.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32109_files&id=/0.png": "files/20170811_RL32109_images_0c57b13a755283f62573e004d477f5871d3107af.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "394c7893ed2773d1b982b7cf13565e901946ea71", "filename": "files/20170811_RL32109_394c7893ed2773d1b982b7cf13565e901946ea71.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 461639, "date": "2017-05-31", "retrieved": "2017-06-07T15:32:38.685776", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 are to be the 78th and 79th ships in the class.\nDDG-51s procured in FY2013-FY2017 were procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. The Navy wants to use another MYP contract to procure DDG-51s in FY2018-FY2022. As part of its proposed FY2018 budget, the Navy is requesting congressional approval for this new MYP contract.\nThe Navy plans to shift in FY2017 to a new variant of the DDG-51, called the Flight III DDG-51, that is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2018 at $3,499.1 million. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2018 budget requests:\n$3,499.1 million in procurement funding to fully fund the procurement of the two DDG-51s requested for FY2018;\n$90.3 million in EOQ (economic order quantity) advance procurement (AP) funding for up-front batch orders of components for DDG-51s to be procured under the proposed DDG-51 MYP contract for FY2018-FY2022;\n$51.4 million in cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in prior fiscal years;\n$32.1 million in research and development funding for the AMDR; and\n$224.0 million in procurement funding to cover costs for building DDG-1000 class destroyers procured in prior fiscal years.\nIssues for Congress for FY2018 for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 destroyer programs include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s requests for FY2018 procurement and research and development funding for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs;\nwhether to approve the Navy\u2019s request for a using new MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\nwhether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of one or two additional DDG-51s (i.e., whether to provide funding for the procurement in FY2018 of a total of three or four DDG-51s);\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "bb2b334facfc0e2517e299e580a4762de2989c82", "filename": "files/20170531_RL32109_bb2b334facfc0e2517e299e580a4762de2989c82.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "f7db10e5e85c22a77ad87257d3dbb8be85b33891", "filename": "files/20170531_RL32109_f7db10e5e85c22a77ad87257d3dbb8be85b33891.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 461419, "date": "2017-05-18", "retrieved": "2017-05-24T16:17:34.742335", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its FY2017 budget submission, noted this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but did not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 was, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requested the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requested $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requested $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement included the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program\u2014an issue that includes whether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "5517f57e64ec0423c7c48fa6cf12707030ab1d95", "filename": "files/20170518_RL32109_5517f57e64ec0423c7c48fa6cf12707030ab1d95.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "af997a01057ddf7c12b2a8739a58cd26161b99c6", "filename": "files/20170518_RL32109_af997a01057ddf7c12b2a8739a58cd26161b99c6.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 461090, "date": "2017-05-12", "retrieved": "2017-05-16T14:29:21.799896", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program\u2014an issue that includes whether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "6f7cc7d9a66465283337c12235299417ba7fec46", "filename": "files/20170512_RL32109_6f7cc7d9a66465283337c12235299417ba7fec46.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "c1e9e111a10aec5eb0d5fa22f64f09c57e9609fd", "filename": "files/20170512_RL32109_c1e9e111a10aec5eb0d5fa22f64f09c57e9609fd.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 460761, "date": "2017-04-28", "retrieved": "2017-05-09T15:02:05.964020", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program\u2014an issue that includes whether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "bef5899d4f342824dc5b99a9f4fea387f383d458", "filename": "files/20170428_RL32109_bef5899d4f342824dc5b99a9f4fea387f383d458.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "3dd5216923fb5158d49c7a4843f22fb18fc8720f", "filename": "files/20170428_RL32109_3dd5216923fb5158d49c7a4843f22fb18fc8720f.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 460295, "date": "2017-04-07", "retrieved": "2017-04-11T15:00:13.301691", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program\u2014an issue that includes whether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "69c82a14d9a87604095524c028b5178145f550b6", "filename": "files/20170407_RL32109_69c82a14d9a87604095524c028b5178145f550b6.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "84c678d4f7583ae7fd5951cad4b1229178edc66d", "filename": "files/20170407_RL32109_84c678d4f7583ae7fd5951cad4b1229178edc66d.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 460257, "date": "2017-04-06", "retrieved": "2017-04-07T15:30:58.027617", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program\u2014an issue that includes whether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 effort; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "69c82a14d9a87604095524c028b5178145f550b6", "filename": "files/20170406_RL32109_69c82a14d9a87604095524c028b5178145f550b6.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "84c678d4f7583ae7fd5951cad4b1229178edc66d", "filename": "files/20170406_RL32109_84c678d4f7583ae7fd5951cad4b1229178edc66d.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 459862, "date": "2017-03-21", "retrieved": "2017-03-22T18:24:54.588860", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program;\nwhether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;\nissues raised in a January 2016 report from DOD\u2019s Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)\u2014DOT&E\u2019s annual report for FY2015; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "44211f0ce13d5f487c74da8c30b8919c9b4a7f19", "filename": "files/20170321_RL32109_44211f0ce13d5f487c74da8c30b8919c9b4a7f19.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "d6e2a9e5be8d14f8934c3200aa31b0b743f2c3e8", "filename": "files/20170321_RL32109_d6e2a9e5be8d14f8934c3200aa31b0b743f2c3e8.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 456552, "date": "2016-10-19", "retrieved": "2016-11-28T21:20:44.117735", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program;\nwhether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;\nissues raised in a January 2016 report from DOD\u2019s Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)\u2014DOT&E\u2019s annual report for FY2015; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "cd4168e341a2615e962bc67070b814e3cf9f2938", "filename": "files/20161019_RL32109_cd4168e341a2615e962bc67070b814e3cf9f2938.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "e4d360da14225533a672f0566be7a64c37aec654", "filename": "files/20161019_RL32109_e4d360da14225533a672f0566be7a64c37aec654.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4902, "name": "Air, Land, Sea, & Projection Forces" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 452932, "date": "2016-05-27", "retrieved": "2016-06-21T21:12:19.544819", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program;\nwhether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;\nissues raised in a January 2016 report from DOD\u2019s Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)\u2014DOT&E\u2019s annual report for FY2015; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "13208ff755939d4f58a3efec70b4001b4f7a63fc", "filename": "files/20160527_RL32109_13208ff755939d4f58a3efec70b4001b4f7a63fc.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "01bf82686efcf218778a82b55c56af3995146d67", "filename": "files/20160527_RL32109_01bf82686efcf218778a82b55c56af3995146d67.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3148, "name": "Conventional Weapons and Military Equipment" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4531, "name": "Defense Authorization" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 452756, "date": "2016-05-20", "retrieved": "2016-05-24T19:00:55.417941", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program;\nwhether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;\nissues raised in a January 2016 report from DOD\u2019s Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)\u2014DOT&E\u2019s annual report for FY2015; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "65ecad12b38a7a151bc3996dfcfbb77f896826af", "filename": "files/20160520_RL32109_65ecad12b38a7a151bc3996dfcfbb77f896826af.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "266fabb7ae19bbd89724e2530cbd62f84c80ea93", "filename": "files/20160520_RL32109_266fabb7ae19bbd89724e2530cbd62f84c80ea93.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3148, "name": "Conventional Weapons and Military Equipment" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4531, "name": "Defense Authorization" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 451387, "date": "2016-04-05", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T16:47:11.100250", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. One of the DDG-51s funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program;\nwhether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;\nissues raised in a January 2016 report from DOD\u2019s Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)\u2014DOT&E\u2019s annual report for FY2015; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "5684bfe183757143c2e8382812fcbf257248a6d1", "filename": "files/20160405_RL32109_5684bfe183757143c2e8382812fcbf257248a6d1.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "8a40bd091530040fcb1ac9def2702b92ec2b163b", "filename": "files/20160405_RL32109_8a40bd091530040fcb1ac9def2702b92ec2b163b.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3148, "name": "Conventional Weapons and Military Equipment" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4531, "name": "Defense Authorization" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 450622, "date": "2016-03-10", "retrieved": "2016-03-24T16:57:18.709492", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The Navy has been procuring Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) class Aegis destroyers since FY1985. The two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 are to be the 75th and 76th ships in the class. The 10 DDG-51s programmed for procurement in FY2013-FY2017 (in annual quantities of 3-1-2-2-2) are being procured under a multiyear-procurement (MYP) contract. The second of the two ships funded in FY2016 is to be the first of a new DDG-51 design variation called the Flight III design, which is to incorporate a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).\nAs part of its action on the Navy\u2019s FY2016 budget, Congress provided $1 billion in unrequested procurement funding to help pay for a DDG-51 that would be in addition to those being procured under the 10-ship MYP contract for FY2013-FY2017. The Navy, in its budget submission, notes this additional $1 billion in funding for the DDG-51 program, but does not show the additional DDG-51 in its shipbuilding plan. The $433 million in procurement funding that would be needed to complete the cost of this additional DDG-51 is, however, included as the second item on the Navy\u2019s FY2017 unfunded requirements list (i.e., the list of FY2017 programs that the Navy desires, but for which it did not have sufficient funding in FY2017).\nThe Navy estimates the combined procurement cost of the two DDG-51s requested for procurement in FY2017 at $3,393.9 million. The ships have received a total of $182.6 million in prior-year advance procurement (AP) funding. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget requests the remaining $3,211.3 million needed to complete the ships\u2019 estimated combined procurement cost. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $16.0 million in so-called cost-to-complete procurement funding to cover cost growth on DDG-51s procured in FY2011. The Navy\u2019s proposed FY2017 budget also requests $271.8 million in procurement funding to complete construction of Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyers procured in prior years, and $144.4 million in research and development funding for development work on the AMDR.\nPotential FY2017 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:\nwhether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy\u2019s FY2017 procurement funding requests for the DDG-51 and DDG-1000 programs, and the Navy\u2019s FY2017 research and development funding request for the AMDR program;\nwhether to provide some or all of the $433 million in procurement funding needed to complete the funding for the additional DDG-51 that was partially funded with $1 billion in FY2016;\nwhether to provide the Navy with authority for entering into an MYP contract for DDG-51s to be procured in FY2018-FY2022;\ncontinued cost growth in the DDG-1000 program;\ncost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;\nissues raised in a January 2016 report from DOD\u2019s Director of Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E)\u2014DOT&E\u2019s annual report for FY2015; and\nthe lack of an announced Navy roadmap for accomplishing three things in the cruiser-destroyer force: restoring ship growth margins; introducing large numbers of ships with integrated electric drive systems or other technologies that could provide ample electrical power for supporting future electrically powered weapons; and introducing technologies for substantially reducing ship operating and support (O&S) costs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32109", "sha1": "3ee1081e60e525cf99515d8dd59bc34cb72dea62", "filename": "files/20160310_RL32109_3ee1081e60e525cf99515d8dd59bc34cb72dea62.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32109", "sha1": "6700a0b4553d6133e460100ff66a106052778eeb", "filename": "files/20160310_RL32109_6700a0b4553d6133e460100ff66a106052778eeb.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3148, "name": "Conventional Weapons and Military Equipment" }, { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4531, "name": "Defense Authorization" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795747/", "id": "RL32109_2015Nov06", "date": "2015-11-06", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning destroyer procurement could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20151106_RL32109_59282bd0995edad908db75fbc40e80fb8ef473ee.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20151106_RL32109_59282bd0995edad908db75fbc40e80fb8ef473ee.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795698/", "id": "RL32109_2015Sep22", "date": "2015-09-22", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2016 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s, including the first of a new DDG-51 design variant called the Flight III design, which is to carry a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR).", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150922_RL32109_bc639a3cb360303beb442b0e4558f2fcfca33f3b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150922_RL32109_bc639a3cb360303beb442b0e4558f2fcfca33f3b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc689215/", "id": "RL32109_2015Jun12", "date": "2015-06-12", "retrieved": "2015-08-03T15:06:47", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2016 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s, including the first of a new DDG-51 design variant called the Flight III design, which is to carry a new and more capable radar called the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR). Decisions that Congress makes concerning destroyer procurement could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150612_RL32109_f04130a66518bd9afc6f28ae090d4e70e174440b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150612_RL32109_f04130a66518bd9afc6f28ae090d4e70e174440b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc505623/", "id": "RL32109_2015Mar24", "date": "2015-03-24", "retrieved": "2015-05-29T05:37:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2016 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. Decisions that Congress makes concerning destroyer procurement could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150324_RL32109_24d4b96c60604920704dc4c67962ba9866583db8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150324_RL32109_24d4b96c60604920704dc4c67962ba9866583db8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503625/", "id": "RL32109_2015Mar04", "date": "2015-03-04", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2015 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150304_RL32109_278f5961010941c14a4768cf91d01ca159ec7eb7.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150304_RL32109_278f5961010941c14a4768cf91d01ca159ec7eb7.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503597/", "id": "RL32109_2015Feb24", "date": "2015-02-24", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2015 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150224_RL32109_738bb25f186da59ec9835d98b430b0608c0482e8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150224_RL32109_738bb25f186da59ec9835d98b430b0608c0482e8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463290/", "id": "RL32109_2014Jul31", "date": "2014-07-31", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2015 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140731_RL32109_0698f7939a2252be3d72b005dc3590cff73b7710.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140731_RL32109_0698f7939a2252be3d72b005dc3590cff73b7710.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc333013/", "id": "RL32109_2014Jun25", "date": "2014-06-25", "retrieved": "2014-08-27T12:47:05", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Congressional decisions concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities, and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140625_RL32109_282f764ff6bad748ca2dcea68f9e76c05c1e4a9a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140625_RL32109_282f764ff6bad748ca2dcea68f9e76c05c1e4a9a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc306477/", "id": "RL32109_2014Jun04", "date": "2014-06-04", "retrieved": "2014-07-08T21:53:44", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Congressional decisions concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities, and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140604_RL32109_038274c6af49b167e281496f677e8ae93ec1a9fb.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140604_RL32109_038274c6af49b167e281496f677e8ae93ec1a9fb.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc306534/", "id": "RL32109_2014Apr08", "date": "2014-04-08", "retrieved": "2014-07-08T21:53:44", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Congress decisions concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities, funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140408_RL32109_79c7a41024f8b0c5b6e63c49a226a12ebdc3648d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140408_RL32109_79c7a41024f8b0c5b6e63c49a226a12ebdc3648d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc284492/", "id": "RL32109_2014Mar24", "date": "2014-03-24", "retrieved": "2014-05-06T21:21:54", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140324_RL32109_d1a1ab5c6a428708b84b2e9b35f86bc5a18e82a0.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140324_RL32109_d1a1ab5c6a428708b84b2e9b35f86bc5a18e82a0.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc276907/", "id": "RL32109_2014Feb04", "date": "2014-02-04", "retrieved": "2014-03-05T18:18:19", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140204_RL32109_fbc3258b548a1ffc35333fad012f9799dd4072fc.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140204_RL32109_fbc3258b548a1ffc35333fad012f9799dd4072fc.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227988/", "id": "RL32109_2013Oct22", "date": "2013-10-22", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20131022_RL32109_202cec098b186d7e855f34abcad1321ba0e8ca6b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20131022_RL32109_202cec098b186d7e855f34abcad1321ba0e8ca6b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227987/", "id": "RL32109_2013Aug06", "date": "2013-08-06", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130806_RL32109_6b90d355ccc6e97284e8da4bdd35e13dac806c88.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130806_RL32109_6b90d355ccc6e97284e8da4bdd35e13dac806c88.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462833/", "id": "RL32109_2013Mar27", "date": "2013-03-27", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2013 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. The Navy for FY2013 is also requesting congressional approval to use a multiyear procurement (MYP) arrangement for the nine DDG-51s scheduled for procurement in FY2013-FY2017. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130327_RL32109_676f305010558bfb464520608befc0b73e29e4cf.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130327_RL32109_676f305010558bfb464520608befc0b73e29e4cf.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463364/", "id": "RL32109_2013Feb14", "date": "2013-02-14", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2013 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. The Navy for FY2013 is also requesting congressional approval to use a multiyear procurement (MYP) arrangement for the nine DDG-51s scheduled for procurement in FY2013-FY2017. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130214_RL32109_a98f84eb870b38b3a6231957a13909e4f35f45a8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130214_RL32109_a98f84eb870b38b3a6231957a13909e4f35f45a8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc463320/", "id": "RL32109_2012Dec21", "date": "2012-12-21", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. The Navy's proposed FY2013 budget requests funding for the procurement of two DDG-51s. The Navy this year is also requesting congressional approval to use a multiyear procurement (MYP) arrangement for the nine DDG-51s scheduled for procurement in FY2013-FY2017. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20121221_RL32109_a04ce44f18ce9abbb5b9486d230bded66eea5e05.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20121221_RL32109_a04ce44f18ce9abbb5b9486d230bded66eea5e05.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810629/", "id": "RL32109_2012Oct18", "date": "2012-10-18", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20121018_RL32109_0b7ed74799f5610e7f1a13dffe1b8306aa50b59b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20121018_RL32109_0b7ed74799f5610e7f1a13dffe1b8306aa50b59b.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87271/", "id": "RL32109_2012Jun12", "date": "2012-06-12", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120612_RL32109_fd193d0bbb0af30ec317afdce90901e6327c3e8a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120612_RL32109_fd193d0bbb0af30ec317afdce90901e6327c3e8a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87269/", "id": "RL32109_2012Apr03", "date": "2012-04-03", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120403_RL32109_48c37c45e22374b29f45eb78cdcd1458f2bc974e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120403_RL32109_48c37c45e22374b29f45eb78cdcd1458f2bc974e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87273/", "id": "RL32109_2012Mar16", "date": "2012-03-16", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120316_RL32109_8fcffa9bb25a00bd3cdeb9edb39e979d7702387b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120316_RL32109_8fcffa9bb25a00bd3cdeb9edb39e979d7702387b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87272/", "id": "RL32109_2012Mar02", "date": "2012-03-02", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120302_RL32109_8ab55c6f0418bf81d6bcf4ac61bd25bc3ae20ca0.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120302_RL32109_8ab55c6f0418bf81d6bcf4ac61bd25bc3ae20ca0.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc87270/", "id": "RL32109_2012Feb03", "date": "2012-02-03", "retrieved": "2012-07-03T07:51:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120203_RL32109_ff0665c7715337d01b3357b74336f325e869ac46.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120203_RL32109_ff0665c7715337d01b3357b74336f325e869ac46.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc813220/", "id": "RL32109_2011Dec22", "date": "2011-12-22", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20111222_RL32109_1b38ee068c8486251552bbf86016e4e2ee3c7670.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20111222_RL32109_1b38ee068c8486251552bbf86016e4e2ee3c7670.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc806088/", "id": "RL32109_2011Jun22", "date": "2011-06-22", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110622_RL32109_5fc4cf4f85f5d3843ba5d64d26893bfa8d2ce2bb.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110622_RL32109_5fc4cf4f85f5d3843ba5d64d26893bfa8d2ce2bb.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810970/", "id": "RL32109_2011May12", "date": "2011-05-12", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110512_RL32109_21debf2cf5b3f477315241e624fd101f0272a4a1.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110512_RL32109_21debf2cf5b3f477315241e624fd101f0272a4a1.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc98051/", "id": "RL32109_2011Apr19", "date": "2011-04-19", "retrieved": "2012-08-21T08:46:06", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Decisions that Congress makes concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110419_RL32109_6b1c56f52318790880015ef4c507cbef46d8c60e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110419_RL32109_6b1c56f52318790880015ef4c507cbef46d8c60e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc33043/", "id": "RL32109_2011Mar14", "date": "2011-03-14", "retrieved": "2011-04-28T13:31:19", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2012 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110314_RL32109_f81779aee3d9f976fbb7f6c1ad5b4c706dc91e38.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110314_RL32109_f81779aee3d9f976fbb7f6c1ad5b4c706dc91e38.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc227986/", "id": "RL32109_2011Jan21", "date": "2011-01-21", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "Report that discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110121_RL32109_638993b232f9fa6c1fa78e37b67c9a046bcf6757.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110121_RL32109_638993b232f9fa6c1fa78e37b67c9a046bcf6757.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491306/", "id": "RL32109_2010Dec23", "date": "2010-12-23", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20101223_RL32109_1b8ebad3680fcce5fd08391ad956a1bc9fdcd959.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20101223_RL32109_1b8ebad3680fcce5fd08391ad956a1bc9fdcd959.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc29649/", "id": "RL32109_2010Sep28", "date": "2010-09-28", "retrieved": "2010-12-04T14:26:25", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100928_RL32109_d049b9d9bb19ed55a74c59670778366562771f49.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100928_RL32109_d049b9d9bb19ed55a74c59670778366562771f49.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc491032/", "id": "RL32109_2010Jul26", "date": "2010-07-26", "retrieved": "2015-01-27T19:40:46", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100726_RL32109_2176e5d28a042ed6bfd500650e5778f39a9906fb.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100726_RL32109_2176e5d28a042ed6bfd500650e5778f39a9906fb.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501697/", "id": "RL32109_2010Jun14", "date": "2010-06-14", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report presents background information and potential oversight issues for Congress on the Navy's Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) and Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer programs. Congressional decisions concerning these programs could substantially affect Navy capabilities, and funding requirements, and the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100614_RL32109_7be1f791eed67a47438cc685589646837f91dafb.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100614_RL32109_7be1f791eed67a47438cc685589646837f91dafb.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501703/", "id": "RL32109_2010Jun10", "date": "2010-06-10", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100610_RL32109_e6fca4c2885084451ec5b7e33493604572be9348.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100610_RL32109_e6fca4c2885084451ec5b7e33493604572be9348.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501767/", "id": "RL32109_2010May26", "date": "2010-05-26", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100526_RL32109_b465e094e645e62ea52905f5237cf6338b58d135.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100526_RL32109_b465e094e645e62ea52905f5237cf6338b58d135.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503533/", "id": "RL32109_2010Apr08", "date": "2010-04-08", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100408_RL32109_067a3d83c368f1410ba9ac0bd7b76c26b3e6ff25.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100408_RL32109_067a3d83c368f1410ba9ac0bd7b76c26b3e6ff25.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503618/", "id": "RL32109_2010Feb26", "date": "2010-02-26", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100226_RL32109_501f7aedcffc56c9a92ba922e2ab8602e4aa61b2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100226_RL32109_501f7aedcffc56c9a92ba922e2ab8602e4aa61b2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc626939/", "id": "RL32109_2009Dec23", "date": "2009-12-23", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091223_RL32109_891f7c6fb599fb821f9f17abcd0650a6fb0d1e04.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091223_RL32109_891f7c6fb599fb821f9f17abcd0650a6fb0d1e04.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc626990/", "id": "RL32109_2009Nov23", "date": "2009-11-23", "retrieved": "2015-06-15T14:46:40", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2010 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091123_RL32109_1a79b06fc3da31d575631ec99bb14c226bae6c5a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091123_RL32109_1a79b06fc3da31d575631ec99bb14c226bae6c5a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc689223/", "id": "RL32109_2009Oct22", "date": "2009-10-22", "retrieved": "2015-08-03T15:06:47", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2010 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20091022_RL32109_ea9932cf7ee04194cab9ab85d5f7668ebc858027.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20091022_RL32109_ea9932cf7ee04194cab9ab85d5f7668ebc858027.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc689354/", "id": "RL32109_2009Sep17", "date": "2009-09-17", "retrieved": "2015-08-03T15:06:47", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2011 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090917_RL32109_705a3f753f558f0547c1018febc4ced2e9320b21.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090917_RL32109_705a3f753f558f0547c1018febc4ced2e9320b21.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc700682/", "id": "RL32109_2009Jul23", "date": "2009-07-23", "retrieved": "2015-08-27T16:20:31", "title": "Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses issues Congress faces regarding the Navy's proposed FY2010 budget, particularly as relating to destroyer procurement plans and programs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090723_RL32109_87f38e1cdd7adc8549d23f8f9c2af3a5de12b380.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090723_RL32109_87f38e1cdd7adc8549d23f8f9c2af3a5de12b380.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Destroyers", "name": "Destroyers" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc700715/", "id": "RL32109_2009Jun04", "date": "2009-06-04", "retrieved": "2015-08-27T16:20:31", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. The report discusses Navy's proposed FY2010 budget requests $1,084.2 million to complete the cost of a third Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer that was authorized but only partially funded in FY2009,", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090604_RL32109_95d4264cb81edc116a8f9a2eab3fdc405fc04693.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090604_RL32109_95d4264cb81edc116a8f9a2eab3fdc405fc04693.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795840/", "id": "RL32109_2009Apr13", "date": "2009-04-13", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. The FY2010 defense appropriations bill, which was enacted as Division C of H.R. 2638/P.L. 110- 329 of September 30, 2008, a consolidated appropriations bill, provided $1,508.8 million in FY2009 DDG-1000 procurement funding, reflecting a decision to procure a third DDG-1000 in FY2009 using split funding (i.e., two-year incremental funding) in FY2009 and FY2010.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090413_RL32109_7cea340ed4578bd3fa8450895c109273cbc5b233.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090413_RL32109_7cea340ed4578bd3fa8450895c109273cbc5b233.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795350/", "id": "RL32109_2008Nov14", "date": "2008-11-14", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. The issue for Congress for FY2009 was how to take the Navy's new position on destroyer procurement into account in marking up the Navy's proposed FY2009 budget.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081114_RL32109_f1d49f44f137ab64f6cfce67cc5221eab0428aed.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081114_RL32109_f1d49f44f137ab64f6cfce67cc5221eab0428aed.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795648/", "id": "RL32109_2008Oct22", "date": "2008-10-22", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. The issue for Congress for FY2009 was how to take the Navy's new position on destroyer procurement into account in marking up the Navy's proposed FY2009 budget.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081022_RL32109_4b6e753c79b13284d5a9475101ae445326cb6b64.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081022_RL32109_4b6e753c79b13284d5a9475101ae445326cb6b64.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc795629/", "id": "RL32109_2008Oct09", "date": "2008-10-09", "retrieved": "2016-01-13T14:26:20", "title": "DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. The report discusses Navy's proposed FY2010 budget requests $1,084.2 million to complete the cost of a third Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer that was authorized but only partially funded in FY2009.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081009_RL32109_d095159665886dd8927f8c540bed2b0ff2bf57eb.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081009_RL32109_d095159665886dd8927f8c540bed2b0ff2bf57eb.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810727/", "id": "RL32109_2008Sep12", "date": "2008-09-12", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080912_RL32109_337acb0700d8f5b2fe5c66c41cdfe50533f15114.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080912_RL32109_337acb0700d8f5b2fe5c66c41cdfe50533f15114.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc770561/", "id": "RL32109_2008Sep11", "date": "2008-09-11", "retrieved": "2015-11-04T09:58:14", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on the DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. It discusses the Navy's proposed FY2010 budget requests of $1,084.2 million to complete the cost of a third Zumwalt-class destroyer that was authorized but only partially funded in FY2009.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080911_RL32109_7560a466a3de11ae1f20f2cb887f70bb90449262.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080911_RL32109_7560a466a3de11ae1f20f2cb887f70bb90449262.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc770499/", "id": "RL32109_2008Aug08", "date": "2008-08-08", "retrieved": "2015-11-04T09:58:14", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 and DDG-51 Destroyer Programs: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report provides background information on the DDG-1000 (Zumwalt) program. It discusses the Navy's proposed FY2010 budget requests of $1,084.2 million to complete the cost of a third Zumwalt-class destroyer that was authorized but only partially funded in FY2009.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080808_RL32109_46fa9e7ca55ba343e2bd39d9da74a44a18b2f606.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080808_RL32109_46fa9e7ca55ba343e2bd39d9da74a44a18b2f606.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations", "name": "U.S. Department of Defense -- Appropriations" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc743355/", "id": "RL32109_2008Jul15", "date": "2008-07-15", "retrieved": "2015-10-20T21:35:54", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 Destroyer Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the new kind of destroyer called the DDG-1000. The Navy's proposed FY2009 budget requests funding to procure the third DDG-1000 and estimates its cost at $2,653 million. The report provides additional background on the program, oversight issues, options for Congress, general legislative activity for the fiscal year, and related appendices.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080715_RL32109_01837eb9c6c974195e57e057ad8bbe96781d6411.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080715_RL32109_01837eb9c6c974195e57e057ad8bbe96781d6411.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy -- U.S.", "name": "Navy -- U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Warships", "name": "Warships" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc700877/", "id": "RL32109_2008Jun05", "date": "2008-06-05", "retrieved": "2015-08-27T16:20:31", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 Destroyer Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report discusses the Navy procurement program and new kind of destroyer called the DDG-1000. The report discusses the issues for Congress, which is whether to approve, modify, or reject the Navy's proposals for the DDG-1000 program.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080605_RL32109_75e53f9d654c6ad6624803cb08c800f703b2816e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080605_RL32109_75e53f9d654c6ad6624803cb08c800f703b2816e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense budgets", "name": "Defense budgets" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense procurement", "name": "Defense procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810038/", "id": "RL32109_2008May01", "date": "2008-05-01", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 Destroyer Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080501_RL32109_d596f90058affb5569c0ca4286ef05f6874d9768.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080501_RL32109_d596f90058affb5569c0ca4286ef05f6874d9768.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817936/", "id": "RL32109_2008Apr11", "date": "2008-04-11", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 Destroyer Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080411_RL32109_f7e790a6a609052df5c4021b7b235a3b612181d7.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080411_RL32109_f7e790a6a609052df5c4021b7b235a3b612181d7.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818541/", "id": "RL32109_2008Feb27", "date": "2008-02-27", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 Destroyer Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080227_RL32109_c68a6bb7862bb8f4d15e317b1cfab0eb2c40ded8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080227_RL32109_c68a6bb7862bb8f4d15e317b1cfab0eb2c40ded8.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc820305/", "id": "RL32109_2007Oct25", "date": "2007-10-25", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 Destroyer Program: Background, Oversight Issues, and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20071025_RL32109_2beff22231b02a6ba9a09995d63e26eda3dd0e3e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20071025_RL32109_2beff22231b02a6ba9a09995d63e26eda3dd0e3e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc815897/", "id": "RL32109_2007Aug16", "date": "2007-08-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)) and CG(X) Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070816_RL32109_1c6c3dba39aa36dfbe81cbe6e8b3667d4138a599.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070816_RL32109_1c6c3dba39aa36dfbe81cbe6e8b3667d4138a599.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807649/", "id": "RL32109_2007Jun11", "date": "2007-06-11", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)) and CG(X) Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070611_RL32109_797bd4642c97ed91dfc390a963a5f89a675a98f6.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070611_RL32109_797bd4642c97ed91dfc390a963a5f89a675a98f6.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc805585/", "id": "RL32109_2007May16", "date": "2007-05-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)) and CG(X) Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070516_RL32109_7b4bafa7114729bb66549b2f82b06d5b81d50075.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070516_RL32109_7b4bafa7114729bb66549b2f82b06d5b81d50075.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9354/", "id": "RL32109 2006-08-29", "date": "2006-08-29", "retrieved": "2006-12-05T10:00:08", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060829_RL32109_442c65204468e884d45f03d7a42cf6701d4fc9b8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060829_RL32109_442c65204468e884d45f03d7a42cf6701d4fc9b8.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Shipbuilding subsidies", "name": "Shipbuilding subsidies" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10430/", "id": "RL32109_2006Aug14", "date": "2006-08-14", "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:26:37", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": "The Navy wants to procure three new classes of surface combatants -- the DDG-1000 (formerly DD(X)) destroyer, the CG(X) cruiser, and a smaller surface combatant called the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). The Navy wants to procure 7 DDG-1000s, 19 CG(X)s, and 55 LCSs. The Senate Appropriations Committee, in its report (S.Rept. 109-292 of July 25, 2006) on H.R. 5631, recommends approving the Navy's request for FY2007 procurement funding for the first two DDG-1000s and increasing the Navy's request for FY2007 DDG-1000 research and development funding by a net $1 million. This CRS report explains the above as well as other budgetary recommendations made by the Senate Appropriations Committee.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060814_RL32109_b3c2704410f892f9e60976d675a90f7ecba6478b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060814_RL32109_b3c2704410f892f9e60976d675a90f7ecba6478b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs9355/", "id": "RL32109 2006-07-26", "date": "2006-07-26", "retrieved": "2006-12-05T10:01:46", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060726_RL32109_4f1c2fe058b66bfb9e675970af9e5a03f0e8f4db.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060726_RL32109_4f1c2fe058b66bfb9e675970af9e5a03f0e8f4db.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Shipbuilding subsidies", "name": "Shipbuilding subsidies" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Navy - U.S.", "name": "Navy - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Transportation", "name": "Transportation" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10427/", "id": "RL32109_2006Jun21", "date": "2006-06-21", "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:26:38", "title": "Navy DDG-1000 (DD(X)), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": "This report details the number and cost of three different naval vessels which the Navy is interested in procuring: the DDG-1000 (formerly DD(X)) destroyer, the CG(X) cruiser, and a smaller vessel called the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). The report also explains two different pieces of defense legislation (H.R. 5122/S.2766 and H.R. 5631, respectively) which discuss different financial approaches to funding the procurement of said vessels. These pieces of legislation also explore more cost-efficient methods of achieving equivalent results with less costly vessels, as well as funding research for future designs.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060621_RL32109_e79409f5daec91e4ebf0c59c67d2637d95e2bb80.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060621_RL32109_e79409f5daec91e4ebf0c59c67d2637d95e2bb80.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8646/", "id": "RL32109 2006-03-07", "date": "2006-03-07", "retrieved": "2006-06-01T12:54:56", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060307_RL32109_254e1366fe7678c224ab1240bd98522e038f06a9.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060307_RL32109_254e1366fe7678c224ab1240bd98522e038f06a9.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8460/", "id": "RL32109 2006-02-28", "date": "2006-02-28", "retrieved": "2006-03-20T09:41:30", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060228_RL32109_30caa6589d2ce54a0027de477d206444f172413a.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060228_RL32109_30caa6589d2ce54a0027de477d206444f172413a.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc807225/", "id": "RL32109_2005Dec07", "date": "2005-12-07", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20051207_RL32109_c3bb848422d783ddc7b641b0b965e603f811cd74.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20051207_RL32109_c3bb848422d783ddc7b641b0b965e603f811cd74.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc820790/", "id": "RL32109_2005Nov28", "date": "2005-11-28", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20051128_RL32109_93cc3981bd8369d59b153cff31e29115dab11861.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20051128_RL32109_93cc3981bd8369d59b153cff31e29115dab11861.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6752/", "id": "RL32109 2005-07-29", "date": "2005-07-29", "retrieved": "2005-08-10T08:47:56", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050729_RL32109_01d35374b06f4c69a4f932a22ceaf72090d554f7.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050729_RL32109_01d35374b06f4c69a4f932a22ceaf72090d554f7.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6753/", "id": "RL32109 2005-06-24", "date": "2005-06-24", "retrieved": "2005-08-10T08:50:53", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050624_RL32109_2cda3aa50655865f31affab33796c4385f2508d0.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050624_RL32109_2cda3aa50655865f31affab33796c4385f2508d0.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc811127/", "id": "RL32109_2005May27", "date": "2005-05-27", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050527_RL32109_7d06df0c4c8c2d0e01f8318aa1f28e08f9d0eb6e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050527_RL32109_7d06df0c4c8c2d0e01f8318aa1f28e08f9d0eb6e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6478/", "id": "RL32109 2005-04-21", "date": "2005-04-21", "retrieved": "2005-07-26T08:20:21", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050421_RL32109_2c7ec6e0a19ad679245c1c63b4690cbcd6e6a30d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050421_RL32109_2c7ec6e0a19ad679245c1c63b4690cbcd6e6a30d.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6173/", "id": "RL32109 2005-01-25", "date": "2005-01-25", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T01:57:34", "title": "Navy DD(X) and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050125_RL32109_40310576236e0bd1e431f50f7802b34ee8cc9d9b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050125_RL32109_40310576236e0bd1e431f50f7802b34ee8cc9d9b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6395/", "id": "RL32109 2004-10-28", "date": "2004-10-28", "retrieved": "2005-07-26T08:22:31", "title": "Navy DD(X), CG(X), and LCS Ship Acquisition Programs: Oversight Issues and Options for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20041028_RL32109_30e7fcdb36dd7f6c9a245fa7eadab844e99fe51f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20041028_RL32109_30e7fcdb36dd7f6c9a245fa7eadab844e99fe51f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense economics", "name": "Defense economics" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Naval procurement", "name": "Naval procurement" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Public contracts", "name": "Public contracts" } ] } ], "topics": [ "National Defense" ] }