{ "id": "RL32662", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL32662", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 349021, "date": "2007-01-23", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:29:33.233029", "title": "Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests", "summary": "U.S. attention has focused on Russia\u2019s fitful democratization since Russia emerged in 1991 from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Many observers have argued that a democratic Russia with free markets would be a cooperative bilateral and multilateral partner rather than an insular and hostile national security threat. Concerns about democratization progress appeared heightened after Vladimir Putin became president in 2000. Since then, Russians have faced increased government interference in elections and campaigns, restrictions on freedom of the media, large-scale human rights abuses in the breakaway Chechnya region, and the forced breakup of Russia\u2019s largest private oil firm, Yukos, as an apparent warning to entrepreneurs not to support opposition parties or otherwise challenge government policy.\nDemocratization faced further challenges following terrorist attacks in Russia that culminated in the deaths of hundreds of school-children in the town of Beslan in September 2004. President Putin almost immediately proposed restructuring the government and strengthening federal powers to better counter such terrorist threats. The restructuring included integrating security agencies, switching to party list voting for the Duma (lower legislative chamber), eliminating direct elections of the heads of federal subunits, and asserting greater presidential control over civil society by creating a \u201cPublic Chamber\u201d consultative group of largely government-approved non-governmental organizations. All the proposals had been enacted into law or otherwise implemented by early 2006.\nSome Russian and international observers have supported the restructuring as compatible with Russia\u2019s democratization. They have accepted Putin\u2019s argument that the restructuring would counter Chechen and international terrorists intent on destroying Russia\u2019s territorial integrity and political and economic development. On the other hand, critics of the restructuring have branded them the latest in a series of anti-democratic moves since Putin came to power. They have characterized these moves as fine tuning a system of \u201cmanaged democracy,\u201d if not authoritarianism, in order to gain more influence over electoral processes ahead of Duma and presidential races in 2007-2008. The stakes for various power groups seeking to avert unwanted popular electoral \u201cinterference\u201d are high, since Putin has declared that he will not seek another term.\nThe U.S. Administration and Congress have welcomed some cooperation with Russia on vital U.S. national security concerns, including the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), strategic arms reduction, NATO enlargement, and since September 11, 2001, the Global War on Terror. At the same time, the United States has raised increased concerns with Russia over anti-democratic trends, warning that a divergence in democratic values could increasingly stymie U.S.-Russian cooperation. Some U.S. observers have urged restraint in advocating democratization in Russia, lest such efforts harm U.S.-Russian cooperation on vital concerns, while others have urged stronger U.S. advocacy, regardless of possible effects on bilateral relations. This report may be updated as events warrant. See also CRS Report RL33407, Russian Political, Economic, and Security Issues and U.S. Interests, by Stuart D. Goldman.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL32662", "sha1": "14dcfe3f549c76f29fddd495ce5b32edd1ed2c5d", "filename": "files/20070123_RL32662_14dcfe3f549c76f29fddd495ce5b32edd1ed2c5d.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL32662", "sha1": "9d50fdae42d8c3b5c0365d265765cb1ebbe78821", "filename": "files/20070123_RL32662_9d50fdae42d8c3b5c0365d265765cb1ebbe78821.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs10405/", "id": "RL32662_2006Aug29", "date": "2006-08-29", "retrieved": "2008-12-11T20:26:48", "title": "Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests", "summary": "U.S. attention has focused on Russia's fitful democratization since Russia emerged in 1991 from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Many observers have argued that a democratic Russia with free markets would be a cooperative bilateral and multilateral partner rather than an insular and hostile national security threat. President Putin's 2004 proposal to restructure the government has been supported by international observers. The U.S. Administration and Congress have welcomed some cooperation with Russia on vital U.S. national security concerns, including the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, among other issues.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060829_RL32662_23d067134279339450c9688fbd80d8885b869ede.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060829_RL32662_23d067134279339450c9688fbd80d8885b869ede.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Politics and government", "name": "Politics and government" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Politics and government - Russia", "name": "Politics and government - Russia" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign relations - U.S. - Russia", "name": "Foreign relations - U.S. - Russia" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign relations - Russia - U.S.", "name": "Foreign relations - Russia - U.S." } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs6290/", "id": "RL32662 2005-01-28", "date": "2005-01-28", "retrieved": "2005-06-12T02:22:45", "title": "Democracy in Russia: Trends and Implications for U.S. Interests", "summary": "U.S. attention has focused on Russia's fitful democratization since Russia emerged in 1991 from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Many observers have argued that a democratic Russia with free markets would be a cooperative bilateral and multilateral partner rather than an insular and hostile national security threat. President Putin's 2004 proposal to restructure the government has been supported by international observers. The U.S. Administration and Congress have welcomed some cooperation with Russia on vital U.S. national security concerns, including the non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, among other issues.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20050128_RL32662_dfaef5e4ea8c04e6967eaa8c6f5e752b69da48e4.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20050128_RL32662_dfaef5e4ea8c04e6967eaa8c6f5e752b69da48e4.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Politics and government", "name": "Politics and government" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign relations - Russia - U.S.", "name": "Foreign relations - Russia - U.S." }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign relations - U.S. - Russia", "name": "Foreign relations - U.S. - Russia" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Politics and government - Russia", "name": "Politics and government - Russia" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign policy", "name": "Foreign policy" } ] } ], "topics": [ "Energy Policy", "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }