{ "id": "RL33663", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "RL", "number": "RL33663", "active": true, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov, EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2023-12-30T04:03:52.433957", "id": "RL33663_74_2023-11-22", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2023-11-22_RL33663_a23af3110b89ed4e0a75e571c43006a21a0162a0.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33663/74", "sha1": "a23af3110b89ed4e0a75e571c43006a21a0162a0" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2023-11-22_RL33663_a23af3110b89ed4e0a75e571c43006a21a0162a0.html" } ], "date": "2023-11-22", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL33663", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2023-12-30T04:03:52.432768", "id": "RL33663_72_2022-07-20", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2022-07-20_RL33663_0245d1da59941c433c9841735160426282113c01.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33663/72", "sha1": "0245d1da59941c433c9841735160426282113c01" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2022-07-20_RL33663_0245d1da59941c433c9841735160426282113c01.html" } ], "date": "2022-07-20", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL33663", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source_dir": "crsreports.congress.gov", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "retrieved": "2023-12-30T04:03:52.430719", "id": "RL33663_69_2021-01-07", "formats": [ { "filename": "files/2021-01-07_RL33663_cdd8bd33576d9739426e0c7976514e3281624938.pdf", "format": "PDF", "url": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL33663/69", "sha1": "cdd8bd33576d9739426e0c7976514e3281624938" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/2021-01-07_RL33663_cdd8bd33576d9739426e0c7976514e3281624938.html" } ], "date": "2021-01-07", "summary": null, "source": "CRSReports.Congress.gov", "typeId": "RL", "active": true, "sourceLink": "https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL33663", "type": "CRS Report" }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 607313, "date": "2019-11-07", "retrieved": "2019-11-07T23:17:39.133047", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended the GSP program in Division M, Title V of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141). This act extended the GSP program until December 31, 2020, as well as retroactively renewing it for the time period between December 31, 2017 (the previous expiration date) and April 22, 2018.\nCurrently, 120 developing countries and territories are GSP beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2018, products valued at about $23.8 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of $238.4 billion worth of total imports from GSP-eligible countries. Total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.6 trillion in 2018.\nIn recent years, Members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil, Turkey) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for products deemed \u201cimport sensitive\u201d has caused some controversy, as well as concerns about certain beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility requirements based on alleged violations of worker rights, failure to protect intellectual property, and other practices. In May 2019, President Trump terminated Turkey\u2019s GSP designation based on its improved level of economic development. The President also terminated India\u2019s GSP eligibility in June 2019 on the basis of market access issues.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as providing the U.S. with adequate market access, taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport-sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "777d0f472b77eefb0006eacb179d8410153df042", "filename": "files/20191107_RL33663_777d0f472b77eefb0006eacb179d8410153df042.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/2.png": "files/20191107_RL33663_images_0bf1f9b870ca965605a370500079297526cb0106.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20191107_RL33663_images_ee96100592189652fa8228f9a53ff1d7423647cf.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20191107_RL33663_images_e2f2d5a84ef7bc3048aefb4bb4f327f682ea770d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "54e86255d32f4a7f493c44d4174356b3c34e2806", "filename": "files/20191107_RL33663_54e86255d32f4a7f493c44d4174356b3c34e2806.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 606772, "date": "2019-10-28", "retrieved": "2019-10-29T22:17:49.186266", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended the GSP program in Division M, Title V of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141). This Act, extended the GSP program until December 31, 2020, as well as retroactively renewing it for the time period between December 31, 2017 (the previous expiration date) and April 22, 2018.\nCurrently, 120 developing countries and territories are GSP beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2018, products valued at about $23.8 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of $238.4 billion worth of total imports from GSP-eligible countries. Total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.6 trillion in 2018.\nIn recent years, Members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil, Turkey) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for products deemed \u201cimport sensitive\u201d has caused some controversy, as well as concerns about certain beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility requirements based on alleged violations of worker rights, failure to protect intellectual property, and other practices. In May 2019, President Trump terminated Turkey\u2019s GSP designation based on its improved level of economic development. The President also terminated India\u2019s GSP eligibility in June 2019 on the basis of market access issues.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as providing the U.S. with adequate market access, taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport-sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "6b0d11d83c0388ef392a4493f945d451ac8ec849", "filename": "files/20191028_RL33663_6b0d11d83c0388ef392a4493f945d451ac8ec849.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20191028_RL33663_images_ee96100592189652fa8228f9a53ff1d7423647cf.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20191028_RL33663_images_e2f2d5a84ef7bc3048aefb4bb4f327f682ea770d.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "https://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "c40b9fb380a7a5ccd2b9061a971e35aaadf305d3", "filename": "files/20191028_RL33663_c40b9fb380a7a5ccd2b9061a971e35aaadf305d3.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 589629, "date": "2019-01-08", "retrieved": "2019-01-09T23:06:53.070421", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended it until December 31, 2020 in Division M, Title V of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141).The GSP program was also retroactively renewed for all GSP-eligible entries between December 31, 2017 (the previous expiration date), and April 22, 2018, the effective date of the current GSP renewal reauthorization. \nCurrently, 121 developing countries and territories are GSP beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The GSP program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2017, products valued at about $21.2 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of total imports from GSP countries of about $220 billion. Total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.3 trillion in 2017.\nIn recent years, Members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for products deemed \u201cimport sensitive\u201d has caused some controversy, as well as concerns about certain beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility requirements based on alleged violations of worker rights, failure to protect intellectual property, and other practices. In October 2017, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) announced that it would initiate closer reviews of beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility criteria on a triennial basis, beginning with Asian and Pacific Island countries. Other country practice reviews, as requested by U.S. interested parties, are ongoing.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "990531feb93ea88fbeb4e370709322e8b6c58d84", "filename": "files/20190108_RL33663_990531feb93ea88fbeb4e370709322e8b6c58d84.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/2.png": "files/20190108_RL33663_images_d00bd1f369d4d6f985ecfde286f79ebdb71acd2e.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20190108_RL33663_images_ce45154a3f06b40952d8041ceaec15841bd89eea.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20190108_RL33663_images_c612380ec127f54c3480b7d9553a877ffc7503ad.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "cf3d0ee5ed08e42bc9e715c2126703265505558b", "filename": "files/20190108_RL33663_cf3d0ee5ed08e42bc9e715c2126703265505558b.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 584186, "date": "2018-05-09", "retrieved": "2018-08-29T15:30:43.288368", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended it until December 31, 2020 in Division M, Title V of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141).\nThe GSP program was also retroactively renewed for all GSP-eligible entries between December 31, 2017 (the previous expiration date), and April 22, 2018, the effective date of the current GSP renewal reauthorization. \nCurrently, 120 developing countries and territories are GSP beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The GSP program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2017, products valued at about $21.2 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of total imports from GSP countries of about $220 billion. Total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.3 trillion in 2017.\nIn recent years, members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for certain products has caused some controversy, as well as the worker rights, intellectual property, and other practices of certain beneficiaries. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) recently announced that it will conduct closer reviews of beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility criteria. On April 27, 2018, the USTR initiated GSP country practice reviews of India (market access), Indonesia (market access), and Kazakhstan (worker rights). These reviews were requested by stakeholders. The USTR also announced a new triennial review process of beneficiaries\u2019 GSP eligibility, beginning with Asian and Pacific Island countries.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "28485bc48b246c16a7bd0e28f779bfcbfb74c073", "filename": "files/20180509_RL33663_28485bc48b246c16a7bd0e28f779bfcbfb74c073.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20180509_RL33663_images_f61653752deb9225576a85cbfd22c51b64862604.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20180509_RL33663_images_7dadbd32a2d8283e2b1e1ac5ee84ff7f9da29686.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/2.png": "files/20180509_RL33663_images_d00bd1f369d4d6f985ecfde286f79ebdb71acd2e.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "406a98a1535e8df3ebf968d6c3ce8a35e431cecc", "filename": "files/20180509_RL33663_406a98a1535e8df3ebf968d6c3ce8a35e431cecc.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 577034, "date": "2017-12-27", "retrieved": "2018-01-03T13:50:15.629082", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended it until December 31, 2017, in Title II of P.L. 114-27. Since the program expires at the end of this year, its renewal may be an issue for the 115th Congress.\nAt the time of the last GSP renewal, enacted on June 29, 2015, the program had previously expired. Therefore, the program was also retroactively renewed for all GSP-eligible entries between July 31, 2013 (the previous expiration date), and the effective date of the current GSP renewal reauthorization. P.L. 114-27 also provided the President with authority to designate new products as eligible for GSP status, including some cotton products (for least-developed beneficiaries only) and certain luggage and travel goods. \nAs of July 2017, 120 developing countries and territories were GSP beneficiaries. The GSP program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2016 (last full year available) products valued at about $19 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of total imports from GSP countries of about $201.6 billion (total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.2 trillion).\nIn recent years, GSP renewal has been somewhat controversial. Members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for certain products has caused some controversy, as well as the worker rights, intellectual property, and other practices of certain beneficiaries. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) recently announced that it will conduct closer reviews of beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility criteria. Additionally, concerns over offsets used to fund GSP renewal legislation were a factor in the most recent GSP program lapse.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "76fb1b1e2801eb2d33b485a964c5ba98ecf0424f", "filename": "files/20171227_RL33663_76fb1b1e2801eb2d33b485a964c5ba98ecf0424f.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171227_RL33663_images_46a670027c4d55a43ef8ba4f33b31765d05f7260.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171227_RL33663_images_9c8ba7d2bd37126473a5d61f70e20557653392b0.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171227_RL33663_images_7667209342fd11348554dab11b629621372ff1c5.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "bfddeb9d99d06d70b34527152ec140f6f042b953", "filename": "files/20171227_RL33663_bfddeb9d99d06d70b34527152ec140f6f042b953.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 576786, "date": "2017-12-14", "retrieved": "2017-12-19T13:50:32.283949", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended it until December 31, 2017, in Title II of P.L. 114-27. Since the program expires at the end of this year, its renewal may be an issue for the 115th Congress.\nAt the time of the last GSP renewal, enacted on June 29, 2015, the program had previously expired. Therefore, the program was also retroactively renewed for all GSP-eligible entries between July 31, 2013 (the previous expiration date), and the effective date of the current GSP renewal reauthorization. P.L. 114-27 also provided the President with authority to designate new products as eligible for GSP status, including some cotton products (for least-developed beneficiaries only) and certain luggage and travel goods. \nAs of July 2017, 120 developing countries and territories were GSP beneficiaries. The GSP program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2016 (last full year available) products valued at about $19 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of total imports from GSP countries of about $201.6 billion (total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.2 trillion).\nIn recent years, GSP renewal has been somewhat controversial. Members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for certain products has caused some controversy, as well as the worker rights, intellectual property, and other practices of certain beneficiaries. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) recently announced that it will conduct closer reviews of beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility criteria. Additionally, concerns over offsets used to fund GSP renewal legislation were a factor in the most recent GSP program lapse.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "ce89d44ac15ebe570f11eb3c69887459bd8aad73", "filename": "files/20171214_RL33663_ce89d44ac15ebe570f11eb3c69887459bd8aad73.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171214_RL33663_images_7667209342fd11348554dab11b629621372ff1c5.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171214_RL33663_images_9c8ba7d2bd37126473a5d61f70e20557653392b0.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171214_RL33663_images_46a670027c4d55a43ef8ba4f33b31765d05f7260.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "c7f645b7cc3ba3f64b078c5c3951b7b497df9a9f", "filename": "files/20171214_RL33663_c7f645b7cc3ba3f64b078c5c3951b7b497df9a9f.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 575529, "date": "2017-11-14", "retrieved": "2017-11-28T14:40:13.986542", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides nonreciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. Congress first authorized the U.S. program in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and most recently extended it until December 31, 2017, in Title II of P.L. 114-27. Since the program expires at the end of this year, its renewal may be an issue for the 115th Congress.\nAt the time of the last GSP renewal, enacted on June 29, 2015, the program had previously expired. Therefore, the program was also retroactively renewed for all GSP-eligible entries between July 31, 2013 (the previous expiration date), and the effective date of the current GSP renewal reauthorization. P.L. 114-27 also provided the President with authority to designate new products as eligible for GSP status, including some cotton products (for least-developed beneficiaries only) and certain luggage and travel goods. \nAs of July 2017, 120 developing countries and territories were GSP beneficiaries. The GSP program provides duty-free entry into the United States for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 44 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs). In 2016 (last full year available) products valued at about $19 billion (imports for consumption) entered the United States duty-free under the program, out of total imports from GSP countries of about $201.6 billion (total U.S. imports from all countries amounted to about $2.2 trillion).\nIn recent years, GSP renewal has been somewhat controversial. Members of Congress have held a range of views on whether or not to continue to include emerging market developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil) as beneficiaries, or to limit the program to least-developed countries. Duty-free access for certain products has caused some controversy, as well as the worker rights, intellectual property, and other practices of certain beneficiaries. The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) recently announced that it will conduct closer reviews of beneficiaries\u2019 compliance with GSP eligibility criteria. Additionally, concerns over offsets used to fund GSP renewal legislation were a factor in the most recent GSP program lapse.\nGSP is one of several trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, including the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). U.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain eligibility criteria, such as taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights and protect intellectual property rights, among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Certain \u201cimport sensitive\u201d products (e.g., most textiles and apparel) are specifically excluded, and limits are placed on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (except for products from LDBDCs and AGOA countries). GSP country and product eligibility are also subject to annual review. \nThis report examines, first, recent legislative developments, along with a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report describes U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report briefly analyzes of the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and stakeholders\u2019 views, and discusses possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "5ab63a3f86a423e6fc8525473d5856da1d1c5403", "filename": "files/20171114_RL33663_5ab63a3f86a423e6fc8525473d5856da1d1c5403.html", "images": { "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/0.png": "files/20171114_RL33663_images_46a670027c4d55a43ef8ba4f33b31765d05f7260.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/1.png": "files/20171114_RL33663_images_9c8ba7d2bd37126473a5d61f70e20557653392b0.png", "/products/Getimages/?directory=RL/html/RL33663_files&id=/2.png": "files/20171114_RL33663_images_7667209342fd11348554dab11b629621372ff1c5.png" } }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "4ed6136dd64cb1caed0523dee99c12732aef5bbb", "filename": "files/20171114_RL33663_4ed6136dd64cb1caed0523dee99c12732aef5bbb.pdf", "images": {} } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 4865, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 446202, "date": "2015-10-07", "retrieved": "2016-04-06T18:14:20.983915", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Overview and Issues for Congress", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides non-reciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). The United States, the European Union, and other developed countries have implemented similar programs since the 1970s. The U.S. program was first authorized in Title V of the Trade Act of 1974, and is subject to periodic renewal by Congress. The GSP program was most recently extended until December 31, 2017, in Title II of P.L. 114-27. The program was also retroactively renewed for all GSP-eligible entries between July 31, 2013 (the latest expiration date), and the effective date of the current GSP renewal (July 29, 2015). P.L. 114-27 also designated new product categories as eligible for GSP status, including some cotton products (for least-developed beneficiaries only) and certain luggage and travel goods. On September 30, 2015, the President announced, among other things, that Seychelles, Uruguay, and Venezuela had become \u201chigh income\u201d countries and no longer eligible to receive GSP benefits, effective January 1, 2017.\nIn recent years, GSP renewal has been somewhat controversial. Some issues have included whether or not to continue to include emerging developing countries (e.g., India, Brazil) as beneficiaries or to open the program to least-developed countries only. Particular products given duty-free access have also caused controversy, as well as the country practices of certain beneficiaries. The most recent program lapse was due, in part, to GSP funding provisions.\nThe GSP program is one of several U.S. trade preference programs through which the United States seeks to help developing countries expand their economies. Other U.S. trade preference programs are regionally focused, and include the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the Andean Trade Preference Act (ATPA, also expired in 2013 and may not be renewed), and the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI, includes preference programs for Haiti). The GSP program provides duty-free entry for over 3,500 products (based on 8-digit U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule tariff lines) from 122 BDCs, and duty-free status to an additional 1,500 products from 43 GSP beneficiaries additionally designated as least-developed beneficiary developing countries (LDBDCs).\nU.S. implementation of GSP requires that developing countries meet certain criteria to be eligible for the program. For example, countries must not have seized ownership or control of the assets of U.S. citizens or have harmed U.S. investors in other specified ways. Eligible countries must also be taking steps to maintain internationally recognized worker rights among other things. GSP rules of origin require that at least 35% of the appraised value of the product be the \u201cgrowth, product, or manufacture\u201d of the BDC. Third, the GSP program includes certain curbs on product eligibility intended to shield U.S. manufacturers and workers from potential adverse impact due to the duty-free treatment. These include specific exclusion of certain \u201cimport sensitive\u201d products (e.g., textiles and apparel), and limits on the quantity or value of any one product imported from any one country under the program (products from least-developed beneficiaries are not subject to this restriction). Fourth, GSP country and product eligibility are subject to annual review. \nThis report presents, first, recent developments and a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report presents a discussion of U.S. GSP implementation. Third, the report presents an analysis of the U.S. program\u2019s effectiveness and the positions of various stakeholders. Fourth, implications of the expiration of the U.S. program and possible options for Congress are discussed.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": true, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33663", "sha1": "61ec05bc541088ad97fb2574699828f552d47054", "filename": "files/20151007_RL33663_61ec05bc541088ad97fb2574699828f552d47054.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33663", "sha1": "75d841b72b04aa0cb1afc17b2a5f7789ac21ae5a", "filename": "files/20151007_RL33663_75d841b72b04aa0cb1afc17b2a5f7789ac21ae5a.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [ { "source": "IBCList", "id": 2212, "name": "Import Policy" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc770532/", "id": "RL33663_2015Aug17", "date": "2015-08-17", "retrieved": "2015-11-04T09:58:14", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": "This report presents recent developments and a brief history of the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), which provides non-reciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). It discusses the economic rationale and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP and the U.S. implementation of the GSP. The report also presents an analysis of the U.S. program's effectiveness and the positions of various stakeholders, as well as the implications of the expiration of the U.S. program and possible options for Congress.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150817_RL33663_6d3336d0ab570df73367cab1674f8ab30e2780ea.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150817_RL33663_6d3336d0ab570df73367cab1674f8ab30e2780ea.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade", "name": "Trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff", "name": "Tariff" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff agreements", "name": "Tariff agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff preferences", "name": "Tariff preferences" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Imports", "name": "Imports" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International trade", "name": "International trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign trade", "name": "Foreign trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade -- Developing countries", "name": "Trade -- Developing countries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc808978/", "id": "RL33663_2015Apr21", "date": "2015-04-21", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20150421_RL33663_9b1ef5868e1f6294074b5a3f579687aca7209408.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20150421_RL33663_9b1ef5868e1f6294074b5a3f579687aca7209408.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc501643/", "id": "RL33663_2014Dec16", "date": "2014-12-16", "retrieved": "2015-03-30T22:03:27", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": "The U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program provides non-reciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDCs). This report presents, first, recent developments and a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the GSP. Second, the report presents a discussion of U.S. implementation of the GSP. Third, the report presents an analysis of the U.S. program's effectiveness and the positions of various stakeholders. Fourth, implications of the expiration of the U.S. program and possible options for Congress are discussed.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20141216_RL33663_d8b365fd4eb52e92e182dcca602942f942be6f45.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20141216_RL33663_d8b365fd4eb52e92e182dcca602942f942be6f45.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade", "name": "Trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff", "name": "Tariff" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff agreements", "name": "Tariff agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff preferences", "name": "Tariff preferences" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Imports", "name": "Imports" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International trade", "name": "International trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign trade", "name": "Foreign trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade -- Developing countries", "name": "Trade -- Developing countries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc821022/", "id": "RL33663_2014May19", "date": "2014-05-19", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20140519_RL33663_90fcb9b5214701ea7f9049cfca55a1c438e33e53.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20140519_RL33663_90fcb9b5214701ea7f9049cfca55a1c438e33e53.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc228059/", "id": "RL33663_2013Jan09", "date": "2013-01-09", "retrieved": "2013-11-05T18:07:05", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": "Report that presents the background of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), discusses its implementation in the U.S., and analyzes the program's effectiveness.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20130109_RL33663_c149f125e3fa958093c5a8341d73cd296eb52b7b.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20130109_RL33663_c149f125e3fa958093c5a8341d73cd296eb52b7b.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade", "name": "Trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff", "name": "Tariff" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff agreements", "name": "Tariff agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff preferences", "name": "Tariff preferences" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Imports", "name": "Imports" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International trade", "name": "International trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign trade", "name": "Foreign trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade -- Developing countries", "name": "Trade -- Developing countries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc85463/", "id": "RL33663_2012Apr09", "date": "2012-04-19", "retrieved": "2012-06-06T14:34:05", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": "This report presents, first, a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). Second, the report presents a discussion of U.S. implementation of the GSP, along with the present debate surrounding its renewal and legislative developments to date. Third, an analysis of the U.S. program's effectiveness and the positions of various stakeholders are presented. Fourth, implications of the expiration of the U.S. program and possible options for Congress are discussed.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20120419_RL33663_1eb694ae2609a6fb88ca1f69a945015ba18f070f.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20120419_RL33663_1eb694ae2609a6fb88ca1f69a945015ba18f070f.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade", "name": "Trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff", "name": "Tariff" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff agreements", "name": "Tariff agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff preferences", "name": "Tariff preferences" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Imports", "name": "Imports" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International trade", "name": "International trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign trade", "name": "Foreign trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade agreements", "name": "Trade agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade - Developing countries", "name": "Trade - Developing countries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc818178/", "id": "RL33663_2011Sep16", "date": "2011-09-16", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110916_RL33663_8b8c996136d2c1e3faa53dc6c47905d224747848.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110916_RL33663_8b8c996136d2c1e3faa53dc6c47905d224747848.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc84065/", "id": "RL33663_2011Feb23", "date": "2011-02-23", "retrieved": "2012-04-27T15:49:45", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": "This report presents, first, a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, which provides non-reciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDC's). A brief comparison of GSP programs worldwide, especially as they compare to the U.S. system, is also presented. Second, the report presents a discussion of U.S. implementation of the GSP, along with the present debate surrounding its renewal and legislative developments to date. Third, an analysis of the U.S. program's effectiveness and the positions of various stakeholders is presented. Fourth, implications of the expiration of the U.S. program and possible options for Congress are discussed.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20110223_RL33663_f9edac313953b166c72b64f3af524bd5600a77b2.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20110223_RL33663_f9edac313953b166c72b64f3af524bd5600a77b2.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade", "name": "Trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "tariff", "name": "tariff" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "tariff agreements", "name": "tariff agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "tariff preferences", "name": "tariff preferences" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "import", "name": "import" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International trade", "name": "International trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign trade", "name": "Foreign trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade - Developing countries", "name": "Trade - Developing countries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc817983/", "id": "RL33663_2008Oct29", "date": "2008-10-29", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20081029_RL33663_f74ae2577833f11f91a8b4213aaf77a583493ee4.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20081029_RL33663_f74ae2577833f11f91a8b4213aaf77a583493ee4.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc462274/", "id": "RL33663_2008Sep25", "date": "2008-09-25", "retrieved": "2014-12-05T09:57:41", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": "This report presents, first, a brief history, economic rationale, and legal background leading to the establishment of the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program, which provides non-reciprocal, duty-free tariff treatment to certain products imported from designated beneficiary developing countries (BDC's). A brief comparison of GSP programs worldwide, especially as they compare to the U.S. system, is also presented. Second, the report presents a discussion of U.S. implementation of the GSP, along with the present debate surrounding its renewal and legislative developments to date. Third, an analysis of the U.S. program's effectiveness and the positions of various stakeholders is presented. Fourth, implications of the expiration of the U.S. program and possible options for Congress are discussed.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20080925_RL33663_3e606b9d6a0278634d97c4fec13c1b4e8ae0e9ec.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20080925_RL33663_3e606b9d6a0278634d97c4fec13c1b4e8ae0e9ec.html" } ], "topics": [ { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade", "name": "Trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff", "name": "Tariff" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff agreements", "name": "Tariff agreements" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Tariff preferences", "name": "Tariff preferences" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Import", "name": "Import" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "International trade", "name": "International trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Foreign trade", "name": "Foreign trade" }, { "source": "LIV", "id": "Trade -- Developing countries", "name": "Trade -- Developing countries" } ] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc821865/", "id": "RL33663_2007May22", "date": "2007-05-22", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070522_RL33663_fcd9e09569146cc0d5aacfef99351d7c83335806.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070522_RL33663_fcd9e09569146cc0d5aacfef99351d7c83335806.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc808378/", "id": "RL33663_2007Jan24", "date": "2007-01-24", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20070124_RL33663_f05c631a000503c004e608a93cd05980090ab838.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20070124_RL33663_f05c631a000503c004e608a93cd05980090ab838.html" } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc805085/", "id": "RL33663_2006Sep26", "date": "2006-09-26", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "Generalized System of Preferences: Background and Renewal Debate", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20060926_RL33663_cd5536102aa065a37907914ce8ed250333bb6ae8.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20060926_RL33663_cd5536102aa065a37907914ce8ed250333bb6ae8.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Economic Policy", "Foreign Affairs", "Industry and Trade" ] }