{
  "id": "RL32410",
  "type": "CRS Report",
  "typeId": "REPORTS",
  "number": "RL32410",
  "active": false,
  "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
  "versions": [
    {
      "source": "EveryCRSReport.com",
      "id": 104352,
      "date": "2004-05-20",
      "retrieved": "2016-04-07T20:15:26.900344",
      "title": "The Former Soviet Union and U.S. Foreign Assistance in 1992: The Role of Congress",
      "summary": "In 1992, Congress played a vital and creative role in what many considered to be the year's most\nimportant foreign policy issue -- the question of U.S. assistance to Russia and the other new\nrepublics of the former Soviet Union. It approved a series of bills, most prominent of which was the\nFreedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992. \nThe Freedom Support Act authorized U.S. foreign assistance to the new states and established the\npolicy framework that laid out the criteria for assistance as well as the types of programs and projects\nto be assisted. \n  Members of Congress took the lead on this issue by pressuring the Administration to submit\na legislative proposal. The House Foreign Affairs Committee even crafted and, on March 24, 1992,\nintroduced its own authorization bill for the region. On April 1, 1992, President Bush announced\nthe Administration's \"comprehensive\" legislation, the Freedom Support Act. \n  As Congress debated the Administration bill, attention focused on several key issues. Should\nthe United States assist the former Soviet Union, and, if so, how much money should the country\nprovide? How much freedom should the Administration have to carry out an assistance program for\nthe region? What kind of conditions must the new states meet in order to be eligible for assistance? \nWhat specific programs should the U.S. support with its funding?\n  As the bill moved through committee and floor debate, Congress molded and transformed the\nAdministration bill in critical ways. Unlike the Administration, Congress established specific levels\nof funding. It placed some restrictions on Administration flexibility. It recommended criteria that\ncountries should follow to be eligible for assistance and established prohibitions on assistance. \nFinally, Congress listed a range of programs, some of which were recommended, others clear\npriorities, for adoption by the Administration.\n  Like most important and controversial legislation, passage of the Freedom Support Act was a\nprocess affected by diverse and conflicting interests. The House and Senate took different\napproaches to the bill. The bipartisan support of congressional leaders was considered crucial to the\nsuccess of the legislation. Multiple committee jurisdiction was resolved, but not without some\nfriction. Perhaps the most dramatic conflict affecting the legislation was that caused by those who\nheld the bill hostage to the passage of domestic economic legislation.\n  In the end, Congress produced a policy for the United States to follow in its efforts to influence\nthe former Soviet Union. The Freedom Support Act was approved by the Senate on July 2, 1992,\nby a 76-20 vote. The House approved the bill on August 6, 1992 by a 255-164 vote. The Senate\npassed the conference report on October 1 and the House followed on October 3. The President\nsigned the Freedom Support Act into law ( P.L. 102-511 ) on October 25.",
      "type": "CRS Report",
      "typeId": "REPORTS",
      "active": false,
      "formats": [
        {
          "format": "PDF",
          "encoding": null,
          "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32410",
          "sha1": "23e493efaa2c03d6229406332f0480d5213f4c53",
          "filename": "files/20040520_RL32410_23e493efaa2c03d6229406332f0480d5213f4c53.pdf",
          "images": null
        },
        {
          "format": "HTML",
          "filename": "files/20040520_RL32410_23e493efaa2c03d6229406332f0480d5213f4c53.html"
        }
      ],
      "topics": []
    }
  ],
  "topics": [
    "European Affairs",
    "Foreign Affairs"
  ]
}