{
  "id": "RL32123",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RL32123",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 348273,
      "date": "2007-07-09",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:01:10.752029",
      "title": "Airborne Laser (ABL): Issues for Congress",
      "summary": "The United States has pursued a variety of ballistic missile defense concepts and programs over the past fifty years. Since the 1970s, some attention has focused on directed energy weapons, such as high-powered lasers for missile defense. Today, the Airborne Laser (ABL) program is the furthest advanced of these directed energy weapons in relative terms and remains the subject of some technical and program debate.\nThe Department of Defense (DOD) has remained a strong advocate for the ABL and its predecessor programs. The Defense Department and most missile defense advocates argue that the ABL, which is designed to shoot down attacking ballistic missiles within the first few minutes of their launch, is a necessary component of any broader U.S. ballistic missile defense system. Until recently, Congress has largely supported the Administration\u2019s ABL program.\nFunding for the ABL began in FY1994, but the technologies supporting the ABL effort has evolved over 25 years of research and development concerning laser power concepts, pointing and tracking, and adaptive optics. Delayed now for many years, the ABL program plans to conduct a lethality test now scheduled for August 2009. Assuming a successful test, the Defense Department has said that this test platform could then be made available on an emergency basis for a future crisis. To date, about $4.3 billion has been spent on the ABL program, including $632 million for FY2007. For FY2008, the Administration requested $548.8 billion, which was cut substantially in the House and Senate defense authorization bills. Total ABL program costs are not available because the system architecture has not been defined.\nProgram skeptics continue to raise several issues. Their questions include the maturity of the technologies in use in the ABL program and whether current technical and integration challenges can be surmounted. If the ABL is proven successful, there have been questions about the number of platforms the United States should acquire. Seven aircraft have been mentioned previously, and apparently this number remains the program\u2019s objective, but is this number appropriate? What stresses might continued ABL program slippage or delays place on the supporting industrial base? How does the ABL compare to alternative concepts? To what degree should the United States invest in alternative missile defense technologies in the event that the ABL program may not prove successful?\nThis report examines the ABL program and budget status. It also examines some of the issues raised above. This report does not provide a detailed technical assessment of the ABL program (see CRS Report RL30185, The Airborne Laser Anti-Missile Program, by Michael E. Davey and Frederick Martin). This report is updated periodically as necessary.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "encoding": "utf-8",
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32123",
          "sha1": "728b115200fc218f33ec5446b2fcd4f63f2c542f",
          "filename": "files/20070709_RL32123_728b115200fc218f33ec5446b2fcd4f63f2c542f.html",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32123",
          "sha1": "ff8d4b8a3dac3eb82d6cd3eb07161ffc9fb4bf59",
          "filename": "files/20070709_RL32123_ff8d4b8a3dac3eb82d6cd3eb07161ffc9fb4bf59.pdf",
          "images": null
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7515/",
      "id": "RL32123 2005-08-18",
      "date": "2005-08-18",
      "retrieved": "2005-10-24T11:15:30",
      "title": "Airborne Laser (ABL): Issues for Congress",
      "summary": "This report examines the airborne laser (ABL) program and budget status. It also examines a variety of related issues, including the questionable maturity of ABL technologies, the number of ABL platforms the United States should acquire, and to what degree the United STates should invest in alternative technologies in the event that the ABL may not prove successful. This report does not provide a detailed technical assessment of the ABL program (see CRS Report RL30185, The Airborne Laser Anti-Missile Program).",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20050818_RL32123_0b586df2fc3cfd463bf577ecf01371b655c3fcb9.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20050818_RL32123_0b586df2fc3cfd463bf577ecf01371b655c3fcb9.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Advanced weapons",
          "name": "Advanced weapons"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Ballistic missile defense",
          "name": "Ballistic missile defense"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Weapons systems",
          "name": "Weapons systems"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department",
      "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs7493/",
      "id": "RL32123 2003-10-22",
      "date": "2003-10-22",
      "retrieved": "2005-10-24T11:15:03",
      "title": "Airborne Laser (ABL): Issues for Congress",
      "summary": "This report examines the airborne laser (ABL) program and budget status. It also examines a variety of related issues, including the questionable maturity of ABL technologies, the number of ABL platforms the United States should acquire, and to what degree the United STates should invest in alternative technologies in the event that the ABL may not prove successful. This report does not provide a detailed technical assessment of the ABL program (see CRS Report RL30185, The Airborne Laser Anti-Missile Program).",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORT",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "filename": "files/20031022_RL32123_e8815fb8bdbe65e352451e2fc16bee0e60037c31.pdf"
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20031022_RL32123_e8815fb8bdbe65e352451e2fc16bee0e60037c31.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": [
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Defense policy",
          "name": "Defense policy"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Advanced weapons",
          "name": "Advanced weapons"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Ballistic missile defense",
          "name": "Ballistic missile defense"
        },
        {
          "source": "LIV",
          "id": "Weapons systems",
          "name": "Weapons systems"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Affairs",
    "National Defense"
  ]
}