{ "id": "RL33247", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL33247", "active": true, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 382662, "date": "2011-03-11", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T22:08:07.596436", "title": "Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2011", "summary": "From 1789 through 2009, the President submitted to the Senate 160 nominations for positions on the Supreme Court. Of these nominations, 148 received action on the floor of the Senate, and 124 were confirmed. On August 5, 2010, the Senate confirmed the nomination of Solicitor General Elana Kagan to be an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, making her the 124th Justice on the Court.\nThe forms of proceeding by which the Senate considered the 148 nominees to reach the floor break down relatively naturally into five patterns over time. First, from 1789 through about 1834, the Senate considered the nominations on the floor on the day after they were received from the President. The second period (1835-1867) was distinguished by the beginning of referral of nominations to the Committee on the Judiciary. The third period (1868-1921) was marked by rule changes that brought about more formalization of the process. During the fourth period (1922-1967), the Senate began using the Calendar Call to manage the consideration of Supreme Court nominations, and the final time period, 1968 to the present, is marked by routine roll call votes on confirmation and the use of unanimous consent agreements to structure debate.\nOf the 124 votes by which the Senate confirmed nominees, 73 took place by voice vote and 51 by roll call, but on only 26 of the roll calls did 10 or more Senators vote against. Of the 36 nominations not confirmed, the Senate rejected 11 outright, and 12 others never received floor consideration (some, apparently because of opposition; others were withdrawn). The remaining 13 nominations reached the floor but never received a final vote, usually because some procedural action terminated consideration before a vote could occur (and the President later withdrew some of these). Including those that received incomplete consideration, were rejected, or drew more than 10 negative votes, just 50 of the 160 total nominations experienced opposition that might be called \u201csignificant.\u201d\nOf the 148 nominations that reached the floor, 100 received one day of consideration, while 26 received more than two days, including four on which floor action took seven days or more. Of these 148 nominations, optional procedural actions that indicate the presence of an attempt to delay or block a confirmation vote occurred on 58, of which 26 involved procedural roll calls. Among a wide variety of procedural actions used, the more common ones have included motions to postpone, recommit, and table; motions to proceed to consider or other complications in calling up; live quorum calls, and unanimous consent agreements.\nNeither extended consideration, the presence of extra procedural actions, nor the appearance of \u201csignificant\u201d opposition affords definitive evidence, by itself, that proceedings were contentious. For example, some nominations considered for one day still faced procedural roll calls, some considered for three days or more faced no optional procedures, and some opposed by more than 10 Senators were still considered only briefly and without optional procedures. Of the 148 nominations to reach the floor, however, 76 were confirmed in a single day of action with neither optional procedural actions nor more than scattered opposition.\nThis report will be updated to reflect action on additional nominations to the Court.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33247", "sha1": "f9216e388dd2393e14d4e91cc58f787d1ad863ce", "filename": "files/20110311_RL33247_f9216e388dd2393e14d4e91cc58f787d1ad863ce.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33247", "sha1": "a62ee890fa0d2dcfc0d34266c88826f8bbf245c9", "filename": "files/20110311_RL33247_a62ee890fa0d2dcfc0d34266c88826f8bbf245c9.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 2155, "name": "Judicial Branch Appointments" }, { "source": "CongOpsList", "id": 4140, "name": "Senate Floor Proceedings" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc26232/", "id": "RL33247_2009Jun05", "date": "2009-06-05", "retrieved": "2010-07-07T17:39:19", "title": "Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2009", "summary": "This report discusses Senate procedure relating to Supreme Court nominations from 1789 to the present, but excluding the June 1, 2009 nomination of Sonia Sotomayor.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20090605_RL33247_8efdf1b0e9bb3508a4a54c7f0945a31c6fe5923e.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20090605_RL33247_8efdf1b0e9bb3508a4a54c7f0945a31c6fe5923e.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Congress", "name": "Congress" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate", "name": "Senate" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Senate rules and procedure", "name": "Senate rules and procedure" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Law", "name": "Law" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court nominations", "name": "Supreme Court nominations" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Supreme Court justice", "name": "Supreme Court justice" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Advice and consent of the Senate", "name": "Advice and consent of the Senate" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc820135/", "id": "RL33247_2006Jun02", "date": "2006-06-02", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2006", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060602_RL33247_4a86e1bfb008fbdc87dfa3120f3b96e4ca1d0ff6.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060602_RL33247_4a86e1bfb008fbdc87dfa3120f3b96e4ca1d0ff6.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc809138/", "id": "RL33247_2006Jan24", "date": "2006-01-24", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Supreme Court Nominations: Senate Floor Procedure and Practice, 1789-2005", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060124_RL33247_0ba71280a6b99b0aaa7ca51816624b7ec2083f66.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060124_RL33247_0ba71280a6b99b0aaa7ca51816624b7ec2083f66.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [] }