{ "id": "RL32130", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL32130", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 104168, "date": "2004-03-08", "retrieved": "2016-04-08T14:25:40.510505", "title": "Nuclear Weapon Initiatives: Low-Yield R&D, Advanced Concepts, Earth Penetrators, Test Readiness", "summary": "The Bush Administration completed its congressionally-mandated Nuclear Posture Review in\nDecember 2001. The review led to major changes in U.S. nuclear policy. It found that the Cold War\nrelationship with Russia was \"very inappropriate\" and that this nation must be able to deal with new\nthreats. It planned to retain Cold War-era nuclear weapons, which would suffice for many\ncontingencies, though at reduced numbers. To complement these weapons so as to improve U.S.\nability to deal with new, more dispersed threats in various countries, the Administration sought to\nexplore additional nuclear capabilities.\n Accordingly, the FY2004 request included four nuclear weapon initiatives: (1) rescinding the\nban that Congress imposed in 1993 on R&D on low-yield nuclear weapons; (2) $6 million for\nthe\nAdvanced Concepts Initiative (ACI) to begin certain studies of weapon-related science and\ntechnology; (3) $15 million to continue a study of the Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator (RNEP), in\nwhich an existing bomb would be converted into a weapon able to penetrate into the ground before\ndetonating to improve its ability to destroy buried targets; and (4) $25 million to enable the United\nStates to conduct a nuclear test within 18 months of a presidential order to test, and for related\npurposes, as compared with the current 24-36 month time that was set shortly after the end of the\nCold War. Congress acted on these requests in the FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act\n( P.L. 108-136 ), and acted on the latter three in the FY2004 Energy and Water Development\nAppropriations Act ( P.L. 108-137 ). For FY2005, the Administration requests $9.0 million for ACI,\n$27.6 million for RNEP, and $30.0 million for improving nuclear test readiness.\n These initiatives are controversial. Supporters claim that the first three initiatives would\nenhance deterrence, thereby reducing the risk of war, and that some weapons that might result from\nthe initiatives could enable the United States to destroy key targets in nations that may pose a threat. \nCritics are concerned that these initiatives would lead to nuclear testing, increase the risk of nuclear\nproliferation, and make U.S. use of nuclear weapons more likely. Regarding enhanced test readiness,\nthe Administration argues that nuclear testing might be needed, for example, to check fixes to\nweapon types with defects, and that 24 to 36 months is too long to wait; critics are concerned that\nshortening the time to test could signal a U.S. intent to test, and that renewed testing could lead to\na renewed interest in testing by other nations. \n This report provides the policy context for the four initiatives. For each, it then presents a\ndescription, history, FY2004 legislative actions, the FY2005 request (for all but low-yield\nR&D),\nand issues for Congress. It is designed for those who want a detailed introduction to the debate,\nthose seeking arguments and counterarguments, and those looking for answers to specific questions. \nIt will track congressional and executive actions on these initiatives through updates as developments\nwarrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32130", "sha1": "19f08cbfcaec96bf1fda85f6d4d1dd7a4ce4ff1f", "filename": "files/20040308_RL32130_19f08cbfcaec96bf1fda85f6d4d1dd7a4ce4ff1f.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32130", "sha1": "2fceccadfeda2965635a99bd4325ba216b209fec", "filename": "files/20040308_RL32130_2fceccadfeda2965635a99bd4325ba216b209fec.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5701/", "id": "RL32130 2003-12-11", "date": "2003-12-11", "retrieved": "2005-06-12T18:09:04", "title": "Nuclear Weapon Initiatives: Low-Yield R&D, Advanced Concepts, Earth Penetrators, Test Readiness", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20031211_RL32130_54ff0d59219a7657208b37e606b1a7041eb59674.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20031211_RL32130_54ff0d59219a7657208b37e606b1a7041eb59674.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear weapons - National policy", "name": "Nuclear weapons - National policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Politics and government", "name": "Politics and government" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5700/", "id": "RL32130 2003-10-28", "date": "2003-10-28", "retrieved": "2005-06-12T18:06:54", "title": "Nuclear Weapon Initiatives: Low-Yield R&D, Advanced Concepts, Earth Penetrators, Test Readiness", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20031028_RL32130_cec36a453da0c48705d5074e1ca1bccab4a8e6b5.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20031028_RL32130_cec36a453da0c48705d5074e1ca1bccab4a8e6b5.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Weapons systems", "name": "Weapons systems" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Nuclear weapons - National policy", "name": "Nuclear weapons - National policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Politics and government", "name": "Politics and government" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Appropriations", "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }