{ "id": "RL32476", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL32476", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 348990, "date": "2007-01-24", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:28:22.206029", "title": "U.S. Army\u2019s Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress", "summary": "In what the Army describes as the \u201cmost significant Army restructuring in the past 50 years,\u201d it is redesigning its current active duty division force to a 48 brigade combat team (BCT) force. The Army National Guard and Army Reserves will also redesign their forces in a similar fashion. The planned addition of active duty brigades and the conversion of Army National Guard brigades could provide a larger force pool of deployable combat units to ease the burden on units presently deployed, and possibly to shorten the length of time that units are deployed on operations. The Army has three other concurrent initiatives underway that it considers inextricably linked to its brigade-centric redesign: rebalancing to create new \u201chigh demand\u201d units; stabilizing the force to foster unit cohesion and enhance predictability for soldiers and their families; and cyclical readiness to better manage resources and to ensure a ready force for operations. These initiatives involve substantial cultural, policy, organizational, and personnel changes.\nSome experts believe that modular redesign, selective rebalancing, stabilizing, and cyclical readiness are prudent actions that should provide the Army with additional deployable units and also eventually bring stability to soldiers and their families. As long as no additional significant long term troop commitments arise, many feel that these initiatives could help ease the stress on both the active and reserve forces. As the Army continues its modular conversion, it may have to contend with budget, personnel, and equipment shortages which could impede plans to build this new force as intended. Some also question if the Army can afford both its Future Combat System (FCS) program and its modularity program. The 110th Congress might decide to examine these and other concerns in greater detail. This report will be updated.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32476", "sha1": "af98b6a2501533b63f3e0fcaa27d8bed0978de4b", "filename": "files/20070124_RL32476_af98b6a2501533b63f3e0fcaa27d8bed0978de4b.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32476", "sha1": "f4bb9a788e50357eb382c6ce70b1999cfdcb388f", "filename": "files/20070124_RL32476_f4bb9a788e50357eb382c6ce70b1999cfdcb388f.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8978/", "id": "RL32476 2006-05-05", "date": "2006-05-05", "retrieved": "2006-07-03T14:51:36", "title": "U.S. Army's Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060505_RL32476_d5b6ee6c3447be33d8115957bbf545c627d36878.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060505_RL32476_d5b6ee6c3447be33d8115957bbf545c627d36878.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Army - Reorganization - U.S.", "name": "Army - Reorganization - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive departments", "name": "Executive departments" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8648/", "id": "RL32476 2006-02-06", "date": "2006-02-06", "retrieved": "2006-06-01T12:55:00", "title": "U.S. Army's Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060206_RL32476_fc10d938534e843ac8418bdbd0f90ce787de40c2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060206_RL32476_fc10d938534e843ac8418bdbd0f90ce787de40c2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Army - Reorganization - U.S.", "name": "Army - Reorganization - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive departments", "name": "Executive departments" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6683/", "id": "RL32476 2005-05-20", "date": "2005-05-20", "retrieved": "2005-08-03T11:29:09", "title": "U.S. Army's Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050520_RL32476_ede29c8e1690124255df8b49b4e9c2816f324f1e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050520_RL32476_ede29c8e1690124255df8b49b4e9c2816f324f1e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Army - Reorganization - U.S.", "name": "Army - Reorganization - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive departments", "name": "Executive departments" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc815876/", "id": "RL32476_2005Jan06", "date": "2005-01-06", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "U.S. Army\u2019s Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050106_RL32476_bb5da6b51e36f72c1b2bbcf65412cff8ba1eba6e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050106_RL32476_bb5da6b51e36f72c1b2bbcf65412cff8ba1eba6e.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs5824/", "id": "RL32476 2004-07-19", "date": "2004-07-19", "retrieved": "2005-06-11T05:04:56", "title": "U.S. Army's Modular Redesign: Issues for Congress", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20040719_RL32476_d049904f4374909ee84aadef029027e87165c836.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20040719_RL32476_d049904f4374909ee84aadef029027e87165c836.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Defense policy", "name": "Defense policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Army - Reorganization - U.S.", "name": "Army - Reorganization - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Executive departments", "name": "Executive departments" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }