{ "id": "RL32528", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "RL", "number": "RL32528", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect upon U.S. Law", "retrieved": "2023-08-18T04:03:24.838515", "id": "RL32528_22_2023-07-13", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2023-07-13_RL32528_55883c5787ebc8f8b41f7df1654fd0d1cb56a503.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32528/22", "sha1": "55883c5787ebc8f8b41f7df1654fd0d1cb56a503" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-07-13_RL32528_55883c5787ebc8f8b41f7df1654fd0d1cb56a503.html" } ], "date": "2023-07-13", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32528", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 585411, "date": "2018-09-19", "retrieved": "2018-09-20T14:21:17.625743", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect upon U.S. Law", "summary": "International law is derived from two primary sources\u2014international agreements and customary practice. Under the U.S. legal system, international agreements can be entered into by means of a treaty or an executive agreement. The Constitution allocates primary responsibility for entering into such agreements to the executive branch, but Congress also plays an essential role. First, in order for a treaty (but not an executive agreement) to become binding upon the United States, the Senate must provide its advice and consent to treaty ratification by a two-thirds majority. Secondly, Congress may authorize congressional-executive agreements. Thirdly, many treaties and executive agreements are not self-executing, meaning that implementing legislation is required to render the agreement\u2019s provisions judicially enforceable in the United States.\nThe status of an international agreement within the United States depends on a variety of factors. Self-executing treaties have a status equal to federal statute, superior to U.S. state law, and inferior to the Constitution. Depending upon the nature of executive agreements, they may or may not have a status equal to federal statute. In any case, self-executing executive agreements have a status that is superior to U.S. state law and inferior to the Constitution. Courts generally have understood treaties and executive agreements that are not self-executing generally to have limited status domestically; rather, the legislation or regulations implementing these agreements are controlling.\nIn addition to legally binding agreements, the executive branch also regularly makes nonlegal agreements (sometimes described as \u201cpolitical agreements\u201d) with foreign entities. The formality, specificity, and intended duration of such commitments may vary considerably, but they do not modify existing legal authorities or obligations, which remain controlling under both U.S. domestic and international law. Nonetheless, such commitments may carry significant moral and political weight for the United States and other parties. Unlike in the case of legal agreements, current federal law does not provide any general applicable requirements that the executive branch notify Congress when it enters a political agreement on behalf of the United States.\nThe effects of the second source of international law, customary international practice, upon the United States are more ambiguous. While there is some Supreme Court jurisprudence finding that customary international law is \u201cpart of\u201d U.S. law, domestic statutes that conflict with customary rules remain controlling, and scholars debate whether the Supreme Court\u2019s international law jurisprudence still applies in the modern era. Some domestic U.S. statutes directly incorporate customary international law, and therefore invite courts to interpret and apply customary international law in the domestic legal system. The Alien Tort Statute, for example, which establishes federal court jurisdiction over certain tort claims brought by aliens for violations of \u201cthe law of nations.\u201d\nAlthough the United States has long understood international legal commitments to be binding both internationally and domestically, the relationship between international law and the U.S. legal system implicates complex legal dynamics. Because the legislative branch possesses important powers to shape and define the United States\u2019 international obligations, Congress is likely to continue to play a critical role in shaping the role of international law in the U.S. legal system in the future.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32528", "sha1": "14233c22472591f7e81f553794ebb8640f601a51", "filename": "files/20180919_RL32528_14233c22472591f7e81f553794ebb8640f601a51.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32528_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180919_RL32528_images_b96ba91f2227843707402763dcf772d4b1ba0b07.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32528_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180919_RL32528_images_0d2cf175cd57ffd09ab0e901d63568ff55a70485.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL32528_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180919_RL32528_images_8fe6230c6bdcd84db24697ecec2362c822cdbdfb.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32528", "sha1": "68dd97124b9040bdfe5f2875d1142c515c7c19db", "filename": "files/20180919_RL32528_68dd97124b9040bdfe5f2875d1142c515c7c19db.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4784, "name": "International Law" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 445680, "date": "2015-09-24", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T18:19:17.153529", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect upon U.S. Law", "summary": "This report provides an introduction to the roles that international law and agreements play in the United States. International law is derived from two primary sources\u2014international agreements and customary practice. Under the U.S. legal system, international agreements can be entered into by means of a treaty or an executive agreement. The Constitution allocates primary responsibility for entering into such agreements to the executive branch, but Congress also plays an essential role. First, in order for a treaty (but not an executive agreement) to become binding upon the United States, the Senate must provide its advice and consent to treaty ratification by a two-thirds majority. Secondly, Congress may authorize congressional-executive agreements. Thirdly, many treaties and executive agreements are not self-executing, meaning that implementing legislation is required to provide U.S. bodies with the domestic legal authority necessary to enforce and comply with an international agreement\u2019s provisions.\nThe status of an international agreement within the United States depends on a variety of factors. Self-executing treaties have a status equal to federal statute, superior to U.S. state law, and inferior to the Constitution. Depending upon the nature of executive agreements, they may or may not have a status equal to federal statute. In any case, self-executing executive agreements have a status that is superior to U.S. state law and inferior to the Constitution. Treaties or executive agreements that are not self-executing generally have been understood by the courts to have limited status domestically; rather, the legislation or regulations implementing these agreements are controlling.\nIn addition to legally binding agreements, the executive branch also regularly makes nonlegal agreements (sometimes described as \u201cpolitical agreements\u201d) with foreign entities. The formality, specificity, and intended duration of such commitments may vary considerably, but they do not modify existing legal authorities or obligations, which remain controlling under both U.S. domestic and international law. Nonetheless, such commitments may carry significant moral and political weight for the United States and other parties. Unlike in the case of legal agreements, current federal law does not provide any general applicable requirements that the executive branch notify Congress when it enters a political agreement on behalf of the United States.\nThe effects of the second source of international law, customary international practice, upon the United States are more ambiguous and controversial. While there is some Supreme Court jurisprudence finding that customary international law is part of U.S. law, U.S. statutes that conflict with customary rules remain controlling. Customary international law is perhaps most clearly recognized under U.S. law via the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), which establishes federal court jurisdiction over tort claims brought by aliens for violations of \u201cthe law of nations.\u201d\nControversy has sometimes arisen concerning references made by U.S. courts to foreign laws or jurisprudence when interpreting domestic statutes or constitutional requirements. Historically, U.S. courts have on occasion looked to foreign jurisprudence for persuasive value, particularly when the interpretation of an international agreement is at issue, but foreign jurisprudence never appears to have been treated as binding. Though U.S. courts will likely continue to refer to foreign jurisprudence, where, when, and how significantly they will rely upon it is difficult to predict.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32528", "sha1": "575f139f985147b98b008dd0ec1d5528be8e74fb", "filename": "files/20150924_RL32528_575f139f985147b98b008dd0ec1d5528be8e74fb.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32528", "sha1": "2ce3cbc59891da783bdb9fa34756754810d4d301", "filename": "files/20150924_RL32528_2ce3cbc59891da783bdb9fa34756754810d4d301.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 3919, "name": "International Law and U.S. Sovereignty" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc503644/", "id": "RL32528_2015Feb18", "date": "2015-02-18", "retrieved": "2015-04-30T17:37:21", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect upon U.S. Law", "summary": "This report provides an introduction to the roles that international law and agreements play in the United States. This includes the role of different branches of government play in navigating such laws.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150218_RL32528_23b2249b78e68db5ab99448c304ad3cee96f8634.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150218_RL32528_23b2249b78e68db5ab99448c304ad3cee96f8634.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "International law", "name": "International law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc276858/", "id": "RL32528_2014Jan23", "date": "2014-01-23", "retrieved": "2014-03-05T18:18:19", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect upon U.S. Law", "summary": "This report provides an introduction to the roles that international law and agreements play in the United States. The report discusses forms of international agreements and the effects of international agreements on U.S. law.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140123_RL32528_f407a56511576933e5dd70650fe6c5dbad79bbf6.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140123_RL32528_f407a56511576933e5dd70650fe6c5dbad79bbf6.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "International law", "name": "International law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462330/", "id": "RL32528_2013Mar01", "date": "2013-03-01", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect Upon U.S. Law", "summary": "This report provides an introduction to the roles that international law and agreements play in the United States. International law is derived from two primary sources \u2014 international agreements and customary practice.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130301_RL32528_8d3a22fdc13d12aee452563f1ca4c0aafd8a4357.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130301_RL32528_8d3a22fdc13d12aee452563f1ca4c0aafd8a4357.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "International law", "name": "International law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc505426/", "id": "RL32528_2010Jan26", "date": "2010-01-26", "retrieved": "2015-05-29T05:37:21", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect Upon U.S. Law", "summary": "This report provides an introduction to the roles that international law and agreements play in the United States. International law is derived from two primary sources--international agreements and customary practice. Under the U.S. legal system, international agreements can be entered into by means of a treaty or an executive agreement. The Constitution allocates primary responsibility for entering into such agreements to the executive branch, but Congress also plays an essential role.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20100126_RL32528_903f48050cd49b064a0ea13be42dc1e59b0e6bd6.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20100126_RL32528_903f48050cd49b064a0ea13be42dc1e59b0e6bd6.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "International law", "name": "International law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc810749/", "id": "RL32528_2004Aug16", "date": "2004-08-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "International Law and Agreements: Their Effect Upon U.S. Law", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20040816_RL32528_f165344ea6cc34360667fb79ed4247015c7b464c.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20040816_RL32528_f165344ea6cc34360667fb79ed4247015c7b464c.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "American Law", "Foreign Affairs", "National Defense" ] }