{ "id": "RL33709", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "number": "RL33709", "active": false, "source": "EveryCRSReport.com, University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "versions": [ { "source": "EveryCRSReport.com", "id": 349564, "date": "2006-12-12", "retrieved": "2016-04-07T18:39:17.663029", "title": "North Korea\u2019s Nuclear Test: Motivations, Implications, and U.S. Options", "summary": "On October 9, 2006, North Korea announced it conducted a nuclear test. After several days of evaluation, U.S. authorities confirmed that the underground explosion was nuclear, but that the test produced a low yield of less than one kiloton. As the United Nations Security Council met and approved a resolution condemning the tests and calling for punitive sanctions, North Korea remained defiant, insisting that any increased pressure on the regime would be regarded as an act of war. China and South Korea, the top aid providers to and trade partners with the North, supported the resolution itself, but have been unwilling to cut off other economic cooperation and aid considered crucial to the regime. The sanction regime depends heavily on individual states\u2019 compliance with the guidelines. Economists argue that the only definitively effective punishment on North Korea would be the suspension of energy aid from China, which reportedly supplies about 70% of North Korea\u2019s fuel.\nDetermining the motivations of a government as opaque and secretive as North Korea is exceedingly difficult, but analysts have put forth a range of possibilities to explain why the Pyongyang regime decided to test a nuclear weapon. Possible motivations include an attempt to engage the United States in bilateral talks, to ensure the security of the regime, and to satisfy hard-line elements within the Pyongyang government, as well as technical motivations for carrying out a nuclear test.\nThe short-term implications of North Korea\u2019s nuclear test are clear: whether a technical success or failure, North Korea\u2019s willingness to carry out a test in the face of significant opposition indicates that it is willing to endure the potential consequences. Analysts fear that the medium and long-term implications could include a more potent nuclear threat from Pyongyang, a nuclear arms race in Asia, and the transfer of nuclear weapons or material to states or groups hostile to the United States. There are also strong concerns about the impact on the global nonproliferation regime, particularly to other states poised to develop their own nuclear weapon programs.\nThe most fundamental U.S. goals of the confrontation with North Korea are to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and to prevent an attack\u2014either nuclear or conventional\u2014on the United States or on its allies in the region. The options available to U.S. policymakers to pursue these goals include the acceptance of North Korea as a nuclear power, bilateral or multilateral negotiations, heightened legal and economic pressure on North Korea, adoption of a regime change policy through non-military means, military action or threats, and withdrawal from the conflict.\nThis report will be updated as circumstances warrant.", "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORTS", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "HTML", "encoding": "utf-8", "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/RL33709", "sha1": "f61c4ab69866f83d2c4961ba426047f5a9e99d29", "filename": "files/20061212_RL33709_f61c4ab69866f83d2c4961ba426047f5a9e99d29.html", "images": null }, { "format": "PDF", "encoding": null, "url": "http://www.crs.gov/Reports/pdf/RL33709", "sha1": "e3fce3ae5211c13265ffdfffaae917d782c8b6e8", "filename": "files/20061212_RL33709_e3fce3ae5211c13265ffdfffaae917d782c8b6e8.pdf", "images": null } ], "topics": [] }, { "source": "University of North Texas Libraries Government Documents Department", "sourceLink": "https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc805514/", "id": "RL33709_2006Oct24", "date": "2006-10-24", "retrieved": "2016-03-19T13:57:26", "title": "North Korea\u2019s Nuclear Test: Motivations, Implications, and U.S. Options", "summary": null, "type": "CRS Report", "typeId": "REPORT", "active": false, "formats": [ { "format": "PDF", "filename": "files/20061024_RL33709_0dc7180c17074fa78a8f2a5ebb1a977289ad551d.pdf" }, { "format": "HTML", "filename": "files/20061024_RL33709_0dc7180c17074fa78a8f2a5ebb1a977289ad551d.html" } ], "topics": [] } ], "topics": [ "Foreign Affairs", "Intelligence and National Security", "National Defense" ] }